700°

Square Enix responds to fan's question on Final Fantasy Versus XIII

Square Enix on there twitter page gave a hint (although a vague one) on when we will hear more about Final Fantasy Versus XIII.

PshycoNinja4425d ago

I bet E3 2012. They have to give in at some point and give the fans what they want. I am glad they are acknowledging the fans that want to know more but they are still being vague with everything they say.

We NEED a release date.

We NEED to see this played on the PS3.

We NEED to see the game released sooner rather than later.

Abash4425d ago

"nope, but look for news soon (soon can mean so many things though really...)"

Wow that was about as helpful and informative as avoiding the question all together

ABizzel14425d ago

At this point it might as well be called Final Fantasy 15 and be a PS4 launch title, if it hasn't gone multiplatform by now.

jthamind4425d ago Show
Lavalamp4425d ago

@jthamind

I'm not going to report you for trolling, but I will report you for being immature. That sort of attitude only contributes and perpetuates to the negativity you so detest.

lover20124425d ago

@jthamind
"flag me for trolling, i don't care. lol. "
WOW what a daredevil
don't worry i will flag you

bakasora4424d ago

Maybe this title is in the same situation like Metal Gear Rising, I mean Revengeance.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4424d ago
KeybladeMaster4425d ago

Agreed. While Square Enix puts this game on the back burner they are effectively putting Kingdom Hearts III on the back burner too and that is something that upsets many Square Enix fans. Final Fantasy and Kingdom Hearts fans alike.

The longer we see this game in production the longer Kingdom Hearts III development gets delayed. Square needs to show that this game is real and is almost done. If they don't do it by E3 I don't see too many fans being happy with Square. They need to get on with releasing Versus XIII (maybe it might be called XV) soon.

limewax4425d ago

Actually large amounts of the mythology tie over to the Fabula Nova Crystallis. However I agree it needs to be shown and soon. My personal suspicion is that it's going to be SE's declaration to joining the next gen much sooner.

It has been said before that Versus uses parts of the Luminous engine designed for next gen. So I can see this becoming a next gen launch title. However it has been catered to the PS3 architecture heavily so it depends on the architecture of the PS4

Kenshin_BATT0USAI4425d ago

In regards to the name despite it's relation to FNC, they should change the name. Maybe just drop the 13 and call it Versus.

The Great Melon4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

The name change could happen. Final Fantasy Type-0 use to be Final Fantasy Agito XIII, so depite existing in the Fabula Nova Crystallis universe it dropped the XIII.

I don't think the name Final Fantasy Versus XIII helps it too much either. 'Versus' makes the game look like a spin-off while XIII brings back thoughts on a controversial entry in the series. As many other people agree slapping a XV on it would be preferable despite not strictly playing like a typical FF. It would by virtue of being the next numbered Final Fantasy generate more sales.

PshycoNinja4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

There's no reason for it not to be at E3. Granted if not E3 than most likely TGS but there's no reason not to show it at E3. Square has shown off gameplay for a lot of their games there and if they know whats good for them they will show Versus XIII.

catfrog4425d ago

i hope not, if theyre only just starting to show it at TGS, it almost guarantees that it wont release in NA this year. if they start showing it at E3, maybe, probably not, but maybe

sikbeta4425d ago

TGS will mean 2013 release most lickely, screw this, save it for next gen :P

iamtehpwn4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

Due to Final Fantasy XIII and XIV, and non-FF related performances on HD consoles this generation, Square Enix needs (to the point of where their life depends on it) to reaffirm the public opinion about them, and Versus XIII is a fantastic oppurtunity to do that. But there are two big things about it:

1) They will need to release a demo before release and a have a steady flow of media and trailers like they did for XIII-2, where XIII-2 was in the news cycle every day. We were always learning new information about the game. Make that happen for Versus XIII next.

2) Rename Versus XIII to Final Fantasy XV to show how ambitious the game is. Granted, the game is heavily connected to the Fabula Nova Crystallis Mythos, considering both Versus XIII and XIII-2 (type-0 as well) revolve around Etro and L'cie, I don't think many people would mind however.

And I think people will consider Square a big player again after that.

