240°

IGN: Alone in the Dark Review & Video Review

Alone in the Dark has some good ideas, but it fails at most because it tries them all. Nice visuals, great fire effects and valiant efforts at innovation don't make up for boring combat, frustrating controls, poorly designed levels and a hackneyed story. There's a certain amount of old-school adventure charm in Alone in the Dark, but it shines only as the dimmest of lights, hemmed in by the darkness of its many failures.

Presentation - 4.5
Graphics - 6.0
Sound - 6.5
Gameplay - 3.0
Lasting Appeal - 3.0
Overall -
3.5 / 10
BIoodmask - contributor
Published: 543 days ago | Review | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360 | PC
 
 

12Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 80 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
ssjwaite - 543 days ago
1 -
ouch
Shut this user up Let user speak
aebriscoejr - 542 days 22 hours ago
1.1 -
Well that does it for me. I'll only be getting a rental. It's too bad because I had high hopes for this game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Qbanboi - 542 days 22 hours ago
1.2 -
Ouch indeed.

Well, aleast Haze wont feel "Alone" this year. Ha, get it? ^^
Shut this user up Let user speak
SolidSnake93 - 542 days 21 hours ago
1.3 -
Ha ha lolz bubs for you with the alone joke.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Superfragilistic - 542 days 19 hours ago
1.4 -
Now I know why Phil Harrison doesn't want to make any more single player games! lol
Shut this user up Let user speak
barom - 542 days 16 hours ago
1.5 -
dang, I really thought it would be something. Ahh well let it go down in price. I'll buy it for 5$
Shut this user up Let user speak
meepmoopmeep - 543 days ago
2 -
double ouch
Shut this user up Let user speak
Breakfast - 543 days ago
3 -
triple ouch
Shut this user up Let user speak
SUP3R - 543 days ago
4 -
OMG
That's worse than HAZE!!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Condoleezza Rice - 543 days ago
4.1 - Haze isn't the worst game out there
In my honest opinion;Haze is a 6.5,nothing more,nothing less.

A 6.5 in my book,is a game that is alright,but ultimately fails in delivering a great experience.I should also mention that after playing NG 2 I awarded it the same score.

On topic;Yowza,I didn't expect IGN to give this game a 3.5
Shut this user up Let user speak
blindfromthesun - 542 days 21 hours ago
4.2 - Condoleezza Rice...
You have an Xbox 360 to play Ninja Gaiden 2? Did you borrow one and play the game all the way through? Someone brings up Haze and YOU promptly dish out some Xbox hate...sounds odd. Good grief, I can't take anything you say seriously, except your lies.

On topic: 3.5 is a little harsh but is only one review. A single review shouldn't change your opinion of any game. If you don't believe the review, rent the game first before you decide to buy.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Superfragilistic - 542 days 19 hours ago
4.3 - @Condi
Who said "I should also mention that after playing NG 2 I awarded it the same score."

What has that got to do with Alone in the Dark? I understand the Haze reference because SUPER already raised it as did others and it's got a similar Metacritic. But NG2 has nothing to do with it other than making your motives completely transparent! lol

For reference:

Chalk
Alone in the Dark - 61 Metacritic
Haze - 55 Metacritic

Cheese
Ninja Gaiden 2 - 81 Metacritic
Shut this user up Let user speak
BIoodmask - 543 days ago
5 - I was hoping
this game would be good. I really liked the first one. I should have know what to expect from Atari.
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheExecutive - 542 days 23 hours ago
5.1 -
yeah they are kinda like sierra
Shut this user up Let user speak
MK_Red - 542 days 23 hours ago
5.2 -
I'm with you Bloodmask but Atari's TimeShift wasn't too bad IMO. I kinda liked it and it got decent scores.

