170°

GT5: Aesthetic Customization and Bikes a Possibility

Italian website multiplayer.it recently held a video interview with GT5 creator Kazunori Yamuchi when asked about the possibility of personification of the game ala Forza Yamuchi stated it was a posibility but the team was focused on GT5 Prologue.

Read Full Story >>
tv.multiplayer.it
Fishy Fingers5858d ago

Umm good for Italian N4G members I guess.

Torch5857d ago (Edited 5857d ago )

I've gotta get some much-needed sleep, but here are some abbreviated interview highlights for the curious-minded:

-All technological requirements to render collision in GT5 are already in place and therefore technically not difficult to implement in the future.

-The possibility that GT5 may allow the customization and trading of vehicles "a la" Forza Motorsport

-Episodic content (i.e., updates) may be possible in GT5 although they are currently focusing strictly on Prologue at the moment.

-Polyphony is currently not entirely satisfied with Prologue's current online play, although they hope to address this in a fall update.

-In direct response to the interviewer's question: Polyphony is yet to determine how they will enrich the single-player experience in GT5 compared to earlier GT versions, although it is certain that the game will see the return of the Licensing system.

-Although the game is currently utilizing the full potential of the PlayStation3 (i.e, accurate vehicle physics, models, etc.), minor improvements will be made and evident in the future.

-Working toward releasing GT for PSP within the vicinity of GT5's release...and there may be some form of integration between the two versions.

-Kazunori Yamuchi finds it difficult to play any racing games (namely: Forza, Project Gotham) other than Gran Turismo [NOTE: Interpret as you see fit!]

-Kazunori Yamuchi favorite vehicle is the Ferrari 330 P4, although he unfortunately doesn't own one. ;)

Hope this helps.

Lord Anubis5857d ago (Edited 5857d ago )

thanks torch. Bubbles lad.

although you missed the bike part. I'm not sure if they were referring to GT5 or a whole new Touris Trophy.

Glad to be a gamer5857d ago (Edited 5857d ago )

@Sonarus (Forza motorsport= 92%met Gt4= 89%met) The difference between the physics for these two is like night and day.

@Tordavis ive played Gt prologue for a few hours at my mates and i agree with everything you said. Most people on this site won't agree with you as they dont know any better. Most of them have only played Playstation games and believe that anything exc to Ps is better than the competition in every way.

The one thing that gt does eclipse Forza with is its lighting model. The actual car models are not that much better and the comprimise for this is the lack of detail on the track enviroments and surface.Cars don't even leave tyre marks on the road surface.London is the exception to this and accomplishes the extra detail by being very small/inclosed and having less cars on its track.

sonarus5858d ago

Lol it appears as if the dude understands itallian. Anyways if GT5 gets car customization and bikes, then it will be the most complete racing game ever made. I pose this question to the forza fanboys

Damage confirmed
Car Tuning confirmed
realistic driving physiscs confirmed
Weather effects unconfirmed but likely
Bikes and customization unconfirmed
Gorgeous visuals and a wide selection of cars confirmed

What else is it that GT5 must do to meet up to the mighty forza's standards?

GT series has always been and will always be ahead of the competition because in their mind they aren't even competing. They are in a league of their own. They don't do target renders because they target real life

360Jamaican40GigFL5857d ago

hmmm u do kno the forza series is ranked higher than the gt series in terms of simulation, tuning, customization, physics........ gt and forza are real"driving simulators" not driving and riding so bikes aren't necessary, all gt wins in is graphics obviously. so i dont kno how it can be ahead of the the competion in sales and popularty yes but not in terms of being a simulator. Dude as i said before no matter how much u pretend that u got nothing against the xbox its obvious that u do u fanboy.

and yes i is buyingz gt prologue

sonarus5857d ago (Edited 5857d ago )

ranked higher by who? By professional drivers and car manufacturers???

