|
N4G
|
VGReleases
|
BADJoystick
|
GameNews24
|
ZTGD
|
Price Comparison
|
All
PS3
Xbox 360
Wii
PC
PSP
DS
Mobile
Gaming
Industry
Dev
Tech
More
Arcade
Xbox
PS2
GC
Events
My Game Channel
My N4G Favorites
Price Comparison
N4G Announcements
N4G Contests
Forums
UR
MR
Blogs
Read
Related Games/Stories
340°
Ubisoft demands high Assassin's Creed 2 review score?
59
Jim Sterling writes: "We hear about these situations far too much, where a publisher is accused of attempting to broker a guaranteed favorable review from a press outlet. The latest to face such allegations is Ubisoft, having been named and shamed by German magazine Computer Bild Spiele for demanding a high score for Assassin's Creed 2. SCANDAL!"
Read Full Story >>
destructoid.com
Alternative Sources:
Ubisoft Demands High Score ...
- gameinformer.com | By:
Ceekay
Ubisoft accused of Assassin...
- beefjack.com | By:
Cyrus365
Ceekay
-
contributor
Published: 28 days 13 hours ago | Rumors |
PlayStation 3
|
Xbox 360
|
PC
Related Stories
5°
E Gamer Assassins Creed 2 Review
13m ago | PlayStation 3 |
Com(0)
10°
GameFocus: Assassin's Creed 2 360 Review
4h ago | Xbox 360 |
Com(0)
10°
Best Buy Games Assassins Creed 2 Review
1h ago | PlayStation 3 |
Com(0)
30°
OXCGN'S Assassin's Creed 2 Review. Does History Repeat Itself?
7h ago | Multi |
Com(9)
10°
The Bitbag: Assassin's Creed 2 Review
1h ago | Multi |
Com(0)
10°
RewiredMind: Assassin's Creed II Review
10h ago | Multi |
Com(0)
10°
About: Assassin's Creed II Review
2h ago | Multi |
Com(0)
10°
Lawrence Review: Assassin's Creed 2 (PS3)
13h ago | PlayStation 3 |
Com(0)
10°
GameFocus: Assassin's Creed 2 PS3 Review
3h ago | PlayStation 3 |
Com(0)
10°
The Gamer Scene - Assassin's Creed 2 – Video Review
14h ago | Multi |
Com(0)
Average Score User Score
Related Games
9.3
9.1
Assassin's Creed 2
| PS3
-
9.1
Assassin's Creed 2
| Xbox 360
From GamesRadar
More Assassin's Creed 2 Info
| PS3
Assassin's Creed 2 Cheats
| PS3
From CheatCC
Assassin's Creed 2 Cheats & Codes - PS3
Assassin's Creed 2 Cheats & Codes - Xbox 360
Save
|
Email
|
Info
|
Report
|
Add Alt Source
Gamer Zone(50)
Open Zone(9)
Comment Settings
Showing: 1 - 50 of 50 Comments
naughty57
- 28 days 13 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1 - This is getting ugly
very sad though, websites and mags can't even keep their word no more
Agree(9)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
dgroundwater
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.1 -
This issue is a bother, no doubt about it. Many publishers besides Ubi pull shenanigans like this. Just check multiple sources before picking a game up.
It doesn't say anything about the quality of the game though, AC2 will still rock.
Agree(4)
|
Disagree(2)
|
Report
evrfighter
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.2 -
so herein lies the problem
as soon as the review embargo's are lifted. What does that say about sites like IGN or Gamespot who give it at least a 9?
Agree(6)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
Kira83
- 28 days 11 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.3 -
no kidding, guess i can disregard the 9/10 OPSM gave the game.... for now.
Agree(3)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
mikepmcc
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.4 -
Seriously, who has the time to care about this kind of stuff? I'll buy a game if it's good, and not let the "politics" get involved in my purchase. Anyone who will negate a $60 purchase on a whim because of some obscure issue obviously didn't care about the game very much in the first place.
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
DaTruth
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.5 - @Mikespmcc
Do you use E.S.P. to know the game is good??? That is why we go to reviewers, because we can't play every game before it comes out to know if it's good.
That's what the problem is!
Oh and this completely owns all the people saying PS3 fanbabies want MW2 to fail! Clearly PS3 owners had a point when they were arguing the reviewing process was skewed!
Agree(4)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
DaTruth
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.6 -
It's Kane and Lynch all over again!
Edit:Excuse my above post where I say PS3 owners were arguing the review process is flawed! It might have appeared I was saying all PS3 owners everywhere!