Still, after reading the review I got a feeling that reviewer didn't fully understand the game. It won't be the 8 we were expecting but also, not a 3.5.
Atari is going downhill and with the decision to stop making singleplayer games... lol. Goodbye Atari :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
HeroOfCows - 542 days 22 hours ago
5.3 -
Sorry dude, TimeShift was Sierra, not Atari =(
Shut this user up Let user speak
MK_Red - 542 days 22 hours ago
5.4 -
Dammit, my bad. Sierra's TimeShift :)

Thanks for the info HeroOfCows. Bubbles for you.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SolidSnake93 - 542 days 21 hours ago
5.5 -
Yeah Atari makes a good game occasionally. When the planets align, a polar bear visits you in your dreams, and you find a penny on the streets and that is exactly what happened right before they released Neverwinter Nights 2.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ElementX - 542 days 20 hours ago
5.6 -
Sierra used to be good. They made awesome games like Quest for Glory and King's Quest. Also Gabriel Knight: Sins of the Fathers.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Orange Juice - 543 days ago
6 - how dissapointing
The game had potential, thats for sure. Those first few gameplay trailers had me really interested, but I guess this score confirms a rental.
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheHater - 542 days 23 hours ago
7 -
Why is this being review for the ps3? The ps3 version of this game isn't come out of another 6+ months.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SUP3R - 542 days 22 hours ago
7.1 -
You're right, didn't notice that.
Shut this user up Let user speak
facepalm - 542 days 23 hours ago
8 - ...Ouch...
Right after a period of great scores, there has to be a period of terrible scores.

(Bringing balance to the "force"...^-^)

But yeah, only 1 point edge above "Operation Darkness".
Shut this user up Let user speak
Silogon - 542 days 23 hours ago
9 -
WOW, the walls came in on this one quick! I was holding off getting it until I could compare the PS3 and xbox 360 versions but now I'm not even gonna bother. I was really looking forward to this one too. Such a shame.
Shut this user up Let user speak
HeroOfCows - 542 days 22 hours ago
9.1 -
You sure got some bubbles back quickly.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jack Bauer - 542 days 23 hours ago
10 -
wow that sucks...3.5
Shut this user up Let user speak
LevDog - 542 days 23 hours ago
11 -
Well thats what you get when you have the 360 as the lead platformer..

LevDog for Fanboy of the Millennium
Shut this user up Let user speak
MK_Red - 542 days 23 hours ago
12 -
Holy ****!?! There is no way this game could deserve such a low score. WTF was IGN playing? To me the game always looked great but even from a not so positive stand point, the many innovative ides and unique gameplay parts alone deserve a much better score IMO. Totally unfair. Sure, it may not be the 8/10 or something but 3!? Even the uber harsh EuroGamer gave it a 7/10.
I'm still getting it to make up my own mind about it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
meepmoopmeep - 542 days 23 hours ago
12.1 -
yeah, i'll be getting it too... still deciding if it's a rental or buy. i'm still looking forward to playing this game. 3.5 is a bit too harsh.
Shut this user up Let user speak
MK_Red - 542 days 22 hours ago
12.2 -
Glad to hear. Definitly a rental at the very least though since even this reviewer thinks it has unique ideas, good fire gameplay and catchy soundtrack, I know I'll be buying it. Plus, it's a M rated game which I kinda tend to collect as much as I can.
Shut this user up Let user speak
HeroOfCows - 542 days 22 hours ago
12.3 -
I think if IGN doesn't like something, they absolutely hate it. I mean, IGN UK gave it double that score.
Shut this user up Let user speak
MK_Red - 542 days 22 hours ago
12.4 -
lol, true. 7 from IGN UK and 3 from IGN US!? I'm pretty sure they didn't understand the game and it's design and just hated it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Superfragilistic - 542 days 19 hours ago
12.5 -
Yeah the 3.5 is a bit odd when their IGN UK counterparts awarded a 7. Either way I'll be checking it out to form my own opinion. :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
MK_Red - 542 days 12 hours ago
12.6 -
Wise choice Superfragilistic.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 542 days 23 hours ago
13 -
It can't be worse than Haze. No way is that possible.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 542 days 22 hours ago
14 -
WOWZERZ!

