210°

GTA 5: Not coming before 2011

According to Take 2 CEO Strauss-Zelnick, the next GTA is not supposed to be released anytime soon.
DEskofier - contributor
Published: 101 days ago | News | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360 | PC
 
 

Showing: 1 - 41 of 41 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
BigKev45 - 101 days 7 hours ago
1 -
We have Read Dead in 2010, the next big thing from Rockstar
Shut this user up Let user speak
Hi-def freak - 101 days ago
1.1 - Dont forget
AGENT
Shut this user up Let user speak
deadreckoning666 - 101 days ago
1.2 -
Lol, this is supposed to be news? Anyone who thought otherwise probably believes that game developers are miracle workers which also seems to be the mentality of the people who ACTUALLY believe Killzone 3 will come out next year ROFL.

"I think GTA V should be played by every one."
I agree 100%. PS3 owners already have an exclusive "GTA style" game with Agent and 360 gamers are getting Crackdown 2 and supposedly a "Shenmue style" open world game. Theres no need for the next GTA game to be exclusive to ANY console.
1.3 Saaking | 100 days 23 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
NecrumSlavery - 100 days 23 hours ago
1.4 -
Red Dead Redemption looks like it will crush GTA4 in every way. And PS3 exclusive AGENT will be epic. Also Rockstar has Max Payne coming and PS3's 2nd exclusive L.A. Noire too. GTA5 can take a rest for a while.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lt_Skittles - 100 days 22 hours ago
1.5 -
@Dead

I don't think GTA V should be exclusive, to any system, and I am glad that you share that perspective. GTA V shouldn't be exclusive, because it's a landmark for RockStar, and it's bound to be huge, and both systems do have their open world games, but GTA is a monster of a series.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lifendz - 100 days 21 hours ago
1.6 - So maybe Agent will come out in 2010
GTA4 had its pluses, but it also had a great many negatives. I hope they don't get too big a head cuz of all the critical acclaim and listen to the game buying public that, for the most part, were disappointed.
Shut this user up Let user speak
BigKev45 - 100 days 20 hours ago
1.7 -
True, Hi-Deaf Freak. I saw the last Red Dead trailer and I was blown away!
Shut this user up Let user speak
cyberwaffles - 100 days 18 hours ago
1.8 -
whew, for a second i thought it said "GT5: not coming before 2011." i was about to be pissed. honestly don't care about GTA games anymore, but i'll wait and see if GTA5 will be worthy of a purchase.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cgoodno - 100 days 18 hours ago
1.9 -
Any game that doesn't even have a trailer showing some gameplay won't be out for at least a year. This is why it was also no surprise to see Max Payne 3 pushed back.

P.S. When I first read this, for some reason I read it as GT5 and not GTA 5.
Shut this user up Let user speak
-GametimeUK- - 101 days 7 hours ago
2 -
I think the next GTA should be a 360 exclusive so it doesnt suffer from the PS3's hardware limitations. It would be an amazing exclusive if it was made specifically for the 360 :)

But yeah I can wait for the next GTA game. No rush.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lt_Skittles - 101 days 4 hours ago
2.1 -
Wtf are you talking about? I think GTA V should be played by every one.
Shut this user up Let user speak
suunyd - 101 days ago
2.2 -
What was that? I couldn't understand you with your one bubble... ROFLMAO!!!!!!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
aaronisbla - 100 days 23 hours ago
2.3 - Damn with dumb comments like yours
its not hard to see why you got bubbled rape even if this site was geared more towards sony like everyone says.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nuri - 100 days 23 hours ago
2.4 -
The only thing suffering at this moment is probably your mind not being able to fully realize what you have just stated, because your mind is very minuscule.

Why would you say something like that, games are meant to be enjoyed by all; when it comes down to having a game on one system because the person says so I feel they aren't a gamer anymore.
Shut this user up Let user speak
deadreckoning666 - 100 days 23 hours ago
2.5 -
"its not hard to see why you got bubbled rape even if this site was geared more towards sony like everyone says."

Ummm..people say this site is geared toward Sony because thats the way it CLEARLY is. Want proof? Look at the amount of disagrees I'm about to get for stating the obvious.