I have nothing against the 360 honest lol. I just don't see why 360 fans can tell me a long time playstation fan that forza is better than GT when car manufacturers and professional race drivers continue to endorse the game over forza. It just makes no sense to me

ruibing5857d ago

Tried GT5P at a store kiosk today, it was pretty amazing. I really like how the will keep on bringing new features to the Prologue up until the release of GT5.

jkhan5857d ago

Yes I totally agree with you. For them the only competition is themselves. I like Forza 2 as well, its a very good game, but its no where near as good as GT5;)

mistertwoturbo5857d ago

Professional Race drivers endorse Gran Turismo because the GT series has always been about a mature, racing simulation experience. Forza 2 was thought more of as a video game, and not necessarily simulation. I know it sounds silly, because yes GT is a video game as well. But let's say in a world Gran Turismo was never a video game, and it was just a "Software" for race drivers to use to practice they're skills around different tracks. Hence, a simulator. It would be one hell of a simulator. And GT5 seemingly bridges that gap between simluation, video games, and professionalism.

Everything about GT5P yells classiness, down to the showrooms, main pages, fonts, and even environments. It's not your run of the mill teenagers fast and furious game.

So it's to no surprise, worldwide GT is highly endorse by professional racers and worldwide racing tracks.

And to clear things up, I'm not saying Forza 2 was never endorsed or said it was a bad game. It's just not the same image as Gran Turismo. Forza unfortunately is always going to take the back seat to the GT series, even ever since Forza 1. It's a good looking racer with excellent physics, but that's just not enough to win.

tordavis5857d ago

GT has a huge following and 5 games under it's belt. Classy, mature experience? Give me a break. Race car drivers jumped on GT because of the popularity. GT is so far from a simulation and so close to a video game it's not even funny. It wasn't until GT5 Prologue that the physics engine caught up to Forza. The physics in GT have always been terrible and unrealistic. You can't deny that. Now they finally have a physics system that is on par with Forza 2, but still a little behind because crashing in GT5 Pro is still the same after all these years. Forza is still a new series and in it's second iteration has trump everything GT has done.

I don't expect race car drivers to just jump from GT into Forza. Also, you don't have to be a race car driver to realize that all the cars in those old GT games drive nothing like their real counterparts. People who play Forza 2 will buy the car that they own and compare. I always hear, "It drives just like my car!" If that's not simulation, I don't know what is. Forza 2 doesn't need real race car drivers and race car magazines touting how good it is to prove it's dominance. The game speaks for itself.

The thing that is truly funny about all the Forza 2 bashing is that any person who's bashing the game obviously hasn't played it. Everyone thinks GT5 Prologue is better than Forza 2 because of the graphics. Graphics don't make a game people. It's the gameplay and features that make the game. Forza 2 still has amazing graphics and are a tad weaker than GT5 Prologue. A tad. While the physical crash damage is not realistic, the effects of the damage are.

If you are a PS3 owner and not narrowminded, find a way to play Forza 2 please. I own both Forza 2 and GT5 Prologue and I've hated GT all the way up to GTHD. GT5 Prologue gets a huge nod by me but it's still far away from coming even close to Forza 2 in gameplay. Forza beats it in car customization, tracks, features, online and gameplay. GT5 Prologue wins in graphics. If you want to disagree with me, then tell us your experience of playing GT5 Pro vs Forza 2. You'd think after all these years we'd at least see a good online model for GT. Nope. Forza 2 has it. Car customization? Nope. Forza 2 has it. Stop saying GT5 Pro is better. You look stupid when you do.

sonarus5857d ago

reviewers always rate GT higher. The physics in the past games may have been weak but they still made a driving sim out of it. The physics are def more realistic now. So like i said once GT adds its car damage what else will be left for forza fans to bag on?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5857d ago
SickNick855857d ago

and yamauchi say that the graphic will be better than the Prologue...

if all it's true GT5 will be the better racing game ever

PirateThom5857d ago

Ha, if true, like in Forza, I'll have to make a car say "WTF" on one side and "LOL" on the other. There was also a parrot somewhere.

level 3605857d ago

Forza2 is so yesterday, time to move on to a higher plane and that is GranTurismo.

These are as till all just speculations... but then...

>> Bikes are always going to be a welcome and most challenging feature if Kazunori-san will be able to add them on the game.

>> I would definitely like to see damage-mode in bikes as well. That'll be great to see smashed fairings, mis-aligned wheels and a few dented mufflers...

>> Will the set-up be somewhat like the PGR4 Series where bike and cars are all mixed-up in a few races as well as just specific bikes and cars in others?

>> Because it'll be quite a challenge especially when playing this features on-line with the penalty system and all with other gamers'. Polyphony will have to make a few additional changes with the rules and regulations.

