Will Medal of Honor: Warfighter be Better than Battlefield 3?

With all the new press on EA’s next military first-person shooter, Medal of Honor: Warfighter, people are starting to wonder how that will compare to their last years hit on Battlefield 3. The military based first-person shooter genera is getting a little over done but players can’t help but be excited for the next Medal of Honor game...

[TheSuperior]

Its hard to say when we have played through the full game of battlefield and only seen MoH through screens and trailers. i have high hopes for the game though but this will be the last time i will be excited for a military first person shooter for a long while lol

[Bleucrunch]

Yea if you played one you have played them all....why can't FPS's be more like far cry...Im sorry for throwing Far Cry into the mix...I just think that Franchise does the FPS the way it is suppose to be...WELL thought out and DRIVEN.

[TheSuperior]

Im excited for Far Cry also the new trailer looks soooooo good. thats a bit different then the normal FPS. cant wait to get ahold of that. not that it has anything to do with anything but im also excited for max payne 3 lol

[KeiserSosay4788]

I don't know what you saw, but I saw what looks to be a COD CLONE with farcry 3 except for some the team oriented stuff. Killstreaks and everything.

[DasTier]

I'm exited for far cry 3, but 2 was horrible. Lets just hope there's no pills, constant re spawning checkpoints, some more areas where not everything is hostile to you and some vehicles which aren't made of Raditz.

[Bleucrunch]

Dam bro I thought 2 was freaking awesome...The fact that you are playing the game and have to suffer the effects of Malaria is brilliant...It makes it a real as you can get....imagine trying to stop the bad guys but you have to deal with the flu bug messing you up inside....Just brilliant.

[Moncole]

The last MOH game sucked, why would this be any better?

[TheSuperior]

Im going to have to agree with you there, im just the type of player to get excited from what i see then get greatly let down from what i play xD haha

[Bleucrunch]

This to me is a loaded question...This new iteration of Medal of Honor should be better than the LAST medal of honor not battlefield...The last Medal of Honor which was suppose to bring back the once loved franchise was in my opinion crap...They need to go back to what made Medal so good in the first place...The Campaign...stop trying to mimic the competition and be your own entity...be unique and trust me the people will play your game for hours upon end...but this is EA so they will do the exact opposite.

[supraking951]

Mimic the competition? It didnt mimic CoD if thats what your saying. Best modern military campaign in a long time, no nonsense of blowing up iconic structures or trying to add shock value ( children killed, airport massacre like COD).

[Bleucrunch]

Well I believe that is what EA is trying to do with these two FPS's. If you are going to get into specific actions in the game then I would agree with you that it is not trying to mimic...But I will go into semantics with you because I believe you know exactly where I was going with my comment.

[THESHAUNZY]

MOH won't be as good as respawns new game.

[h311rais3r]

Yea your right. It won't be as good as something that has absolutely no info released. Good logic ;)

[mewhy32]

this game is going to be freakin' awesome on xbox.

[abombletap]

I can't even remember the last time I played MOH lol

[xruiner89]

No.

[NastyLeftHook0]

i got the absolute truth. you cannot logically disagree.

its your opinion.

[krazykombatant]

nope.

[Swiggins]

It has the potential to be better than Black Ops 2, that's for sure.

Medal of Honor doesn't provide the same level of scale that Battlefield does, no vehicles, smaller maps. Put's it more in the scope of CoD, which while fun, has grown stagnant...I REALLY wanted the last MoH to be good, hopefully this time around my hopes won't be dashed.....RAINBOW DASHED!!!! =D

[Tai_Kaliso]

Battlefield 3 was bad, Dice cannot make a game that I enjoy, I have high hopes for this new Medal Of Honor game now that Dice is hands off.

[Holeran]

If it doesn't have the PS3 input lag that Battlefield 3 has then it's an automatic win.

[zero_cool]

That's one of the main reasons i prefer sci fi fps games over the others becuase their differnt from one another & also their a lot more fun to play imho.

P.S...Too me online gaming is second nature to core gaming imho.

Cheers Gamers & Happy Gaming!

[supraking951]

The first MoH had an excellent campaign, one of the best in a long time. It wasn't flashy at all like what MW campaigns try to be, over the top nonsense. The plane scene alone in MoH beats everything in the CoD campaigns. The only thing MoH needs to improve on is the mp which it will now that DICE isnt doing it.

[FFXI101]

"The first MoH had an excellent campaign, one of the best in a long time. It wasn't flashy at all like what MW campaigns try to be, over the top nonsense"

100% agree with you.

[THILLREBORN]

What I think is happening is that they are bouncing back and forth each between BF and MoH titles and each will get better and better

[xX-Jak-Xx]

battlefield 3 is not really good compared to bad company 2
i hope MoH is much better than BF3

[SpecialK]

On consoles I get what your saying actually. I definitely enjoyed the maps more in bad company 2.

Last time I played it though the servers seemed to have gotten pretty bad. Gonna miss the Vietnam pack that was brilliant fun.

[Hufandpuf]

there's no point in comparing. I'll like Battlefield 3 for the multiplayer and MOH for the single player.

[Marcuskac]

yes

[BattleTorn]

Unfortunity not. Unless they avoid being like COD as much as possible, and stick to what makes BF3 so good.

Which is large scale maps, with vehicles.

[TheGrimBunny]

This is a tough one man. Battlefield 3 is AMAZING, much better than the last Medal of Honor but you never know with Warfighter.

[iamlegend9999]

Hell no

[Homer1421]

it will never be better if they just try to emulate COD again. It needs to be original not a shoddy rip off

[MerkinMax]

The Campaign is completely opposite of what CoD does. MoH campaign is grounded, and much more focused, not the over the top thrill ride of a CoD campaign. The multiplayer on MoH was developed by DICE, so we can disregard that as Danger Close's doing. This time Danger Close is doing it all, so I really can't wait to see how they handle multiplayer.

[leemo19]

Sp i think MOh 2010 by far beats out Bf3 and any cod since after four. I like Moh 2010 due to it brought better emotion in degree of how the soldiers over Afghanistan/Iraq deal with, Like in way you got to be in their shoes. Now could the Sp be improved of course a lot of sp games could. I'm hoping the Sp will be a lot longer, harder and brings more missions like rescuing rabbit at the end or when you fighting off the Taliban waiting on rescue squad to pick you up. Mission like that is what makes the game different than the rest.

Mp is where the game massively needs improvement. Mp felt like there was so much potential there but fell short due to dice made it little to much like their mp but had to much cod similarity in it. So giving that Danger Close is doing the full mp this time I'm hoping it different from bf3 and cod and brings certain portion of how the sp was.

[Pandamobile]

The single player will hopefully be better, but not on the multiplayer side of things, although, they might be very different and hard to compare.

[Gamer-Z]

Hard to say right now but from I've seen it looks like its just going to be another COD wannabe with BF3 graphics.

[artdafoo]

Easy, optimize FB2 engine for better visuals than BF3, remove horrible input lag, remove Frag Ammo, remove full auto shotguns and ur done

[Ninjamonkey82]

Completely different style of game :/.

[Anti-Fanboyer]

They don't have to try hard to outdo BF3's singleplayer.

[PygmelionHunter]

Battlefield 3 will cease my thirst for military shooters until next gen, those are getting old reaaaaally fast.

[r21]

SP wise, could be but MP wise who knows?