60°

Work on Fallout MMO can continue for now; Bethesda injunction appeal denied

There's been so much written about Interplay's nebulous Fallout MMO in the context of tedious litigation, it almost seems to welcome the franchise's thorough, irradiated reduction of modern society. But for those interested in legal tussles, here's where we stand today: Fallout property owner (and former licensee) Bethesda was recently denied a preliminary injunction against Interplay, which would have denied Fallout Online use of the franchise's story, character and other identifiable elements. Today, an appeal against that decision was denied.

NYC_Gamer4586d ago

why should they allow interplay to create some mmo?the fallout license was sold to bethesda...

ZombieAssassin4586d ago (Edited 4586d ago )

There was a clause in the agreement that allowed them to still make it but it had to be under certain conditions and Bethesda would get 12% of sales and subscriptions.

"In April 2007, Bethesda Softworks, the developer of Fallout 3, purchased full rights to the Fallout IP for $5.75 million USD. While Bethesda now owned the rights to the Fallout MMO IP as well, clauses in the purchase agreement state allowed Interplay to license the rights to the development of the MMO.[4] Specific requirements were stated in the agreement that if not met, Interplay would immediately lose and surrender its license rights for Fallout. "

"Development must have begun within 24 months of the date of the agreement (April 4, 2007), and Interplay must have secured $30 million within that time frame or forfeit its rights to license. Interplay would furthermore need to launch the MMOG within 4 years of the beginning of development, and pay Bethesda 12 percent of sales and subscription fees for the use of the IP. "

I think the main reason Bethesda is going after them is because they made Fallout a pretty well known franchise and opened ZeniMax Online Studios, so now they prolly wanna make a Fallout MMO...I believe they even stated that if Interplay fails to finish the game in time or lose this lawsuit they are interested in making a Fallout MMO.

I honestly don't care who does it I just want it, although I'm not sure how it'll work if they use the VATS system for an online game. 4 years though isn't a lot of time to develop an MMO especially when you don't have a crapton of money at your disposal.

zeal0us4586d ago

Interplay already down under, they need to just sell what rights they have left to Bethesda and work on a new project.

MAJ0R4586d ago

wow first they lost the lawsuit to notch and now Interplay, Bethesda is getting hammered from all sides

brish4585d ago

Bethesda filed both lawsuits. Bethesda lost both lawsuits.

Why do you think Bethesda is the victim here when they are the ones doing all the suing?

MAJ0R4585d ago

I don't think they are the victim, they deserve what they brought upon themselves. I was just pointing out that their getting destroyed legally :P

mixelon4585d ago

I'd hate to be at interplay working with this sort of uncertainty. MMO development is a hard enough time in the best of conditions but working on one under the shadow of impending cancellation before its even had any chance to prove itself must be depressing.

The whole case is ridiculous really. Why the hell did Interplay say they'd allow it in the first place? Seriously bizarre.

30°

Why a Fallout MMO Would be Terrible

8CN: Here's another one from the ever-present rumor mill: Bethesda may or may not be kind of sort of working on a Fallout MMO. At least according to this article from Air Herald. Or, at least, according to that article, Fallout: New Vegas director Josh Sawyer claims that the Fallout franchise could eventually make for a decent MMO. This is a terrible, terrible idea.

700p3573d ago

It is definitely a terrible idea. Look what happened to elder scrolls online.

40°

The List: 5 Singleplayer Games That Could Be MMOs

David Jagneaux of MMORPG writes: "As has become customary here at MMORPG, this week’s list is the reverse of last week’s! Previously, we covered five MMOs that we think could be turned into great singleplayer games. Now, we want to look at five singleplayer games that could be turned into great MMOs. With the extreme level variety the genre we know and love experiences in today’s industry, there is plenty of room for new concepts. In fact, several of the games on this list already have MMO-esque counterparts on the market in the form of different IPs."

joab7773601d ago

Wow...aside from Pokemon...replace with red dead...and thats my list too.

Now...I love mmo's. I do for so many reasons. Good mmos have few draw backs. I ALSO love single player rpgs. And if done right, a company could make an epic single player mmo. Hear me out.

My example is Dragons Dogma. It has an amazing single player experience...very rewarding. Why? Because u could create ur own pawn that others could borrow. They could have easily been real players in an mmo. At the end, there is the online UR dragon, but also a rich endgame dungeon with many monsters and great loot.

Now, if a company could manage to offer something akin to Dragons Dogmas system for those who want to play alone, allows them to borrow other ppls pawns for example. It could work. It would need balancing.

For those who want the mmo experience, they simply group up and tackle things together. They also hav the pawn option in case they want to use it and level it.

Now, maybe single player content is a bit easier or comes later with a buff...and its loot would need to be a lower level, but it would giv all those who dont want to group up to continue playing.

380°

On The Chopping Block: Five AAA Games That Will Never See The Light Of Day (And One That Might)

GP: "For every game that is released on the market, there are dozens that never make it passed the first production meeting. While I have no feelings towards those games because they were never shown to the public, there have been many instances where a game was shown to the market to much fanfare, and then their productions were suddenly cut short and they vanished forever.

This article is about those games. The ones that could have been AAA titles, the games that you would have expected to sell systems and launch new franchises. Why didn't these games make it? They certainly looked more than good enough. Read on to find out."

Read Full Story >>
gamepodunk.com
TrendyGamers4442d ago

I wouldn't be surprised if we never see FFXIV on the PS3.

FinaLXiii4442d ago (Edited 4442d ago )

Jack Tretton´s biggest mistake was anoncing it

ShinMaster4441d ago

That ain't his fault. Square Enix needs stop announcing games that they don't plan on releasing in years (Versus) and releasing games no one asked for (XIII-2).

[on topic]
Project Milo - All fake.
Mega Man Legends 3 - F* you Capcom!
Fallout Online - Zzz....
B.C. - ?
Sadness - Had Nintendo made a system with more up to date specs, the game would've been released.

4442d ago
MysticStrummer4442d ago

lol @ Milo. I didn't care about any of these, but the title reminded me of The Agency. I stumbled upon info about The Agency during the summer of 07 while doing some random web surfing, and was instantly intrigued at the prospect of getting game related texts on my cell phone. I searched constantly for new intel after that, getting more and more excited each time I found new info or footage, until the day I read it was canceled. Bastards. I still hope someone will finish it since I read it was nearly completed when it was axed.

CRASHBASHUK4442d ago

well after hearing all the bad reviews and the glitches on ff14 for pc dont think most ps3 fans wont bover tbh

Clarence4442d ago

None of these games are AAA.

Valorous_Entity4441d ago

Wow this is a stupid article. XIV was atrocious and the fact they are even trying to fix it is hilarious to me.