340°

Crytek promises MSAA, SMAA(T2x on consoles), Nvidia TXAA and something new for Crysis 3

"For C3 fans asking about AA: PC will have our new SMAA with all modes (T2x on consoles )+ Nvidia new TXAA + all MSAA modes +something new :)" Tiago Sousa

Shaman4403d ago (Edited 4403d ago )

For people wondering MSAA is standard hardware AA that was absent in Crysis 2, but now with DX11 patch its possible with deferred rendering. SMAA is AA developed by Crytek engineers and Jorge Jimenez. T2x is SMAA variant for consoles, no more temporal AA. And TXAA is newly developed AA by Nvidia which as far as I know runs only on new Kepler cards, very advanced with great results comparable to 8 and 16xMSAA.

For reference...

http://www.iryoku.com/smaa/...

T2x for consoles

http://www.iryoku.com/smaa-...

TXAA

http://news.softpedia.com/n...

Couple GIFs from teaser video (from GAF)

http://i240.photobucket.com...

http://i240.photobucket.com...

http://i240.photobucket.com...

http://i240.photobucket.com...

360GamerFG4403d ago

Truth time, I have no idea what you just said.

TheEatingOrange4403d ago (Edited 4403d ago )

LOL SAME its like chinese

But thanks @shaman appreciate your informative message

Draperc4403d ago (Edited 4403d ago )

Basically Crysis 3 will have newer and better ways to reduce aliasing, also known as "jaggies", on consoles while the PC version will have those plus the usual standard MSAA

Hisiru4403d ago (Edited 4403d ago )

@Shaman
Fuc$ me, I don't even know what that means but thanks for the info dude. It seems to be good news, right?

starchild4403d ago

How do you think Nvidia's TXAA compares to AMD's new MLAA 2.0? As I understand it MLAA 2.0 can be used on any game, while TXAA can only be used if the game is programmed to use it. I am trying to decide between getting an HD 7870 or waiting for one of the Kepler cards.

Mrmagnumman3574403d ago

Morphological Anti-aliasing is different then other AA's. It uses post processing filter's and blur's the edge of pixels. Typically having A lot of other AA is better. But MLAA has been a great asset for the ps3, because it takes less processing power then normal MSAA, but can equal the effects of 8x MSAA. But if you have a powerful computer(I have a GTX 570), its better to just max out normal AA, and use Transparency AA for a game like Crysis. Now about TXAA, its a very advanced brand new AA, that only works on the newest Nvidia cards. It gets you great quality, for a small cost.As for which is better, probably TXAA

Gazondaily4403d ago

+respect to you for knowing your shiz.

Crysis 2 looked impressive on consoles. To think that Crysis 3 will trump that is even more impressive. Let's see how it turns out.

4403d ago
Pandamobile4403d ago

I've read some of Jorge Jimenez papers in my computer graphics class. He does some amazing work.

Cryptcuzz4403d ago

Would this mean the end of the dreaded jaggies on consoles? You seem well versed in this, please share your knowledge if you have the time.

This is the reason why I want the new consoles to be announced and released. To me, I rather get lower texture but with no jaggies, then higher-res textures with jaggies.

To me, jaggies really deter from getting fully immersed in a game, since they are such a distraction.

tachy0n4403d ago (Edited 4403d ago )

u sir, just described one of the features of CryEngine 4 developed by Nvidia and Crytek....

u mad DICE and AMD??

neoMAXMLC4403d ago

The temporal AA is what really hurt Crysis 2 on consoles. Absolutely awful method of AA.

F7U124403d ago (Edited 4403d ago )

Better image quality and performance on consoles confirmed. I love SMAA and use it whenever I can over the regular in-game AA.

wolfofashes4402d ago

Nice post Shaman,although it seems that they are not scrapping temporal AA,but using a more mature temporal solution

''We joined forces with Tiago Sousa from Crytek, to deliver a very mature temporal antialiasing solution. It has been integrated into CryEngine 3, checkout the SMAA demo movie.''

To Mrmagnunmman357.You are almost right,but got to point that MLAA is not less expensive than MSAA(direct comparison is really hard,one uses more bandwidth and the other more calculations),instead it uses more CPU power,that's why they use on the PS3.Another thing is that MLAA does not blur textures on 3D objects,blurring only 2D stuff like HUD elements(here's why Dice applied it only on the very last moment leaving HUD with no AA but no blur caused by it either)the solution that blurs texture a lot is FXAA a more GPU oriented solution.

Shaman4402d ago

Actually, temporal solution in T2x is temporal supersampling, algorithm is SMAA. Go to Jorge Jimenez site, and find the demo of T2x. It looks better than MLAA and is even better in moving picture.

FanboyPunisher4402d ago (Edited 4402d ago )

Shaman, do you know what sunlight and blue skies look like?

PS,

Only kind of AA current gen machines are using (consoles) are resource limited, and very VERY shitty.
Consoles are doing with the lite version of most of this processing.

Buy a PC, you had all this shit since day 1.
Sad day, you know you're getting the short end of the stick when you need to have a dev tell you youre getting some kind of aliasing.

Consoles are become more and more, the third world starving corner of the gaming industry, technology wise.

Food stamps for all.

