680°

Is MAG Doomed For Failure?

Ironstarmovement writes: "Before we indulge with details, I would like to say I hate Sony's last minute marketing for their gaming exclusives."

Read Full Story >>
ironstarmovement.com
ActionBastard5206d ago

I think MAG is going to surprise a lot of haters. It's a completely different experience than MW2, yet I think MW2 PS3 owners will buy this. I know I will.

MyBlasterRunsHot5206d ago

I agree with you 100% but also agree with the article's point of MAGs late and almost non-existent marketing.

captain-obvious5206d ago

i don't care im getting this game this week end
the game is in my friends store right now
but i need some cash + i need to finish ME2 too first

MyBlasterRunsHot5206d ago

I need ME2 as well but I can't afford it sadly

Bubbles_Kitty_Cat5206d ago

I found the beta to be extremely mediocre, so I will be very surprised if this game does well.

There are just too many great games available to play a game like MAG, in my opinion.

davekaos5206d ago

I really hope not!!
I could see the warhawk community getting into mag or atleast i hope so

Keith Olbermann5206d ago

Im getting it day one. It will have a strong user base that will stick with it for a long while. If they mean selling less than MW numbers or BBC2 numbers equals fail then yes it might but MAG dosnt have to sell millions of copies to be successful.
PSN ID: lpguycu
Add me to friends if your gonna play the hell out of this game like I am. :)

Bubbles_Kitty_Cat5206d ago

I think a small core might stay with it, but I really can't see it having any type of mass appeal.

Megaton5206d ago

They're not marketing it at all. I haven't seen a single commercial. Seen tons for Mass Effect 2, Army of Two: 40th Day, and Bayonetta, but not a single one for MAG.

morganfell5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

MAG has a draw. Even to the haters. Watch how many post repeatedly in this thread...ooops, first hate case already.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

360degrees5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

In terms of sales it will not break any records, or even come close to their projected numbers as it always seems to come down to poor advertising, and Sony's constant method of backing games with....uh...lets describe them as having an "Acquired" taste. By that I mean some people will hate it, and a few will love it, with the average person giving it a huge Meh overall. For those future diehard fans, of course it will always be a success in their eyes, but according to the money market and average consumer, yes it will fail. Please go ahead and re-read this comment again in two months and see how true it holds.

SilentNegotiator5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

I'm LITERALLY watching a MAG commercial right now.
Weeeeeeird.

LOL, poor Kevin Butler, people are trying to steal his job.

EDIT:
LOL, butthurt disagrees. I'm sorry I disrupted your delusion that SONY IS TEH WORSS MARKTIN EVAR!!

jwatt5206d ago

I'm very impressed with the quality of Sony's First party titles but MAG was dissapointing imo. I really hope the game does well but I can't see it doing so well.

Saaking5206d ago

The beta was good, just not for me. I'm gonna get ME2 so MAG will have to wait a while.

WildArmed5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

I hope it does very well.
While I'll be skipping MAG unfortunately, I blame Bioware.
But I do hope it does well.. it's not for me.. But looks very promising.
I'd love to see where we go from MAG as Zipper works around to it's sequel or new updates.

I'm more of a gamer that loves small battles.. co-op and top of my list, single player experience. (hence uncharted 2 tops my list).
I will be getting BC2 for my FPS cravings (last FPS i bought was in Feb 09).. since my brother loves the MP and I love the story

Darkstorn5206d ago

The MAG beta simply didn't impress me that much. I appreciated how it differentiated itself from MW2, but I greatly preferred the Battlefield: BC2 beta to that of MAG.
That being said, MAG is the underdog, and I'd like to see it perform well.

Megaton5206d ago

I think MAG is the perfect game to bundle with consoles, and also the perfect game to get Warhawk's pricing ($60 w/headset, $40 download). Unfortunately, Sony disagrees, and the game will likely be passed up by many.

kneon5206d ago

Given that there were 230k pre-orders last week we can expect at least 300k the first week. And that's with little to no advertising. I expect they will probably ramp thing up for the superbowl.

