During DICE 2012 in Las Vegas last week, Activision Publishing CEO Eric Hirshberg gave a speech about the importance of letting the creative minds lead a video game company's business decisions, and not the other way around.
Activision Blizzard ordered to pay $23.4M for patent infringement involving popular games.
I would read the article but the giant pop-ups from the top and bottom of the screen made me close it.
Without reading $23.4 million isn't a deterrent for a company that size.
Boss: Let's fire a few people to recoup on that loss.
Slave: Cortana has decided to get rid of Arkane Austin and Tango Gameworks.
Boss: Let's get those Firing Letters "Copilot Approved" and send them through the power of the cloud.
Slave: Long Live Phil !!!
ALL in the room: LONG LIVE PHIL !!!!
Well another troll company with a patent trying to extort money out of companies. Seems like they’re going to try and sue everyone.
The legal battle for the acquisition of Activision Blizzard continues, with Microsoft countering one of the FTC's latest moves and the Judge delaying a relevant ruling.
Look, to be honest the FTC should just stop.
MS has A/B and nothing has really changed yet...if you are worried about 5-10 years from now...just drop it cause the future is unpredictable.
Take this week's news, that 4 Xbox exclusive are going Multiplatform.
The FTC and the lawyers behind the "Gamers' lawsuit" against Microsoft over the acquisition of Activision Blizzard are denouncing the recent layoffs within the respective legal battles.
I bet Activision is glad they merged with Blizzard when they did. Most of the stuff Activision pumps out is pretty terrible. Their one saving grace is Call of Duty.
Really? Please tell me what innovative thing Activision has done lately? Guitar Hero has been shelved for lack of innovation. COD would be shelved by now if not for its rabid fan base.
Saying Activision doesn't innovate is a completely lie.
The correct term would be to say they don't innovate enough with all those billions they get from COD.
Now we're getting into semantics. What they mean by "innovate" and what we mean may be very different things.
Played MW3 a couple of days ago. Was dumbfounded by how shitty it looks. It looked as bad as Counterstrike 1.6.
The fact is that the gameplay hasn't changed, and neither have the graphics. So you're not getting anything new with Modern Warfare 3.
And no, it is not a fallacy to claim that Activision doesn't innovate. A fallacy is a break in logical reasoning. Saying that Activision doesn't innovate is merely a claim.