VanillaBear4425d ago

"both Versus XIII and XIII-2 (type-0 as well) revolve around Etro and L'cie, I don't think many people would mind however"

Trust me with how long it's been in production you don't know how many things have been changed

Perhaps thats the reason it's been delayed so much, they wanted to seperate it from FF13 and the Fabula Nova Crystallis mytho.....with Type-0 they left it to late when they tried to move away from the Fabula Nova Crystallis series since it was going to be out in Japan the following year.

iamtehpwn4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

@VanillaBear. Simply Put: No.

They would have to rewrite the entire story for it to not be about Etro, and Crystal mythos, and also lose many art and gameplay assets tied to it.

Type-0 did not move away from Fabula Nova Crystallis. In fact, there are quite a few L'cie in Type-0:
http://finalfantasy.wikia.c...

http://finalfantasy.wikia.c...

Also:
"According to a piece of concept art released during the end of 2008, fal'Cie are to be featured in the game. "

^ As you can see, Etro is going to be a key center piece around the story as she is the one gives Noctis and Stella their powers....Noctis and Stella may very well be L'cie of Etro or possibly Etro's "Champions" like such as Lightning and Caius who were loaned the power of Etro and ascended to a higher form of existence.

VanillaBear4425d ago

Look all I'm saying is that it's been in production for years, we really don't know what will be in the game.

With the amount of time they've spent on it they might of rewritten most of the story and changed certain elements. We just don't know

Besides I know Type-0 didn't change completely I even stated that, I just said they wanted to change it but ran out of time so they couldn't seperate it enough as they wanted, thats why it still links to the Fabula Nova Crystallis mytho.

"According to a piece of concept art released during the end of 2008, fal'Cie are to be featured in the game. "

^ As you can see, Etro is going to be a key center piece around the story as she is the one gives Noctis and Stella their powers....Noctis and Stella may very well be L'cie of Etro or possibly Etro's "Champions" like such as Lightning and Caius who were loaned the power of Etro and ascended to a higher form of existence."

As it even states......2008

FOUR years ago, I'm pretty sure thats enough time to change whatever they want.

iamtehpwn4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

Oh and when you said "Type-0" tried to move away from Fabula Nova Crystallis, have you ever played the game? There's a Fabula Nova Crystallis: Final Fantasy Logo in the game.

http://upload.wikimedia.org...

The game is even divided into Chapters like XIII and XIII-2 are, so that also a appears to be a theme/approach to FNC series.

I find it mighty fun the hatred you guys have for the Fabula Nova Crystallis Mythos and yet you still demand Type-0 and Versus XIII, two games that more directly approach the myth than XIII did. And I highly doubt they tried to move away from the myth. I mean, honestly, Versus XIII's story has been finished for quite some time now, do you really think they went back, and rewrote the story bottom up JUST so it wouldn't be a FNC title? You guys are ridiculous. You act like FNC is AIDS because it's related to FFXIII. Just because XIII didn't present the mythology in a goodlight, doesn't mean that anything that touches it is shit. And I gaurentee you, Versus XIII will STILL feature Etro and L'cie.

izumo_lee4425d ago

You are indeed correct with your assumptions about the Etro & L'cie being in FF:type-0. I have played & finished the import version of the game & i can assure you the ideals of L'cie are a big part of the game.

As for FF vs.13 in that long trailer they showed at TGS a couple years back. Noctic is clearly looking at a painting/sculpture of the Goddess that is heavily featured in FF13-2. It may be in fact a painting of Lightning as the goddess.

I think all the hate towards the FNC series is that with the release of FF13 the fans expected something more cause it was a next gen Final Fantasy game. We have had epic games like the old school games, the PS1 & PS2 games & with new hardware the expectations were too great for FF 13 to deliver on.

I find it funny i got disagrees in the post below this that all i want is for FF vs.13 to be finished & released before porting it to another system. FF 13 we all know & read Squarenix handled that poorly. If they decide to stop mid development AGAIN to make it multiplat we WILL see a repeat of FF 13 all over again.

iamtehpwn4425d ago

To the anyone who believes Versus XIII has moved away from Fabula Nova Crystallis:

The trailer from just last year, Over a year after XIII's Japanese release:

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

1:26. You clearly see the words: 女神エトロ, which is Megami Etoro or in English "Goddess Etro" as they talk over the painting of Etro.

torchic4425d ago

Versus XIII and XIII are still very much inter-linked.

