1050°

Second Uncharted 3 review arrives, scores slightly lower than predecessor

A second review for Uncharted 3 has arrived. It received a slightly lower mark than its predecessor. It is nevertheless described as one of the best PlayStation 3 games.

Read Full Story >>
gamingeverything.com
blumatt4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

Doesn't matter what scores it gets, it's gonna be a great game. The other two games proves that. You're always gonna have game journalists who are overly critical of games and ones that give low scores just to increase traffic and hits on their sites.

I don't care about sales numbers and review scores. A great game can sell good or bad, and I'll make my own judgments regarding how good a game is. I don't need a reviewer to tell me what I think.

@APOFISBORICUA
Yeah, it's sad to say but most likely a multiplat game will probably win this year's Spike VGA Awards Game of the Year. It would be cool as hell if Uncharted 3 got it after Uncharted 2 got it two years ago. Would be so awesome!

APOFISBORICUA4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

I have a feeling that Uncharted 3 even if its going to be better than 2 will recieve lower scores. Same has happened to Resistance 3. Uncharted 3 will get to much GEARS is better comparisons from the biased sites. So that means it is worse?? Hell no... that only means that Batman will end up getting most of the GOTY awards. Its going to happen... a multiconsole game getting GOTY is the safe bet for any publication. Just my opinion. Still UNCHARTED 3 Collectors is day one for me... this at least 4 me will be the game of the generation. See you all online in U3 multiplayer...

Whats up with all the disagrees??

Ok let me say this as the last thing. If Batman AC is better than Batman AA as reviewers are saying its ok to give the game a higher score, but dont come talk with the usual crap concerning PS3 exclusives revies... Part 3 is better but score is lower. This has happened a lot these days... KZ3, LBP2, iNFAMOUS 2, Motorstorm PR and APOCALIPSE, Ratchet ACIT, Resistance 3, MLB The Show 11 and now U3 have suffered from this hipocrital way of scoring. I give a damned about scores as I have games some of you may have never played and I enjoyed them (LAIR). But its not fair that this is happening. The only games who sees an increase in their scores because they are better are all multiconsole games. Batman AC and Dark Souls. So whats happening? I dont know and I dont care. I will be playing UNCHARTED 3 november 1 and thats the only thing that matters to me.

deadpoole4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

To me reviews and scores are useless ... I watch gameplay videos on youtube and decide for myself about game.

I dont need any gaming website help to buy my games.

It just reminds me ... one of my friends has bought more crap games then anyone else based on reading reviews ... lollll.

jdfoster4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

you're taking this viewpoint from ONE review... Let me just say it depends on who's reviewing the game... Some one can have different preferences and opinions to another review. (e.g Gears 2 scored more on IGN than Gears 3 did, because of quality? No (maybe but depends on your individual preference and opinion). But because of who's reviewing it.... People have different opinions in everything... another example... Colin Moriarty would give Resistance 3 a 10 but because it was Stephen Lambrechts he gave it a 9... Get my point? Doesn't matter on what she, he thinks... It matters what YOU think !! :))

Brosy4577d ago

Guys it received a 94 out of 100. Last I checked thats a good score. You guys are acting like it flopped or something.

BrianC62344577d ago

I hope people don't pull that Gears is better crap. That's just a shooter. Uncharted is a different kind of game. Don't even compare the games.

tickticktick4577d ago

OMG!!! it got a 94 OGFG!!! MS paid em

EmperorDalek4577d ago

But how do you know it's a better game than U2? It won tons of GOTY awards and was voted best Playstation yet (forgot where). I think the MP is a lot better in U3, but it's a single-player game.

It's just one review. Wait till the rest of them, and more importantly wait till you play it before you decide reviewers are unfair to U3. 94 would say it's excellent, so I don't see why you're complaining.

death2smoochie4577d ago

How do you know UC3 is better than UC2 when YOU NEVER PLAYED UC3 as its not out yet???
Good god man. 94/100 is an AMAZING SCORE!
So I assume you expect ALL PS3 exclusives to get perfect scores then you will be happy?
Take some advice:

Reviews scores are NONSENSE. They are ONE persons opinion and not YOUR opinion.
There have been some FANTASTIC games this generation that got BAD scores, but were still amazing games.
Guess what? If you enjoy the game that's all that matters.
scoring in the 90's is amazing. If you are crying about why a game on your selected console did not score perfect is your concern, then you need help.