Show all comments (38)
90°

PlayStation 3: chasing the 1080p dream, part three - Gran Turismo 5 and the indie explosion

From Digital Foundry: "Welcome to the third part in the biggest DF Retro episode we've ever produced - a year-by-year look at how 1080p gaming fared on the PlayStation 3. Launched in 2007 touting its then-exclusive HDMI digital interface, Sony layered full HD gaming on top of its Cell processor and RSX 'Reality Synthesizer' as key selling points for its third generation console. Of course, we all know how that turned out - both Sony and Microsoft machines routinely ran the most advanced titles at sub-720p resolutions, often with questionable performance, so what happened to the 1080p dream?

In the first two parts of John Linneman's investigation, we've covered off the first four years of the Triple's lifecycle and moving into 2010, the overall fortunes of the PlayStation 3 continued to improve. The platform holder released - what was then - the most advanced motion controller in the console space, backed up by experiments with stereoscopic 3D, which turned out to be a short-lived but still formidable pairing. Combined with a strong E3 showing, PS3 was looking good.

However, it's fair to say that it was a fallow year for 1080p gaming on the system, with only Scott Pilgrim Saves The World's razor-sharp pixel art upscaling, Castle Crashers and Soldner X2's 3D/FMV stylings accommodating full HD output - alongside a wonderful Monkey Island remaster."

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
ApocalypseShadow641d ago (Edited 641d ago )

Just remember ladies and gentlemen, Sony never said all games would be 1080p. Only that the system would support games up to 1080p in a survey before the system was released.
https://spong.com/article/9...
And as we saw, some games did support it, some games tried their best to support it and some games didn't or never reached it.

Is a higher resolution great to have if you can do it? Sure. Is it necessary for a fun game? No

But what I find interesting is Eurogamer. Are they really talking about HD and PS3 in their article or are they really pushing their 4.50 Euros 4K video download subscription? Seems one is being used to sell the other. Just look at the bottom of the article.

Michiel1989641d ago

thats what every company tries to do, push for people to buy their products. Are you really gonna blame them for that?

ApocalypseShadow640d ago

Not all articles are about selling. They're about informing or entertaining.

Maybe I'm supposed to watch the video instead of reading. But I shouldn't have to click. But the article lazily tells us some games did hit 1080p and some didn't. I didn't learn anything new as I own the console. Then, they push a Patreon subscription.

Are you saying every opinion, preview, review and rant article requires a push to buy something now? Tell me which sites are prone to do so so that I can avoid them in the future.

Michiel1989640d ago

not everyone played during the ps3 era. I started during snes era but loved seeing articles/videos about how gaming evolved before that.

i dont think this article is trying to push you to get that patreon sub, it doesnt for me at least. I dont think theres anything wrong putting an ad at the bottom of the article. all the regular DF videos are free already.

SonyStyled640d ago

Wipeout HD on PS3, a remake of the PS1 game was 1080p 60fps. And that released in 2007-08

Christopher641d ago

This really feels like a filler article. I don't feel like I learned anything notable or substantial from this. I feel they could have reduced the unnecessary intro and over-explanation of things and put the whole series in one article for a more substantial and possibly informative piece rather than piece-mealing it out as they have.

dumahim641d ago

It's more about the video. DF Retro videos are for Patreon members first, and I think the whole thing was one big video. For the youtube channel, it gets chopped up and released weekly.

ApocalypseShadow640d ago

Chris is actually right on this one. Something known already was just kind of washed over in the article. Unless you're supposed to get more in the video. If more is in the video, then more could have been said in the article.

Only thing I learned new was that they are selling a subscription. My point though is that you gain more viewers by having better articles and content.