Crystals, l'Cie, fal'Cie, Etro. all those will be in Versus.

Versus even has the same Behemoth/Behemoth King used in XIII/XIII-2.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4425d ago
DA_SHREDDER4425d ago

I bet E3 2012 noone is gonna care about this game, even an old school jrpg fan like me could care less. Squeenix hasn't made a good game, excuse me, square hasn't made a good FF since FFX. I highly doubt they could make a decent rpg if their lives depended on it.

TimeSkipLuffy4425d ago

and end up with the likes of Final Fantasy XIII. While it was not bad, I even enjoyed it, but it still lacks a lot and should have stayed exclusive for the PS3. I want this to do better and to make fans jump out of joy once it is released (exclusively) for PS3 ^^.

LUCKYXS7LEVEN4425d ago

they are just waiting to say coming to xbox 360, to get the same hype they got with 13. at that point the game dies for me

FACTUAL evidence4425d ago

I just want to see a traditional FF game...just make ff15 please before I fucking die and miss out on it..

Megaman_nerd4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

FF has never been traditional to begin with all of them pretty different from each other. That's why we have people that only like the Snes ones, the PS ones or the newer ones when they started with the corny stuff at FFX.

VanillaBear4425d ago

I want a name change

I really don't want this related to FF13, I know both seem like they move away from a traidtional FF game but if anything FF13 was more of a spin off then FF13 Versus. I would pick Versus gameplay over FF13s

Name it FF15 I say

torchic4425d ago

why are you so caught up with the title?

and how is Final Fantasy XIII more of a spin-off when it's the game that has ATB, and not Versus? in fact, how can you even make such an assumption without ever playing Versus?

do you even know what you're talking about?

DigitalRaptor4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

You need to come to terms with the fact that they're not changing the name to a main entry.. first of all.

And according to Nomura, Versus XIII is meant to be a new type of FF game/experience, something players haven't seen before in the franchise. The battle system, the way they're approaching interactivity (event scenes) and bringing back the classic elements such as world map and airships is proof. It kinda is a spin off, but then again it kinda isn't, since it's tied to the Fabula Nova Crystallis mythology and was conceptualized at the same time as XIII if I'm not mistaken.

It's not clear cut and that's what I like about it. Unpredictability is what I want from it and that is what Nomura & team are going to deliver in spades. The scope of the game deserves a main entry position, but it's not happening.

mep694425d ago

We also NEED a Japanese VA option with quallity subs.
Didn't buy their last one because of this, they didn't even make an international edition on PS3 :(

mobhit4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

jthamind: ...Fans wanted this game to come out. When did any PS3 fan act like this was a shining beacon? Good job being a fanboy.

Anyway, Square hurry up with some news already!

zeddy4425d ago

soon? i hope they mean e3 soon. this has gone on long enough.

Blacksand14425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

I'll give you one 2013 on PS4. Sony going to push this on that's why it haven't came out yet.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4424d ago
Megaton4425d ago

E3, Microsoft's presser, shoulder tap betrayal, flood of internet tears.

Believe it.

jetlian4425d ago

if its not that its been canceled. I cant see a game taking this long only being on one system

TheUnbiasedLion4425d ago

Last gaurdian says hi to your comment.

jetlian4424d ago

yea TLG and they havent shown much gameplay and SQ is MP now. not saying it cant happen just unlikely

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4424d ago
OmniSlashPT4425d ago

It's funny because your avatar is Cmd Shepard lmao oh the irony

LX-General-Kaos4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

I believe the speed bump slowing down the production of FF13V is a multiplat announcement. This game has a chance to show up on the PS3, 360, and Nintendo Wii U entertainment console. Square would maximize profit with a multiplat release, and a possible name change to FF15. Which would be ideal.

An announcement that epic would do wonders for square, and Final Fantasy fans come this E3 2012. Everyone would have a fair chance to experience greatness. It would come to no surprise that if all square console jrpg games were multi from now on.

Rated E For Everyone

Shikoro4425d ago

Dude, stop with your PR like comments. It's really getting annoying...