BTW.
Don't worry about batman winning GOTY...if you're going by SCORES...Portal 2 is up for the running easy if SCORES is your measurement for this....

Outside_ofthe_Box4577d ago

KZ3 is trash. KZ2 > KZ3. Thus KZ3 got lower scores. LBP2, InFamous 2, and the rest of the games you mentioned are better than their predecessors.

MsclMexican4577d ago

You know whats scary?

Batman Arkham City on ps3 has a 97 on metacritc...
That beats Uncharted 2...

Holy shit

Uncharted 3 or Batman for GOTY.... the epic battle will soon commence

NewMonday4577d ago

Flame filled posts for a 9.4 score? com'on

ok first score was 9.9 its a safe bet many reviews after will be "lower"

IcarusOne4577d ago

94/100? I guess it's those last 6 points where greatness lives.

humbleopinion4577d ago

some of the comments here are on the borderline between ridiculous and insane.
You have to accept that it is rare that a sequel scores higher then the previous game unless it's miles better (that was the case with Uncharted 2 by the way). If the game is about just as good as the previous iteration, then the reviews have to take into account that the previous game was here first to break boundaries, and also that other games have been released as well and raised the standards and the bar.
In some cases (especially sports franchises) the reviewers also have to tell the player: ok, the previous game is now available for a fraction of the price. Should you shell out 60$ for the next game which is almost identical, or is it a smarter decision to buy the previous game for 15$? The reviews are here to serve the customers. That's all.

Claiming that Uncharted 3 scoring "only" 94 in a publication is biased, or that only PS3 sequels suffer from worse scores although being better is delusional and stupidly fan-boyish at best. Halo Reach is a much better looking, better playing and more balanced Halo game yet it still scored lower then Halo 3. Forza 4 is miles better than Forza 3 yet is still has a 2 points lower metacritic average for the exact reason I mentioned above. Gears 3 > Gears 2 > Gears 1 yet the scores indicate otherwise - simply because years have passed and the bar has been raised.
And don't even get me started about games with lower scores like Crackdown 2, which was in many cases referred to as Crackdown 1.5. Using your fractured logic, shouldn't it in this case score higher then Crackdown 1!?
The answer is NO. The bar has been raised, and the sequel is judged both against newer game as well as the actual improvements if offers over the previous iteration. That's how life works - thanks to evolution standards are always raised all the time. Ask Darwin.

nveenio4577d ago

"Uncharted 3 is Drake’s most varied, compelling and overwhelming adventure ever!"

So it's better than the 2nd but scores worse? I know, I know...probably different reviewers. Still, though, it's gotta make you wonder.

AAACE54577d ago

It will be a good game, just deal with it!

If you liked/loved Uncharted 2, you will feel the same way, if not better.

Every game can't get perfect 10's... that's why they are called critics.

ConanOBrien4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

Drake's face very akin to younger glass-less Michael Pachter - the ANALyst

http://www.thegamersmag.com...

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4577d ago
metsgaming4577d ago

This game will get lower score than uncharted 2 even if it is miles better a sad but true fact reviewers are a joke. For example lbp2 is so much better than lbp but scored less hmm. Its bs like that why reviewers are even bigger joke than they already are, the games obviously better yet they give it a lower score and they fail to realize how bad that makes them look. Plus add the fact its an exlusive just makes it worse than normal. Calling it now it wont score as high as uc2 but in reality it will probably be a beter game.

SnotyTheRocket4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

It's because they didn't think LBP2 was as "Fresh" as LBP1, but I don't give a shitt if it's not "Fresh" like LBP1, IT WAS BETTER IN EVERY WAY, still got lower scores (not by much, mind you) for some reason. It will probably happen with Uc3 as well. But I loved inFamous 2 and all the other exclusive sequels because they where infinitely better than they're previous installments. Reviewers need to see this stuff and give better scores to BETTER games!

andibandit4577d ago

Review scores usually reflects the present, you cant drag up a game that is x years old and say "This is the definition of a 90/100 game".

kikizoo4576d ago (Edited 4576d ago )

" To compare, Gears of War 3 received a 96% in the same issue."

stop comparing with others consoles and standard, or multiplatform, uncharted 3 is compared only to uncharted2, the multi-awars winners, goty, with best graphics on consoles.

by the way, gamineverything=nintendo everything, probably not really happy with sony dominating soft and hardware sales.