FrankenLife5206d ago

I buy it right after I finish WKC and ME2. I love the game, but I spent enough time recently in FPS. I need get some RPG time in.

Tony P5205d ago

"Doomed to fail". Ugh. No.

Odd? Maybe?

I feel like I've heard more about Heavy Rain than this. But that's only odd because I'm used to seeing shooters get all the press and everything else get the back shelf.

But it's an FPS with MP so I'm pretty sure it won't be hurting for attention.

Chubear5205d ago (Edited 5205d ago )

Dude A: "Don't know, played the beta but I was kinda unimpressed. Didn't really seem like 256 battle just small portions of a battle"

MAG gamer: "Did you get to lvl 10 in the beta?"

Dude A: ".. why? What happens at lvl 10?"

Seems a vast majority of people that played the beta and were'nt too impressed (those that ACTUALLY did play the beta and didn't like it) only played Sabo maps and thought that's what MAG was about.

MAG is Massive and the developers need to have players easy into the game to understand what's going on or you'll be totally confused and fraustrated later on in the game like many were during closed beta when thrown into Acquisition or Domination.

This is how you're broken into MAG:

You first play Suppression: This is to give you a familarity with the shooting mechanics and how that usually works.

Then you get to a certain lvl and you'll unlock Sabotage: This is an easier mode to help you understand the basics of defending and attacking.

Then after a short while Acquisition is unlocked: This is a full on intense battle were everything you learnt from suppression & Sabo are put to the test cause now you're attacking or defending multiple locations.

... Then the Grand Papa is unlock - 128v128 insanity. This is the big show. You grab your gonads and bring your A game from what you learnt in Acquisition cause you're going to need it.

Acquisition & Domination is where you understand you need ALL classes to win. If you have a whole platoon of just rambo guys, they'll get slaughtered pretty fast. Medic, Engineers, Snipers, Assault guys all have to work together to win.

This is the first TRUE tactical FPS online game there's been on consoles. To miss out on this cause of a couple of minutes playing a beta of sabo would be insanity for a FPS fan.

dustgavin5205d ago (Edited 5205d ago )

As long as it is better than Section 8 it should do alright. Remember that stinker that just came out 4 months ago?

http://www.metacritic.com/g...

STK0265205d ago

a lack of advertising is something most of Sony's first party title are suffering from. But I do think that a game like MAG will be heavily affected by this. A single player game can only sell one copy, and while it will be a financial disaster, the game can still be extremely good. However, a game like MAG, which is meant to be played with 255 other players, has no single player to speak of and is powered by a system like the shadow war, needs way more active players to "stay alive".

MAG being an FPS, and 2010 being packed with plenty of games of all kind, you can't really expect MAG to sell "well" for a long time after its release.

I really think MAG has a lot of potential and really could be a great game, I'll actually be getting it myself, however, I do fear it could quickly turn into something similar to a low-populated MMO, and suffer a slow and painful death. And, worse, I can't seem to understand why Sony is not backing MAG more, considering it is developed by Zipper, a developer known for its amazing work on the Socom franchise.

I would also add that, unlike GT5 and GoW3, which are games with a huge following, great feedbacks in the previews and are sure to sell millions very quickly, MAG is a new franchise, beta testers are divided and previews on websites like IGN are saying the game's good, but has some potential problems. That's really the kind of game a publisher should "artificially" hype with marketing, since word of mouth isn't all that positive, in order to get more people in the game at launch. Remember, an online only game is only worth as much as its community.

yesah5205d ago

it should be released later.

FACTUAL evidence5205d ago

Action i agree with you, but i honestly think within 6 months this game will sell 200k copies.....honestly, the thing that's holding mag back is the lack of single player for me. If it wasn't online only then I'd be all over this. People can disagree all they want, but it's not going to do well...not saying it is going to be a bad game, the beta was fantastic, but we all know how this is going to turn out.

Viper75205d ago

I tought the beta was quite nice, nothing revolutionary (well there's really nothing revolutionary in COD:MF2 either), and it has its flaws.
But it was pretty solid game.

