180°

A PlayStation 4 and Xbox 720 Are Not A Necessity

From Toasty Controller...

"The original announcement of the PS3 was partnered up with a public statement by Sony regarding the shelf life of the PS3. They called it the "ten year plan", which obviously means they have full intention on supporting the PS3 for the next decade. At first thought, this wasn't taken with a grain of salt; if you're like me, you thought that would mean another ten years before the next Sony console. Once everyone calmed down after the original unveiling, it was understood that we're already in the middle of that same ten year plan with the PS2, which was actually outselling the PS3 six months after the initial launch. You could likely attribute that to the outrageous price of the PS3 at launch, which happened to correlate with the price drop of the PS2 around the same time."

Read Full Story >>
toastycontroller.com
pucpop4502d ago

it goes a little something like this: release new consoles already!! i enjoy the buzz of new tech

EVILDEAD3604502d ago

We saw this story early last year and most believed the same.

But, I was the one saying what would transpire and it has.

People can pretend all day that new consoles arent needed today, but come next year they will screaming for them.

The author of this article is even saying that in two years they will be a neccessity. Well guess what it is only January of 2012.

Doesnt this guy realize that by Fall/Holiday of 2013 when the 360 makes it into stores that it will be literally 2-3 months shy of two years.

Announcement in June for 720..release 2013..

I hear all of this noise about one dropping out, but Sony won't be too far behind the 360.

Evil

pc_masterrace4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

It has everything to do with high-rez textures/1080p 60fps; give me that sony and I won't bother you for another 10 years.

tigertron4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

"A Playstation 4 and Xbox 720 are not a necessity" speak for yourself. Different people want different things. I want next-gen in 2013. I personally believe that current gen consoles are beginning to show their age i.e. majority of games stuck at 720p 30fps etc.

However, this article does make a good point i.e. HD, HDDs, system updates; they hve definately added a few more years to this gen.

Even though this gen feels quite young, it is actually quite old. At the end of this year the 360 will be 7 years old - in 2013 I personally think it would be the best time for next-gen to start; but there are those who are quite fine with current gen consoles for the next few years - and I respect that; but me - I want the next gen to start next year at least.

yabhero4502d ago

But next gen has already confirmed to start late 2012 with 1080 at 60 fps. I don't get the Nintendo hate... NEXT GEN COMES LATE 2012...

dark-hollow4502d ago

this gen is on it final stages.
New ips are trilogies now! (Mass effect, uncharted, gears of war, resistance etc.)

morkendo234502d ago

this gen is on it final stages.
New ips are trilogies now! (Mass effect, uncharted, gears of war, resistance,killzone,gow,biosho ck,skyrim,arkham city etc.)

YEAH, BUT HOW LONG MUST we play those type games over an over an over an over again??? ps3 been out since??? 2006 same freakin games. im dead bored of those type games now.

ilovemyps34502d ago

Developers have little power to make better games: is it possible to make a better uncharted,or forza,or gears,or grand turismo? I don't think so.

At the same time, if we could have 200 new games, until 2013-2014, of the same quality as an uncharted game, or god of war 3, or gears, it would be great, no need to update hardware.

When we think about our 3.2 GHz CPU on our consoles, and they're almost 7 yo, its incredible how time flies. Man, we are 6 years older then the time we bought our new console.

But hardware needs to evolve, we get new generations of tv's every year, the same for AV amplifiers, beamers,etc. 10 years, its quite a long time,in electronics world.

In 2 years, we will be able to buy an ultra slim ps3, for 99, fanless, and play a god of war 4, uncharted 3, killzone 3, motorstorm apocalypse, on our 75" 3d LCD.coool :)

Objective4502d ago

I'm a huge fan of Gears, and frankly I'd like to see a leap in graphics capability and processing engine in the next Gears. Another instalment of Gears or Uncharted at this stagnating level of technology would be sad.

matey4502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

WiiU= Watson technology/Custom gpu using the very best most current tech/cpu with 1gig EDRAM unheard of in PC or console basically IBM Watson technology this Console WiiU can get alot more powerful over time you wont get any better graphics than what you will get with WiiU off ps4 even if it landed in 3 years.

Reggie said Graphics on Garden/Zelda demos were 10% of WiiU power and them tech demo's were already twice the best we see on ps3 resolution/graphics/framerate you name it.

yabhero4502d ago

I agree with you just need to update your specs...
the are using a 4-6-8 core Power7 IBM has confirmed it and you can say they'll use a lower because that's the lowest that series goes... 4 cores. The GPU is likely a Radeon 5000 series the eDRAM is expected to be high but not as high as your talking about because is would be huge with 1 GB eDRAM... there I going to be 1-2GB or GDDR5 Ram which is very fast...
the Zelda demos did not use WiiUs full power... it used about half and the unfinished demo kits were still 50 more powerful than PS3.

ilovemyps34502d ago (Edited 4502d ago )

Thankfully the game looks 2 times better than a ps3 game.ps3 tech were drawn maybe 2- 3 years before its release, which means ps3 hardware is based on stuff 6-7 years old.
If you take today hardware, maybe a cheap CPU and a graphic card, with some value ram,well optimized, maybe we could output the same,or close quality of an average ps3 game.
So, its just normal Wii u beats x360 and ps3.perfectly normal, no surprise. But its a good thing, Nintendo always use old and cheap hardware, so they can sell consoles doing profits,day one. I wouldnt have been surprised if Wii u was actually using 1 gb ram, a 20$ graphic chip, and a Celeron 2ghz,as CPU.

Using special CPUs and chips can only be a good thing for us: since Nintendo won't earn a lot of money with Wii u, this one being more expensive to produce, for attracting more people, they will rely less on hardware,like they did with the first Wii, and will rely more on the software side. THIS means we should have less shovelware, since Nintendo would have to produce big quality titles, so people buy their (more expensive ) console, and more games.