Dante1124577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

94!!! Pre-order canceled. Derp...

lol jk

Edit: And the newly created accounts to proclaim failure and biased reviewers begins.

@ Ziro

Lol, can't I say that about playmania rating UC3 higher than Gears 3 as well? Spin...

BrianC62344577d ago

It's a good thing it didn't get a 93. If it did we'd all have to cancel. :)

Monkey5214577d ago

Well, when I was in High School... a 92% was considered a B+
I don't want a B+ Game.. I want a solid A!

/S

But in all seriousness, people are freaking out too much! 94 is a great score and proves that Naughty Dog still has it! I mean, seriously... UC2 got so many perfect scores, it would be hard for UC3 to really beat it.

Spitfire_Riggz4577d ago

Dont you just love how when the review is one of the highest ever people in the comments are like "OMG GOTY THIS GAME RULEZ WOW AMAZING" and "Mark down another super high score for this game!"

Then you have articles that are saying something negative, like U3 scores lower than U2. And we get "you know what I dont even care about review scores. Reviews are a non factor"

AAWELLS094577d ago

Well said my friend and my thoughts exactly. It just seems like PS3 fanboys are so worried that Xbots wont think highly of the UC series. Most gamers already know that its a great game but they all show nervously typing away trying to convince everyone to agre with them but when the shoe is on the other foot its a different story and the trash talking begins. There is alot of people on here that really need to grow up bad.

Old McGroin4577d ago

@ aawells07

I was exclusively an "Xbot" up until last October (2010) and I'm a pretty big Gears fan so when I borrowed Uncharted 2 off my bro I was a little scepticle. I finished the game over one weekend. Now, I look at that in two ways.
The first way is that the game was pretty short lived and in my honest opinion there wasn't much replay value, once I finished it I felt I had seen and done everything I could possibly could in one playthrough and the online aspect was a bit weak.
The second way I look at it is that I might have finished it in a little under 2 days, but that was hours upon hours of solid playing because I was so engrossed with the story/spectacle/set pieces that I couldn't put the pad down.
I think Uncharted 2 is one of the best games I've ever played, the only let down was I felt I had no reason to go back to it once I'd finished it. I expect Uncharted 3 to be the same, an absolutely astounding campaign but once it's done I can't see the multiplayer (going by my opinion of the beta) keeping me coming back for more. That's just my opinion as a former Xbot!

On the topic of the score, 94% is an excellent score by anyone's standards and if people are comparing it to the 96% given to Gears they have to remember that there was probably two different people reviewing them, one magazine doesn't mean one reviewer.

nycredude4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

old mcgroin

I agree with everything you said except the replay value thing. i played both UC1 and 2 multiple times and each time it's still as fun as the first. It's a testament to how well designed the games are. Trust wait a month or two and go back and play uncharted 2 again. you will see what i mean.

Aawells07
I don't know what you are getting at. i don't see any PS3 fans and xbots fighting over this article. I couldn't care less what someone else thinks. I love the games and I will buy it no matter what reviews say. This is a forum to discuss our passion so why can't we express our feelings?

Regarding this review everything in it reads that it is better than UC2 but the score is lower which doesn't make much sense but since when did scores make sense? That is why I am an advocate of getting rid of review scores altogether. Just write an informative review that gives gamers an idea of what to expect is all I ask. Scores are for fanboys to fight over.

bangoskank down below

I only have one bubble so I will respond with this update.

"I expressed how much people like you disgust me and then I stated that I am a fan of all consoles"

Way to be civilized bro and show your colors. Just because you own every console known to man and some unknown doesn't make you some super gamer who is better than others who don't care about owning three consoles, two handhelds, and a pc. Why do you care so much what other people do or play. People disgust you? Why, is he not human? What makes you better? You sound like a sociopath. Seek help.

showtimefolks4577d ago

and this magazine has given it 94 how is that bad?

APOFISBORICUA

batman isn't winning take that to the bank, why we forgot about portal 2?

end of the day scores are just numbers if you liked the the uncharted series you will buy this if you didn't like it before i doubt this is gonna change your mind

portal 2
gears 3
uncharted 3
skyrim
AC
saints row 3

one of these should get goty in my opinion. I believe the sleeper pick is saints row 3 because it could have a GTA:SA affect on reviewers with so much craziness

LOGICWINS4577d ago

YUP, IGN's been showing Saints Row: The Third a ton of love.

evilunklebud4577d ago

It was going to be a tall order to beat UC2... still could.

