The question is asked, should single player and multiplayer games be split in two and sold as separate units?
Captain Price's fate at the end of 2011's Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 could've been very different, as this new post-credits scene reveals.
The developers have provided a little band-aid while PlayStation players attempt to get back into MW3.
Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.
Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash
Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.
They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.
I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.
Interesting...I'm sort of split on the idea. On one hand I love having more for my money by publishers including both components into the package (as long as it doesn't suck) and on the other I feel like each would get more attention during development if they were different entities.
For now I like it the way it is since I really don't want to pay over $60 USD for a new game.
I can see a future where a game can be purely multiplayer on console. Take Counter Strike for example, I could certainly see the likes of Call of Duty or Halo being sold in multiplayer form only via. digital distribution. Such a game over time would then just see mandatory updates and a slew of map packs to rake in the cash.
I swear I wrote the very same thing on a comment a couple weeks ago. They should. Sell each for $30 separate at launch. I don't see anything wrong with it. The FPS market gets their money cause they'll sell MORE copies since it's cheaper, and those that want the single player only can pay for it separately or get another game altogether.
They definately should. I have played over 800 hours of bad company 2 online, I dont even have any idea what the single player looks like. BF3 I am on 200 hours again havent even placed the single player disk in my xbox. that
I know im the minority here but....i have played each & every new COD with my gamefly subscription i play the campaign then send it back to gamefly. I have ZERO interest in multiplayer whatsoever. I like the stories & once there done im done with the game.