Hopefully it will award team play more than it did in the beta, as it was pretty chaotic sometimes.

Pillage055205d ago

Doomed? I doubt it. I also don't see it becoming a huge success though either. It will likely capture a smaller but devoted group of gamers. I can see a lot of socom fans migrating to MAG.

FelicityOldGamer5205d ago

I will buy it!

:)

But I think that´s missing some ads!

PS: I am sorry for some problems with my english... it´s because I am a brazilian gamer , and my english it´s a little rusty.

paul03885205d ago

Bad games usually fail so I wouldn't be surprised if MAG crashed & burned... The beta was HORRIBLE

SPACEBALL 15205d ago

you people sayin MAG will succeed are doing nothing but lying to yourself.... MAG is a good idea, but its just not executed well at all. oh yeah... ITS BORING!!!!

TheDeadMetalhead5205d ago

Oh look, it's THIS article again.

Anon19745205d ago

When does anyone advertise a game you can't buy yet? The guy even mentions that Sony usually starts advertising on release...like everyone else, but for some reason that's seen as a problem here? MAG's got a TV spot right now.

Even Halo 3, which had one of the biggest marketing campaigns video games had ever seen only started running TV spots a week and a half before release.

Does this guy really want to see TV advertising for games a month in advance? This article FAILS.

Dtoxz5205d ago (Edited 5205d ago )

I tried to like it. MW2 even WITH glitches is WAAAYYYY better. It's just fun. MAG does feel mediocre. They should have made this a SOCOM game or at least 3rd person. It feels like SOCOM in first person. Feels almost last gen.

256 people fighting at once feels awesome though!

IMO I'm sure it will have its fair share of fans. Yes, most of the Warhawk crowd I bet! Lol. I don't think it's doomed, but I don't think it will sell REALLY well though.

Here's hoping.

Dread5205d ago (Edited 5205d ago )

I really hope the game does well, and it probably will do good enough when everything is all said and done. However, I think being able to keep those servers full all the time is going to be a difficult task. Even KZ2 and UC2, the purported "best games" of all times, according to the majority of sony fanboys in n4g, have not managed to keep the milti-player servers full. And those games are not designed for 250 players.

On a different note, I never played the MAG beta, but i always wondered what happens if the game does not reach the player limit. Are there specific games designed for smaller groups, or are the maps solely designed for 250 players? Do you have to wait until the 250 players sign in, or does the game begin with fewer players? how many maps r there in total? also, do the sony fans feel that paying 60 for a milti only game is worth it. Or do you only think it is a rip off when MS does it?

peace

FragGen5205d ago (Edited 5205d ago )

I've pre-ordered it based on playing the beta, and IMHO, it's far too excellent and deep to be a really _amazing_ seller.

To be a true mega-hit, with a few rare exceptions, it seems like you gotta be dumbed down a bit in your gameplay mechanics (look at the top selling console/games) most people do not want to sign in for a 60 minute minimum session game. Most people do not want to play a game for two to three weeks before they really even fully grok it's entire scope/mechanics. They want to "pretend bowl" or "pretend to play guitar" for 10 minutes here and there.

I just hope its successful enough that the community will thrive for a long time and the servers will be maintained, etc. I think Zipper was smart to try to get some MMO type elements going, games like WoW are an exception to the dumb down rule and may be MAGs best chance for after launch momentum building. Zipper seems like they understand this is a long term commitment.

It'd be AWESOME to see MAG go off the charts and break the "dumb masses" rule.... but even if it doesn't I'll be satisified if I can still find players in a year, I have not been this psyched for a specific game launch in years.

FragGen5205d ago

@Chubear 1.22: Brilliant post, man.

All you 'tards saying "I played the beta! Meh!" and are dismissing it as boring, unimpressive, etc, need to read Chubears post. If you only played the beta for a couple of hours total you DIDN'T really play the game. It would be like playing halfway through another games tutorial and saying "meh. I've played that game it sucks".