Looking forward to it, day 1.

FlameBaitGod4577d ago

The magazine gave it a gold award yet gave it 94/100 lol xD

andibandit4577d ago

The magazine problably knows that 94/100 is a great score.

Xalaris4577d ago

"Doesn't matter what scores it gets, it's gonna be a great game."

Sounds like insecurity honestly, but since it IS UC3, I guess I'll let it slide xD

4577d ago
Drake1174577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

There is no way in hell this game is going to get under a metacritic of 9 Uncharted and ND are way too good for that. Idk why all you ppl care that it got a score of .4 lower than UC2. Thats prob not even going to be a noticeable difference. Leave it be the game will be amazing and people will still buy the sh** out of it, Move along.

SilentNegotiator4577d ago

LOL, 3/5 of a point less and the article makes a big deal of it in the title?

kikizoo4576d ago

This is the problem, not the review.

+ they wrote " To compare, Gears of War 3 received a 96% in the same issue." wich is really stupid, since you can't compare.

damnyouretall4576d ago

i usually read the higher scores, cause they tell you what they like about the game rather than what they didnt like. if you obsess over the minimal negative shit, and nitpick, then you should should just give up on videogames.

EazyC4576d ago

What you said about GoW 3 is biased and incorrect.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 4576d ago
Zir04577d ago

"To compare, Gears of War 3 received a 96% in the same issue." and U3 got 94%.

I got a feeling there will be a lot of blacklisted sites/magazines in coming weeks.

fluffydelusions4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

I never saw ND complain about scores for past games and I've been following them since PS1 days. Only Cliffy B got pissed from low scores.

DatNJDom814577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

Its funny how that loser zir0 commented on the actual site in true xbox fanboy fashion. great job. In case ya dont hit the link heres his comment:

"LOWER THAN GEARS 3!!! FAIL!!! PS3 IS FAIL!!! NAUGHTY DOG = FAIL!!!

XBOX 360 + GEARS = WIN!"

great job! /s

SilentNegotiator4577d ago

Zero is just trolling as usual, ignore him. Sony only blacklists malicious sites like Kotaku and that one (German, I think?) site.

He even left a sad little comment on the site. Bungie account #497543 confirmed?

Tarantino_Life4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

You mean like How playmania magazine scored UC3 a 9.9 while Gears3 a 9 or how IGN scored Gears 3 a 9 While giving UC2 a 9.5? I got a feeling there will a lot of butthurt bots in the coming weeks complaining of bias, linearity, gears multi etc etc after seeing UC3 get better scores then gears ahem. Lol at the spin after this mag gave UC3 94

Virus2014577d ago

Why do people say that if UC3 gets a higher score than Gears 3 xbox fanboys will complain and say the websites is biased. I've never in my 3 years of being on this site have seen an xbox 360 fanboy complain as much as a PS3 fanboy. I feel that deep inside some of the people that hate on the xbox 360 secretly want one. Come on guys this is an Uncharted review and someone has to start saying something negative about the xbox 360. Xbox gamers are busy playing and enjoying their games that's why N4G is known as a Ps3 fanboy site. I think all the hate that is shown on this website is really envy and it's pathetic. If you really enjoyed your ps3 you really wouldn't be on this site attacking another system in this "fake war" that you think you are a part of.

Ps3 gamers enjoy Uncharted and all the other beautiful Ps3 exclusives.

Xbox 360 gamers enjoy Gears and their exclusives.

I'll enjoy all because I enjoy gaming period.

LOGICWINS4577d ago

"I've never in my 3 years of being on this site have seen an xbox 360 fanboy complain as much as a PS3 fanboy."

I've been a member of this site for about a year now and I've noticed the same thing.

Arksine4577d ago

@above

Sorry, but there is plenty of complaining from both camps. And NO ONE plays the "N4G Victim" card as much as 360 fanboy.

milohighclub4577d ago

It's called selective reading.

finnhima4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

"Xbox gamers are busy playing and enjoying their games that's why N4G is known as a Ps3 fanboy site."

...yeah im sure.

