230°

Official: God of War 3 Will Not Feature Online Co-Op

Over the weekend a news story hit the web about God of War III featuring an online co-op component. With the source coming from the official Sony retail site, which allows retail stores to take quizzes on upcoming games, the news seemed like a likely thing.

Read Full Story >>
examiner.com
Chubear5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

Yes, WE SOOOO wanted to believe this lol. Gosh, that would have been uberly insanely uber but now we'll just have to make do with Insanely uber :( lol

Winter47th5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

I'd love a survival type Co-Op like Uncharted 2. GOWIII's on my list anyways but if it had co-op it sure would'a been a huge plus in replayability & bang 4 the buck. March's already crowded as it is, so when it comes it's a matter of preferring to play with my friends or solo.

The Killer5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

competitive online mode
not sure about Coop might ruin the solo experience.

competitive online mode will not ruin the single player mode because it will be about who stays standing last with all olympus weapons and powers!!! that can be really great!! or imagine some kind of heavy arrow weapons can be used in the competitive mode!!

if any game wanna sell well these days it have to have some kind of online experience to add the longevity of the game because these days its hard to justify 8-15 hours long campaign for 60Eu or 45GBP or 60USD!!

darthv725266d ago

Would have been nice though. Who would actually fight along side kratos anyway? He is such a bad mf that he'd lay waste to any sidekick that didn't hold their own in a fight anyway.

I think it would have been fun to play as the brother from down under only to be sacrificed to the gods by the main man himself when the time came.

WenisWagon5266d ago

Especially for a game which droids are hailing as the next big exclusive? Flop...

Noctis Aftermath5266d ago

Will their be any online play at all? because as we know, games that are single player only are going the way of the dinosaurs.

deadreckoning6665266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

At least we know OFFICIAL doesn't mean Sony Official.

baum5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2 has Co-op, doesn't it? It seems that God of War 3 doesn't "do everything".

Now let's wait for Sony to ruin the day by saying "No track editing for GT5".

badz1495266d ago

this co-op thing is too good to be true! luckily I was not over excited about it! I just wanna play GoW3 now! that's all I'm asking!

presto7175266d ago

Kratos does not need a sidekick. He did not need one in part one and he did not need one in part two.

ReservoirDog3165266d ago

Sad, sad day when that happens man. Sad, sad day.

Lifendz5266d ago

I'm even getting that obnoxious collector's edition because...well...this is Kratos in what may be his last appearance on PS3. Anyone else play the demo and have to pause the game to marvel at how pretty it is? Pretty may be the wrong word. Can't wait. Areeessssss

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5266d ago
LOLPSN5266d ago

Its all about Single Player anyway

MattyF5266d ago

Exactly. The game will be great without any type of co-op play.

topdawg1225266d ago

True, this is probably the last game that needs online, not every game needs online to be good. This will still be epic

Noctis Aftermath5266d ago

I'm not exactly sure why people seem to be against the idea of online co-op, since it wouldn't interfere with the single player mode i don't understand why it's bad to have more features.
Well since it won't have co-op anyway i guess it doesn't matter.

Max Power5266d ago

would have been very disappointed if there was co-op. I still would have bought the game regardless, but I'd be annoyed with the "every game needs some sort of online" conformist mentality that seems to be griping this generation.

creatchee5266d ago

I don't know how people can actually get excited for a game NOT having co-op. It's hard to guess what that co-op would be or how it would work, but I am 100% confident that Santa Monica could've pulled it off.

It doesn't change a thing - God of War III will be awesome. But who WOULDN'T want more game to play? I understand that fanboys needs their damage control and such, but saying that a game is better because it doesn't have co-op is like saying that "it's good that I am missing a toe because it makes the other 9 stronger."

Doesn't make sense, does it?

baum5266d ago

Why are you taking this troll seriously? Lol wow

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5266d ago
Pennywise5266d ago

Not surprising. But, in before the "screw Sony" rants.

LOLPSN5266d ago

LOL I told you PSN can't handle co op

cry moaaaar Droids

bunbun7775266d ago

completely ignorant of the awesomeness that is Kratos would think that we the fans are losing anything by this "new" feature not being implemented.

I could see how someone who was trying to keep score in a fake war might think they scored on this -- but honestly there are no 10 year olds here that are crying because of this.

Don't cry for me Argentina.,...

MattyF5266d ago

I guess the Uncharted 2 Co-op stuff never happened then, right?

Chubear5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

Come back and talk when you can game on the 360's Live with 8player co-op lmao XD heck, have you guys even managed to get a 10v10 MP match going yet talk less of 8player co-op? lol

Lou-Cipher5266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

Even if they did have a PS3, they are not old enough to play mature rated games anyway. They belong with the rest of the brainwashed 12 year old children that have overtaken the 360's main user base.

