Update: Assassin's Creed A.I. on the PS3 and Xbox360 exact same

zypher - 1179 days 20 hours ago

well, Ubisoft could utilize PS3 controller's motion-sensing capabilities to compensate for the lack of rumble. or, it could use the disc capacity of Blu-Ray to add bonus features. who knows? i'm just glad that one of the many anti-PS3 rumors can now be squashed.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Donkey Slayer - 1179 days 15 hours ago

It wouldn't suprise me if they were developing for the 360 first and porting over to the PS3. If that was the case, ports alwys have a chance of suffering in the process.

If it was built for both at the same time though then I'd have to go with Milkman's post

"This is good news for both consoles actually because you can see here that both consoles can actually support the same power but in different ways useing there own strong points within the console.
"

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

kmis87 - 1179 days 14 hours ago

I may be wrong about this, but the cpu is responsible for the ai, not the gpu.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Daytona - 1179 days 12 hours ago

But my statement on the GPU still stands though.
http://news.teamxbox.com/xb...
I hate showing things like this since it really doesn't matter, because both/all next gen. systems are going to kick arse in "true" next gen. gaming.
Wii.....isn't this fun, lol.

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

Retard - 1178 days 18 hours ago

Aug. 31st, 2005 8:34 am

Jee, you're an idiot buddy. The hardware specs have changed quite a bit since then and no finalization of the RSX exist yet.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

TheMART at Xboxkings - 1178 days 16 hours ago

Uhm still no final RSX details and the console has to hit the shops in about one month?

That would disturb my thoughts if I was about going to buy a hardware based machine like a console! I would like to know what I buy!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

lalaland - 1178 days 5 hours ago

So far the list of 1080p games for PS3 looks like this:

- Virtua Tennis 3
- Marvel Ultimate Alliance
- Lair
- NBA 07
- Ridge Racer 7
- Mobile Suit Gundam
- Gran Turismo : HD
- flOw
- Full Auto 2

Of those VT3, FA2, RR7, MUA are all crossplatform games in some form, and for all, besides the resolution, the developers and journalists report the PS3 version looks the better. The same goes for crossplatform games like NBA 2K7 and Blazing Angels.

If a lot if not most crossplatform games look the best on PS3 (and in higher resolution) and not a single one has been reported to look visually better on the X360 (in close to final form), then certainly one can't claim the graphical performance of X360 to be better than the performance of PS3.

-----------

-> TheMart

The exact specification of the hardware in consoles is rarely ever communicated before launch. To consumers specs doesn't matter as long as Sony delivers, and so far they certainly have. We've seen crossplatform games look better in higher resolution on the PS3 in a virtually silent console with only a slightly larger footprint than the X360 (unless you count the powerbrick). No need to worry...

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Sexius Maximus - 1178 days 23 hours ago

You forgot to include Morgan Webb on G4

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

power of Green - 1178 days 22 hours ago

Alivea? Munn and Layla caly?.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Landa - 1178 days 23 hours ago

Was that really necessary?

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

AuburnTiger - 1178 days 23 hours ago

Who's console died within the first 3 months? And how much crying did it take for them to fix it?

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Chewy 101 - 1178 days 18 hours ago

Im not letting him speak more though, one bubble... LMAO

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

TheMART at Xboxkings - 1178 days 16 hours ago

Yeah isn't it sh!tty that the spec's on the RSX still are not -officially- put out then?

I would be so curious if I was about to invest 600 dollars in hardware, what I actually would buy, don't you?

I mean, Sony likes spec's on paper. With the PS2 emotion engine (it never worked, but allright) and the PS3 cell. They like it so much. So why don't they give the specs of the GPU if they always like to compare?

Because they know when they compare it to the 360 GPU it'll lose... It's a standard Nvidia PC 6800 card because they found out the Cell couldn't do CPU and GPU tasks both a bit too late. So no time for a special designed GPU anymore like the 360 has. Now they're aware it's the weaker one around this gen and they say: "The final spec's aren't out yet."

Yeah right...

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

cosmoracer - 1178 days 11 hours ago

I think you are on to something here. Have you or anyone else noticed that the PS3 videos of gameplay have a wierd blur effect whenever things get to complex on the screen? You could just call it motion blur, but motion blur should only occur on things close to you moving fast, like the dirt and such- not the mountains. I think it is a shoddy way to compensate for the GPU's lake of ability to keep up with the cell. I am a patent attorney, not a Electrical Engineer, so this is just a guess. What do you guys thing?

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

lalaland - 1178 days 5 hours ago

-> TheMart

The exact specification of the hardware in consoles is rarely ever communicated before launch. To consumers specs doesn't matter as long as Sony delivers, and so far they certainly have. We've seen crossplatform games look better in higher resolution on the PS3 in a virtually silent console with only a slightly larger footprint than the X360 (unless you count the powerbrick). No need to worry...

--------

-> cosmoracer

Motionblur is a physical "defect" from camera- or objectmovement coupled with the "cameras" physical limitations. We as humans are used to see motionblur every day, and that is why it gives for a much more realistic impression.

The only time, when the camera is in motion, that motionblur isn't visible, is when the camera is moving straight forward and the object in view is far away straight ahead -- and even then there is a slight motionblur although it is too small for the human eye to register -- or if the object is moving at the exact same speed and direction as the camera. If the camera is slightly skewed compared to the direction of movement, the entire "world" will "suffer" from visible motionblur.

It is a feature of PS3 games and has nothing to do with any lack of ability on the GPU's part. It is easy to make games look sharp and difficult to implement motionblur, not the other way around.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Antan - 1178 days 2 hours ago

a standard 6800 card u say........our survey says............HAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA.

"NVIDIA CEO Jen-Hsun Huang stated during Sony's pre-show press conference at E3 2005 that the RSX will be more powerful than two GeForce 6800 Ultra video cards combined"

and im sure when nvidia or sony release the specs there may be a some tweaks under the bonnet, but until this happend NO-ONE will know the truth.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

Antan - 1178 days 1 hour ago

of course is it is. its just people on here like to spin and twist things round to make one thing look bad compared to other things, any game seen on either ps3 or 360 can be done on either, make no mistake. Some people are just not clever enough or don`t want to believe, hence the flaming starts.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Antan - 1177 days 6 hours ago

Good reply Pheonix, a little common sense goes a long way, at the end of teh day its games thats sells systems, which we all know of course.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report