After recently completing the game, I’ve realized the simple truth that Drake’s Deception was narratively underdeveloped. Naughty Dog substituted a lack of poignant emotional development with a numbing amount of aimless grandiosity and narrow, repetitive gameplay.
Following a recent interview with Sony, Naughty Dog head Neil Druckmann claims the original intent was “unfortunately lost” in the process.
Glad he clarified it but i'm still somewhat skeptical. Plus, his comments about how Ai will revolutionize storytelling were still pretty iffy.
"AI is not a substitute for human creativity. We position it as a technology that supports creativity. Creativity resides in people. We will continue to contribute to people's creativity through technology," the CEO said.
...not yet but 100% within the next 10 years!
..Then Sony will use it like the drop of a hat. They're no different to the others.
People that aren't software developers just don't understand the benefits of AI. People who's only exposure to A.I is the Terminator movie and other related sci fi films won't understand the benefits it provides.
It's not about replacing human labor. It's about making human labor easier.
Many years ago, I had laser eye surgery done. It was performed by a robot. The doctor took my measurements and calibrated the machine to make sure it would do what needed be done. And then the robot corrected my vision in 10 seconds.
15 years later and I still have 20/20 vision.
Druckmann claims the tech could 'push the boundaries of storytelling in games.'
I’m more interested in what else he said.
“Neil Druckmann says new Naughty Dog title could ‘redefine mainstream perceptions of gaming’
He also said it has "ethical issues we need to address" but of course that doesn't get the clicks.
I’m all for it. Cuts the time to make a game. Look, Hellblade 2 took 5 years to make, if AI can do that in half the time, as a consumer, I support it.
While I tend to disagree with a lot of the points made here, this is a very well thought out and written piece.
Well written the article may be...but flawed none the less.
(as a side note.. all articles should be written well)
---
Consider that the writer cannot/well not provide a contrary counterpoint from a gamming perspective. Which game stands the scrutiny that the writer lays at the feet of U3?
And, if the writer is merely pointing out the narrative driven flaws that he/she identified in U3, why not contrast it with other narrative driven games? Why not praise U3 for moving the game genre closer to the depth and storytelling craft associated with most Oscar nominated movies? (...and please don’t twist what I just said).
It’s easy to tear something down.. some of the smartest 'crafters of opinion' do it every day in the political spectrum.
Lastly, U3 is a game. It’s a 3rd person shooter to be specific. So don’t knock it for telling a story and directing the player through the events of said story. That’s what we paid for (ie.. not a sand box)
Did we here the same complaints from Mario Galaxy, Halo (all), Gears of War or God of War, Zelda, Mirror’s edge or every single First person Shooter in existents? The list of narrative directed games comprise of nearly 99% of all games created (unscientific of course).
The exceptions being but not limited to:The Witcher, Elder Scrolls, GTA and most sand box driven series.
The true test of a good article is not only to have a well articulated opinion, but to present it in the most objective way possible.
Unless of course the goal is to be a shock jock....
Please feel free to share your thoughts, I will monitor this post and will respond to any rebuttals.
Thanks -
the failings of unchrted 3
IT ENDED.
Whats with all these "What Uncharted 3 FAILED at" articles
Obvious hate because it was rated so highly, shame Eurogamer had to set off that chain of events which lead to sites give it a "lower" score just to follow what they did for more hits.