KingOptimus1014425d ago

You are such a fanboy, your always on the sales articles talking about how good the 3DS is doing, most of your comments are negative towards ps3 and ps vita, and now you talking about sony losing an exclusive just stop it already.

J86blum4425d ago Show
Outside_ofthe_Box4425d ago (Edited 4425d ago )

No it wouldn't be epic. It'd be epic if you didn't own a PS3, but overall it would just mean content would get cut.

They would no longer be trying to the best that they can with Versus 13 if it went multiplat because they would now be making sure that all console versions are on par with each other and making sure that the Wii U version isn't a gimmick instead of focusing on making a great game.

stonecold34425d ago

final fnatasy vs 13 is for the ps3 excluisve there no 360 or wii u version planned you might want to buy a ps3 if you want final fanatsy vs 13.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4425d ago
dorron4425d ago

It was announced before PS3 was launched. Will this game be released before this gen is over? O_o

TeaDouble_E4425d ago

I don't understand why SquareEnix hasn't released this title. Are they not interested in money?

DoctorXpro4425d ago

And they point the finger at Alan Wake development....

yeah right

Godmars2904425d ago

Sad thing is no matter what they announce I'm not going to be too excited about it.

They'd have to have a demo ready to go out as they announce it.

Megaton4425d ago

I gave up on this game years ago. SE hasn't produced anything of value this generation, why would they start now?

WitWolfy4425d ago

True true... At least they published AA.

Canary4425d ago

And a release date 2 months off.

Generally speaking, games stuck in development limbo for as long as Versus... do not turn out well.

PshycoNinja4425d ago

As I recall, Normura said in an interview that the next time people see the game, it will be running on the ps3, it will have a demo and a trailer.

RedDead4425d ago

I know you guy's all say that now, but all it will take is one good trailer, or one good gameplay vid etc and you'll be back on the hype train. That's just the way it works. If the game looks good you'll be interested again. If the game actually turns out good are you saying you won't buy it because it's been in Dev too long?

Also, Pshyco is right, Nomura said that, it's likely either E3 or TGS. Personally i'm betting E3, a release date...and TGS the 'release' conference where it'll get a crap load of hype

Godmars2904425d ago

No. *I* will at least be interested in the game again *if* I get my hands on a demo. Even then I'll be waiting for a review I can trust before I buy it, and there are few of those.

Think I've given up on this console gen in general. Its had a few honestly good games, still has few coming, but I'm just done with the over hype machine and blind fan loyalty which has pointlessly put gamers at each others throats just because they own one system.

terrorofdeath4425d ago

And people complain when a game is released too soon cause of bugs and patches.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4425d ago
Show all comments (112)
350°

Square Enix Preparing for Layoffs in U.S. and Europe Amid Heavy Restructuring

In a town hall that took place on Monday, Square Enix president Takashi Kiryu reportedly confirmed imminent layoffs in the U.S. and Europe.

2d ago
lelo2play2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Square should ask Sony for more money...

Outside_ofthe_Box1d 21h ago

Square should ask Microsoft to buy them out...

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 19h ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box,
So that Microsoft can close down the studio after doing nothing with them? Right...

Outside_ofthe_Box1d 5h ago

@FinalFantasyFanatic

That's exactly my point...

gleepot2d ago

Sad but true. It's the consequence of a shift in player habits, massive overhead, and out of control budgets across the industry.

blackblades2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

What did NA and EU did anyways? Just translate or something? I would say it might help them get back to there roots but DK.

Hofstaderman2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Actually, you are correct they play a hand in localization especially in Europe with the many languages. That and marketing.

nommers1d 4h ago

Marketing for SE has been poor lately so these layoffs make sense if true.

Profchaos1d 17h ago

Yup videogame crash 2024 edition

_Decadent_Descent1d 6h ago

Hope so. Industry needs a good crash to shake it up again.

Show all comments (64)
460°

Square Is Shifting Strategy To Aggressively Pursue Multiplat Releases,Focus On Quality Over Quantity

Square Enix is shifting its strategy to aggressively pursue multiplatform releases and focus on quality over quantity.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
CantThinkOfAUsername2d ago

Yup, it's official. FFXVI and FFVII Rebirth didn't sell as much as they expected.

gold_drake2d ago

read the report, where exactly does it say what u just said ? lol

TheEroica1d 21h ago

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt for some gamers.... 🤣

Barlos2d ago

It's your interpretation. That doesn't make it 'official'.