638d ago
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv721707d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro1707d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig1707d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright1707d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

1707d ago
neutralgamer19921707d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright1707d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk1707d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright1707d ago (Edited 1707d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare21707d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san1706d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1706d ago
SCW19821708d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech1708d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss1707d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

1707d ago
ElementX1707d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright1707d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali1707d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm1707d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde1707d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

1707d ago
1707d ago
Dark_Knightmare21707d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright1707d ago (Edited 1707d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk1707d ago (Edited 1707d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX1707d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk1707d ago (Edited 1707d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright1707d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

1707d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 1707d ago
1707d ago
xRacer74x1707d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke1707d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech1707d ago (Edited 1707d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig1707d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

1707d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1707d ago
Hungryalpaca1707d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis1707d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz1707d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19811707d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1707d ago
Nacho_Z1708d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig1707d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z1707d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King1708d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)
320°

Gran Turismo 5, Gran Turismo 6, Wipeout HD, God of War 3 and more running on PC via the latest RPCS3

DSOGaming writes: "It appears that the best Playstation 3 emulator that is currently under development, RPCS3, received a new update recently. kd-11 has implemented new Surface Cache fixes to RPCS3 that reportedly improve the appearance of car reflections in Gran Turismo 6, and fix various graphics glitches in other games."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
1745d ago Replies(6)
gangsta_red1745d ago

If someone out there in internet land could make a decent PS3 emulator imagine what Sony could actually do if they put the time and effort in to make this happen for their next console?

It's definitely not impossible as we can see here. It should definitely be done since BC seems to be very important to Sony this next gen. Imagine PS+ free game offerings from Sony that could include the whole catalog from the PS console family..fantastic.

Silly gameAr1744d ago

Why waste time and money on it? Some people want to move forward, not go back.

Eonjay1744d ago

It's not a deal breaker but having the feature would be amazing. I would rather have it than not have it.

gangsta_red1744d ago

Not everyone feels that way and if Sony is making an issue of supporting PS4 games for PS5 why not support their other past games for people who still have them or a means to buy them and play them.

KwietStorm_BLM1744d ago

You literally just said some people. So I'd imagine you can comprehend that there's a larger subset of people not in that same "some" group. PlayStation used to be known for backward compatibility. Xbox made a big deal about support for their entire catalog. What's the issue with PlayStation, who has an even more substantial history in gaming, tapping into that market? We don't have this problem on PC. It's only a good thing for consumers to be able to bring their games with them through generations on console.

Silly gameAr1744d ago (Edited 1744d ago )

@kwietstorm

Yes, I said some people. What I said was MY opinion. I'm one of those people that couldn't care less about bc, but im not saying ALL people don't care about it. I think they should spend that time and energy for future features and games, but like I said, that's only my opinion.

Imortus_san1744d ago (Edited 1744d ago )

Not every body trows their games way every time the new gen cames along, and everybody that likes games like to be able to play their favorite games in the best possible way.

PS: Retrocompatability is the most requested feature in Sony Foruns, even Sony said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1744d ago
frostypants1744d ago (Edited 1744d ago )

The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile? Are the number of additional consoles PS3 BC would push be enough to justify the cost of developing the emulation (and it would have to be bullet proof)? I like the idea of having it, but for my part not having it won't effect my purchase decision.

1744d ago
Eonjay1744d ago

You are asking the right question but the wrong way. For me, the addition of PS3 BC would add value as a customer and make it even more likely for me to buy a PS5. If it is valuable to the customer it is valuable to them.

Also, the way they are doing it would be way cheaper than a program like Microsoft had. The are emulating the hardware. Not the software.

gangsta_red1744d ago

"The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile?"

Sony could definitely make some extra profit selling PS3 games through their marketplace (the same way they have their other classics available). It's not about whether or not it will effect anyone's purchase decision, it definitely didn't do so for the PS4. But as others have expressed, it would be a nice addition to have for PS5 if Sony could open up their whole library digitally and physically to users.

ShadowWolf7121744d ago

Racing games should be some of the easiest to emulate and they're still not hitting 60fps with it, to say nothing of image flickering and occasional sound issues.

Still gonna be a bit yet before they have it fully up and running, it seems, and even then it may only work for part of the library. :/

1744d ago Replies(2)
Gwiz1744d ago

Is it possible to have PS3 emulation on PS5?yes depending on what kind of power it really has.
An i7 9700k is no slouch and the PS4 already has a God of War 3 running much better with less
power required because they converted CBE to X86 which is not something you want to be doing in the long run.

What power would be required to play these games emulated at said PS4 version?.
It's not an easy situation Sony themselves created and ultimately I believe they are happy this way because they
want you to use PSNow,that service is why you will not even get it. (let's not forget that it was a huge investment)

1744d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (45)