1140°

PS3 Underdelivers Again - FarCry 2 Gimped?

After all this hullabaloo about how the PlayStation 3 is the only "true" HD console, here comes the release of FarCry 2 to slap Sony's PR in the balls. In addition to people complaining about the messed-up widescreen and mandatory 3.5GB install, the PS3 version falls short of its Xbox 360 counterpart by only supporting 720p while the 360 version supports full 1080p.

Ripten noticed this themselves just by looking at the back of the case for the game, a photo of which they've conveniently provided for you:
Updates:
Ripten has updated the story with the following:

It is also worth noting that in a recent IGN head-to-head comparison of the game, the reviewer had the following to say regarding the differences:

“The only real differences are the PS3’s occasional framerate hitches and the dropping of some sound effects during hectic gunfights. These issues don’t really hurt the experience in any major way, but will be a minor irritation for some. If you’re at all interested in shooters, Far Cry 2 is an experience you will enjoy on any console. If you have the luxury of choice, the 360 version runs just a little bit more smoothly.”

OVERALL:
1st = PC
2nd = 360
3rd = PS3

Translation: gimped?
Alternative Sources:
Fake: FC2 runs at 720p nati... - pc.gamespy.com | By: lwhatee
Fake:FC2 runs at 720p on bo... - videogaming247.com | By: lwhatee
Twizlex - contributor
Published: 427 days 9 hours ago | News | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360 | PC
 
 

1234Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 171 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jack Bauer - 427 days 10 hours ago
1 -
i dont see this post going well...
1.1 elshimiablo | 427 days 9 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
NO_PUDding - 427 days 9 hours ago
1.2 -
I was gonna say. no free roamign game coudl be 1080p on any damn console.

Haha, Ripten.

Anyway, lets wait for comapriosn vids!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nostradavis - 427 days 9 hours ago
1.3 -
@elsh,

Please humor me and show me this confirmation you speak of?

@No Pudding,

If the PS3 version could support 1080 like the 360, why not say so on the box? They say this on the box for the PS3 version of FaceBreaker.

Look, I own both consoles and I haven't bought a game for my 360 in over 3 months because I refuse to play the damn thing until they fix all the hardware issues. That aside, I see no reason why (if they can do it) that they don't label the box such
Shut this user up Let user speak
Parapraxis - 427 days 9 hours ago
1.4 - @ Nostradavis
You have absolutely no idea what "native" means when referring to video output do you?

Maybe have some knowledge on the subject before speaking.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Fox01 - 427 days 9 hours ago
1.5 -
Just face it, the PS3 s***cks and at equal development time you get better results from the 360 (yes, I'm looking at you Killzone 2).
Shut this user up Let user speak
pwnsause - 427 days 9 hours ago
1.6 - Fox01
no, thats what happens when you don't port from PC to PS3, instead porting from PC to 360. After 2 years, AFTER 2 YEARS of PS3 Developers stating to other Developers that the only way to develop on PS3 is to make PS3 lead or port from PC>PS3>360, Developers refuse to do so and these are the consequences.

This is why EA got S**ted on by PS3 gamers last year. if Multiplatform games like Dead Space and Burnout Perform equally on both consoles, why dont developers see that and go that route? Even Factor 5 stated this when they were developing for PS3 with Lair.

And BTW Farcry 2 on consoles is 720p native. the 360 version upscales it to 1080p. the PS3 can upscale to 1080p as well, but this is an example of "lazy Developers" who just wants to make a quick buck on what they are doing, and not completing the job on making the game better on that platform.

Burnout Paradise was a game that got patched recently to allow PS3 upscaling to 1080p. its not that hard to develop on the PS3 if you develop on that platform first or port it from the PC version. Devil May Cry 4 was PC lead BTW, and look how the PS3 version compares to the 360 version, the PS3 version was superior to the 360 version. so as i said before, WHY SO LAZY?
Shut this user up Let user speak
lwhatee - 427 days 9 hours ago
1.7 - why on earth is people approving this Fake story
http://www.videogaming247.c...

IGN confirmed it too
http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/fa...

please report the story as Fake
Shut this user up Let user speak
sushipoop - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.8 -
And Ripten the idiots strike again! Far Cry 2 runs at 720p native for both console versions. 1080p upscaled is not true 1080p. Please get your facts straight.