CantThinkOfAUsername2d ago

- 1% increase in net sales compared to a year with Forspoken and Octopath Traveller II, which didn't sell more than 3 millions combined (and I'm being generous).

- A 38.3% decrease in operating income despite the release of 'High-Definition' titles namely FFXVI, FF Pixels Remaster, Dragon Quest Monsters, and FFVII Rebirth.

- Aggressive multiplatform strategy one year after saying that exclusivity with PlayStation was mutually desired.

Sure, it's all in my head.

Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Probably for PC and the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2. Square Enix games doesn't sell to well on Xbox

Extermin8or3_2d ago

Nothing sells well on Xbox that's precisely Microsoft's problem

The3faces2d ago

Apparently they don't sell well on PlayStation either.

Lightning772d ago

Square named Drops Xbox as part of their multiplatform approach in their quarterly reports.

Like it matters MS will probably find away to close them down to.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 19h ago

I can see them going for PS5/Switch/PC for the most part, it'll mostly likely be the Switch 2 by the time their next game enters development, which is probably a good thing since the Switch is struggling with 3rd party games. If they're hurting for money/sales, I don't see them bothering with Xbox, that's just wasted time/money for them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 19h ago
DarXyde2d ago

I mean, maybe? They'll want as much as possible and I figure they could have been hoping for greater impact on PlayStation, but that's good reason to reflect and realize the resources and development cycle of these games aren't very sustainable. The solution is to make more affordable games with shorter dev cycles, then once in a while bring out the big guns.

I think Final Fantasy VII Re make and Rebirth would do really well if it was multiplatform. Specifically, if Nintendo gets their hardware up to snuff, and the rumors are promising. I don't really have much faith in its performance on Xbox, but Nintendo gamers really commit to buying their games. At one point, Breath of the Wild for Switch outsold the Switch itself.

Granted, Zelda always solos everything except GTA, but Nintendo folk are avid Final Fantasy fans. I think it would do exceptionally. Nintendo just needs to make porting easy and inexpensive and they'll get more games.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 19h ago

I don't think the exclusivity hurts them as badly as they think, I think it's a range of factors, like the quality of the games, high sales expectations, ESG/DEI, censorship, development costs/time... I also suspect that Square-Enix is extremely inefficient with their resources, they struggled/avoided towns in the FF13 trilogy, and FF14 was mostly wilderness with little to do apart from derp about in the wild (they also avoid towns and making a lot of characters there too). But FF14 also went through development hell, I think Square-Enix just needs to overall how they do everything, because the way they manage that studio just isn't working.

Christopher2d ago

The two most profitable games for them didn't sell as much as expected. Yes. Make it make sense.

MrCrimson2d ago

I interpret it as - they want to be multiplatform, as they will sell more copies.

EternalTitan2d ago

16 isnt even a JRPG let alone a final fantasy game.
So glad that it bombed.

itsmebryan1d 21h ago

Square finally realized what Sony figured out recently, their installed base is not enough. We are going to see a lot less exclusives from everyone moving forward.

MajorLazer1d 15h ago

PS5 is nearly at 60 million only half-way through its life-cycle, but sure, the install base is not enough.

EternalTitan16h ago(Edited 16h ago)

Good exclusives always sell despite install base. Look at Nintendo's recent Zelda.
Its just 16 was awful.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 16h ago
CrashMania2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Hopefully the next Nintendo system isn't a potato and it can contribute to FF sales in future as well, in addition to PC releases. If this ensures the long term health for SE and franchises than like FF and KH then I'm all for it.

NotoriousWhiz2d ago

Adding Nintendo and PC customers is the best way to increase sales and long term success. Not going to get that from Xbox.

shinoff21832d ago

Hopefully square brings all the lose switch exclusives over to.

Hofstaderman2d ago

Will there be a XBOX for Square to release games on? Or a MS Games service?

thesoftware7302d ago

Hof,

You must not have heard they are launching new hardware and have already committed to a Next-Gen Xbox.

