510°
8.5

GameSpot gives 8.5/10 to UT3

It's a very basic, straightforward package, but don't take that to mean that UT3 is a no-frills sequel. With its variety of modes and its occasionally crazy high-speed action, UT3 still feels very different than the typical first-person shooter coming out these days. On top of that, it's very exciting and just as much fun now as it has been in previous installments. UT3 has more than enough content to keep you busy, and with mod-making tools included in the package, the potential for more user-generated content in the future is certainly present.

Read Full Story >>
gamespot.com
MK_Red6010d ago

Good score from GameSpot. They gave the previous game a 9.6/10 (UT2004) if I'm not mistaken but hey, that one was really big and special. Maybe UT3 is more of a UT2003 and so the real classic UT comes in form of UT4 / UT2008. Still, one hell of a fun game.

clownfacemcgee6010d ago (Edited 6010d ago )

I think Gamespot is pissed because this is also a timed exclusive for the PS3. We all know Gamespot are massive fanboys. If Halo 3 got a 9.5, this game should at the least get a 9 by my judgement. Even just the demo was awesome on my craptastic PC. And I'm sure the full game is leagues better.

EDIT: I don't care how it compares to UT 2004. If UT 2004 was good, then why possibly screw it up by tweaking the gameplay too much? The graphics got an update, and the whole thing is incredible. You can't legitimately criticize it because the previous incarnation was good too. And 8.5 is a good score for most games, but they gave Halo 3 a 9.5 and I don't UT3 could possibly be 1 whole point worse. I expect equal judgement of all games. I don't think equal judgement is too much to ask for.

Time Lord6010d ago

"Front-end interface has too many menus and selections to move through, which makes it feel sort of like a console game."

lol, is that all? surly they must of had more. or why would u give it 8.5

hellraiser5016010d ago (Edited 6010d ago )

Have you played the demo its exactly the same as ut2004 except an updated graphics engine. I mean no new weopons, a couple new vehicles. About the only new gameplay aspect of the game is the hover board which sucks because if you get shot once you fall off in some ragdoll jesture and you become defenseless. What I'm trying to say is that it's not gamspot its the game itselt only adding very little from the previos installment. Besides since when is 8.5 that bad of a score.

tony6009d ago

you are right is a good score for that game sequel, but for some reason some gamers think that is a bad score. unreal tournament is not call of duty 4 or bioshock, these are almost perfect games.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6009d ago
MK_Red6010d ago

Unlike the other story that I disagreed with you on Time Crisis 4, I'm actually with you on this one.
Halo 3 also had short singleplayer and good multiplayer. UT3 has them both plus original UT ideas and superb stunning graphics.

riqued6010d ago

It's a timed PS3 exclusive, so until its ready to go to the 360 they can't review it honestly.

tony6009d ago

well, i agree with that, halo 3 is not a 9.5. probably a 8.2.

PS3 Limps on and on6010d ago

it's not getting the scores I thought. I expected amazing 9.5 or something. Still, when a game gets NO lower than 8/10 and 9/10. It's a great game.

MK_Red6010d ago

I have a feeling that there should be one attention seeking idiot who would give 7 to UT3 just to get traffic and to make a name.

wil4hire6010d ago (Edited 6010d ago )

Want Unreal to be a little different, but more of the same. Thats what makes the game great.

Its an amazing fast-paced shooter to just sit down and enjoy for an hour or more.

8.5/10 is a realistic score. I'm almost gaining respect back for Gamespot after the Uncharted 8 & the Mass Effect 8.5. If they really are getting back to understanding that 9/10 10/10 games = perfect with n o techinal issues or problems that have to be overlooked to enjoy the game, then Kudos to them.

I think this year no console has won. The reviewers have. Think about all the traffic "system wars" and "console wars" generates.

8's used to be good. and 9's used to be for games like Metal Gear/FInal Fantasy.

riqued6010d ago

And all that started with a certain company getting more marketing share on gaming.

We were all fine before that, reviewers weren't forced to give the scores the publisher wanted.

wil4hire6010d ago

yep.. and after this year and a few more months.. things will be back to normal.

I hope.

Shaka2K66010d ago

Regarless of reviews any true gamer knows that.

GameOn6010d ago

UT3 is im sure very differnt from gears. gears is a tactical shooter where cover and team work are very important. UT3 is a super fast, run n gun shooter with awsome grphics + style.
They are both great in their own different ways.

lawman11086010d ago

Shaka aka Narsim aka Shmee all the same idiot.

Show all comments (49)
140°

Tech Focus - Motion Blur: Is It Good For Gaming Graphics?

Opinion is divided on this one for sure! Is motion blur good for gaming? Why do developers include it?

TheOptimist2141d ago

I hate any game that has motion blur and the first thing I do is switch off the motion blur in games. It just makes me nauseous.

XentaJones2140d ago

motion blur makes me sick... so its off.

OpenGL2140d ago

I agree with Alex here, many implementations are terrible but when it is done right it improves the experience.

2140d ago
TheSplooge2140d ago

I always turn it off. Along with depth of field.

Mr_Wilson2140d ago

Those plus vignetting, chromatic aberration, and film grain.

Show all comments (22)
90°

Let’s be Honest, DOOM Looks like the Best First Person Shooter We’ve Seen in Ages

Alex from GamersFTW writes:

“In all seriousness though, I feel like DOOM’s success will be measured by how much the game has to offer. Graphically it’s looking spectacular, and I’m sure the latest multiplayer trailer caught all of our attention. Personally, the game is beginning to remind me of those late nights playing Unreal Tournament 3, which is totally a good thing. This, in addition to the promise of user-generated content, is making DOOM look like the best first-person shooter I’ve seen in ages.”

Read Full Story >>
gamersftw.co.uk
Shillmeister2971d ago (Edited 2971d ago )

The campaign looks brilliant, like a true nostalgia trip to the original DOOM titles of old! The multiplayer equally looks like a trip down memory lane to fast-paced and frantic arena games a-la Quake, and honestly the MP REALLY makes me want to the get game at launch to capitalise on the hype. Problem is I'm not overly fussed with multiplayer typically in games, they can get weary after a while, and buying a game solely for its MP is risky - especially on console - as it's heavily dependant on the community!

Rock to my left, hard place to my right..

EDIT: On the MP note, does anyone know if it'll have bots available, similar to Unreal Tournament 3? I still give that a quick play time to time with bots (and all the mad mutators).

c00lvilKid692971d ago

I’m exactly the same, usually multiplayer games are of no interest to me. But DOOM has sparked my curiosity, especially as someone who used to enjoy multiplayer first person shooters like Quake/Unreal. Totally understand your concerns about it being heavily dependant on the community, too. Which is just another reason they should include bots, in case the numbers need to be made up. I’m hoping the community will be good, considering the creative freedoms they’re handing over with the SnapMap thing.

2971d ago
esmittystud1012971d ago (Edited 2971d ago )

Its basically a "console" ahead, in terms of graphics, of another shooter called Homefront thats getting ready to release. LOL

wakeNbake2971d ago

Well thats just a low budget turd, no comparison at all.

mezati992971d ago

i am gonna have to agree with this

Show all comments (20)
30°

Game Music Daily Week 54

Great selections as always and they are...
Final Fantasy
Metal Gear Solid
Super Smash Bros.
Crypt of the Necrodancer
Unreal Tournament
Advance Wars
Payday 2

Read Full Story >>
ftg.operationsupplydrop.org