60°

Net Effect -- Has The Internet Made It Better or Worse to be a Gamer?

We decided to look at various facets of being a gamer and decide in each case whether they were better before or after the Internet irrevocably changed them. Here are our findings...

Read Full Story >>
gammasquad.uproxx.com
n4f4405d ago

worst and the game industry just like the music is going very stall.
im afraid the movie industry is going to suffer too(of boredom)

vortis4405d ago

Better.

Gamers have a voice. And crap that happens behind closed doors gets exposed thanks to the interwebz.

Also, there are free-to-play games.

Also, we get to learn about a lot of different games from different regions we didn't know about before the interwebz.

So yes, I'd say better.

Besides, without the interwebz how would we ever have known about Crapcom pulling that crap with disc-locked content?

Hicken4405d ago

I would say better, but it's also made it that much easier for ignorance to spread like wildfire. Whether it's game/console bashing or pure misinformation, the level at which the negatives in the industry now occur is staggering.

Granted, the positives you mention are very noteworthy, but I'd dare say the downside is as influential.

Jackhass4405d ago

True, but without the Internet they Capcom wouldn't have been able to pull their stunt to begin with!

vortis4405d ago (Edited 4405d ago )

Yeah they would have sold them to you with in-store card codes, like those points cards you buy for MMOs.

Worse yet, no one would be the wiser. You'd have to goto like GameStop, buy 1000 Cappoints for like $10 - $20 and then use them to unlock the disc-locked content on your disc.

You don't need the internet to scam consumers.

TekoIie4405d ago

Better...

The pros far outweigh the cons in this sort of discussion.

Megaman_nerd4405d ago

I used to buy more games last gen but now with online I'm sometimes playing the same one for like half a year. XD

thebudgetgamer4405d ago

Both. On one hand it's great because we have tons of info on games we are interested in, were it was once a guessing game.

On the other, you give everyone a forum to speak and eventually you have too deal with a lot of crap to find the good stuff.

Show all comments (9)
190°

Microsoft to add next Call of Duty to Xbox Game Pass, WSJ reports

The plans could be announced during the Xbox game showcase in June.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
Profchaos2h ago

Until cod gets onto gamepass day 1 it's really just theory that it will hurt the overall sales I guess we will find out.

Zeref2h ago

I think it will hurt physical sales a bit. But CoD makes the most money from microtransactions. I'm sure the amount of people that are gonna play it on gamepass will be offset by the amount of new people buying MTs

Einhander197214m ago

But that increase needs to offset the loss in physical sales. CoD has been a big seller that has retained it's price much better than the average game.

And just like any game with dlc and mtx the majority of players don't buy it, it's the big spenders that really generate revenue, so the idea that by adding it to Game Pass is going to increase spending on mtx will likely not pan out as well as people hope. On top of that Microsoft currently gives away content updates for most of their games so presumably no more selling things like zombie mode.

So far nothing has really gone the way Microsoft envisioned it would, I think this will continue going forward.

-Foxtrot1h ago

It’s rumored there’s going to be new tiers to Gamepass added when COD hits. So most likely the most pricey one will include newer COD titles.

Name Last Name5m ago

It’s a gamble but I think they have to do it. Release COD on GP to see if it grows. Otherwise, GP will definitely not grow.

Kaii2h ago

Will this succeed or be a massive trainwreck, place ya bets people ^.^

CrashMania1h ago(Edited 1h ago)

It depends. Even on Xbox CoD still sold millions of copies, this will canabalise a large portion of those sales, potentially hundreds of millions in initial revenue. With the assumption being it'll get more players from GP buying MTs.

But with poor console sales, GP is hitting it's saturation point on console and stagnating, and with PC being very entrenched in steam with gamepass not being that popular there, without a bigger install base it's not really going to increase subs by very much even with CoD. Are people really going to jump ship to monthly to buy xbox's and sub to GP to play CoD especially when it'll probably sell 15+ million on PS5 anyway? I doubt it, but who knows I might be wrong, it'd certainly be a bit concerning if the sub count didn't move even slightly from the biggest FPS on the market being on there, it's a gamble though.

Releasing CoD on GP definitely make the service more attractive, but I question the impact based on what I mentioned above.

shinoff21831h ago

I don't think cod does this. You gotta sell your ps5, buy an Xbox subscribe, etc. I think most that want it on ps5 are just gonna buy it. I don't think it'll move many xboxes.

GamingSinceForever18m ago

GamePass is attractive for single player games that you are in and out of in short fashion. I do not see how it is beneficial for a game that you’d play for years.Better off just buying it outright.

