140°

Exclusive: Worlds Inc. CEO Explains Lawsuit With Activision-Blizzard

Jake Thomas of Gaming Unwrapped writes:
Activision is at war. Their properties Call of Duty and World of Warcraft are subject to litigation by Worlds Inc., a company that claims the patent for “online interactions in games” since 2001.

Having previously brought NC Soft to court in 2009 (and formed an unclassified settlement), Worlds Inc. has set its sights to one of today’s largest publishers and two of today’s largest intellectual properties. We got a chance to interview the CEO of Worlds Inc. to learn more about his motivations, plans and expectations as he takes on an industry goliath in search of justice. Here is what was said:

Read Full Story >>
gamingunwrapped.com
rdgneoz34412d ago (Edited 4412d ago )

Summary: "We like to patent random vague ideas that we've never fully developed / made use of. That way someone else may come along and do something along those lines (though doesn't have to be any where close), so that we can sue them. Since we don't actually make anything of any value..."

GillHarrison4412d ago

You nailed it perfectly. I can't believe this is even making it to court.

TekoIie4412d ago

Yeh Worlds inc keep pulling that crap. They're a bunch of self righteous dicks who believe they are entitled to every idea they claim to have thought of first...

GuruGavrill4412d ago

I conducted this interview. You have no idea how hard it was for me to stay unbiased. I think the guy is a loon.

rdgneoz34412d ago

Please tell me you hit him over the head afterwards for being an idiot...

Also, would have loved if you had him list what he's actually used his "patent" for besides suing people...

GuruGavrill4412d ago

Damn that's a good one, I wish I would've thought of it.

senorwakko4412d ago

I read an article in the Wall Street Journal recently about this very subject... Its not only in gaming, but cellphones, etc. One example is companies who are fighting over how you move your finger over the screen of your phone to "open" them.

The craziest part about some of the patent litigations is companies who own a particular patent, but have never made use of it, and only troll other companies who may or may not be infringing.

I love when Mark Zuckerberg stated about the Facebook court case, "If you were the inventors of Facebook, you would have invented Facebook."

Patent trolling is becoming ridiculous and hurts not only innovation, but also the price to consumers.

Show all comments (10)
100°

Please, can Call of Duty leave awful Netflix-style menus behind

Call of Duty games used to be streamlined experiences, but COD 2024’s UI could be another nightmarish clutter of streaming tabs.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
LucasRuinedChildhood18d ago

Let's just leave Call Of Duty behind.

anast17d ago

The isn't for you anymore.

BlackCountryBob17d ago

If we’re beating that drum, can we also stop forcing anyone who wants to play only the single player to download Warzone and all updates BEFORE they are then able to do another download from the menu of the single player campaign. I don’t see why I need 150gb of downloads in several ways to play the single player mode only from a bloomin disk which should have that campaign on it already.

DefenderOfDoom217d ago (Edited 17d ago )

The UI is confusing to me because I have not purchased a Call of Duty iin like 8 years .Only bought CoD MW3 because 3 of my friends I have known since to 70s are playing zombies . But I am used it now .

smolinsk17d ago

The UI is the least of the franchise many problems these days. But yes the UI is also terrible.

200°

Players claim Fortnite ruined Call of Duty by letting in more corporate greed

Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
GoodGuy0929d ago (Edited 29d ago )

Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.

Tacoboto28d ago

The "good ole days" are actually what drove me away from COD and Halo 3/Reach. Halo 4 becoming a COD-like drove me away from that only a week or so after it launched and I beat its campaign.

It sucked way back then, going a month or two without playing online-shooter-of-the-moment, and then needing to buy a $15 map pack to play with the majority of the population or your favorite playlist. The "community" rejecting Spartan Points in MCC killed that game's support, too. No revenue = no support, plain and simple.

Cacabunga27d ago

That headline could easily be something Spencer could have said 😅 I had to check if it was really an opinion piece

KyRo27d ago

As times gone on, the COD battle pass has got ALOT worse so they can push people to buy the more premium battle pass which itself is a huge rip off and nearly half the price of the base game.

The cosmetics can be fine but they've taken it to far to the point of no return. Why make a military themed game then have rabbits, dinosaurs, cats, rats & z list rappers as skins? You wouldn't add a Lamborghini to a fantasy RPG to replace a horse and you would never see Mario have limb dismemberment because they know what they are. COD is having identity crisis but kids and streamer but then all

franwex28d ago (Edited 28d ago )

Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?

Inverno27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Exactly! Trends don't all need to be followed. Plus where Fortnite got somewhat better with it's monetization, Acti got worse. Or at least Fortnite has lended itself more to the wacky stuff, and has put more effort and quality into that stuff.

jjb198127d ago

I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.

PRIMORDUS27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.

StoneTitan27d ago

I mean cant really blame them for supporting the game that made them the most money and the most people player...ever?

Psychonaut8527d ago

Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance.

Ra303027d ago

100% correct! The makers of Call of Duty ran out of ideas long, long ago so they take ideas from other games like Ghost Recon, Fortnite and any other FPS game hat had success hell CoD remasters maps that they've remastered several times already then charge you again for it. Call of Duty is simply a cut, copy and paste and then put the $70 price on it every year. Activision and now Microsoft has been essentially remastering Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare every year since it was released in 2007 its to the point it's worse than the sports game like the Madden, NBA and others yearly sports franchises.
@Psychonaut85 is spot on "Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance"!

Show all comments (24)
100°

Massive new COD Black Ops Gulf War leak lifts the lid on loadouts

The Black Ops Gulf War leaks continue with a list of weapon descriptions giving more info on what you can expect from new and returning weapons.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com