But, for some reason, I think you already knew that and wanted to spin a silly narrative; besides, why wouldn't they release games on the SX/SS? You do know these consoles will still be here, right?

Hofstaderman2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Optics. They have a STATED plan to do so. Thats not commitment. The shareholders and board are calling the shots now. Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already. Investment in hardware, R and D and marketing is how much again? That cost with the history of their hardware performance....at most maybe a handheld. What I am certain of XBOX is finished, the writing has been on the wall before the studio closures. Its MS Games and they are not hardware. They are software because MS is a software company. Expect them to be folded in the Surface team.

DarXyde2d ago

*hardware

I believe they committed to hardware.

I hate to nitpick, but that's kind of the company they are. You have to.

2d ago
Michiel19892d ago

@hofstaderman the board and shareholders have always called the shots or had a huge impact on decisions.

Xbox finished lmao, the writing has been on the wall? mate they just spend 70 BILLION dollars, and you see the writing is on the wall that they're done. 0 idea what you're talking about. They grafiti'd on the wall and you still can't see it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Aloymetal2d ago

No to both, not worth the effort, money and time on an already dying brand.

2d ago
thesoftware7302d ago

"They have a STATED plan to do so. That's not commitment."

Huh? What are you talking about? They announced they would be unveiling new Hardware this holiday season; how else are they supposed to commit to it?

" Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already"

What a silly statement, you think this deal was approved so they could make 80 billion in less than a year? This is a long-term commitment, a future-proofing of profit.

"What I am certain of XBOX is finished,"

No, you are not certain of this lol; as you stated, if they make even a Handheld in the form of a Steam-Deck that can dock to a TV/monitor, wouldn't that be just changing the form factor but still XBOX?

Closing these studios has really got you guys delusional; that is what happens in companies, in a changing market: you acquire, and you trim; like it or not, that is the way things are done. Lets look.

Where is the new Psygnosis with a new wipeout?
What happened to Japan Studio? Pixl Opus? London Studio?
Where is Zipper Interactive?

I can list more, but you see, closing devs doesn't mean your company is finished, especially when you have like 30+ dev teams.

Extermin8or3_2d ago

They won't be unveiling the hardware this holiday season it will be like the series x and s they got a tease at the game awards 2018. But no details until year of their release in 2020 lol

Relientk772d ago

Please tell me the Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake is still coming. I feel like I've been waiting forever for that game.

gold_drake2d ago

i think the juggernauts kingdom hearts (disney provides the money for that one) final fantasy and dragon quest are fine, the rest not as much

Michiel19892d ago

I'm kinda worried about the future of DQ though, Toriyama and the composer both passed away. Huge blow to the franchise.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 19h ago

@Michiel1989,
Akira Toriyama had an understudy though, he emulates his style, so maybe he'll do the art for Dragon Quest games, I would love to see Nobue Uematsu do music for the series though, that could be fun if they could convince him.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 19h ago

I'll be so p*ssed if that doesn't go ahead, also, where's DQ12 at? They've been silent on that for so long, and it was announced years ago.

@gold_Drake,
I'm pretty sure they can siphon some profit from A Realm Reborn to keep FF and Dragon Quest going too. I think the company would have gone bankrupt if it wasn't for that cash cow.

gold_drake1d 15h ago

14 is definitely brings in the a consistant cashflow

Charal2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Another sign that dedicated consoles market is in trouble, while PC seems more and more attractive to big publishers.

Having a good gaming PC and a PS5 myself, given current trend form both Sony and MS I am less and less playing on PS5, waiting for exclusives to release on PC, so I understand the logic behind the new strategy.

anast2d ago

Post those numbers. Then your comment might make sense.

thesoftware7302d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Ants,

I get that we don't know exactly without numbers, but come on, man, we can clearly see what's happening.

The console market has not grown much, the highest-selling console in history is still the PS2. You can play the " prove it" game all you want, but Sony's more aggressive PC push, SE completely rebooting their company/business, after being mainly exclusive to one console and showing a sizeable profit loss is telling.

PC is a high seller, and your doubtful PS5 dominant stance does not change the clear writing on the wall, straight from Sony's mouth, that they need to be, and will be more aggressive in the very lucrative PC market.