Halo 3 supported 1080p. What was the true resolution for that one? 640p. I'm not surprised to see Twizlex post something as idiotic as this. Everyone at Ripten is brainless.
Shut this user up Let user speak
sonarus - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.9 -
Game runs at 720p on all consoles
Shut this user up Let user speak
gambare - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.10 - Upscaled or native?
let's not forget that the 360 can upscale the game video signal even if the game doesn't support 1080p, a true 1080p... well... everyone notice the difference. But bot games are 720p native.
Shut this user up Let user speak
yamamoto114 - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.11 -
The internet yet again fails to understand the difference between rendered resolution and upscaled resolution.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SlyGuy - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.12 - I admit, I am no techie
but this is such a BS article. LOL.

I thought by now everyone knew that the 360 puts all resolutions on the back of their game box (including UPSCALED 1080p).

The PS3 usually indicates only the NATIVE resolutions supported.

In a way, Sony is just being more HONEST!
Shut this user up Let user speak
jackdoe - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.13 -
Nostradavis, you know the difference between upscaling and native resolutions, yes?
Shut this user up Let user speak
ElementsUnknown - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.14 - The real problem is a lack of a hardware upscaler
As the previous posters have mentioned, the game is upscaled by the 360's HANA hardware upscaler. Whey they don't have an upscaler in the PS3 is beyond me. I have a cheap 1080p set and I rely on the upscaler in my systems, so I do notice a difference between my PS3 and 360.

The weird part is that the PS3 has one awesome upscaler for DVDs, it must be software based. Either way it makes the 360's DVD upscaler look like crap in comparison. Since my inexpensive LCD HDTV isn't up to the job I end up buying most multi-platform games for the 360, which is a shame because the PS3 is so reliable and such a beautiful system with a beautiful interface (XMB).

WAKE UP SONY, PEOPLE WANT TO LOVE YOU, STOP MAKING IT SO HARD!
Shut this user up Let user speak
aceitman - 427 days 8 hours ago
1.15 - well duh if you look at the back of all 360 games
that started when ms put out the 1080p option they all play in 1080p if you have hdmi cable and 1080p tv to put it on that is also how gametrailers do there side by side comparison show 360 1080p show ps3 in 720p wala thats how some 360 games look a little better and some look the same cause the way they show them this is old news that must be his first 360 game or the 1st time he looked at the back of the box
Shut this user up Let user speak
sushipoop - 427 days 7 hours ago
1.16 -
Ripten = The new Kotaku. Searching for hits by writing false garbage. Keep up the great work!
Shut this user up Let user speak
cherrypie - 427 days 7 hours ago
1.17 - FarCry 2 runs at 1080p on Xbox 360 and only 720p on the PS3
"If the PS3 version could support 1080 like the 360, why not say so on the box? They say this on the box for the PS3 version of FaceBreaker"

Exactly. You simply dont make a mistake with such things. FarCry 2 runs at 1080p on Xbox 360 and only 720p on the PS3 -- the darn boxes say so(!).
Shut this user up Let user speak
SlyGuy - 427 days 7 hours ago
1.18 - @ Elements
I do believe the PS3 upscales to 1080p. Just leave that as the only option ticked off on the PS3 and wala! 1080p upscaling!

I do not use it because my tv does a better job at upscaling games than the PS3.

Someone can easily take a screenshot of BOTH PS3 and 360 versions upscaled to 1080p!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Alvadr - 427 days 7 hours ago
1.19 -
FAR CRY 2 IS NOT, REPEAT NOT, FULL 1080P ON EITHER CONSOLE!

Great comparison, we dont need to play the games anymore, lets just read the back of the boxes!
Shut this user up Let user speak
thewhoopimen - 427 days 7 hours ago
1.20 - @1.14
There is a hardware upscaler on the ps3. It's been talked about this past year.

The ps3 can default upscale to 1080p as well... but it isn't labeled on the box because it isn't considered native.
Shut this user up Let user speak
morganfell - 427 days 7 hours ago
1.21 -
The article has been revised. It now says, "Ripten Owned...Again."
Shut this user up Let user speak
robotnik - 427 days 6 hours ago
1.22 -
Dan Landis doesnt know shiit about upscaling, his article is full disinformation.
Shut this user up Let user speak
vhero - 427 days 6 hours ago
1.23 -
another fanboy article its not 1080p true on the 360 though just upscaled i for one am sick to death of all these fake articles and if these are the only ones MS can win these days then they are in trouble. Come on lets talk about decent ones I mean MS does actually have a few aces up there sleeve like fable and gears lets talk abolut them rather than comparing multi platform games I amongst probably 90% of the people on here probably dont give a crap about multiplatform games and which one looks slightly better on which console as we have already decided which console we are going to buy it on for a completly different reason e.g. they only have one console (no way someone would go out and buy a 360 because the 360 version of farcry 2 has slighly better graphics which is DOESNT!) which renders this article pointless get real.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kain81 - 427 days 6 hours ago
1.24 - M$ lied gamers again and again
see the cover: 1080p for every Game even Halo3 that runs with 630p
this is lieing in The FACE