Those clowns are just mad that The God of War Collection(remastered PS2 Games) have better Graphics,Gameplay, and alot more value than Halo 3, Halo ODST, Left 4 Dead,and Left 4 Dead 2 does put together.

Plus, they have to use their allowance to pay to play those horrible games online.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5266d ago
TheTruth20095266d ago

It could promote the community aspects of PSN and allow players to better get to know one another.

But it won't happen. Why?

Few people have mics on PSN.
They have an older fanbase that doesn't care much for Online Co-Op.
And why put money into a title that the Sony followers won't buy anyway.

Here's a little statistic for you:
God of War II was released on March 13th, 2007.
The PS3 fanbase was approximately 120 million.
The title only sold 3 million copies. 2.5% of the fanbase.
The PS3 fanbase will be approximately 30 million when God of War III is released next March.

Let's use the same equation:
30,000,000 X 2.5% = 750,000 copies.

Now OBVIOUSLY it'll sell more than that.
But it won't be a blockbuster.

Looks like Uncharted 2 numbers are coming.

Sony Fans. Come on...

Go and buy something. For once.

bunbun7775266d ago (Edited 5266d ago )

With your awesome logic and numbers showing that only 3-4 million of a possible 120 million bought the game..... what were ps2 users thinking-- I guess they just wanted to watch the Matrix on DVD....

Maybe ---and this is the zinger-- maybe Kratos is too hard core for most fans, with the bloodletting and the sacrifice, with the mini sex games and the uber storyline...

my enjoyment of the game will not be affected by whether there are 1 million sales week one or 5 million sales. I will still enjoy the game-- if Santa Monica started making games to tailor to the mainstream,,,, well then it wouldn't be God of War now would it?

Do you even know the power of the blades of Chaos?

dazzalfc5266d ago

"It could promote the community aspects of PSN and allow players to better get to know one another.

But it won't happen. Why? "

Possibly because the developers think online Co-op would get in the way of both the story they have created and the gameplay, and implementing co-op would mean a possible re-write of the entire game, along with giving other playable characters that would work along with the story and style of the game.

Or, in your world, 'becuz teh PS3 is teh crap, SOnee dunno wat der doin'. Trust me, i think they do, hence why they have been in the industry for over a decade now, becoming an integral part of the gaming society, and why your stuck behind a pc screen, commenting virtually every hour on an internet site. Maybe you can comment when your more educated.

One last thing......

"Few people have mics on PSN.
They have an older fanbase that doesn't care much for Online Co-Op.
And why put money into a title that the Sony followers won't buy anyway. "

So not only do you know the insides of the market and age of PS3 users, but you also managed to figure that 'few' people have mics and PS3 owners won't buy that game. Given the only real sales successes (exclusive wise) for the 360 have been the ever popular Halo and Gears, i doubt you can really brag about owners buying games (especially in the aftermath of almost 1million 360 users being hit for modding their consoles). I highly doubt your in a position to talk about Mic usage either. Unless i'm going deaf, i hardly heard anyone with a mic in Fifa 10, or CoD4 last week.

Stick to making less assumptions and continuely writing about the PS3. The more you talk about it, the more its obvious your more interested in it than anything else, and its there in which you truly fail at this

ultimolu5266d ago

Guys, IGNORE HIM. He's a troll craving attention.

baum5266d ago

It appears that mr. "No one cares" cares. Could he be more of a joke? I wonder.

TheTruth20095266d ago

Bunbun777. My friend. Sad attempt.
"Maybe ---and this is the zinger-- maybe Kratos is too hard core for most fans, with the bloodletting and the sacrifice, with the mini sex games and the uber storyline... "

Gears of War 1 & 2 - Constant chainsawing of opponents and strong language.
5 million copies sold each. With a quarter of the fanbase.

Grand Theft Auto 4 - Sex, harsh language, and violence. Biggest game this generation.

Kill the excuses. Some "zinger".

Dazzalfc. Let's see...

"Possibly because the developers think online Co-op would get in the way of both the story they have created and the gameplay, and implementing co-op would mean a possible re-write of the entire game, along with giving other playable characters that would work along with the story and style of the game."

You see, Microsoft works hand-in-hand with developers to make sure the community aspects of XBOX Live are implemented into each game. Just like with achievements. Sony doesn't do the same. They know that it's a waste. Or they're just inept and don't know any better. Could be. Trophies still aren't even mandatory with all PS3 games. Sad. They stole the idea just to muck it up? Guess so.

You guys are too busy making excuses and trying to insult me to think clearly.

I know.

