970°

Off-Screen Uncharted 3 Campaign Screens Proves Its Visual Prowess

A few reviewers have posted some off-screen screengrabs of Uncharted 3 which show the game’s true visual prowess with no add effects and they look really stunning.

Read Full Story >>
gamersmint.com
smurfz4576d ago

That DESERT. Man, how am I supposed to consume so many awesome games within such a short span of time? More importantly, who's GOING to give me the MONIES to do so? :(

Convas4576d ago

More game than time? Join the club.

nveenio4576d ago

Oh great...there's a club now? Just tell me to whom I write the check for dues...

I've got this pre-ordered through Amazon with $0.99 release day shipping. I figure I might be able to get some work done that week while I wait for the package to arrive. Otherwise, I'd be buying it at Wal-Mart first chance I get. (Plus, going through Amazon saves me $5.)

Autodidactdystopia4576d ago (Edited 4576d ago )

when i look at that screen in the desert with my wire-frame dev goggles (i have lots of experience with gpus cpus and game engines including optimizations of the game-world for performance.) No joke PM me and ill teach you some stuff.

I begin to think wow its amazing but then i realize what im looking at. I am looking at one single surface albeit warped into dunes.

One single surface with one single dynamic texture and a lil displacement by the feet along with some decals.

it looks good but remember Altair form AC during the loading screens you had Altair running around a similar environment of flatness and smoke whilst loading in the rest of the level. and pretty damn good fps too.

i also remember that when i look at the floor in many of my games My fps shoots up to like 300fps due to culling and other obvious reasons i see the technique they are using here. everything else is gone there is literally nothing in the scene but drake and the ground until he runs down off the dune into the city which is also risen about 30 ft so that the ground culls the rest of the dunes as he enters the city. clever techniques but something tells me that every last drop of the ps3 is being used to push that barren desert scene and as soon as he runs down into the city the angle of the floor of the desert is risen upwards and he is below it as he enters the city meaning that the desert is no longer being drawn so the ps3 has resources for the rest of the level. (meaning its not rendering the whole level at once just the desert then just the city)

Looks like a really good mix of their streaming technology and level design.

but i think that's the basic principal of how they've done it.

Seriously though Im not lying or anything. go look up culling for games and you'll see that they are using the desert to cull itself from the rest of the city until the very last second and then the wall of dirt he comes running down begins culling the city from the desert on the other side.

Sweet. :)

@ below My point is that I like what I see but I also understand how its possible. which is not due to the overwhelming power of the ps3 but due to clever decisions by ND because that level of fidelity would not be possible if there were more in the scene.

Biggest4576d ago

I can't seem to find your point.

Biggest4576d ago

Now I don't understand why your point matters. Uncharted 3 looks to be an awesome game on all fronts. Why try to damper excitement by explaining what you feel is smoke and mirror development? Can't the game just look GREAT and be done with it?

Autodidactdystopia4576d ago (Edited 4576d ago )

Well I am not trying to damper anything.

I said nothing about smoke and mirror development.

I enjoy savoring the little things if all you wanna say is that it looks GREAT and be done with it then that is up to you. I prefer to look at the little things and maybe let someone who does care about the "HOW" rather than the "what" learn something.

If you felt that then maybe you should evaluate how you feel about this because I think it is an outstanding example of developer cunning and achievement. I just get excited by this stuff it is my passion so Im gonna say whatever the hell I want. Thank you. :)

you should take more time saying unique things not just trying to discredit someone you don't even know on a gaming website.

Iroquois_Pliskin4576d ago

oh sweet jesus so many great games coming out and not enough time... count me in

MaxXAttaxX4576d ago

You bore me.

You sound like the type of guy who would ruin the "magic" and fun of other things like movies and sex.

Autodidactdystopia4576d ago

wow you guys are on it today.

for every layer of magic and fun you think you have just imagine what lies beneath. Thats the beauty of the universe you can never get to the bottom layer of the onion.

People like you who made fun of the guy who said the world is round and not flat.