Agree(3)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
ozstar
- 28 days 9 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.7 -
@DaTruth, thats right. That was the other recent game that came up.
If your job is threatened because of an review you pretty much guarantee they will choose self preservation.
@mikepmcc, calling it obscure? Jesus it affects the WHOLE industry, its not obscure. Its the reason why GTA4 is the "best reviewed game of all time", but in retrospect, most people don't think it actually is.
Agree(3)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
SaberEdge
- 28 days 7 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.8 -
You want to know what's really shameful?... the way a bunch of know-knothing gamers are willing to hang Ubisoft out to dry based on compeltely unsubstantiated claims by one German game magazine that most of us have never even heard of.
What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? With you guys I guess it's "guilty until proven innocent". *Shakes head*
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
nan0
- 27 days 13 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.9 - Everybody needs to realize
Not to believe everything you read. This is probably a loud of BS. Some unreliable source in Germany trying to get hits for their site. It's probably some noobs who are pissed that they couldn't get a copy so they made up this BS.
----------------------------- --------Yeah
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
Blaze929
- 28 days 13 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
2 -
I suspect IGN has long since been bending over for publishers. That's the problem with the "big name" sites/magazines now; start to wonder if they even play the games they review anymore.
That's why I like some of the smaller sites and sites that are doing that N/A score thing now.
Agree(8)
|
Disagree(3)
|
Report
|
Reply
kaveti6616
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
2.1 -
Well, I IGN gave the first game a lower than excellent score. A 7.8 right? Anyways, it's sad to see Ubisoft doing this because I really thought that with a few minor tweaks and gameplay improvements, Assassin's Creed could have been great. Now, it seems that Ubi has less confidence in the sequel, and that makes me less confident in purchasing it.
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
TOO PAWNED
- 28 days 13 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
3 -
in a long run this will destroy our industry.
Agree(11)
|
Disagree(2)
|
Report
|
Reply
Kain81
- 28 days 13 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
3.1 - Iam affraid ,you are right about that
T.T
Bubbles+
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(2)
|
Report
rbluetank
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
4 - this is why you should rent to buy!!!
you and only you know what type of games you like...
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
kaveti6616
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
4.1 -
That ends up costing money. I know you will say in the long run that it saves money, but I'm not going to feel that way if I rent a game for 7 or 10 bucks that I end up loving enough that I want to buy, thus meaning that I will pay more money for it. It's not impossible to find a dedicated and unbiased reviewer in the industry.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
raztad
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
5 -
What a shame.
I still have high hopes for AC2.
Agree(5)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
kaveti6616
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
5.1 -
Doesn't it put a dent in your hope? If the publisher of the game is doing this, what does that say about the quality of the game?
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
raztad
- 28 days 9 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
5.2 -
@^^^
Not exactly. I'm sure this kind of pressure is more common than we know. Moreso, when the sequel of a big hyped game with a massive follow up is about to be released I suspect many reviewers try to behave "properly".
I'm gonna wait for more reviews and user feedback.
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
Dawn_Of_Ashes
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
6 -
with the failure that was assassin creed 1, i can understand that ubisoft is afraid of getting bad score but they dont have to do that kind of thing. It only prove that they dont believe at the quality of the game.
Agree(3)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
rob6021
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
6.1 -
I honestly think they did the same thing with AC1
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
Unicron
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
7 -
Yet more proof...
SCORES are STUPID AND WORTHLESS.
Agree(6)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
Karum
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
8 - If this is true...
Then well done to that site for not giving Ubisoft their wish.
Also, if it's true then it shows Ubisoft don't have as much confidence in their game as they should.
Agree(4)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
Sigh
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
9 - I'm not surprised really
Like someone said on here last week, honest journalism is dead.
Agree(6)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
tweet75
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
10 - well ubisoft i was going to buy the game now im not !
I hope other gamers will join me who were looking forward to this game and choose not to purchase it because of these actions. Also I will never buy a game if a company is accused of doing this for the game.
Agree(3)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
Sprud
- 28 days 11 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
10.1 -
Then you need to stop buying all high budget games. This has been going on for a while now.
Agree(4)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
mikepmcc
- 28 days 11 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
10.2 -
really? Do you know how many developers poured their blood and sweat into the game? You shouldn't deny them that on the decision one marketing person made, much less deny yourself a great game. I'm sorry, but there is nothing you can to end corruption forever, it's going to happen. Your loss though, I'll be having fun playing...
