Velocity Gamer: So I know it's not entirely the most legit thing to do, but after much thought I do believe my score needed some changing. If I were to give Skyrim a 5 and MW3 a 4.5 that would just seem weird no?
The developers have provided a little band-aid while PlayStation players attempt to get back into MW3.
Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.
Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash
Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.
I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.
The famous comedy duo is the latest example of pop culture becoming one big grey blob
Certain to have some sort of reference to their online store for CBD/THC chews, which is advertising heavily online the last month or two.
The randomness of the multiplayer characters is one of reason I quit playing COD after briefly returning in 2022. We got Space Marines, rappers, tree monsters etc. all in a series called “ Modern Warfare”.
Wow, a website that will actually take some though into their review score. I completely agree with the change as well. I'm a big fan of COD, but seriously with all the sequels coming out this year it's kinda hard for COD to stand out without any improvements or innovation.
you can't just go around changing scores because a better game comes a long and a .5 difference doesn't seem liable any more. Kind of puts any score given into doubt. Its about impression. At the time COD made an impression for you to give 4.5.
Finally reviewers are starting to see the truth.
I don't care regardless because I'm loving CoD already, but I do think that's totally lame. I would see no problem with him posting a second impression, but changing the original review score is just weak. How are we supposed to trust a site that doesn't even stand behind it's beliefs?
I get that in retrospect of Skyrim he could post a second impression saying if he now believes the score should be lower, that's fine. However the Batman and Battlefield part really discredits the claim, because those games came out before MW3, and as such would have been taken into account previously. CoD is by no means perfect, it's fine if you want to give it a merely decent score, but don't change the original review. The admittance that this is all a result of recent events is good, but ruined by the unprofessionalism.
Absolutely ridiculous comment in the summary.
You can't just directly compare review scores between Skyrim and Modern Warfare 3.