Edit: I rest my case :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tony240ZT - 100 days 23 hours ago
2.6 -
I laughed, thanks
Shut this user up Let user speak
FlipMode - 100 days 23 hours ago
2.7 -
"I think the next GTA should be a 360 exclusive so it doesnt suffer from the PS3's hardware limitations"

http://www.psxextreme.com/p...

Funny stuff...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Elven6 - 100 days 23 hours ago
2.8 -
The 360 DVD and the PS3 RAM issues were what Rockstar complained about during development, if the game(s) were exclusive on either platform the issues wouldn't be a problem.

In theory the PC should be the ultimate platform for them to realize their vision but the port turned out pretty bad.
Shut this user up Let user speak
NecrumSlavery - 100 days 22 hours ago
2.9 - gametimeuk your so dumb...lol
did you know that the ps3 can just print gta4 and both dlcs on the bluray twice so if you by chance scratch the bluray disc(virtually impossible), the ps3 can read the other layer and the game still work???...lol

360 having superior anything? I'd give you a bubble but you're in the top 10 of the most annoying trolls on n4g.....lol
Shut this user up Let user speak
aaronisbla - 100 days 20 hours ago
2.10 - @dead
why'd you pick out my comment? its not like i said it in a non believing way. The site seems to switch sides every now and then, don't act like it wasn't rampant with 360 fanboys back in the day cuz if you dont remember it, either you just werent around or you are delusional

Perhaps you got those disagrees simply because you mentioned it? Or maybe they just don't like you? Why do you care?
Shut this user up Let user speak
ReservoirDog316 - 100 days 18 hours ago
2.11 -
I hope you guys (and girls) realize he's messing with your head. Don't give him the satisfaction of getting mad.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Government Cheese - 101 days 3 hours ago
3 - Umm where does this article say that no GTA5 before 2011?
It says they don't think GTA should be an "annual" franchise. IV came out in 2008, so if anything it could just as well be coming out in late 2010.
Shut this user up Let user speak
2cents - 101 days 2 hours ago
3.1 -
Just another quality article brought to you by the.....'Internet' woo hoo!
Shut this user up Let user speak
artistadam - 100 days 23 hours ago
3.2 -
lol, that's what i am saying... nowhere in that article did it say "no sooner than 2011"... i've heard rumors of a take-two AAA game being pushed out of 2010 but, something makes me think it's probably AGENT or something else...

R*'s track record proves that there may very well be a new GTA in 2010... but, like everything R*, we won't even get a crumb of information until they're ready to tell us...

R* are the best at keeping information internal... one of the few companies out there that don't leak info... i doubt they even mentioned GTA5 to the interviewer...
Shut this user up Let user speak
stonecold1 - 100 days 23 hours ago
4 - gta 5 should be exclusive to ps3
as the xbox 360 has the other version gta4. gta5 should be exclusive to the ps3 and maybe pc and te xbox 360 is holding the ps3 and pc gaming back
Shut this user up Let user speak
deadreckoning666 - 100 days 23 hours ago
4.1 -
@Stone Cold1- I really don't see that happening ANY time soon.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Noctis Aftermath - 100 days 23 hours ago
4.2 -
The game would have alot more content, but it won't happen, companies are all about money and they won't lose a few mil sales to release a better game (which would cost them more to make anyway)

With the xbox around they can have a smaller game but make just as much if not more money, so the only chance it will happen is if sony have locked them into an exclusive deal(unlikely).
Shut this user up Let user speak
stewgart - 100 days 23 hours ago
4.3 -
I wish it was ps3 exclusive also on the bases of the belief that dvd limitations held back what could be done with gta4 hence the two expansions packs seen on 360. I've nothing against the 360, I just love gta and want it to be made to its full potential. I also wish the next MGS game was ps3 exclusive... it's kind of annoying how microsoft slaps these developers across the face with their money at the expense of us gamers.
Shut this user up Let user speak
maniacmayhem - 100 days 23 hours ago
4.4 - @ Stonecold1
Wow, -GametimeUK- was ripped to shreds for saying GTA should be an Xbox "excluuuusive"!

