780°
8.0

1UP reviews Unreal Tournament 3 for PS3

As for today, the arrival of Unreal Tournament 3 stands to be one of the highlights of the year for Net-connected PS3 owners. For many, this will be a fresh experience, lessening the impact of the modest mode options and lack of some fan favorites from prior versions. At the same time, the lessons learned over the years of iteration and the sparkling new graphics engine make this the latest and greatest version for fans of the series. While that experience factor also benefits the bot A.I., that shine may wear off fairly fast for those not planning to play online.

Whether or not you'll find a community playing this game in a year leads back to that earlier question of just how close PC and console gaming have become...and your response to Unreal Tournament 3 will help shape the answer.

Score: 8/10

boodybandit5987d ago (Edited 5987d ago )

online for a couple hours today I have to say I am a little disappointed with this score. I was suprised how well it plays online with a controller, how smooth it runs and how incredible it looks.

I think it deserves a rock solid 9. I understand the campaign mode is slim but UT has always been about the multiplayer and it runs GREAT!

SmokeyMcBear5987d ago

dude.. its on ps3, what did you expect?

jackdoe5987d ago

Sigh. UT 3 has a metacritic score of 86 on the PC. PS3 score shouldn't be that different since the two versions are IDENTICAL. So 1up is not "teh bias", just following what everyone else is giving the game.

PS3PCFTW5987d ago (Edited 5987d ago )

you know if this was an xrod/pc exclusive it would have gotten a 9.7.

rofldings5987d ago

Lame. 1UP gave 8/10 to R&C too. Didn't they preview this game on the 1UP show a while ago and they were praising it? And then they come out with an 8/10.

Thanks for the review, MicroUP

http://n4g.com/ps3/News-761...

Everyone seemed to be enjoying it, except that ugly "woman", of course. :)

Bnet3435987d ago

8/10 was such a bad score. Why do you care what 1up gives it? Did that 8/10 they gave it stop you from buying it? You got the game and enjoyed it right? I don't see what the fuss is all about, I mean if you really cared about game reviews that much ..... :/

PS3n3605987d ago

This game owns halo 3. If you like halo when this comes out on 360 your going to jizz your pants. On the PS3 it runs smooth as silk with Gears graphics and faster than Halo. This game shows off what the ps3 is currently capable of. Even if your a diehard 360 fanboy do yourself a favour and try this game it will blow your mind. This is gonna sell millions of consoles.

barom5987d ago (Edited 5987d ago )

Why the hell would they put Garnett on UT3? That Patrick (Klepek? something) dude was the one who's been doing all the previews both in magazines and on both the latest 1up shows were they talked about UT3. Also I remember on one of the podcasts (one with Jane Pickard or something), Garnett was hating on the Sony and PS3 (and a little bit on Shane).

WTF IS UP WITH 1UP!!! THIS IS BULL!!!

shrimpboat5986d ago

I've been playing the Single player and online and I am very impressed at how good it runs on and offline. I thought it would get at least all 9's across the board but like you said "it's a PS3 game" All reviewers do not seem to give the PS3 versions any attention and just run through them when reviewing them then post a bunch of crap online about how the 360 version was better, we'll for one they play the 360 version all the way through then paly the PS3 version for like 15 minutes. How can you give a good review like that. The Orange box had a lower review for frame errors BUT THE REASON WAS BECAUSE OF THE AUTOSAVE FUNCTION WHICH IS NOT ON THE 360 VERSION. WHILE THE GAME IS BEING SAVED YOU WILL SEE A LITTLE FRAME STUTTER SOMETIMES WHICH IS NORMAL, BUT SINCE ITS ON THE PS3 THEY SHUN IT AS A ERROR. I no longer trust reviewers. I still buy the game on the PS3 if I want the game regardless what the reviewers say and so far I haven't made any mistakes.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5986d ago
HarryEtTubMan5987d ago

I know I saw it today and it looked AMAZING and was so intense online... I can't belive only a 8. Im getting this immediately

boodybandit5987d ago

and it worked flawlessly. I am going to go out and pick up a good keyboard and mouse set for it tomorrow. A lot of people are using them online.

WisinYandel5987d ago

Dont mind the reviews. GO BUY THIS GAME! Trust me, its awesome. :)

EZCheez5987d ago

Mind you this is personal opinion.

8 is an awesome score. What takes away from it is the way the review and a lot others are written. When a reviewer seems to cut straight to the negative in the first paragraph, you start to feel as if there might not be that much positive stuff to look forward to, and you might not even finish reading the review. If reviewers would start focusing on all of the things that games did right nowadays rather than what went wrong and possibly save that for last, 8 would feel like a much better score than it does right now.