But some Bots believe this.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kain81 - 427 days 6 hours ago
1.25 - HOW can this be aproved
its a total fake. here are too many Bots these Days.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tarasque - 427 days 5 hours ago
1.26 -
Here we go again, boohoo i will not buy this crappy port boohoo they are just lazy devs boohoo looks like MS paid them off to gimp the Ps3 version boohoo.
1.27 Cliff Bull-Shit-ski | 427 days 5 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
1.28 Cliff Bull-Shit-ski | 427 days 4 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
1.29 GameDev | 427 days 4 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jamegohanssj5 - 427 days 4 hours ago
1.30 -
That's weird as I heard that the PS3 version ran a bit smoother than the 360's.

TGSI
Shut this user up Let user speak
DaTruth - 427 days 3 hours ago
1.31 - @morganfell
bubbles!!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Real Gambler - 427 days 2 hours ago
1.32 - Ripten is only looking for hits, so they will publish anything stupid for that.
But the true fault belong to Microsoft. They use the fact that most kids do not know the difference between native and upscaled resolution, so they put upscale resolution on all their games. Even worst than that, many HDTV do better upscaling than the XBOX itself, so if these kids ever buy a good hdtv, they are screwed because they will let the 360 do the upscaling instead of their TV, which is really sad. They could get a better picture by trusting their tv and they don't know about it.

As far as the real native resolution goes, I would wait for the expert to come up with it. So far Quaz51, who's usually a reference is claiming that the PS3 is 1080p (but not 1920X1080P, only 960X1080P so Sony could not put 1080P on the box since it's not TRUE 1080P) and is also confirming that the 360 version is only 720P. Still, this is not official yet, so I would wait before you or me make a fool of ourselves.

http://www.n4g.com/ps3/News...
Shut this user up Let user speak
anh_duong - 427 days 1 hour ago
1.33 -
now you can understand why there are crazy extremist nutcases who fly planes into buildings when you have got a whole bunch of people here who can get so worked up on a resolution difference that even a perfectly trained eye can't even see.

sony/microsoft = the religion
gaming journalist = clerics
fanboys = matyrs

my contention is not with the faboys but with the journalists who perpetuate these sort of hit-whoring imflamatory articles.
Shut this user up Let user speak
rexor0717 - 427 days ago
1.34 - God...
I was watching some Gears of War 2 footage...Uncharted still looks better. Ouch. End this madness.
Shut this user up Let user speak
aliveinboston - 426 days 22 hours ago
1.35 - PS3 version runs at a higher resolution, 360 version is not 1080P
PS3 version runs at a higher resolution according to Beyond3d's Quaz51 (respected by both "sides" of the console war).

Far Cry 2 on

PS3: 1.04M pixels/frame (960x1080)
360: 9.22M pixels/frame (1280x720)

They both have upscaled 1080P output but neither is true native 1080P.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 427 days 9 hours ago
2 - no big deal.
hdmi 1.3 supports 720p : )

so does that mean every game thats 720p on 360 is gimped cause hdmi 1.2 doesnt support it? XD

or does that mean if you only have a 720p t.v. all your 360 games are gimped cause hdmi 1.2 doesn't support it?? XD

gimped my ass... ^thats why ps3 IS a "true" HD console^
Shut this user up Let user speak
GUNS N SWORDS - 427 days 8 hours ago
2.1 - BS
you can get up to 1080p (including 720p) on component and even VGA.

it's up to your TV whether or not it accepts it.

edit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

among the minor revisions stated in the hdmi 1.3/1.3a spec, it's the support for X-HD resolutions that 1.2 doesn't have. but i don't think we'll see either console actually utilize those anytime soon:) and it's getting even harder to find 1080p games on BOTH consoles, since resolution is often the FIRST thing developers cut back on to make their games bigger or better somehow.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 427 days 8 hours ago
2.2 -
im comparing the specs of hdmi 1.2 to the specs of hdmi 1.3 : )

hdmi 1.2 (xbox360's) only supports 1080p, anything else is downscale and not native whether it be the t.v. or the game

hdmi 1.3 (ps3's) supports 720i, 720p, 1080i, 1080p etc. all native without being down scaled.