Silly gameAr4577d ago

PS3 fansite? Nah. I once read a comment from someone complaining about to much positive Sony news on N4G. (I'm serious)

Let's just say, I think he would be satisfied with all the negative flamebait that's been approved lately. I

bangoskank4577d ago

@Virus201

I think it goes beyond jealousy and into the realm of stupidity. Some of these kids on here act like bullies and racist towards a certain gamer just because they don't have the same console. The moderators are no better because they allow this to happen and sometimes even side with the PS3 fanboys. It kind of sucks that gamers can't just discuss games without it becoming some immature feud.

In case anyone tries to classify me as an "M$ fanboy", I own both consoles and love both IP's. Gears 3 was an awesome game(mulitplayer still is) and I can't wait to receive my UC3 pre-order on November 1st.

starchild4577d ago

@Arksine

It's not playing the victim card, it's merely people making complaints about the fanaticism and extremism that seems to come mostly from the PS3 fanboy camp.

Those people are justified for feeling annoyed with the situation because it really damages the experience of spending time on this site.

I'm mostly a PC gamer who would choose Uncharted over Gears of War any day, but I still hate the BS that mainly comes from the PS3 camp. I don't see Wii fanboys, PC fanboys, or even Xbox 360 fanboys causing as much trouble or acting as irrational and intolerant as the PS3 fanboys.

Tarantino_Life4577d ago

Lol at xbots acting as innocent virgins who have never once trolled on ps3 articles all these years. N4360 is what this site should be renamed as. Listen Bots a piece of advice - No matter how much guys like Ziro, Gamingdroid etc,etc troll on ps3 articles you have to understand we simply dont care for 360. We just dont like Halo. We dont like Crackdown, Banjo whatever. So why try to convince us to buy an xbox? Just stick to whatever articles that are related to your console and GTFO out ps3 threads. Why is it so difficult for you M$ Fanatics to understand?

Objective4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

I have to agree too on PS3 fanboys being the most immature and annoying. I came into console gaming just this gen and bought both consoles with no preference or loyalty bias whatsoever for either. Then coming to this site made me develop an acute disdain for the PS3 fanboys because of their mentality. Look at the comments on this article for example, there is a predictable method adopted here. These fanboys are just preparing themselves for the possibility that UC 3 may not receive the highest praise of all games released this year, and when that happens they will rinse and repeat the same conspiracy theories that are already being spouted here. But if UC3 does get the highest scores, you will hear nothing of conspiracy theories.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4577d ago
4577d ago Replies(2)
Rageanitus4577d ago

Im still getting it..... Uncharted one got below 9 ratings yet It was still the best game imo at the time.....

Alot of these 10/10 ratings are completly overhyped this generation... just loook at halo and COD's

ChiVoLok04577d ago

I think Halo is pretty good this coming from a diehard PS fan. At least it has a story unlike COD.

Rageanitus4577d ago

It was a good enough to finish IMO but it felt too generic of a shooter. Uncharted on the other hand does not really have any other game that compare it to.

Convas4577d ago

Wow, couldn't resist bringing Halo into the mix could you?

What's "overhyped" to one person, is not "overhyped" to another.

And I'm not sure if you've noticed, but Uncharted 3 is riding the hype train big time as well.

Rageanitus4577d ago

yes the uncharted train scene helped change the hype into a good game ;)

Ultraplayerxp4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

^^
"What's "overhyped" to one person, is not "overhyped" to another."

..then following this logic, could I (and a lot more people) say Uncharted 3 isn't riding the hype train?

Convas4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

Sure you could, but you'd be following the wrong line of logic, as I did not say that Uncharted 3 is overhyped, as I have not yet played it.

Also, you (and a lot more people) are obviously completely blind if you can't see it's hyped quite a bit. I mean, the phrase "GOTY" is only shouted a couple thousand times in just about every UC3 thread.

Ultraplayerxp4577d ago

I think you've got it wrong. I was just following your line of thought man. Its confusing when the first part of your post says that hype is merely opinion and then following it up with insinuating that u3 is more than just hyped and passing it off as fact.

hilyou4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

i would never EVER give uncharted 1 more than 8 or 8.5! but uncharted 2 and 3 crush uncharted 1 in every single way there was, is, and can be!
Also halo is not overrated! trust me i have both. 2 me halo 2 is a little bit overrated, but halo 1 is one of the BEST GAMES OF ALL TIME!