M1chl4402d ago

Hey man, thanks for the articles, gonna take a look : ) I am programmer myself, but suck at math, so I am stuck with "normal program" coding : ( But I find these articles really interesting to read : )

wolfofashes4401d ago

I did just that,and in fact it seems a better solution than MLAA.Altough I wonder if both consoles can run the solution in parity or if T2x favours one architecture over the other.Anyway thanks again for the interesting read.

+ Show (9) more repliesLast reply 4401d ago
Tyre4403d ago

@shaman thx for the links...very awesome news indeed. Can't wait to see it running in realtime on my systems.

Krakn3Dfx4403d ago

I didn't really care for Crysis 2, it was very average as a game. I dunno that jungle-ized New York City is going to make it any better, but I guess we'll see.

CaptCalvin4403d ago (Edited 4403d ago )

How about real time reflections this time? Like the kind they already have in older games like half life 2 and bioshock? It's something that developers ignore in favor of fake ones with cube maps in almost all of the more recent games besides racing games.

I'd gladly give up the "cinematic" disco nightclub light show for properly realistic graphics.

Mrmagnumman3574403d ago

Crysis 2 DX11 has real time reflections

CaptCalvin4403d ago

What? you mean the so called real time "reflections" that only reflect objects within 1 meter away from the reflective surfaces?

Show all comments (41)
140°

EA’s best multiplayer games have now shut down for good

Battlefield Bad Company 2, Dead Space 2, Crysis 3, and a handful other EA games have finally had their online services shut down.

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
OtterX152d ago

I had no idea that Bad Company 2 was still running, and only now that I know, I want to jump on! 😥

SonyStyled152d ago

I was able to find games in the Vietnam dlc on ps3 the last week. There were articles on here about the server closure when it was announced in April

DaReapa152d ago

BF1943 is the only online MP game that I was genuinely interested in. Been playing since launch 14 years ago. Hate that I couldn't put in as much time to play as I'd hoped for during the final week.

Inverno152d ago

I got really into 43 when I bought Bf3, and preferred it. Everything that I disliked or found annoying about Bf3, wasn't an issue in 43. Too bad they never bothered releasing it on PS4 or PC.

1nsomniac151d ago (Edited 151d ago )

Dead Space 2...... I wasn't even aware that had multiplayer. Nevermind that it was apparently one of their best multiplayers!

anast151d ago

Once people stop buying micros, these companies close the doors.

Xenial151d ago

Dead Space 2 multiplayer had been hanging on for years - I'd boot my PS3 up to see some familiar names in lobbies. This will definitely be missed!

100°

EA has finally removed SecuROM from Crysis 3

Electronic Arts has released a new update for the PC version of Crysis 3 that removes its SecuROM protection system.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
370°

The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn & more running in 8K/30fps on NVIDIA GeForce RTX3090

Bang4BuckPC Gamer tested Crysis 3, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Final Fantasy XV, with all of them running with 30fps in 8K.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
RazzerRedux1299d ago

Yep. Wait a couple of years and get this level of performance on a RTX 4070 or 4080 at a much lower price.

Killer73nova1299d ago

And wait a couple more years for rtx 5070 or 5080 at a much much lower price

Yung-T1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

That headline is a tad misleading.
The rig stated in that YouTube video is extremely high-end (ryzen 3950x oc, 32gb etc) and utilizing special water-cooling solutions, loops with pumps etc.

This rig easily costs 5k+ and a normal pc with a RTX 3090 wouldn't get close to these framerates or sustainable temperatures.

Aggesan1299d ago

Who has a "normal" pc with a RTX 3090?

Yung-T1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

There's still a difference between a high-end GPU+CPU and a custom-made water cooling system including a Waterloop&pumps etc though, it allows for much higher performance due to the better temperature management that would fry the GPU&CPU with normal builds.

lonewolf101299d ago

That's why people need to read the articles, most headlines are just to get you to click.

Rainbowcookie1299d ago

You would think yes, but honestly does it happen often 🤣 enough

I_am_Batman1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

Most of the threads of the 3950x were barely utilized and none of the games that were tested allocated more than ~12.5GB of system memory. Gaming at 8k is pretty much as GPU bound as you can get so you won't need a water cooled high-end CPU or 32GB of memory.

Psychotica1299d ago (Edited 1299d ago )

How does the cost of the PC make the headline misleading?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1299d ago
Father__Merrin1299d ago

Mega powerful video card but the games you can play on that card are all available elsewhere. I want to see compelling pc only goty material titles ASAP

Psychotica1299d ago

And where else can you run them in 8K or even in 4K with the same level of performance?

averagejoe261299d ago

Who cares? Nobody has 8k screens and the majority don't even have 4k screens.

This push for pointless high resolution is ruining progress. Give us better framerates, lighting, physics, etc. Stop wasting power on needles 8k.

lonewolf101299d ago

@averagejoe26

There are people with 8k monitors though.

Bender65021299d ago

And still we can't escape 30fps.

JCOLE131951299d ago

I mean given the fact the games are running at 8K it doesn’t surprise me...

MrDead1299d ago

DLSS 2.0 no doubt has a big part in this too, The Witcher 3, Horizon Zero Dawn and Death Stranding run like a dream on my 3080, 4k ultra set to 60fps no drops or stutters and the system runs very quiet. Playing Borderlands 3 on badass settings, Red Dead or Division 2 on 4k ultra all run great (Red Dead has a few drops below 60fps) but my PC is working a lot harder on games that don't utilise DLSS, my room warms up nicely when playing those games.

Show all comments (19)