If your getting by thinking that sex is about magic then you might need to check your size. odds are your girlfriend doesn't like your excuses.

Ignorance is bliss I guess. you bore me as well.

Plug your ears and say lalalala. ;P

Bathyj4576d ago

I'm already President of The More Dollars than Sense Club but I could probably still join the More Game than Time Club too.

baodeus4576d ago

The good:
The game looks really good, great artistic direction, very convincing environment and great details.

The bad:
The fanboy gonna used it as fuel for the stupid war.

The ugly:
This is where autodidactdystopia comes in to play. U point out certain things which many won't like to hear.

Dee_914576d ago

@Autodidactdystopia I understand you . I understand that graphics or what ever may be your passion. However your Wall'O'Text was informative nevertheless but unnecessary.
Holy S#!T did he compare this to Greek philosophy lol

PinkFunk4576d ago

@Everyone and Autodidactdystopia

Lay off the fella. I understand your need to dig beneath surface experiences, and understand the "how". I think that's what interests us in the visuals, and in the performance. There's no doubt in the beauty of the scene, and of the game in general - it's just interesting afterward from a perspective of either a developer, an artist, a curious joe, to question the mechanics behind the visual effect.

So let's chill out, and not jump to attack anyone...

...and now the obligatory, zomg I can't freakin' wait till November 1st. UC3 has got to be my most anticipated game, always beauty from start to finish.

wenaldy4576d ago

@auto

You are sorta party/ wedding crasher-type guy.. lol..

@clizz

Im IN!!!!

Autodidactdystopia4576d ago (Edited 4576d ago )

no hard feelings guys I come here for the community
I kinda see myself as the wedding/party crasher always better than compliance.

;)

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

I also cant take back the words i never said. :)
http://www.youtube.com/watc...

I know its cheesy but i really like this song, speaks to me. :P don't muzzle me

ya'll are my bros. I wouldn't be here if i couldn't take the heat.

nycredude4576d ago (Edited 4576d ago )

Autodidactdystopia

WTF are you blabbing about? He is in the middle of a desert. What do you expect to find there a carnival? Skyscrapers? Massive amounts of enemies just waiting in the sand to ambush Nate?

Fact is you have no idea really how they programmed the game. You can assume, or imagine how you would have done it but only they know how they did it. You may well be right but you don't know for sure. Besides who cares how they did it as long as it looks great. I play the game not codes. THis isn't the matrix. And if it is so easy why haven't anyone else done this to this level?

Nolando4576d ago

@auto

It looks amazing nonetheless but I appreciate the insight on how it was done.

There are people that just want to be WOWed and want to believe the PS3 is some bottomless source of "powa".

I am pretty amazed by how defensive people get over someone explaining how it was/could of been done, And you did it in a manner that didn't seem antagonizing.

Great posts, I wish I had a PS3 to play UC2 and 3 (I beat 1 on my uncles PS3 a long time ago great game).

PixL4576d ago

Concerning Auto...'s comment: you're right it's all tricks. However, if you really were into gamedev, you'd know it's the main goal of game makers to trick you. There are always shortages: of memory, of IO output, of processing power, of time before controller response, etc. ND are the masters of trickery and PS3 hardware. I've just watched the new cinematic trailer for UC3. It feels like an Indiana Jones film trailer and it shows everything the same way. You say "it's just culling". Just? Do you even know how many hours of design, programming and drawing it takes to make such awesomeness? And they did it in less than 3 years! UC is a game I can show to people who know nothing about consoles and be proud that it's been released for my platform of choice. That kind of feeling you can't get anywhere else, only on PlayStation.

ChickeyCantor4576d ago (Edited 4576d ago )

"However, if you really were into gamedev, you'd know it's the main goal of game makers to trick you. "

I think he was simply expressing it more on that front.

...Comprehensive reading is awesome!

