220°

AV Club reviews Haze

Scott Jones writes:

''Set in the not-too-far-off year of 2023, the first-person shooter Haze features an introspective soldier with the wholesome, church-going name of Shane Carpenter. While his squadmates, the Mantel Troopers, chug a performance-enhancing drug called Nectar and exchange bits of leatherneck wisdom like "If two guys are dying on the battlefield, but you can only save one, save the guy with the bigger gun," Shane shows off his bleeding heart by empathetically listening to the final words of a dying pilot.

About an hour or so into the game-minor spoiler ahead-Shane defects from his squad of sociopaths and takes up with the opposing Rebels, who come straight from central casting: They wear aviator sunglasses and bandanas, and speak with thick Spanish accents. Stripped of your armor and weaned off Nectar, your only advantage on the battlefield as a Rebel is to-brace yourself-play dead. Shoot your way through various clichéd indoor/outdoor environs, commandeer a vehicle or two, and do some of the requisite fussing over which weapons to keep and which to toss, and around 10 hours later, you'll watch the credits roll.''
godoftime - contributor
Published: 598 days 15 hours ago | Review | PlayStation 3
 
 

Showing: 1 - 38 of 38 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
paul_war - 598 days 15 hours ago
1 - This is a review?
A micro-review at most.

Well I'll be renting Haze & seeing where it goes from there.

These 300 odd words haven't told me anything I don't already know from hands on or reading a half decent preview.

Still I've never heard of the avclub before
Shut this user up Let user speak
sonarus - 598 days 14 hours ago
1.1 -
lol. I'll be waiting on real reviews myself.
Shut this user up Let user speak
LenHart - 598 days 14 hours ago
1.2 - WOW WHAT KIND of sh**ty website is that
AvClub??

LOL
Shut this user up Let user speak
EZCheez - 598 days 14 hours ago
1.3 - This is the kind of review
That can be written without even playing the game. And when you read it, that's exactly what it sounds like.
Shut this user up Let user speak
permutated - 598 days 13 hours ago
1.4 - Cheez-
You mean just like 95% of the GTA4 reviews?
Shut this user up Let user speak
EZCheez - 598 days 13 hours ago
1.5 - Permutated
Yes. Just like GTA4. Although IGN's review was pretty in-depth and they still gave the game a 10, but that's off topic.

I'm just saying that I could have written this review based off of what I know of Haze and what I've played. I really doubt it would be the first time someone tried to write a "review" off of a demo or preexisting knowledge of the game. It's about as in-depth as the sports ticker on ESPN.
Shut this user up Let user speak
blindfromthesun - 598 days 11 hours ago
1.6 - Awww...poor Lenhart had his feelings hurt
Grow up dude. The review is better than anything you could write or conceptualize for that matter. How about you actually read it and then comment.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lookbehind - 598 days 15 hours ago
2 - look at that crappy website(avclub)
Read all the the comments..looks like about 20 fanboys made this site in 25 minutes just to crap all over haze.The review is horrid and can't believe people approved it. Opinions?
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 598 days 15 hours ago
2.1 -
HAHAH THE AVclub, YOUR ALL NERDS! av stand for advance placement...lol....get a life, go back to playing halo fruit cakes.
GETTING THIS GAME TOMARRO!!! b*TCHES!!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
permutated - 598 days 13 hours ago
2.2 - Lookbehind-
Just because you don't agree with them, doesn't mean they didn't play the game or that they're 'fanboys'. They have a ton of content on their site, and it looks like you're just pissed that this mediocre game is getting the scores it looks like it deserves.
2.3 vickers500 | 598 days 13 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jumper1080 - 598 days 15 hours ago
3 -
im going to get this game and if i like any other game and think it will be fun to play then i will get it, im not going to base my opinion on a review site.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Area_51 - 598 days 15 hours ago
4 -
These guys low ball everygame they review,I think i'll wait for more scores to come in. Buy what the heck the is taking so long for the reviews to come in?
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 598 days 15 hours ago
4.1 -
dont look at reviews, use your own judgement. its coming out tomarro. and im getting it from what i played and what i have seen on it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Area_51 - 598 days 14 hours ago
4.2 - @4.1
yea I'm getting it two, I just like to see what people are saying about it
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 598 days 14 hours ago
4.3 -
their you go, if some 1 like famitsu gives it a good score. every 1 else who gives a bad score is just another hater. famitsu always has good judgement.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ISA_Scum - 598 days 14 hours ago
5 -
I'm still picking this thing up. The mediocre reviews are disheartening, but they're coming from the small fries. The big king (Famitsu) praised it, so let's just wait and see.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 598 days 14 hours ago
5.1 -
tomarow!
Shut this user up Let user speak
ISA_Scum - 598 days 14 hours ago
5.2 -
Haha, we'll see. EB Games up here in Canada is always late getting me my games but I couldn't afford to pay in full this time, I had to do the trade-in thing.

Now if I were picking it up at Best Buy...that's another story. Then for sure tomorrow...but unfortunately...
Shut this user up Let user speak
meepmoopmeep - 598 days 14 hours ago
6 -
for someone who reads reviews strictly for their content, this place won't be getting hits from me if they continue with reviewing games as they did with this one. aren't reviews suppose to be informative?
Shut this user up Let user speak
mquirozz - 598 days 14 hours ago
7 - Ignorance is bliss..
Let people think what they want. If people want some biased "lil fish" websites to make their game buying decisions for them, then so be it. You'll just be like the countlees retards who bought games like halo 3 thinking it was gonna be the pinnacle of gaming. play the game(not the demo) and THEN speak your piece ;otherwise, shut the hell up. People need to quit taking the opinions of INDIVIDUALS so seriously.
Shut this user up Let user speak
REPLOID24 - 598 days 14 hours ago
8 - Just
wait what the GameInformers and the 1UPs of the world have to say.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tony Scarboni - 598 days 13 hours ago
9 - You don't need a review to tell this game is garbage
If mediocre shooters are your thing than I suggest you pick it up. I could care less about all the features, if the gameplay sucks everything else suffers.