This is the big problem Zipper has with this game. Getting people who are like "Kewl a N3wZ0rZ FPS!? I rock @ MW2, LETZ PLAAY!!?" to actually understand what the game is about. Because if you play it like MW2 it DOES suck. But if you play it like MAG (a tactical FPS/MMO) it PWNS.

Bubbles_Kitty_Cat5205d ago

Listen, I could tell within a 1/2 hour that MAG was nothing special.

Asking me to play it for hours on end until it "got good" would be like asking me to watch the grass in my front yard grow. lol

The game failed to bring the fun, simple as that.

MyBlasterRunsHot5205d ago

wtf why was this taken off front page so early

MmaFanQc5205d ago

...could you stop with the "OMG THIS PRODUCT IS DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOMD!!!" from random guy blogs?

+ Show (37) more repliesLast reply 5205d ago
Shamuz5206d ago (Edited 5206d ago )

I'm looking forward to MAG, day 1 buy.

40cal5206d ago

And I dont think that it will fail, I plan on picking it up at launch also, bring some hurt to Zippers servers.

I can see a few hundred thousand plus copies getting sold in the first few days.

OmarJA-N4G5206d ago

LMAO! at the disagrees fairy. :D

madjedi5205d ago (Edited 5205d ago )

@ The disagrees for 2, okay idiots he said day 1 buy for him, not him saying it's everyones, i guess 8 or 9 can't read correctly.

@1.1 Yes because everyone knows after 2 months video games magically stop selling, i swear it seems if a sony exclusive doesn't 1 or 2 million the first day or week it's a labeled failure.

I see the game doing 750k-1m in lifetime sales, the reason it is too specific from alot of generic run and gun fps's, as long as zipper makes enough to cover the development costs i don't care if the mainstream gamers/media considers consider it a failure.

This will be a fairly arrogant point of view, but if you dislike mag for the following reasons your opinion of mag is null and void to me and probably other mag players.

1. You can't run n gun and not get cut down in 10 secs.
2. You refuse to work with your squad, and believe the game should let you be an lonewolf/army of one.
3. You don't get any special perks/treatment because you get multiple kills in a row or have the highest k/d ratio in the squad.
4. If you've never played a domination match, you haven't really seen what mag is about(at least this is a reasonable reason).
And #5 If you dislike mag because the graphics are nowhere near uncharted 2 or k2, ie as some haters complain ps2 graphics.

Answer this in competitive games where 2 or 3 seconds will usually decide if you live or die, how often are you actually staring at the scenery or the buildings textures instead of scanning for the enemy?

Btw if people start clans in mag, please don't be the types of assholes, that will abuse the kick a player from the squad option, just to make room for a buddy/clan member.

Beyond that everyone else is entitled to their opinion about mag, damn long ass post.

unrealgamer585206d ago

mag will sell like warhawk in my opinion. With a nice chunk of players with a good community

DirtyLary5205d ago

Yup, can't wait to play it again.

FanboyAttack5206d ago

These types of games never pan out. After playing the beta I was left unimpressed. We'll see I am crossing my fingers that this game will make me put down COD but I am doubting it.

5205d ago
LordMarius5206d ago

That commercial they made hasn't really been pushed, I have only seen it online

Show all comments (162)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1551d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1551d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1550d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1551d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691550d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1550d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1550d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31550d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1550d ago
Muzikguy1551d ago (Edited 1551d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021551d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1550d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021550d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1550d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1550d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1551d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1551d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1549d ago Replies(1)
1549d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1549d ago
PrinceOfAnger1551d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1551d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1550d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241550d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1550d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1551d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1675d ago (Edited 1675d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1675d ago
TheGamez1001675d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1675d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091675d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1675d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1675d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1675d ago
moomoo3191675d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1675d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1795d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1795d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571794d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1794d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721794d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001795d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1795d ago (Edited 1795d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1795d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1794d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1794d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1793d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1793d ago
Profchaos1793d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1795d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1793d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1794d ago (Edited 1794d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1794d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1793d ago (Edited 1793d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1793d ago (Edited 1793d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)