"Do you even know how many hours of design, programming and drawing it takes to make such awesomeness? And they did it in less than 3 years! "

I think he does.
"less than 3" years as it should be. Espespecially if you already have so much to work with ( UC I && II)

A normal development(not regarding games) cycle should range to 6 months. Because technology advances rapidly.
Some developers take many years for their games but that doesn't mean they are taking the time to make the best and crafted game ever. It could be many factors( like change in art-direction, gamedesign changes, complete overhaul in mechanics whatever).
A game shouldn't take longer than 3 years to develop. If it does It just means that most of them are hindering development in someway.

Saladfax4575d ago (Edited 4575d ago )

I find it terribly funny how he's actually playing heavy compliment to Naughty Dog, but the simple fact that he uttered the phrase "...not due to the overwhelming power of the PS3," causes idiots to criticize him. Hell, it's actually nice to hear someone with an educated, informed opinion rather than the usual, "OMG IT LOOKS BETTER BECAUSE I HAVE 20/200000 VISION?!?!"

For the seventy billionth time: give kudos to the game and development team, not the plastic brick it comes on.

And knowing a little more about how devs do certain things gives greater insight and respect to those who do them well. I found the brief description interesting.

To those who thought he was insulting them by suggesting their "tricks" were gimmicky, quit projecting so hard. I swear, people like to get up in arms over the dumbest crap these days.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 4575d ago
showtimefolks4576d ago

they out do themself more often than people give them credit for. We all wondered along with reviewers that if it was possible to improve upon UC2 and now we have this amazing looking game

thePatriot4576d ago

these "screengrabs" make me thirsty.

zeddy4576d ago

who cares how they did it aslong as it looks good right? if you walk up to a wall in uc2 you will see that there arent really any bricks its just a wall with a really detailed picture. but this is the same for every other game and movies. you cant expect them to render every single grain of sand.

mega BIG time4573d ago

Yeah.. soo the 4th screen shot down, im pretty sure that's de_chateau. Drake is really getting around!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4573d ago
psb4576d ago

coz am attending a midnight launch for this baby! Can't wait.

iNcRiMiNaTi4576d ago

Isn't that the whole point of pre-ordering? I thought midnight launches were only given to people who pre-ordered at that location

Pacman3214576d ago

Imo midnight launches are now quite irrelevant seeing as you can get the game a day early if you pre-order online (if you buy off a good supplier).

kikizoo4576d ago

midnight launch are for teenagers, now most of the gamers are adults, so, they probably really don't care.

by the way, just a word for the graphics : bam !

Jensen4575d ago

@kikizoo .... ummm iam an adult... i attend midnight launchers.. cause usually the store gives away free stuff.... and its pretty fun.... hangn out and chillen..soo your opinion on midnight launch for teenager ect... and gamers are adults...completely false.

4576d ago
PR_FROM_OHIO4576d ago

No way that can be playable WOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NAUGHTY DOG Please stop i don't think my PS3 can handle this game just imagine what they are going to do with the PS4 my GOD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Sevir044576d ago

just wait till its in your ps3

christian hour4576d ago (Edited 4576d ago )

@ PR_FROM_OHIO Have a look at some nvidia tech demos that use tesselation, physx and cuda.(if you want an idea of what to expect from ps4) In fact just do some searches for batman arkham city with phys x on, or arkham asylum with phys x on, these are a few of the nice new techs that will make the nex gen consoles even better :D or if you have over a grand to spare, you can experience it now :P

Thats my plan! PC for multi plats (BF3/Skyrim/Arkham City look INSANE on pc) which hopefully I'll have by december (dunno how I'm goign to avoid buying these on 360/ps3 though until then) and then my consoles will be reserved for multiplats :D That way I get my master chiefs and my drakes and my gears and my gods of war : D

To put it in persepctive, 360 and ps3 have 256mb ddr2 Graphics cards, nvidias latest card is a 3gb ddr5 GPU. And that itself isnt even needed to still be leaps and bounds beyond consoles, you could get by with a 2 gig one which is half the price of the 3gb, but still thats (the 3gb) roughly ten times more powerful than current consoles GPU's.