I don't think I would even rent this game. After playing the demo you can pretty much tell where this game is going. No way would I waste
60$ on this run of the mill shooter.
Shut this user up Let user speak
EZCheez - 598 days 13 hours ago
9.1 - Ouch
All of that from a demo? I'll admit the demo wasn't the greatest, but it wasn't that bad.

It's tough to base a judgment for a game based on 10 minutes of gameplay, but I can't blame you for it. If anything it's Free Radical's fault for releasing such a bland demo. Even though i'm a huge fan of Free Radical, i'll admit that the demo was underwhelming. I just have this blind faith that Free Radical, who has never released anything mediocre, will not start now.
Shut this user up Let user speak
MC_KOOL_K - 598 days 12 hours ago
9.2 - 100% agree
this game sucks and im not talking about the graphics {which are just fine}

the first thing you have to get right is a rock solid aim, no wind, no crazy effects, just a straight aim

the second thing is if your having mindless enemys, have them standing still on guard-duty for the easy kill, if you have mindless enemys that run around it just looks so bad

the third thing if i put more then a full clip into a enemy and he still gets up, its time to get out of the gaming business
Shut this user up Let user speak
Meresin - 598 days 13 hours ago
10 -
That review definitely sounds like it was aggregated from previews and information that Ubisoft and Free Radical have released, not based on any actual gameplay experience past the demo. Then again, perhaps they didn't go into much detail to avoid giving out any significant spoilers in the plot.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Bathyj - 598 days 13 hours ago
11 -
My, he really gave it a try didn't he? I mean from his 2 paragraph review it sounds like he really when in with an open mind.

I was expecting this. Because of the delays and because the game will be good without being mind blowing and the fact its a PS3 exclusive it will be an easy whipping boy for cheap sites looking for easy hits.

For me, it was smooth, controlled well, and will fill the gap nicely between GTA and MGS.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jason 360 - 598 days 13 hours ago
12 -
All Playstation mags and sites are hitting this game with low 9's, everyone else is giving it low to high 8's. Looks like the PS3 is still AAA-less, by the time all the reviews for this game are in , I would say it will be in the low 8's tapping at 7's door. The reason is the reviews are all late, which means UBI asked them to hold off till release.
Shut this user up Let user speak
boodybandit - 598 days 12 hours ago
12.1 -
^^^nevermind.
You're not worth it. No troll is.
13 bootsielon | 598 days 13 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Figboy - 598 days 12 hours ago
14 - score aside,
can't we ALL agree that that was a pretty poorly written review?

i mean, i could have put a review like that together based off of the articles i've read, and the demo i played.

it didn't go into ANYTHING significant about the game.

for example:

how were the controls?
how was the framerate?
were there any interesting characters or quirks?
how were the vehicular segments?
aside from the standard in damn near EVERY FPS released in the past ten years "activate switch/lock/latch, etc to progress" mechanic, was there anything else that was a GENUINE nuisance to the game (ie poor level design).
and most importantly to a LOT of gamers out there: how was the 4 player CO-OP? how was the multiplayer?

in short: how was the F*CKING GAME, you poor excuse for a "games journalist?!"

this was a pretty pathetic review, that informed us of nothing. how did it get approved, i don't know, but i was expecting some legitimate reasons as to why this game got a C+ other than the standard "this game isn't doing anything new!" whenever it's a Playstation 3 game in question, while other consoles get plenty of passes on tried and true features, and laggy online and slideshow framerates in some of their BIGGEST GAMES (i'm not going to name any names here).
Shut this user up Let user speak
yanikins111 - 598 days 8 hours ago
14.1 - LOL
Pwned
Shut this user up Let user speak
aaron5829 - 598 days 11 hours ago
15 - AV Who ????
I'm not saying i'm expecting Haze to be a Halo killer or anything... i personally wont expect it to go anything more than an 8.5, but dang ... who is AV err.. av what again ??
Shut this user up Let user speak
ISA_Scum - 598 days 11 hours ago
15.1 -
lol, it's reviews like these that has me only focusing on sites like Gametrailers, IGN and, of course, mags like Famitsu (Have = 34/40)

Playstation exclusive media shouldn't be considered fair and this crap, give me a break. Oh, and Gamespot couldn't honestly review a PS3 game if a gun was pointed at the editor's head. R&C and Uncharted anyone?
Shut this user up Let user speak
ShiftyLookingCow - 598 days 10 hours ago
16 -
While I have no idea about how good this review is(Can someone please review this review?), Haze would have mattered more if it came out last year.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ShiftyLookingCow - 598 days 4 hours ago
17 -
looks like this game sux like a half rotten zombie rat
Shut this user up Let user speak
wow4u - 597 days 16 hours ago
18 - DENIAL (N): refusal to acknowledge existence of something
Look at the apologists up and down the threat. Funny!

aaron5829, Lookbehind, paul_war: "oh, who knows Onion AV Club"
LenHart: "this is only a mini-review!"
EZCheez: "he didnt even play the game"
ISA_Scum (15.1) "its a conspiracy"

Wow, denial. Sony cheerleaders read this article;

Cognitive Dissonance
http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Shut this user up Let user speak
butterfinger - 597 days 16 hours ago
19 - Well another average review for Haze...
I'm still getting it regardless of the reviews (even though they have been mixed at best). I like the demo enough, and I wouldn't mind another first person shooter to play before MGS4. I also picked up Condemned 2 used today at Gamestop for $27, so I'll be into that as well:)
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News