This will translate in more games for us, on pair with ps3 and Xbox quality standards.

So, if even Nintendo is betting on good and powerful hardware, its now even more difficult to imagine which monsters(CPU and gpu) Sony and Microsoft will be using.

Full stereo 3d and 4k displays are making their debuts now, but 2015-2016, 4k should be, perhaps,not the actual standard, but at least, used everywhere,and cheap, next gen consoles will last until 2020, if they show up in 2013.this means that all those techs, like USB 3, 4k display,etc, should be implemented NOW.

My curiosity about ps3/x720 final specs are killing me :)

Show all comments (19)
330°

Microsoft's quest for short-term $$$ is doing long-term damage to Windows, Surface, Xbox, and beyond

Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's plans to increase every department's margins.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Brazz11h ago

"The plan to move Xbox games to other platforms is codenamed "Latitude" internally, and I know there's debate and unease at Microsoft about whether or not this is a good idea. More upcoming Microsoft-owned games slated for PlayStation are already being developed. At least for now, they're potentially obvious games you'd most likely expect. And yes, while it's true Microsoft is a prolific publisher on PlayStation already, it has typically revolved around specific franchises like Minecraft. From what I've heard, Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's mandate to increase every department's margins. "

Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware.

Xeofate9h ago

"Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware."

It's for the best.

Quit stringing along xbox fans and screwing over PlayStation owners.

crazyCoconuts4h ago

Take good care of those Xboxes if you have 'em ...

outsider16244h ago

An Xbox game on a Playstation. Never in my years of gaming did i ever thought this was gonna happen.

jznrpg25m ago

It is dying anyway so doesn’t make much of a difference

VersusDMC9m ago

No way can they get rid of the hardware as probably 90% of game pass subscribers are hardware users.

Highly doubtful those users will move to PC or Cloud to subscribe there and the competition (Sony and Nin) will never have gamepass on their system.

If they want to keep the current subscribers, they need to keep releasing new hardware.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 9m ago
gold_drake11h ago

i think it will kill off the xbox brand. windows will be fine.

but there is and would be a chance that xbox might be killed off in the future. if they fail to make the money they put in. imo.

S2Killinit8h ago

They wont kill it, but they will go fully PC while keeping xbox as a brand, and go multiplatform for the most part. They will also work tirelessly to diminish console gaming’s importance.

PRIMORDUS5h ago

It would be best if Xbox goes the way of Sega, just make and publish games. I know I myself will not support them at all with buying games from them, you all can. 🙃

ChasterMies3h ago

The Xbox brand will live for the games. I don’t expect Microsoft to entirely drop out of gaming hardware. They make Surface tablets and laptops. They’ll make Xbox branded hardware for those that want it.

shadowT10h ago

"Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation"

Forza and Starfield next?

Skuletor9h ago

Starfield would be no surprise and there's the rumor that it will come to Playstation after the Shattered Space DLC, Forza (along with Halo and Gears of War) I find less likely but I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually end up on PlayStation too, especially if Xbox give up on hardware and go the Sega route.

shinoff21839h ago

Not to worried about forza. I'd rather see others like what inxile and obsidian are working on. Starfield sounds like it needs more time in the oven so let it cook first imo. If starfield and it's a small if does release on ps it'll be in the fall around the time for dlc or right at the dlc and come packaged with it.

-Foxtrot9h ago

In the words of Phil Spencer when he was talking about Nintendo last year

“It's just taking a long time for Microsoft to see that their future exists off of their own hardware"

S2Killinit8h ago

Yup. MS are a cancer to console gaming.

Aloymetal8h ago

100%!!
I wonder what happened to that dude that was always here posting those court articles with cartoons about MS spending all those billions in studios. He suddenly disappeared, I guess he doesn't like bad news when the green brand is in trouble. No new articles from him as of late...

PRIMORDUS5h ago

Yup, and it's only going to keep spreading.

Outside_ofthe_Box5h ago

Phil Spencer's words always comes back to bite him lol

9h agoReplies(7)
Show all comments (54)
130°

Microsoft's Absurd Antics Have Me Scared For Dishonored And Arkane Lyon's Future

With Arkane Austin no more and Lyon living for who knows how long, the superb Dishonored is in serious danger; Microsoft cannot be trusted.

Relientk772d ago

I love the Dishonored series so much and really want Dishonored 3. Microsoft better not screw this up.

JEECE1d 22h ago

I mean, I think the fans will probably kill Arkane Lyon by cooking up reasons to hate whatever they do next without playing it. I've never seen a game so artificially disliked as Deathloop.

thesoftware7301d 22h ago

Lol, why don't we just say, we are worried about all studios owned by MS now. They will keep closing studios until they have none left ...🙄

Skuletor1d 19h ago

Just merge them all into a single studio, have it churn out a single Call of Duty every year and call it a day, lol.

Barlos1d 19h ago

Don't be scared, you'll be fine.

Skuletor1d 19h ago

It's exputer, fine is one word I would not associate with them.

Profchaos1d 18h ago

I think it's becoming clear based on matt bootys comments there's no future for any IP that can't sell above 10 million within the launch window. But is also a small game that gives them prestige

/S it's beyond a joke right now

Show all comments (10)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18814d ago (Edited 4d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus233d ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos3d ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb333d ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC2d ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
SonyStyled3d ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

3d ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies3d ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear213d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
jwillj2k44d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot4d ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC2d ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615863d ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k43d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k43d ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody4d ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead3d ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage3d ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast4d ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19794d ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19793d ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage3d ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)