IAmTheTruth4577d ago Show
Rageanitus4577d ago

Although this is a UC thread... I found that Halo was god for consoels at its time but there were so many more PC fps games out there that were better.... the saturation of FPS have become a all time high this gen.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4577d ago
beastgamer4577d ago (Edited 4577d ago )

what?
I'll wait for legit and reviewers I've heard of.

jdfoster4577d ago

Have you seen the source this article has come from.... A forum... (plus didn't they say the magazines out this Wednesday? Yet it's Tuesday so how will they know? (unless it cam early plus he gives no actual proof of the score)

Also I can't wait till all the reviews start coming in.
And CAN'T WAIT for this game to come out!!!!

metsgaming4577d ago

Imo the so called legit reviewers are no better than the no name site probably worse. The only legit review is ur own.

Show all comments (166)
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos909d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC904d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid638908d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance909d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer909d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger908d ago (Edited 908d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma313908d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid638908d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)
210°

Uncharted 3 Anniversary Retrospective: Shackled By Its Precursor's Legacy

A decade after its release, how does Uncharted 3 fare today? Does its story still work? Was its precursor’s legacy a bedrock or quicksand for its own aspirations?

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
910d ago Replies(2)
SullysCigar910d ago

When arguably the weakest game in the series is still awesome and more fun than most games today, you know you're onto a winner!

coolbeans910d ago

I'd extend "arguably" before awesome too. Many technically demanding scenes were jaw-dropping for the time, but it's tough to ignore the sub-par context propelling the action forward.

SullysCigar910d ago

Tough for you, perhaps, and that's fine. I enjoyed it very much. Perhaps a little less than the others in the series, but then the bar is extremely high.

I remember being blown away by the water and sand tech in U3 for the time too. It certainly was a visual treat!

LucasRuinedChildhood909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

It is very good, but when I originally played Uncharted 3 it was the most disappointed I'd ever been in a video-game because Uncharted 2 was just that good. I enjoyed 3 much more when I replayed it in the Nathan Drake Collection though. I could just enjoy it for what it is and accept that it's not Uncharted 2 - it's not a roller coaster, and it doesn't balance and rotate between action, puzzles, platforming and set-pieces in the same way.

Uncharted 3's gameplay is a bit more compartmentalized and focused on one thing at a time. I'm not surprised the scrapped version of Uncharted 4 was going to have no gunplay for the first half. It's also paced much differently - it takes a long time to get to the notable set-pieces. Uncharted 2 is insane from Nepal onwards which is about an hour into the game. haha.

I did like the introduction of chase sequences, and I love first hour (bar fight, young Drake) and from the airplane sequence onwards but I just think the rest of it just sort of meanders along without as much purpose as 2.

When it comes to the script, you can feel the absence of Neil Druckmann and Josh Scherr (writer on every other console Uncharted game). Drake gets hit in the face, and the game goes on a random side plot for an hour to give you some boat set-pieces. He then washes up on a beach close to where Elena is staying to get you back to the real plot. Drake just says "How convenient" to try make you laugh off how sloppy the plot got.

In retrospect, I'm not sure if Naughty Dog were ready to work on 2 different games at once. 3 clearly had production issues that 1 and 2 didn't have, and Hennig's version of 4 didn't work out. They had to crunch so hard to get the rebooted version done on time that Bruce Straley gave up making video-games.

coolbeans909d ago

I'll give you some props for the extra analysis. I remember Druckmann climbing his way to a writer spot in UC2, but wasn't aware of Josh Scherr. I didn't know that was the reason for Straley's departure either. That's pretty damn rough.

GhostofHorizon909d ago

They had to make some weird choices as far as story went because the actor for Cutter had to bail which left a few holes in the story.

Uncharted is one of my favourite series and while the leap from 2 to 3 was not nearly as big as the leap from 1 to 2, I think it was an amazing experience none the less.

coolbeans909d ago

Graham McTavish's departure wasn't easy, but I don't think that would fix many holes tbh. Because the main issue to consider is the precarious mindset Naughty Dog was operating on: an increased emphasis in set pieces that HAD to go in and worrying about the context later.

Petebloodyonion909d ago

I really liked part 3 ( Among Thieves is still the best in my opinion) My only complaint was the interactions with the villains and how they were a missed opportunity, Linda MacMahon (Marlowe) was an interesting antagonist due to the history with Sully and Nate but it fails basically flat especially with her ending. And I couldn't care about Navaro 2.0.