Realistically we're playing on relics with the current consoles and going off industry trends there should have been a new gen of consoles out by now (or at least announced). I'm tired of waiting hence the PC purchase in the pipeline, but I'm hoping they announce new consoles at e3 this year :D Sorry about the wall of text (and any typos), I got carried away :P

Also cant WAIT for UC3. Been playing nothign but the BETA and will continue to until a retail copy lands in my ps3 :D

Show all comments (105)
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos909d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC904d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid638908d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance909d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer909d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger908d ago (Edited 908d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma313908d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid638908d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
910d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar909d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans909d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar909d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans909d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon909d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans909d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion909d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf909d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)
190°

Ranking the Uncharted Games From Worst to Best

KeenGamer: "Which Uncharted game is the best? Uncharted is widely recognized as one of the most groundbreaking and consistently great franchises in gaming. For both long-time fans and newcomers to this action-adventure classic, here’s a ranking of the franchise’s four main games."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
Kyizen1008d ago

UC 2, 4, 3 and 1. Great read and article

ABizzel11007d ago

No Golden Abyss -_-, otherwise I agree with the order.

UC2: Best overall
UC4: Best graphics, best gameplay, best locations, best environements
UC3: Best set pieces IMO (the boat and desert fights will always be amazing)
UC1: A rough Draft of what was to come
UCGA: Basically UC1 on Vita

Levii_921008d ago (Edited 1008d ago )

Great list and great article nicely writen and explained. Although for me personaly i would put Drakes Fortune above Drake’s Deception and Uncharted 4 is absolutely my favourite of the franchise and number 1 for me.

Inverno1008d ago

U2 is the only game playable on crushing without causing a great amount of frustration. Not to mention just how much influence it had that they redid some of U2s set pieces like the caravan twice, and armored truck chase in U4.

DFresh1008d ago (Edited 1008d ago )

I'd rate it as the following.

1.) Uncharted 2
(Close to perfection of any game I've played in years. Single Player/Multiplayer/Co Op all amazing.)

2.) Uncharted 3
(On par with UC2 multiplayer/co op wise minus the kickbacks [aka killstreaks]. I really liked the Lawrence of Arabia story.)

3.) Uncharted 4
(Single player is amazing. Multiplayer was meh. Co Op had potential. Absolutely hated the health revive system it slowed down the game way too much. Always preferred the fast pace action of UC2/UC3. Made it way more fun that way. Recoil was too ridiculous that most people in lobbies would only do hip firing, using power weapons and using that OP grappling hook to melee people after dropping them. Nobody wanted to revive anyone.)

4.) Uncharted
(It's the first in the series so it's hard to judge. Though I loved the story.)

NecrumOddBoy1007d ago

I agree here but it’s also a series you can play from front to back and truly enjoy. Story-wise, they are all great and flow so well. I wish they threw both Golden Abyss and Lost Legacy on this list. Lost Legacy is the best mechanically in my opinion. You can see it’s stepping stone framework for TLOUS2.

Michiel19891007d ago

uncharted 2 is one of the few games that actually surpassed its pre-release hype.

medman1007d ago (Edited 1007d ago )

I am a single player gamer...I barely ever touch a multiplayer component. The only exceptions over the years have been the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, TLOU factions, and the Uncharted 2 multiplayer. The Uncharted 2 multiplayer saw me spend more time playing it than all my other multiplayer experiences over the years combined. That game really was a masterpiece all around.

brando0081007d ago

I agree completely, those are all stellar MP experiences, coming from another SP gamer who only occasionally gives MP some time.

Gardenia1008d ago

Come to think of it, the step between Uncharted 1 and Uncharted 2 is huge. It goes from the weakest in the series to one of the best games ever made.
I think I'm going to play all of them again soon.

Ninver1007d ago

Yeah all of a sudden I've got that Uncharted itch.

Michiel19891007d ago

is multiplayer still up for the remastered trilogy? or did it never have UC2 mp?

Ninver1007d ago

@michiel1989

Not sure

Show all comments (26)