@closing- haze is awesome and underrated.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 542 days 22 hours ago
14.1 -
I rented Haze with a free voucher, and felt ripped off.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 542 days 22 hours ago
14.2 -
lol

i thinks its awesome, so do alot of people. just look at the user reviews.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 542 days 22 hours ago
14.3 -
7.6 is real awesome from a predominately one sided site, and one was prolly you giving it a ridiculous score like a 10 or a 9. I really trust that score!

I played the game, and it was ugly, dim witted, and bug infested. I'd much rather take my chances with this game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 542 days 22 hours ago
14.4 -
people actually like games that you may not. just play games dude, im just telling you what most people said. even ubisoft said "id like to see the user reviews".....well?....... ..their good arent they? haze is a good game to most people. my opinion is that its awesome and i have alot of fun with the multi player and the story was good.

-play games fanboys

@ below- ok fanboy ; ) the games good. every one i have talked to likes it. out of all the gaming website this is the only one with user reviews? wow. maybe your just a hater, who knows.

people can hate it, but the user reviews speak for themselves.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Closing - 542 days 22 hours ago
14.5 -
I don't know where you're reading these user comments, but the majority of the people saw it for what it was, and don't like it. I suppose we just have two totally different set of standards though.

Yep, I'm a real fanboy hater since I only own one system, which is the Ps3.

Edit: " im just telling you what most people said." "people can hate it, but the user reviews speak for themselves."

... You're a true genius. That comments speaks for themselves.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Le-mo - 542 days 22 hours ago
15 -
How is this related to the PS3? The PS3 version isn't due till late 2008.
Shut this user up Let user speak
PirateThom - 542 days 22 hours ago
15.1 -
It's still a PS3 game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
AclayPS3 - 542 days 22 hours ago
16 -
Damn, what a shame. The whole concept of Alone in the Dark sounded pretty cool to me and I was hoping that this game would be a solid 8.0/10 game across the board.

I guess we'll just have to wait for Silent Hill Homecoming, Resident Evil 5, and/or Dead Space to get our real daily dose of Survival Horror.

.... And IGN sure isn't afraid to give out low scores these days. They totally destroyed HAZE with a 4.5, then it was Operation Darkness with a 2.5, and now Alone in the Dark.

But when it comes to graphics, I think that a lot of reviewers are using games like Uncharted, COD4, GT5 Prologue, and MGS4 to compare other games to while reviewing them, and if those games they are reviewing can't compare to the games I listed above graphically, they'll probably just get low scores for graphics and it's as simple as that.
Shut this user up Let user speak
LevDog - 542 days 22 hours ago
16.1 -
Dont forget about Siren.. Siren looks scarier then all those ones you said combined..

LevDog for fanboy of the Millenium
Shut this user up Let user speak
kazuma - 542 days 22 hours ago
16.2 -
double helix games is just gonna destroy silent hill 5 =( why have u forsaken us team silent??

dead space might be a lot of fun, i'm waiting for that one
16.3 project76dodo | 542 days 21 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Old Snake - 542 days 22 hours ago
17 -
This is why I can't stand gaming sites sometimes. When they preview a game, they never say anything bad about it, even if it is going to be horrible, just so they don't get the devs mad. So they get you hyped up for a game, then they give it a score like this.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Rythrine - 542 days 22 hours ago
17.1 - Agreed
Sad, but true.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Wolf873 - 542 days 22 hours ago
18 - Ok this is bad...
I can understand low scores for gameplay, but visuals...come on they are pretty neat, slightly better than GTA-IV for crying out loud, why the hell they had to give such a lousy score. Its at least a 6-7. I hope it doesn't stops Atari from discontinuing with the plans for a sequel, but rather learn where they went wrong and make up for it. Also, improve the PS3 version which has a chance of still making the cut.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News