1070°
7.6

NXGM Reviews CoD: MW3

NXGM says: "This year the war is more open than ever. Reaches around the world
in a conflict worthy of a Hollywood blockbuster. "

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
Gazondaily4556d ago

I'm sorry but I think Google Translate is struggling with translating this review a tad bit.

A summary from the site:

The best (The good):

-The Online will give you endless hours of entertainment.
-Spec Ops mode (and especially the ability to play splitscreen)
-Campaign effective and fun.
-Unlock all game content (Solo, Spec Ops, Competitive)

Worst(The Bad):

-Graphically left behind in all the fields in front of the exponents of the genre.
-Lack of innovation in multiplayer, changes, tweaks upgrades, but nothing significant or surprising to anyone who has played the previous titles.
-The feeling that most elements of the plot and we have seen, both playable, as the tale.
-The lack of interaction with the environment, takes away the whole dive.

fluffydelusions4556d ago (Edited 4556d ago )

I don't really think the graphics are that bad. Granted they are not the greatest out there and I know it's the same as MW2 but I found those decent enough and especially considering it's 60FPS.

"Lack of innovation in multiplayer"
What are they expecting? It's an arcade shooter and it sells. Why would they completely change the formula? If they want more realism and vehicles play BF3. Just my opinion anyway.

ginsunuva4556d ago

You sound a bit angry that there is no innovation. It never said rework the formula, just put some new unseen ideas in it, such as BlackOps' wager modes.
Speaking of which, does mw3 have wagering?

Gamer-Z4556d ago

@fluffydelusions

Rage runs at 60fps and it looks gorgeous, COD has no excuse.

xyxzor4556d ago

@Gamer-Z,

It also has the worst texture streaming. Ever.

Freshnikes4556d ago

I agree, I have bf3 and I still play bops and look forward to mw3 . Bf3 and mw3 are totally diff....

Kenshin_BATT0USAI4556d ago

@gin

no, it doesn't, because it doesn't have that stupid ass currency system in black ops.

Skip_Bayless4556d ago

That's rediculous because MW3 looks better than any other multiplatform multiplayer fps shooter on consoles.

Nes_Daze4556d ago

Innovation as in new features? Maybe adding something not seen before instead of making the FPS genre more like a sports genre in which every year is the same crap and sheep consumers gobble it up. The graphics suck, at least imo, the environment is too sterile, the best thing about call of duty is its arcade style online which is easy to pick up, I'll give it that, but it doesn't come close to the fun online I've had with other shooters.

Gamer19824556d ago

Agreed its the same crap every year and people gobble it up like drugs.. Shame really. Also I bought a copy of Gears 3 for £20 today its been reduce to half price within weeks of release. Nobody wants it no more.

In fact I got 2 copys thought it was a steal at that price went to trade it in to find nobody was giving over £16 trade! In fact my local CEX wouldn't take it claiming they had too many copies! Seems Gears is dead now :(. Gears 1 was amazing and crappy shooters like COD destroy great series like Gears.

Kamikaze1354556d ago

I guess they want something new thrown into the mix. CoD is a milked franchise and there doesn't seem to be a big enough difference between the games.

GoToTheOptionsMenu4556d ago

I probably wouldve bought it tonight if they at least put some crazy shit into it like modern warfare 2
Cant afford to spend $60 on a rehash

saladthieves4555d ago

"That's rediculous because MW3 looks better than any other multiplatform multiplayer fps shooter on consoles."

Hahaah, that's so cute. John Madden trying to be funny.

BABY-JEDI4555d ago

No environmental destruction seems to be a strong critical point

RedDead4555d ago

"What are they expecting? It's an arcade shooter and it sells. Why would they completely change the formula? If they want more realism and vehicles play BF3. Just my opinion anyway."

Serious? We shouldn't expect anything new yeah? That doesn't exempt the game from trying anything new, it deserves score slash for literally nothing at all. It is literally Cod4 again with new maps and perks and a campaign. New content, not new game. Expansion pack is what this truely is, yet again, for the fourth time.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4555d ago
DigitalAnalog4556d ago (Edited 4556d ago )

"Worst(The Bad):

-Graphically left behind in all the fields in front of the exponents of the genre.
-Lack of innovation in multiplayer, changes, tweaks upgrades, but nothing significant or surprising to anyone who has played the previous titles.
-The feeling that most elements of the plot and we have seen, both playable, as the tale.
-The lack of interaction with the environment, takes away the whole dive."

FINALLY, a review with enough sense to call it out as it is. I don't want to hear "but it's 60FPS excuses." Many 30fps have increased their visual/tech fidelity while maintaining the same frame-rate, does this mean once a game reaches 60fps the graphical and other technical aspects of the engine are stunted? Give me a break.

emartini4556d ago

Exactly. Look AT RAGE. THATS 60 frames per second and the graphics are great. Just goes to show that the devs are lazy and would rather just sit on their billions while they rape the hardcore gamers that play COD. The game is so mainstream and casual now that the hardcore gamers are being flushed out by more 5yr olds.

snipes1014556d ago

Well one thing about Rage was that even after installing it on my PS3 there was still a massive amount of texture pop in, which I haven't seen in COD titles. At least to the degree that I saw it in Rage anyhow.

boommuffin4556d ago

they have also been putting a lot of their resources into CoD elite which instead they should have put into making MW3

Biggest4555d ago

If there was no CoD Elite you can rest assured that MW3 would be just what it is. Love it or leave it.

gamingdroid4555d ago

Well considering MW3 actually has a great single player campaign compared to the competition, I will take that with a dash of polish over a buggy game, crappy campaign, disorienting and annoying shine in your face lighting effects, fancy looking graphics and new engine any time.