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(2)
|
Report
DaTruth
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
10.3 -
This is pretty much the effect of huge amounts of marketing money on your favourite gaming magazine or site. The threat of losing those ad revenues next time they release a big game almost assures a good score.
Imagine losing Halo ad revenues!
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
GameOn
- 28 days 7 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
10.4 -
there would all ways be someone else that wants to advertise though.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
zerocrossing
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
11 -
what happened to earning a good score by making a good game? Ubisoft should be ashamed of themselves, not only do they obviously have no fathe in there own work but its just unaceptable to push for a high score just because your a big bev.
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
Kalowest
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
12 -
You should let your product speak for its self.
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
Polycarp
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
13 -
It would be better if reviews never included scores. Honestly, you can't really assign a number to each game. They are all so varied. It would be better if people just read the opinions in reviews to see what people liked or didn't like, and then made their judgment on how important each of those features is to them.
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
Danteh
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
14 -
This is disgusting, but I've been supecting it for a while. I heard stories that if you don't give X game a high score, then maybe they won't let you an early hands on with their next big game... and that's a disaster for any magazine. So they must keep the companies happy.
I'm not trying to start a flame war, but I think that's exactly what happened with Halo ODST. While thye game may be fun, there is no possible way that if it was named for example... Shellshock ODST, it would have gotten even into the 80's scores. It's basically a short DLC with outdated graphix
So yeah I hope this trend dissappears I trust reviews very much when buying :(((
Agree(6)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
DaTruth
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
14.1 -
A far worse fate would be if MS didn't advertise the game in your magazine after a bad score! Denying you a piece of their $30million ad campaigns!
Ya, it's worse than you ever imagined!
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
Solans Scott
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
15 - Should we really be surprised?
There are many gamers that only purchase games based on their review scores and publishers know this. I have seen people have breakdowns because a game that deserved a 10 in their opinion only got a 9.5. The reality is that a very positive review score can propel sales but it is shameful when a publisher actually demands a good score from a reviewer. They should have enough confidence in their own product and it worries me that they don't.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
No FanS Land
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
16 -
That's why I gave up willing to work at ubisoft. Plus it was ubi montreal.
Love the developer but damn is the publisher some crazy moneygrabber! Stupid ubisoft france.
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
DaTruth
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
16.1 - Also,
they didn't want you! j/k
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
CrippleH
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
17 -
I can't really blame them for that. People buy from reviews. I do.
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(3)
|
Report
|
Reply
Kakihara
- 28 days 11 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
17.1 -
Can't blame them for that?? Have I missed something and you're referring to something other than Ubisoft demanding a high score for their game whether it deserves it or not? I don't care how important reviews are to sales, demanding that someone lie is ... well, how aren't there legal repercussions to this???
It's absolutely disgusting, not that it's a shock. I've seen a bunch of good review scores but I'm still very skeptical about this game. Well ... I was skeptical and a little hopeful, now I'm pretty much expecting it to be as big a broken piece of crap as the first.
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
DaTruth
- 28 days 9 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
17.2 -
Can't really blame that dude for stabbing me and my wife, killing her and robbing us blind; A guys gotta eat!
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
gamejediben
- 28 days 11 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
18 -
Yeah I remember last year when the new Prince of Persia game came out and all the early review scores where really high. But once I tried it out I wouldn't have given the game more than a 7.5 or if the ending wasn't pay to play, an 8.
Also the only thing "grade A" about Far Cry 2 was how much of a disaster it was.
Ubisoft is probably the most bullshit game company out there. Call me a pessimist, but I'm sure all the things we hated about Assassin's Creed 1 will be even more magnified in the sequel.
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
DaTruth
- 28 days 9 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
18.1 -
Nobody could have seen FarCry 2 as anything other than a pretty picture. That game was highway robbery in all gameplay respects!
There were so many things wrong with that!
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
Feral Gamer
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
19 -
Destroid is the least reliable site. Their articles are written for hits.
Furthermore, a German mag most of us have never heard about? Sorry but I have trouble trusting the story from only one site.
Agree(3)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
ozstar
- 28 days 10 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
20 -
I can't believe people are shocked by this.
Firstly, didn't Ubi fly certain press all the way to Italy to preview this game?
Secondly, hasn't there been a long term bias inherent in game reviews when "press packs" are distributed to these "journalists"?
Thirdly, we know there have been threats in the past, don't be so naive to assume this isn't a common thing in gaming media.
Remember that just making this public is a threat to jobs, exclusive news preferential treatment and free copies. Bias, because of job security fears is a HUGE problem in normal journalism these days, game journalism is no different.
