590°

Capcom Release-List: Lost Planet Colonies Only for PlayStation 3?

Onaxis writes: "The latest Capcom Release-List posted on NeoGAF shows Lost Planet Colonies as a PlayStation 3 title, and misses the Xbox 360 section:

PlayStation 3
- Bionic Commando
- Lost Planet Colonies
- Lost Planet: Extreme Condition
- Moto GP 08
- Resident Evil 5
- Street Fighter 4

Xbox 360
- Bionic Commando
- Black Cloud
- Moto GP 08
- Resident Evil 5
- Street Fighter 4"

Read Full Story >>
onaxis.blogspot.com
aaquib55991d ago

Not only do we get all the DLC you XBOTS paid for, but we get it at a cheaper price($40), and all looking better thanks to PS3. Now, we get the sequel exclusivily on PS3? Sweet. No worries, next year you'll still have um, uh, halo wars.

TANOD5991d ago

anyone

However neogaf is as reliable as Vgcharts.

we wait for official confirmation from Capcom on this

sonarus5991d ago

360 gets dark cloud whatever that is. when capcom makes their official announcement i'll believe it

Ironhide Delta5991d ago

Are all fanboys as stupid as you? Golly gee whiz Captain Obvious! Of course Capcom is including crap that was already released for the game on 360 as an add on with the ps3 version. They've already made thier money and now they're milking ps3 owners for nothing but profit. Well. We all know how awesome the ports are like Ninja Gaiden Sigma was. All that extra content surely paid off quite nicely. Mind you I played and beat the game back before the ps3 was a twinkle in your quivering fanboy lips. Fanboys of all types suck major ass. Just friggin' play your own damn system and be happy!

Laexerias5991d ago

Halo Wars gave me the critical hit... lmao.

comradesnarky5991d ago

The screenshots for the PS3 version of Lost Planet didn't look very good. Those were from an early build though. I'd hope they'd be able to improve the quality....

Anyways, who cares about the extra content? It'll probably all be free by the time that comes out. I don't think Lost Planet was THAT great anyways.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5991d ago
Rybnik5991d ago

Not to bubble burst, I'll bet it is a typo. Didn't some other site recently reveal that "Colonies" was 360 exclusive? If anything, its probably multi-like the first one.

ChaosKnight5991d ago

I may be in the dark on this but... what is Black Cloud?

Relcom5991d ago

I was wondering the same thing.

JHFKDFNFGJKFHDKF5991d ago

posten on neogaf? it must be true! /sarcasm

Arkham5990d ago

More often than not, yeah.

Sevir045991d ago

dark cloud.... did they mean Dark Void? it's interesting

Sevir045991d ago

LOL!!!! this site is hilarious, the fankids here are just ridiculous...

actas1235991d ago

What do u mean whats dark cloud? Its a new game... what is wrong with you people .. Now every game that any company makes has to be a sequel!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!???

Show all comments (61)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ59d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia59d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73059d ago (Edited 59d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6959d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y59d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex59d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y58d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA33d ago (Edited 33d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07218d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde218d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude218d ago (Edited 218d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992218d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme218d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992218d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313218d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69218d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor218d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69218d ago (Edited 218d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack218d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface217d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)