watch who your calling bulls*** on homie ; )

i think you miss understood me too though.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Statix - 427 days 2 hours ago
2.3 - Lack of 1080i/p support sucks in my case, because...
Far Cry 2 on PS3 effed me personally up the as*, because it doesn't support 1080i/p (upscaled) output. My TV is slightly older-generation, made by SONY in fact, and doesn't support 720p. Therefore, I'm forced to play FC2 and many other PS3 games downscaled to 480p. :(

I just wish so much that the PS3 had an internal hardware scaler that can do 1080i/p (upscaled) for every game like the 360 does.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Utalkin2me - 427 days ago
2.4 -
Maybe he can't get it through his thick skull, component cables do the exact, i mean the exact same thing as HDMI. Component output all resolution including 1080p, no difference in quality or anything.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Parapraxis - 427 days 9 hours ago
3 -
upscaled 720p =/= true 1080p, it's upscaled in the case of many 360 games, i suspect this is another.
Shut this user up Let user speak
i_like_ff7 - 427 days 9 hours ago
4 -
Massive Facepalm....Farcry 2 isnt 1080p on either console....Halo's 3 packaging says 1080p when it runs at subpar 640p. Its just ms's packaging dumb Riptens...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nostradavis - 427 days 9 hours ago
4.1 -
Oh noez! There they go again trying to be bigger than they're not. Apparently Microsoft has the smarter packaging designer. Maybe Sony should hire him as well.

Edit: I am staring at the packing for the PS3 version for FaceBreaker, and the back reads 720p, 1080i, and 1080p. So the assumption that is a Sony guideline of sorts is false.

In other words, FaceBreaker on the PS3 supports not only 1080i but 1080p.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ninja-Sama - 427 days 5 hours ago
4.2 -
This article is fail on so many levels it's not even funny. Why write an article about resolution when you obviously don't know the difference between native res as opposed to upscaled res.

Ripten shud fire the noob who wrote that article.
Shut this user up Let user speak
facepalm - 427 days 9 hours ago
5 -
This is like how they did it with MGS4/Halo 3/and various other games... The game most likely doesn't support "native" 1080P, but does have the option of using "upscaled" 1080P.

I thought that the developers already stated that the game was made to be at 720P, but not to the "golden standard" or 60FPS.
EDIT ADDED: http://www.videogaming247.c...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nostradavis - 427 days 9 hours ago
5.1 -
I just read that beautiful piece of literature, and no where does the dev say anything about both versions of the game only supporting 720p. Fail.
Shut this user up Let user speak
jackdoe - 427 days 8 hours ago
5.2 -
Nostradavis, you are sounding like a massive fanboy here. I thought you made some smart posts in the past, but today is not your day. You know the difference between native and upscaling resolutions. The 360 can upscale much more easily than the PS3. Apparently, Ubi didn't want to put in the effort to include software upscaling with the PS3 version. But that does not make the PS3 version gimped.
Shut this user up Let user speak
facepalm - 427 days 8 hours ago
5.3 -
Point taken...

^-^ I guess the only way to get to the truth behind this matter is to get an actual "pixel count" of each version of the game.

Although it won't really matter since the PS3 is gimped in more ways than just the supposed resolution difference according to IGN Insider's "Head-2-Head" (I would post the link, but you need to have an "insider" account to actually look at the article.) states that:

"[T]he 360 version runs just a little bit more smoothly" when compared to it's PS3 counterpart despite the 3.5GB mandatory install.

EDIT ADDED: As well as "[t]he PS3 version of the game was prone to a bit more hitching. During one story sequence the visuals froze for 2-3 seconds while the characters kept talking. I experienced some half-second hitches out in the world as well, usually when driving quickly or moving into new areas that needed to be streamed in."

And even "PS3 version was prone to dropping some sound effects in the middle of big gunfights. Sometimes there wouldn't be any sound for my gunfire if there were a lot of enemies on screen or there had just been a big explosion. This happened in the 360 version as well, but much less frequently in my experience."

^-^ Of course they stated that the PC version is the best looking on of the bunch (...obviously) although I think that the DRM implementation is stupid. But hey!! At least it's $10 USD cheaper than the console versions.
Shut this user up Let user speak
jackdoe - 427 days 8 hours ago
5.4 -
Smoothly is subjective tbh. How do you define smoothness? How can you compare smoothness when the difference is so low?

-edit- Wow, those differences aren't really that big of a deal, so I don't think you added ammunition. But, man, IGN really has a sh!t load of time to comb over every little detail for differences. And again, some of those differences are subjective.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News