Eonjay1h ago

Few things:
1. Yes this is a good thing for subscribers as long as...
2. There is a rumor that the price will be going up and if this is true, a lot will be riding on what the upcharge winds up being.
3. A new GP tier may be coming as well. New COD may not be in every tier.
4. GP is still constrained by Xbox console sales. To mitigate this MS has a few options. Brining COD to Switch will definitely help future titles.
5. There is a huge chance that this also comes to PSPlus Premium. I assume this is the case because Microsoft stated that they wanted Sony to add it to Plus. The issue became the lost income Sony would incur in publisher fees. I assume this was the driving force behind the Plus price increase.
6. Doing this will obviously obliterate retail sales, but Microsoft and Sony both come out winning by building up their sub base (and then for MS they will feed off of PlayStation Plus). Sony could have also negotiated for MTX publisher fees.

BilboBaggins6941m ago(Edited 41m ago)

lol new COD coming to PS+ day 1 is drug driven fantasy.

Sony ain’t spending that kinda money on a PS+ game from their direct competitor.

H92h ago

FTC look so stupid right now

LOGICWINS2h ago

They're damned if they do and damned if they don't. If they don't put COD Day 1, it would mean they were dishonest about Day 1 1st party games on GP. If they DO put COD Day 1 on GP, they'll lose a ton of sales.

I wouldn't want to be in Sarah Bond's shoes right now.

Eonjay59m ago

Losing sales wouldn't matter to them so much if they could build their sub numbers up. I still think they have a deal with Sony to bring it to Plus as well as proposed by Phil Spencer awhile ago.

Sciurus_vulgaris25m ago(Edited 25m ago)

COD mainly generates money from MTs and season passes.

Petebloodyonion0m ago

I fully expect to see COD released this year on Xbox just to give a win for Xbox owners and in the hope of seeing a substantial increase in Gamepass users.
Actually, I expect COD to be MS's make-or-break game regarding GAMEPASS future for if this game fail to drive membership well nothing will.

As for pricing, I think the base game will be on Gamepass Ultimate but a new tier could see the light of day to include all Battle pass and skin rebate.

100°

Please, can Call of Duty leave awful Netflix-style menus behind

Call of Duty games used to be streamlined experiences, but COD 2024’s UI could be another nightmarish clutter of streaming tabs.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
LucasRuinedChildhood18d ago

Let's just leave Call Of Duty behind.

anast18d ago

The isn't for you anymore.

BlackCountryBob17d ago

If we’re beating that drum, can we also stop forcing anyone who wants to play only the single player to download Warzone and all updates BEFORE they are then able to do another download from the menu of the single player campaign. I don’t see why I need 150gb of downloads in several ways to play the single player mode only from a bloomin disk which should have that campaign on it already.

DefenderOfDoom217d ago (Edited 17d ago )

The UI is confusing to me because I have not purchased a Call of Duty iin like 8 years .Only bought CoD MW3 because 3 of my friends I have known since to 70s are playing zombies . But I am used it now .

smolinsk17d ago

The UI is the least of the franchise many problems these days. But yes the UI is also terrible.

200°

Players claim Fortnite ruined Call of Duty by letting in more corporate greed

Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
GoodGuy0930d ago (Edited 30d ago )

Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.

Tacoboto28d ago

The "good ole days" are actually what drove me away from COD and Halo 3/Reach. Halo 4 becoming a COD-like drove me away from that only a week or so after it launched and I beat its campaign.

It sucked way back then, going a month or two without playing online-shooter-of-the-moment, and then needing to buy a $15 map pack to play with the majority of the population or your favorite playlist. The "community" rejecting Spartan Points in MCC killed that game's support, too. No revenue = no support, plain and simple.

Cacabunga28d ago

That headline could easily be something Spencer could have said 😅 I had to check if it was really an opinion piece

KyRo28d ago

As times gone on, the COD battle pass has got ALOT worse so they can push people to buy the more premium battle pass which itself is a huge rip off and nearly half the price of the base game.

The cosmetics can be fine but they've taken it to far to the point of no return. Why make a military themed game then have rabbits, dinosaurs, cats, rats & z list rappers as skins? You wouldn't add a Lamborghini to a fantasy RPG to replace a horse and you would never see Mario have limb dismemberment because they know what they are. COD is having identity crisis but kids and streamer but then all

franwex28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?

Inverno28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Exactly! Trends don't all need to be followed. Plus where Fortnite got somewhat better with it's monetization, Acti got worse. Or at least Fortnite has lended itself more to the wacky stuff, and has put more effort and quality into that stuff.

jjb198128d ago

I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.

PRIMORDUS28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.

StoneTitan28d ago

I mean cant really blame them for supporting the game that made them the most money and the most people player...ever?

Psychonaut8528d ago

Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance.

Ra303027d ago

100% correct! The makers of Call of Duty ran out of ideas long, long ago so they take ideas from other games like Ghost Recon, Fortnite and any other FPS game hat had success hell CoD remasters maps that they've remastered several times already then charge you again for it. Call of Duty is simply a cut, copy and paste and then put the $70 price on it every year. Activision and now Microsoft has been essentially remastering Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare every year since it was released in 2007 its to the point it's worse than the sports game like the Madden, NBA and others yearly sports franchises.
@Psychonaut85 is spot on "Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance"!

Show all comments (24)