Whatever floats your boat!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4555d ago
KaBaW4556d ago (Edited 4556d ago )

One thing I wanna know about Spec Ops is if you can play with a random person.
You couldn't just join up with a random person and start playing. Needed a friend.
Sometimes, I wanted to play, but other people didn't or they weren't on.
It was quite aggravating, if you ask me. But, overall it's not a big deal.

0neShot4556d ago ShowReplies(5)
Crystallis4556d ago

Thats a respectable review, not because they gave it a 7.6 score but because they iterate whats plaguing the series over the past few years.

syanara4555d ago

One thing I think a lot of people are missing here is that if the developers had to stick with the same engine (and I am not a MW3 supporter by far) but f they HAD to stick with the same engine then they look like they did pretty good with the tools they had.

The set pieces and cut-scenes are all pretty much done in game and while Call of Duty is not a shining beacon of hope for graphics in video games they did look like they worked hard for it.

that does NOT mean the graphics are good by any means. Uncharted 3 can run at 720p 30fps and look twice as good as MW3. Battlefield is argueably better looking than MW3 and I would also say that gears of war 3 looks better than MW3. (infamous 2 easily looks better than MW3 and that was released way earlier this year)

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4555d ago
Fishy Fingers4556d ago

I'm sure this will be one of the reviews (of course I mean, score) that "certain" N4G members will be happy to see. Enjoy yourselves... :)

HarryMasonHerpderp4556d ago

haha its so true.Everyone wants to see COD crash an burn.

The Meerkat4556d ago Show
kingdavid4556d ago

Absolute rubbish meercat

MariaHelFutura4556d ago (Edited 4556d ago )

Did Meerkat just say BF3 was sh!t and COD is a solid game that should hold his attention for 4 days???

Hmmmmm.

kesvalk4556d ago

PC gamers also want it to crash and burn...

Orange Juice4556d ago

As a ps3 owner I hope mw3 does well as my gf and I tend to play it throughout the year between game releases. I just wanted to put that out there in case anybody actually believed meercat.

creatchee4556d ago Show
Deadman_Senji4556d ago

REAL gamers want to see CoD crash and burn.

TKCMuzzer4556d ago

No not really. People just want to see something better. COD makes a ludicrous amount of money and yet you would not know it by what comes the following year.
I paid £45 for Black Ops and if I pay £45 for MW3 am I going to feel anything different when I play it,no. Kill streaks, perks etc, it's all the same. Within days it will feel like what it is, just a glorified map pack.

Drabent4556d ago

I want to see it NOT LAG to hell in a day or two.

Leaguer4555d ago

my hats off to the poster who said "just a glorified map pack"..perfectly said =)

finally someone calling a spade for what it really is..

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4555d ago
ShadowJetX4556d ago

This is a decent review, isn't it?

Burning_Finger4556d ago (Edited 4556d ago )

Sounds fair for all COD games. Waiting for Tom Chick to give it a 10.

hwbrewer34556d ago ShowReplies(6)
PetitPiPi4556d ago ShowReplies(1)
Show all comments (104)
80°

Call of Duty Players Disappointed by $80 B.E.A.S.T. Glove Bundle Deal

Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Kaii17d ago

Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash

melons17d ago

Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.

Gridknac17d ago

They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.

X-2316d ago

I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.

170°

Cheech And Chong Are Coming To Call Of Duty Because Everything Must Be Consumed

The famous comedy duo is the latest example of pop culture becoming one big grey blob

Christopher32d ago

Certain to have some sort of reference to their online store for CBD/THC chews, which is advertising heavily online the last month or two.

Sciurus_vulgaris31d ago

The randomness of the multiplayer characters is one of reason I quit playing COD after briefly returning in 2022. We got Space Marines, rappers, tree monsters etc. all in a series called “ Modern Warfare”.

OtterX31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

I think if there was ever a time for a competitor to rise up and take away some of Call of Duty's thunder, the time would be now. A military shooter that takes itself seriously, not sold out to Fortnitism. Easier said than done, I know... but the time is ripe.

I can't stand this stuff either.

Palitera31d ago

There are tons of MP shooters that make no profit, if you're looking for one of those

fsfsxii31d ago

You guys have been saying this shit since 2009. Fortunately, nobody’s bringing down cod anytime soon, if ever.

crazyCoconuts31d ago

I agree. I really didn't like how the silliness takes away the gritty origins. That and all the crazy effects... dunno. I'm still playing it but I'd love for someone to steal their cheese and cater to grittier players

OtterX31d ago

@fsfsxii It's not so much wanting COD itself to die as it is wanting this silliness to die. Like CrazyCoconuts said, it takes from the grittiness. Many OG COD players want a straightup Military shooter experience, not silly costume time at Carnival.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 31d ago
Profchaos31d ago

is this what the kids want these days a pair of iconic stoners who were big in the 70s and have kind of held on I enjoyed their movies decades ago but I never recall the movie where cheech infiltrates a enemy base while chong snipes for support guess I must of missed that one

Man I'm getting to old for this

Knightofelemia31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

Cheech just looks so wrong in the picture.

Profchaos31d ago

Why just why. cod up in smoke

anast31d ago

They charge too much for a game that is kitsch.

Show all comments (17)
70°

MW3 missed its easiest opportunity to give us some of the best Call of Duty maps ever made

From Bootleg to Black Box, Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 made a heartbreaking mistake by not remastering the bizarrely forgotten maps from its namesake.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com