After making a Tebow reference to one of Black Ops 2's screenshots, Leviathyn.com's Jason Fanelli thinks the setting for the new Call of Duty might be a bad idea. Alternative reality games haven't faired so well lately. Is this a risky move for the franchise?
Following the Wii U and 3DS servers being taken offline, Call of Duty Black Ops 2 and Ghosts are officially dead.
Call of Duty players are jumping into Black Ops 2 for the final time before its Wii U servers go offline for good.
GTA 5 and Red Dead Redemption 2 leap up due to summer sales
Wow, good games never get old I guess.
CoD will always be a beast of a franchise, and how awesome is it that you can just boot it up or pop it into your Xbox and play, MS BC is really a neat feature.
Idk
To be honest part of the reason I enjoyed mw1-black ops was for the different settings, modern, ww2 (waw), and Vietnam. To me this future setting just looks like something I can get from any other futuristic shooter. Add that to the fact COD overall quality and enjoyment for me has been faltering. I just don't think I can buy into this.
"Going the alternate future route is a risky gambit." How can it be alternate future? Does the author know how the future will play out? And the comparison to Turning Point isn't entirely relevant. I don't think that there is any history tweaking going on here. And a futuristic setting isn't very risky. especially not for COD. People will buy it because of brand recognition alone, plus, it looks interesting.
this storyline is gonna be awesome much like how i was for MW3 storyline it will be fun! fuck multiplayer.
Hey at least they are trying something different. I almost *&^% my pants when I saw they were using an original idea in a COD game. Pigs do fly and Hell is cold.
i havent bought a cod game since modern warfare and this actually peaks my interest a bit