So, in other words, PC market is indeed looking more and more attractive to Pubs.

anast2d ago

@730

Numbers?

I'm willing to bet the farm that ¨PC gamers are not the dominate number compared to console, but I don't know because I don't have numbers. However, the price point of entry can allow us to infer what I had just stated.

anast2d ago

I don't click on links on forums. Tell me why that .com source is legit.

Tacoboto2d ago

What an ironic thing to say on a link-agreggate site like N4G. Explains your comment history perfectly.

Michiel19892d ago

asks for numbers. receives numbers and then continues to say I don't wanna click a website (because it might shatter my illusion)

anast1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

@All the people with that good 'ol folk wisdom

It's ironic how I clearly asked for the site and people still can't even answer this simple question.

Tell me how many people click on random links on forums?

Tell me the site and I will look. I don't mind being wrong and I'm barely intelligent enough to change my mind with something substantial.

All the numbers I have seen is that PC doesn't even come close console gaming in revenue, and nothing touches mobile gaming. More people touching something doesn't mean anything. It just means more people own PC for work and touch Steam every now and again, those numbers mean even less.

Charal1d 15h ago

Anast I wasn’t expecting more from you and I haven’t be disappointed.

Don’t believe any number if you want, but things cannot be more evident that most of games companies are pushing to get the most they can from PC market.

Hell, we have both MS and Sony that are releasing their biggest franchise on PC with no or less and less delay vs console release, that is never seen before in the industry.

What is surprising me is that PC is not cheap in term of hardware cost, a rig close to PS5/XBX perfs may be close to double the price I guess, and close to 4x for a good gaming PC.
Plus, PC gaming does not have physical release anymore.

So a lot of supposed advantages from console market are not there but PC market is successful anyway, it would be very interesting to understand it.
Maybe one big argument is that we are more likely to need a PC at home, were we can work with, browse, and game, than a dedicated gaming machine. That why handled console market have been crushed by smartphones, we could see a repeating pattern here.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 15h ago
Babadook71d 22h ago

From what I can ascertain PC is a smaller market than PS. There are occasionally times when PC looks to be stronger but overall it's still behind.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 19h ago

PC also has a lot more competition, especially when people can easily buy and play older games from 20 or so years ago on it.

anast1d 10h ago

You probably need to worry about yourself and your own expectations.

You still haven't even complete the simplest task in telling me the name of the website. Let that sink in. I asked for the name of the website so I can look at it and you couldn't even complete that task.

Show all comments (109)
370°

Square Enix Declares $140m Loss Amid Game Pipeline Shakeup

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth publisher Square Enix has declared a $140m loss based on a shakeup of its internal development pipeline.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Furesis15d ago

What are they doing over there? Sounds like they canceled something big. I read a rumor a while back about ff9 remake . Here "Final Fantasy IX has gone through a very challenging development, the game is still in progress but may undergo changes drastic enough that we won't hear about it for a couple of years."
This could be one of the reasons if the rumor is true. That was Silknight i don't know how credible he is but it's something and it would make sense.

-Foxtrot15d ago

I hope IX is still on the cards

Just a straight up remake which they expand a little bit nothing over ambitious

If IX dosent happen then VI and VIII will never be thought of.

Kakashi Hatake14d ago

6 and 8 were way more p popular games despite today's cult following of 9.

blackbeld14d ago

I want my FF8 remake! Can't believe they cancelled it.

TiredGamer15d ago

What are they doing? Sales are falling and the costs are out of control. Big releases need to be absolute sales home runs now, and Final Fantasy sales have stagnated.

Now we know why Square didn’t fall over themselves to remake the original FF7 all these years ago. It certainly wasn’t a license to print money, at least not with what the expectations were. Each of these full on remakes drains an enormous amount of company resources for a razor thin profit margin.

TwoPicklesGood15d ago

Breaking the game up into multiple parts was a mistake IMO.

blackblades15d ago

The loses came from cancelling games nothing else.