@ Stewgart
"it's kind of annoying how microsoft slaps these developers across the face with their money at the expense of us gamers"

What the hell do you mean? What expense has we the gamers suffered? Just because the 360 version didn't have the DLC content already included? Do you really believe it's because MS had anything to do with that or that maaaybe Rockstar wanted to make a little more $$$ on DLC and keep the life span of a game going.

Or maybe just maybe they released GTA to a specific date and to make money then continued development for expansions.

That's like saying you wish World of Warcraft would have released one game with all of its many expansions on its first release.

C'mon maaan!
Shut this user up Let user speak
stewgart - 100 days 22 hours ago
4.5 -
well microsoft paid $50m for the exclusive DLC, something that would have been in the full game on both consoles if it wasn't held back by dvd limitations. As for next MGS, it is obvious microsoft showed the cash since they did it with just about every former ps3 exclusive. I should have said at the expense of ps3 gamers though since xbox only owners get to enjoy some great games so it's not at the expense of all gamers, just those who want to experience the most out of games.
Shut this user up Let user speak
George Sears - 100 days 22 hours ago
4.6 -
After the success of GTAIV I doubt R* would neglect 5+ million potential sales. Not to mention GTA series at whole has never been an exclusive franchise.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Elven6 - 100 days 22 hours ago
4.7 -
It's ridiculous to think that the 2 GTA IV expansion packs would have been included on the disc if it weren't for the 360 DVD, that is A LOT of AAA caliber content and no publisher would pass up the opportunity to make money on it especially when one of the biggest entertainment releases was on the horizon.
Shut this user up Let user speak
stewgart - 100 days 22 hours ago
4.8 -
@george sears
they seem to having no problems passing up 5m sales for Agent

@elven6
fair point, but did you not get the feeling while playing it that something was missing? that it wasn't quite complete? content was dropped as a result of the dvd limitations.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Elven6 - 100 days 22 hours ago
4.9 -
Stewgart: No, Niko's story was complete and the characters that became part of the two expansion packs were never developed enough for the game to feel incomplete at the end. Infact, they could have picked any of the characters, the expansions developed them so well that once things were over it felt complete. The two expansions add very little to Niko's story so you never get the feeling that they were needed to fill in the gaps.
Shut this user up Let user speak
deadreckoning666 - 100 days 23 hours ago
5 -
"Do you really believe it's because MS had anything to do with that or that maaaybe Rockstar wanted to make a little more $$$ on DLC and keep the life span of a game going."

Exactly, Rockstar didn't HAVE to make DLC if they didn't want to. If Rockstar accepted M$'s offer for 2 DLC packs then Rockstar is the one at fault here

Same deal with Activision. Stewgart, who's at fault? Activision, who makes rehashes of games that they believe people will enjoy or the people who SUPPORT Activision by buying their games? For once will people use their brains on this site...
Shut this user up Let user speak
stewgart - 100 days 22 hours ago
5.1 -
well you can't blame them for accepting the money. It is what the business runs on. In both examples what you are saying is like that of the little guy being guilty even though the big man pulls the strings.
Shut this user up Let user speak
NecrumSlavery - 100 days 22 hours ago
5.2 -
Rockstar did the DLC for MS cause they payed them 50mil. Not out of the kindness of anything. Same reason Splinter Cell Conviction is 360 only.
Money talks peeps.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thehitman - 100 days 22 hours ago
5.3 - even though I think GTA 4 wouldve been
Better as a ps3 exclusive Rockstar isnt at fault. No one on earth would deny 50mil just for some dlc. I bet it helped them make an easier choice on deciding what to do w/ Agent.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Whoooop - 100 days 22 hours ago
6 -
For a second there I though it was GT5...

All I could think of was: GT fans are so screwed and are going to be so pissed..

Let's all thank my lack of reading comprehension.

;)
Shut this user up Let user speak
IllusionMPN - 100 days 9 hours ago
7 - Agent & Red Dead sites
Red Dead Resource
URL: http://rdresource.multiplay...

Agent-HQ
URL: http://agenthq.multiplayern...
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News