Agree(1)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
ElementX
- 28 days 9 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
21 -
Funny how people make fun of Gabe Newell's weight but Jim Sterling is just as obese. Pathetic attempt at slander. Just look at the source: wearetheinternetz.com? That just screams "bullshit". How can such a crappy site have any valid info? How come there hasn't been any reports from mainstream sites about this? Bogus!
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
ozstar
- 28 days 9 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
21.1 -
One example, Ign is owned by News Corporation. News Corp (the owners of Fox News) are famous for "selling" doubt, regarding second hand smoke and cancer links in the eighties. Today, you will see preferential treatment in defense of the coal industry, and other climate change associated polluters, so if this is the case with serious issues what do honestly believe you will get from a game review site?
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
DigitalAnalog
- 28 days 8 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
22 -
Damn Ubisoft, you were one of my most respected gaming companies. Your games rock and I would pass up many of the PS3 exclusives just to play Assassin's Creed II and you RESORT TO THIS?
............................. ..........................
I just hope this rumor is false.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
spunnups
- 28 days 7 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
23 -
I was really pulling for this sequel to be a hit. If this is true, you have to wonder if this game really is that good? Oh well, no shocker, it's not like Far Cry 2, Ass Creed, and PoP were anything but repetitive anyway.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
GraySnake
- 28 days 7 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
24 - there is a rule......
don't trust everything you see on the internet...especially when it smells this rank.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
TheDeadMetalhead
- 27 days 21 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
25 - ...
And this is why I stopped reviewing games. It's all just fanboys, money and politics. :|
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
Showing: 1 - 50 of 50 Comments
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
You must log in to post comments.
Username:
Password:
Remember
Comment Settings
Showing: 1 - 9 of 9 Comments
DonCorneo
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1 - i think they did the same with last year's prince of persia
POP was an overrated POS
but it got 9+ from most sites.
Agree(7)
|
Disagree(1)
|
Report
|
Reply
iown-ipwn-ikill
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.1 -
i really enjoyed prince of persia
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(2)
|
Report
aliens
- 28 days 12 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.2 -
Killzone2 was an overrated POS also.
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(22)
|
Report
ginsunuva
- 28 days 9 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.3 -
Halo 3 was an overrated POS also.
Agree(9)
|
Disagree(3)
|
Report
likedamaster
- 28 days 6 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.4 -
Yeah, I kinda liked POP.
On topic/
Ubisoft is one of my favorite developers/publishers, its sad to hear this.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
buying1999
- 27 days 13 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
1.5 - ODST
was the most over rated, over hyped, and over priced expansion pack ever to be sold.
PS3....Get on board or get left behind.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
likedamaster
- 28 days 6 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
2 -
Konami committed the worst sin. They gave 1up contracts to sign on the spot right after playing their game and said they could not release the review or leave for that matter if they didn't sign the contracts. The worse part were the contracts themselves, stating they could not mention the amount of downloads this certain game required and the length of certain cutscenes of the game. Despicable. What game was this you ask? Well, MGS4 of course.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(4)
|
Report
|
Reply
gamejediben
- 28 days 3 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
2.1 -
MGS4 kicked whole truckloads of game's asses. But the gaming press had the option of waiting until the release of the game to start reviewing the game. It was only if they wanted an EARLY playthrough that they would have to sign those contracts. Not an unfair price to pay really.
In the motion picture industry, to see an early screening, you have to fill out the same kinds of paperwork.
Agree(2)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
nan0
- 27 days 13 hours ago
PM
Track
Ignore
3 - Sounds like someone is ass hurt.
That he can't play MGS4.
People need to stop believeing whatever they read. Some Germna site is probably pissed that Ubisoft didn't give them a copy so they make a BS story up.
Agree(0)
|
Disagree(0)
|
Report
|
Reply
Showing: 1 - 9 of 9 Comments
Add Comment (Open Zone)
Open Zone Posting Guidelines
The Open Zone is a lightly moderated comment section which is open to all members. With enthusiastic fans eager to defend their favorite platform this place can get pretty hot.
Read More...
You must log in to post comments.
Username:
Password:
Remember
Join N4G
Login
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info...
|
Submit News
Site Menu
Game Index
Help & Info
RSS Feed
Feedback
Full Menu...
Webmaster Tools
Affiliate:
© 2008 N4G Network
About Site
|
Advertise
|
Contact Us
|
RSS
|
TOU
|
Privacy Statement
|
More...