140°

Popular Online Passes are Taking Over

Online Passes are becoming more and more popular for games, and the reason, as usual, is money. Developers are tired of putting all of the effort into making games and making sure that servers keep running while profiting only on the initial sale of the game. Online Passes give purchasers of pre-owned games incentive to pay the developer for their product. Is this unfair to the customer? You be the judge.

Read Full Story >>
gamergaia.com
dangert124599d ago

I've never brought a game that uses them recently became a big pc gamer fan. but i think these may hurt the console game pc gamers dont even have to deal with this

Tony P4597d ago

Yeah, but that's only because we were already forced into buying all our games new a long time ago.

But at least the reason we got was "piracy concerns". On console they do it to spite used game sales, which are perfectly legal and perfectly ethical imo.

I don't feel guilty for buying anything used.

Maybe Gamestop should feel guilty for funneling the money out of the industry. Maybe publishers should feel guilty for finding ways to milk more money from customers.

morganfell4597d ago (Edited 4597d ago )

I have had a few cars in my life. One or two were used. I don't remember there being a block that stopped the car from operating on the freeway until I paid the original manufacturer a fee.

And when I sold that car or a car I bought new, it functioned fully for the next buyer.

I've bought used books. I don't recall the words being jumbled until I paid the publisher for a pass.

What the entire industry keeps avoiding is this. I have games for which I wouldn't trade anything. Every HALO game and every Metal Gear game to name a couple. If the industry did a better job of not making crap titles that no one wants to finish and have zero replay once you do finish then the used game industry wouldn't be half the problem we now find.

The publishers and devs want to you to shell out $59 a pop for something that is dead in 10 hours. What other form of entertainment do you purchase that involves a physical product you take home but loses functionality once you attempt to sell it?

And outside of the digital realm, what other form of entertainment says once you buy this we are going to deprive you of any ability to get back some of your money when you discover just how bad this product happens to be.

Great games are the best defense against used game sales. Nothing a company can say or do will change that bit of truth.

The reality is that these new online passes are creating more and more Napster incidents. They are feeding the piracy industry by pressure. This year so far I have spent easily over 2K in games, just software, alone. Not everyone can do that and those that cannot, and see their trade in values dropping, will often seek another way in which to compensate.

Homeland is a good example of a case where a company (THQ) should be sued for false advertisement. They billed the game as if it were the second coming of shooters knowing all along the game was really a short lived piece of trash. They spent more on advertisement than on development. Did they ever consider that might be at the heart of the problem?

Kyosuke_Sanada4597d ago

@ Morgan Fell
Man I've been reading your posts for a while and I know it's off-topic but how the hell you only have one bubble because you are one of the few that actually think before stating an opinion.

Morbius4204597d ago

I was just asking myself the same question about Morgan only having one bubble. I think the bubble system is outdated and broken.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4597d ago
Messatsu2904597d ago

I'm not even buying console games because of this. I just bought Dark Souls because its dark souls and it also doesn't bring any pass bs, but the last game i bought before that was GT5 on launch which was on December... So yeah.. Every time i feel like listing my ps3 and 360 on ebay, because console gaming has gone to shit.

Morbius4204597d ago

I miss the PS2/Xbox/DreamCast generation.

Kyosuke_Sanada4597d ago (Edited 4597d ago )

It's a damn shame especially how many people forgot the great time we had with complete games last generation. Companies need to realize that if quality game is created it will sell new without the need of leashes on consumers' neck by word of mouth.

After reading the replies in the articles similar to this, it's amazing how people just sit there and accept online passes which is basically free money for doing squat.

Vortex3D4597d ago

The article is inaccurate saying online pass contents aren't DLC because you still need to download the single player contents that aren't on the disc.

Show all comments (12)
80°

Mass Effect 3's Ending for Javik Misses the Forest for the Trees

Based on one narratively fitting ending in Mass Effect 3, Prothean squadmate Javik is highly unlikely to return in the next Mass Effect game.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
anast73d ago

He was one of my least favorite characters. I wish they would have done the Proths different.

80°

Batman Arkham City in 2024 – How Well Does It Hold Up?

GB: "With this feature, we take a look back at the incredible Batman: Arkham City with the aim of analyzing it from the perspective of a 2024 release."

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
500°

Spider-Man 2 Metacritic review score means Marvel still hasn’t beaten DC

Reviews are finally out for Marvel's Spider-Man 2, and the game's Metacritic review score means Marvel still hasn't toppled DC.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
CrashMania214d ago (Edited 214d ago )

The Arkham games are largely excellent, a shame they are being followed up by that god awful looking suicide squad game.

RaidenBlack213d ago

All 4 Arkham games are just amazing...
With the Gotham Knights turning out sub par, hope the Suicide Squad fails as well... So that both Rocksteady and WB Montreal goes back to creating good single player DC games ...
A batman beyond game maybe?

anal_vegan_moans213d ago

Having the game fail would make it harder for them to get funding for their next game, please don't wish this on them. They already delayed the game a whole year after backlash, so we still have to wait and see how it will turn out.

GhostScholar213d ago

I think asylum and origins were great. City was good. Knight was horrible.

214d ago
Ezio2048213d ago

You can't expect a game to match 96-94 meta apple for apple. Different era and different gen. No need to diminish either game's achievement. Arkham City and Spiderman 2 are both amazing sequels that improved upon their already incredible first parts.

Tacoboto213d ago

To back that up, there are major websites that adjusted their review scales.

IGN used to have a 100 point system; now it's a 10 point system. I remember GameSpot back in 2004 was razed for giving Halo 2 a 9.4 when IGN gave it like a 9.7 or 9.8

darthv72213d ago

Arkham Asylum was great, but when City came out... wow what a total overhaul that was. Nothing has had that type of night/day difference in scope and scale since.

SM2 is looking to be a great game in itself. Definitely an upgrade over the previous entries. Just from the opening battle with sandman, it gives me god of war 2 vibes with how that one opened with the battle with colossus of rhodes. That is still one of my favorite sequels of all time.

Zeke68213d ago

Thanks for the spoiler how the game starts loser...

darthv72213d ago

Zeke... you've had plenty of time to play god of war 2.

GaboonViper213d ago

And right on cue, here comes the downplaying of Insomniacs masterpiece, not gonna work, this game is gonna be beast in success.

BehindTheRows213d ago

From the same folks who gave it a 10/10 no less.

Aloymetal213d ago

'' here comes the downplaying of Insomniacs masterpiece''
You know that train is never late.

isarai213d ago

Oh look, another trash article from Videogamer

Show all comments (48)