Tapani14d ago

They lost the magic in the remakes. And the story is incomplete. The original FF7 is still way better. The Remake / Rebirth are just fan service. Like an Anime/Manga with "optional" filler content. FF7 had pretty much zero filler, it was paced extremely well, and still today flows much better than the grindy story and spongey enemy battles in the remakes.

babadivad14d ago

If they released it at once on all platforms, they would have made all of their money back. Could have been on to an FF8 or 9 remake. Ready to cash in again on nostalgia like Capcom. This is their fault for trying to milk the title.

Once I head they were breaking it up into parts, I lost all interest.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 14d ago
neutralgamer199214d ago

I hope people understand usually when a loss is declared it means a game which had been in development got cancelled. For example Sony Santa Monica before GOW-PS4 had cancelled a project which Sony had spent 7 figures on

As far as square is concerned they release a bad game once a year. Forspoken anyone?

For those making comments on remake not selling well, I hope y’all realize that Sony is the only reason this remake is happening. If Sony didn’t fund it the remake wouldn’t be happening. Just like Konami didn’t want to remake SH2 because development costs of 100 plus million

shadowT15d ago

Do not miss Final Fantasy 16. Great game!

raWfodog15d ago

I'm waiting for them to release the complete edition bundle, but it's definitely on my list.

PhillyDonJawn15d ago

Wth is going on with the gaming industry?

mandf15d ago

Corporate investors taking everything

TiredGamer15d ago

Not rocket science. Compare sales numbers, development cycles, and budgets to the previous gens. We are all collectively burning up the industry from the inside out. Expectations are ludicrously high now for every release and sales are dropping for even the most prestigious of series.

We used to be satisfied paying $50-60 for a game that took 1/100th the budget and staff to make. Now gamers feel cheated if they have to pay the same for a game that took 100x the budget. We may be reaching the end of the line for this model of gaming.

wiz719115d ago

@tiredgamer I think your point is one that ppl don’t understand and you hit it on the nose .. some gamers don’t want to take accountability but it’s some of the gamers fault the industry is where it’s at .. we as gamers set the standards for the industry not the shareholders , ppl forget that the shareholders and the industry want and need OUR Money. Both the Xbox and PlayStation are seeing a drop in hardware , the industry is very stagnant right now.

Tacoboto15d ago

Speaking to Square:

Turns out their mismanagement wasn't related to the western studios they dumped to Embracer, but their own fault.

With regards to Xbox - a good way to kill your brand is to pull support on high quality titles and only dump B and C-tier titles to it

With regards to PC - Epic Games Story exclusivity for any duration and piss-poor optimization will hurt you.

With regards to FF Pixel Remasters - y'all messed up by barely releasing them on physical, like wtf that was free money!

And lastly, you don't help a franchise by releasing a mainline title that undermines every title that came before it. FFXVI was a DMC-like with bottom-of-the-barrel side quests and I can't imagine that helping Rebirth at all considering its marketing is directly tied to how big that game is.

Tacoboto15d ago

Sony is getting their best titles and with the most polish, so what about it? Nintendo gets their top properties too, for titles that can run on Switch hardware.

It's the other fanbases that get the second- and third-class treatment from Square. If that's due to agreements with Sony, that's not a Sony issue but a Square one for accepting those terms. Sony is doing its best to look out for Sony.

wesnytsfs14d ago

sales and stupid practices like exclusives.

TiredGamer15d ago

The industry implosion is continuing. Sky high budgets, prolonged development windows, stagnant sales numbers, and falling currency values (inflation) are wreaking havoc on the legacy industry. AAA games will slowly become the rarity.

CS715d ago

Sad. Rebirth was one of my favorite games in a long time. Should have sold more.

CrimsonWing6915d ago

Oh I’m with you. What’s worse is they can say, “Well we tried to make this amazing game and spend all this money on, but not enough people showed an interest. So no more of these since we can’t take a hit like that.”

The industry is going to take a dramatic shift. Mark my words on this.

rpvenom15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

I think there is quite a large portion of individuals like myself who held out on buying it on PS5 because I can get it on PC eventually. To be able to mod the game and also have custom graphical settings to my liking

gold_drake14d ago

same

but im not sure if it matters at all. im sure they made sony pay a hefty sum for the 3parter to come on ps5 exclusively. so watever they made in sales, might have come bk in profits for square, but i dont know
and we dont know what "underperformed" even means for square.

Show all comments (43)