What I did love and made me care was Cutter, in the short time he was in the game you could feel that the guy was a good treasure hunter for example when he pulled his own notebook with the clues he founds so the team can escape a room.
It was a small touch that add a lot to the character.

Good-Smurf909d ago

Marlowe was played by Rosalind Ayres.

MadLad909d ago (Edited 909d ago )

I have mixed feelings on the series. I still own all of them on the PS3, and the collection for PS4, but I didn't truly "love" any of the games until 4.

They're good games, but they always stumble on some element.
The first is good, but the climbing mechanics weren't exactly fine tuned with the first showing. Not to mention the spongey enemies if you played on anything past normal; but you're then faced with a fairly unchallenging game experience.
The second mostly fixed the climbing, but added in a pretty clumsy stealth mechanic.
Three was just two with a new story.

Four got it right though.
I don't remember once getting annoyed by any mechanic had in the game.

I know that everyone has a soft spot for 2, and 3 is sort of the black sheep of the series; but they did, overall, get progressively better. Which doesn't always happen.

Show all comments (28)
190°

Ranking the Uncharted Games From Worst to Best

KeenGamer: "Which Uncharted game is the best? Uncharted is widely recognized as one of the most groundbreaking and consistently great franchises in gaming. For both long-time fans and newcomers to this action-adventure classic, here’s a ranking of the franchise’s four main games."

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
Kyizen1008d ago

UC 2, 4, 3 and 1. Great read and article

ABizzel11007d ago

No Golden Abyss -_-, otherwise I agree with the order.

UC2: Best overall
UC4: Best graphics, best gameplay, best locations, best environements
UC3: Best set pieces IMO (the boat and desert fights will always be amazing)
UC1: A rough Draft of what was to come
UCGA: Basically UC1 on Vita

Levii_921008d ago (Edited 1008d ago )

Great list and great article nicely writen and explained. Although for me personaly i would put Drakes Fortune above Drake’s Deception and Uncharted 4 is absolutely my favourite of the franchise and number 1 for me.

Inverno1008d ago

U2 is the only game playable on crushing without causing a great amount of frustration. Not to mention just how much influence it had that they redid some of U2s set pieces like the caravan twice, and armored truck chase in U4.

DFresh1008d ago (Edited 1008d ago )

I'd rate it as the following.

1.) Uncharted 2
(Close to perfection of any game I've played in years. Single Player/Multiplayer/Co Op all amazing.)

2.) Uncharted 3
(On par with UC2 multiplayer/co op wise minus the kickbacks [aka killstreaks]. I really liked the Lawrence of Arabia story.)

3.) Uncharted 4
(Single player is amazing. Multiplayer was meh. Co Op had potential. Absolutely hated the health revive system it slowed down the game way too much. Always preferred the fast pace action of UC2/UC3. Made it way more fun that way. Recoil was too ridiculous that most people in lobbies would only do hip firing, using power weapons and using that OP grappling hook to melee people after dropping them. Nobody wanted to revive anyone.)

4.) Uncharted
(It's the first in the series so it's hard to judge. Though I loved the story.)

NecrumOddBoy1008d ago

I agree here but it’s also a series you can play from front to back and truly enjoy. Story-wise, they are all great and flow so well. I wish they threw both Golden Abyss and Lost Legacy on this list. Lost Legacy is the best mechanically in my opinion. You can see it’s stepping stone framework for TLOUS2.

Michiel19891008d ago

uncharted 2 is one of the few games that actually surpassed its pre-release hype.

medman1007d ago (Edited 1007d ago )

I am a single player gamer...I barely ever touch a multiplayer component. The only exceptions over the years have been the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer, TLOU factions, and the Uncharted 2 multiplayer. The Uncharted 2 multiplayer saw me spend more time playing it than all my other multiplayer experiences over the years combined. That game really was a masterpiece all around.

brando0081007d ago

I agree completely, those are all stellar MP experiences, coming from another SP gamer who only occasionally gives MP some time.

Gardenia1008d ago

Come to think of it, the step between Uncharted 1 and Uncharted 2 is huge. It goes from the weakest in the series to one of the best games ever made.
I think I'm going to play all of them again soon.

Ninver1008d ago

Yeah all of a sudden I've got that Uncharted itch.

Michiel19891007d ago

is multiplayer still up for the remastered trilogy? or did it never have UC2 mp?

Ninver1007d ago

@michiel1989

Not sure

Show all comments (26)