It would be easier for you to just admit that PS3 owners are movie buyers and not game buyers.

It's tough to save a sinking ship.

But nice try though! :-)

And a message to Ultimolu... I'm watching you. :-)

solidjun55266d ago

You sound like Jim Sterling. Matter of fact, I wouldn't be surprised if you were him. I would be careful about your heart condition with all that yelling and nonsense you're doing over the internet. You speak nonsense and you're pretty much a troll. And a bad one at it. Go by the wayside and hang out with PP. You could learn a thing or two from him you twit.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5266d ago
Show all comments (63)
70°

The Best Video Game Opening Levels In Gaming History

The Opening Levels that hooked gamers from the outset.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
240°

Ranking Every God of War Game From Worst to Best

Cultured Vultures: Let’s delve into Kratos’ long and rampageous history and find out which games are worth the hype and which are better left buried under the weight of Kratos’s might.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
JL2930162d ago

Both requels over 2 and 3? Clowns. Those are two of the most boring games I've ever played.

Snookies12162d ago

GoW 3 was amazing, but I personally hated just one thing. (This is on me alone, because I was dumb, lol.) I hated that you couldn't skip cutscenes on repeat playthroughs. I had to go back through the game a third time because I missed one trophy accidentally on my way to the platinum... The cutscenes were great the first go round, even the second... But the third was pretty agonizing.

Haven't played Ragnarok, but I still think GoW 4 is a wonderful game in its own right. Not sure how I would stack them up against each other honestly.

Monstieur162d ago (Edited 162d ago )

I don't consider the reboot part of the original series. The original series were high-skill games with combos and rewards for mixing things up.

solideagle161d ago

lol square, square and triangle is the only combo you needed. I have played all of them on the hardest difficulties...

Golfcoachh162d ago

Maybe I’m just old school but I just couldn’t get into the last two. Maybe it’s the slower action and more story telling but the original trilogy was by far my favorite.

Crows90162d ago

It's not that youre old school. They're different genres

JL2930161d ago (Edited 161d ago )

Me either, at all. It's just yap yap yap. They try to be a RPG's instead of being action games like they used to be.

Fluke_Skywalker161d ago

I'd put the two psp games over 3 in terms of story any day. But not over 2.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 161d ago
TheEnigma313162d ago (Edited 162d ago )

My favorite was part 2 and I think Ragnarok is better that 2018.

Shane Kim162d ago

The newer games are better imo.

ravens52162d ago

There is no worst. Except for Ascension, only cause I didn't play it lol. They are all masterpieces. 1,2,3, 2018 and Ragnarok. 1 of, if not the greatest video game franchise...besides MetalGear.

Snookies12162d ago

Oh wow, I actually forgot that Ascension even existed... I never played it either.

Crows90162d ago

I like ascension. It was different and some interesting combat additions.

darthv72162d ago

If you didnt play it, how could you call it the worst? Its not as bad as the media portrayed it. Honestly the worst are those flash games. they arent even considered true GoW games but in name only. At least Ascension is a real GoW game.

ravens52161d ago

Not saying it's a terrible game. Just mean it's at the bottom of my list. I played a little bit of it. Jus to me, compared to the other main games, it's last.

Fluke_Skywalker161d ago

Ascension is the only GOW game I never finished. Hated it.

Inverno162d ago

Can't agree, older games do so much more than the last two. More weapons, magic abilities, enemies are more varied, level design is also more aesthetically pleasing, and agree with those who say that they shouldn't have removed jumping. Was a time I'd agree, but those old games are so so much better, that they really should've looked into bringing into the reboot/sequels.

Crows90162d ago (Edited 162d ago )

If a game is good then a game is good. Doesn't matter what came before or what comes after.

Inverno162d ago

Of course it matters. If not for what what came before there wouldn't be an after. And if something is great before then you strive to make it just as good if not better, after. I personally don't think there's a fair way to judge the new with the old because the newer games are still essentially a reboot, and went a way different direction. But I still believe the old games did it better. I'm probably bias though since I've been going back to old games and have been finding that they lack all the annoying aspects that devs have shoehorned into new games to fluff out game time.

Crows90161d ago

@Inverno

Im not talking about the passage of time here. Im talking about individual pieces of software. If a game is good then it is good. Thats not a controversial statement. You can compare good with good...sure. But you still end up with good. Now if there is a bad game in the mix and you compare you do end up with some differentials between them...makes sense to compare and see where it went wrong.

But theyre different genres and styles which were individually executed very well.

And no. The new games are not a reboot. Theyre a new direction but simply a continuation.
Tomb raider was a reboot.

Inverno161d ago

The new games are definitely a reboot, and a continuation, it can be both which it is. And a good game might be good, but my point is that if there are things done better before it then there's plenty of room for critiquing and trying to make whatever comes after better rather than just good.