Reviewers are starting to make games sound like a job, and while I know it actually is their job, they are forgetting just how much fun it really is and instead focusing on what they HAVE to find wrong with a game. Reviewers should feel privileged to do what they do and get paid for it, but most of them would rather downgrade someone else's work made with blood, sweat and tears just because, well, it's their job. This goes for a lot of games like Uncharted and Mass Effect just to name a few. Reviewers are starting to suck the fun out of games.

8 is an awesome score. Remember though, all personal opinion.

socomnick5986d ago

Yo I'm Spanish but I have to say reggeton is for F@GS

scotthea3115986d ago

picked mine up over lunch and am anxiously waiting to go home and play this. I can't wait to hear "Multiple Kill!!" and "Killing Spree". Hells yeah.

toughNAME5987d ago (Edited 5987d ago )

Oh except when they give a PS3 game a good review...then their just regular bots

toughNAME5987d ago

lol come on thats funny

SmokeyMcBlunt agrees with me

rofldings5987d ago (Edited 5987d ago )

Double Post.

davez825987d ago

bad score, the pc version isn't really getting good scores either so it makes sense, lets just hope more people play the ps3 version

jackdoe5987d ago

Exactly what I keep on saying. Shame that so many 360 and PS3 fanboys don't understand that. 360 fanboys are getting the same game so no point blasting it and PS3 fanboys need to learn that there is not "teh bias" when PC version is getting the same thing.

Kleptic5987d ago (Edited 5987d ago )

n/m...wrong reply

Show all comments (103)
140°

Tech Focus - Motion Blur: Is It Good For Gaming Graphics?

Opinion is divided on this one for sure! Is motion blur good for gaming? Why do developers include it?

TheOptimist2138d ago

I hate any game that has motion blur and the first thing I do is switch off the motion blur in games. It just makes me nauseous.

XentaJones2137d ago

motion blur makes me sick... so its off.

OpenGL2137d ago

I agree with Alex here, many implementations are terrible but when it is done right it improves the experience.

2137d ago
TheSplooge2137d ago

I always turn it off. Along with depth of field.

Mr_Wilson2137d ago

Those plus vignetting, chromatic aberration, and film grain.

Show all comments (22)
90°

Let’s be Honest, DOOM Looks like the Best First Person Shooter We’ve Seen in Ages

Alex from GamersFTW writes:

“In all seriousness though, I feel like DOOM’s success will be measured by how much the game has to offer. Graphically it’s looking spectacular, and I’m sure the latest multiplayer trailer caught all of our attention. Personally, the game is beginning to remind me of those late nights playing Unreal Tournament 3, which is totally a good thing. This, in addition to the promise of user-generated content, is making DOOM look like the best first-person shooter I’ve seen in ages.”

Read Full Story >>
gamersftw.co.uk
Shillmeister2968d ago (Edited 2968d ago )

The campaign looks brilliant, like a true nostalgia trip to the original DOOM titles of old! The multiplayer equally looks like a trip down memory lane to fast-paced and frantic arena games a-la Quake, and honestly the MP REALLY makes me want to the get game at launch to capitalise on the hype. Problem is I'm not overly fussed with multiplayer typically in games, they can get weary after a while, and buying a game solely for its MP is risky - especially on console - as it's heavily dependant on the community!

Rock to my left, hard place to my right..

EDIT: On the MP note, does anyone know if it'll have bots available, similar to Unreal Tournament 3? I still give that a quick play time to time with bots (and all the mad mutators).

c00lvilKid692968d ago

I’m exactly the same, usually multiplayer games are of no interest to me. But DOOM has sparked my curiosity, especially as someone who used to enjoy multiplayer first person shooters like Quake/Unreal. Totally understand your concerns about it being heavily dependant on the community, too. Which is just another reason they should include bots, in case the numbers need to be made up. I’m hoping the community will be good, considering the creative freedoms they’re handing over with the SnapMap thing.

2968d ago
esmittystud1012968d ago (Edited 2968d ago )

Its basically a "console" ahead, in terms of graphics, of another shooter called Homefront thats getting ready to release. LOL

wakeNbake2968d ago

Well thats just a low budget turd, no comparison at all.

mezati992968d ago

i am gonna have to agree with this

Show all comments (20)
30°

Game Music Daily Week 54

Great selections as always and they are...
Final Fantasy
Metal Gear Solid
Super Smash Bros.
Crypt of the Necrodancer
Unreal Tournament
Advance Wars
Payday 2

Read Full Story >>
ftg.operationsupplydrop.org