Show all comments (31)
170°

God of War 3 Remastered Has Sold 4 Million Copies To Date

God of War 3 Remaster has sold 4 million copies since its inception, making the franchise PlayStation's most profitable gamer merch brand.

purple101323d ago

Haha I still remember my brother playing the opening scene on ps3!!!

Yeh he had to put the controller down his heart was beating too fast trying to get past first 10 minutes. He said "it's too much". Best thing I've ever seen in gaming. Haha

robtion323d ago

A great game from an era before things went politically correct and gaming turned serious/'mature'.

It certainly wasn't concerned about upsetting or offending anyone and was more fun because of it.

The boss battles and set pieces still top most games released today.

SullysCigar323d ago

This game was absurdly good for it's time. The very definition of 'epic'.

robtion323d ago

Yes. The graphics were just ridiculous compared to most other games on the market at the time.

masterfox323d ago

I wished Ascension had the same treatment.

Heavenly King323d ago

Ascension SP had some things better than GOW3, and also some things worst than GOW3. But in general it was a really good game, for me it also deserves a REMASTER. The problem per se with the game is that most people were satisfied on how GOWIII ended, so Kratos got his revenge, so in order to rise the interest in the game how have to make it MORE EPIC is that the game did not had the epicness of fighting huge bosses (I guess due to technical difficulties,the game had actually a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding that is my guess), but it compensated with having in general a more complex combat system, and an amazing soundtrack. but in general the game needed to be more epic than GOWIII somehow, and that did not happened, after GOWIII people had expectations through the roof. They should have waited and release it for PS4 so the vision of the game is not compromised.

My list of good and bad compared to GOWIII

GOOD: THE COMBAT
The combat was more elaborated, which allows you to be more immersed in the fights. Also every enemy was more resistant, even those that you could usually kill in 2-3 attacks in previous games. THE LAST BOSS is so damn epic!!!, but there is only one moment like this in the whole game.

GOOD: LESS QTEs
I love the fact that "cicle" in the new enemies (killing animations) are not QTEs, in Ascension they are mini-games on their own, depending on the enemy, making it more engaging. You had to dodge and hit when the window was open in order to eventually do the killing blow.

GOOD: The Soundtrack
it has the orginal trilogy musics, but with a new perspective since the game had a new composer. The ST was amazing also the new music written specifically for this game were badass

GOOD: The puzzles actually require you to think.

BAD: There are bad camera angles during the game, like zooming way too out of vista, and then swarming you with "light units" that like I said before had better AI and did not die of 2 attacks. those parts a few, but are a mess.

BAD: EMPTY ARENAS
Other thing that really annoyed me is that when you fight a sub-boss/heavy unit in a big arena; that ARENA WAS EMPTY, it was just you and against the medusa, or against the manticore. They should have zoom in into the action to avoid noticing the void scenario. I guess emptiness was because of the game having a lot more colors (because the world is not dying like in GOWIII) so it is graphically more demanding. My guess is that it was not possible technically, since in most of those cases you had huge vistas or intricate scenarios that needed to be rendered. The fact that the cerberus is smaller in this game disappointed me.

BAD: Only one BADASS EPIC moment, the others moments of the game were great but, they needed to set the bar even higher than GOWIII and they failed miserably.

BAD: The graphics did not improved much. I was GOWIII with more colors, and that's it.

So 4 good things against 4 bad ones. The problem is those 2 last BAD aspects are actually why the game was received so poorly. Everyone expects the next game to have a really BIG improvement in all aspects in contrast to the previous one, and that was not the case in ascension. And also GOW is the definition of EPIC, and that was not there neither. The jump on every aspect from GOWI to GOWII was huge being on the same console, and the jump from GOWII to GOWIII was humongous (obviously because a more powerful console). While the jump from GOWIII to Ascension is too little, and people expected more.

On it's own is a good game; but is not sufficient when GOWIII was released before it.

CrimsonWing69323d ago

I know this is unpopular opinion, but I prefer these over the new ones. I’m not saying the new ones are bad or anything, but they sort of get boring to me, whereas the older games were like non-stop roller coaster rides.

ChiefofLoliPolice323d ago

I love the new ones but I understand what you mean. The older ones had more action and was more arcady like.

MIDGETonSTILTS17323d ago

Ragnarok was not BIG at all… GoW1 had larger set pieces, and it was on ps2.

GoW 2018 had big moments in its own way…. Ragnarok abandoned these aspects though

robtion323d ago

I agree. It was just less serious and more fun.

victorMaje323d ago

One of my all time favourites.

Show all comments (16)