920°

Rage HD Screenshot Comparison: PS3 Vs Xbox 360

NowGamer: Rage is a stunning-looking game – but which console does it look best on, PS3 or 360?

Read Full Story >>
nowgamer.com
Shaman4593d ago

What is this? The game doesn't appear that blue on my TV...

PCRockStar4592d ago ShowReplies(4)
Pixel_Pusher4592d ago

wow, I clicked to view the first image and an exe tried to install itself. wtf

BulletToothtony4592d ago

me too.. too bad they need an .dmg to install on my computer ;)

badz1494592d ago

RAGE is a jaggies heaven on consoles! why don't they just do a Borderland by making it cell-shaded and get done with it? these short aren't even looking close to what have been showed before! those jaggies are not gonna look pretty on larger screens! even on the pc side, there's no advanced graphic setting. looks like id really dropped the ball with this!

SignifiedSix4592d ago

Lol, bullet. Using a mac? Same here xD But it didn't try downloading anything for me :O

pixelsword4592d ago

Something funny is happening; LoT's pics look almost identical, but these pics show one to be better than another?

One is lying, the other may also be lying, but who these days are ipartial?

NeoBasch4592d ago

Knights must always tell the truth, Knaves always lie.

Person A says Person B is a Knight. Person B says either Person A is lying or he (Person B) is.

Is Person A a knight or knave? Person B?

morganfell4592d ago

Look at what we saw earlier today with the video comparisons. One site had the 360 darker, the other site had the PS3 darker.

You can't trust anything from a group of people that refuse, I mean outright refuse to list exact test setups, refuse to list detailed review standards, and consistently publish articles composed of hit hungry headlines.

european_cannon4592d ago

My God! This comparison sucks a$$!

PCRockStar4592d ago

I get flagged for trolling when I only stated the obvious in regards to the photos!
Love it!

SignifiedSix4592d ago

You have to remember. You say anything negative about the PS3 on here, you get flagged for it...

pixelsword4592d ago

Yeah, but if you say anything negative about the 360, you lose bubbles; so it evens out.

hilyou4592d ago

i would say id did a really really good job on making the graphics same on each console.

Crazyglues4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

Wow game looks amazing, been playing for 3 hours now and it's pretty cool, I'm loving it...

it's pretty cool to be playing at 60fps and you notice it right away because everything feels so much more live... Amazing Looking game..

So far I'm loving it..

.____........___...____
.____||......||.......____||
||.........___||.......____||

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4592d ago
fastrez4593d ago

PS3 jaggies. Jesus. I'll be installing it then...

Feckles4593d ago

Don't think it'll make much difference - the PS3 is a mandatory install and the Xbox is optional.

Although installing the game on Xbox should improve the texture load times.

Those jaggies on the PS3 version are unforgivable though. This is hardly a good advert for the idTech 5 engine.

Shaman4593d ago

Jaggies are there because game drops resolution rather than frames when its under stress. Both are 720p native though.

NukaCola4593d ago

I have seen this game running on PS3. These jaggies are not this bad. This game looks the same on both consoles and NowGamer is full of it. They will also have two seperate people reviewing the game and I bet the scores will bve different. I really don't like this site.

DeadIIIRed4592d ago

Yep, even in the crap quality youtube videos the graphics don't look as terrible as that

SilentNegotiator4592d ago

If the game drops resolution at stressful parts, then I'm sure Nowgamer nit-picked out the worst ps3 screens they could get, when it hit the lowest parts.

Ju4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

This game runs 60fps. Likely the framerate is used to apply some sort of AA (remember how Kojima used half frame interleaving to add AA to GT PSP?). That said, those jaggies can be a result of grabbing a 16ms shot which indeed has jaggies; but won't be visible in motion. No video looks as bad as these shots. And then its a question how those shots were taken. Play with the contrast ratio and you loose color range resolution which will result in over saturated edges (hence jaggies). That's how those shots look.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4592d ago
Feckles4593d ago

@Shaman

Would rather it lost frame rate than resolution – what's this obsession with 60fps?

@NukaCola

Yes, this is what the PS3 version looks like. I believe NowGamer captures on this hardware:

http://www.digitalfoundry.o...

Same as Eurogamer.

Dante1124592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

Both version had jaggies (supposedly the PS3 had more) and still had alot of pop-ins as well. No wonder this game is scored low.

From article

"Pop -ins are bad on both consoles, though it appears to take longer to load textures on the Xbox360."

Edit: Just asked a friend on Live and he said that he hasn't even noticed pop-ins in his version and that it doesn't have a blue tint to it either. I guess I'll just stick to LoT comparison.

gamingdroid4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

If it is a loading issue, it is probably cause the texture is streaming from disc. Try installing the entire game and see if the issue is still there.

However, the more frequent texture pop-in on the PS3 is quite blatant in the video below. It also shows blurry PS3 version in the pics.

Verify it yourself:

http://www.gameblurb.net/fe...

This jives well with Xbox 360 having the ability to store more texture in RAM so less pop-ins.

As you said though, we will have to wait for Digital Foundry or LoT comparison.

Gamer30004592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

@gamingdroid
so you bring the article that says:
"Pop -ins are bad on both consoles, though it appears to take longer to load textures on the Xbox360."
but some how you still think xbox360 has the better version ???
why so desperate ??
any way both version are nothing to brag about
and
with all the 8s and 7s this games fails big time

gamingdroid4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

As I said, it loads slower because the texture is loaded from DVD disc. If it loaded from HD, what do you think will happen?

It will be on par with the PS3 and less pop-ins.

Metacritic has this game at 82 based on 46 reviews. A very respectable score!

I think you are just upset because your favorite console didn't happen to be better on your platform of choice... not my fault so don't hate on me. :D

Gamer30004592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

@gamingdroid
lol ...i'm upest ???XD
i have always said that both will look the same
and i was right

H2H for rage from lens of truth :
they look the same in every pic
http://www.lensoftruth.com/...
"Rollover to see the Difference. Notice the Textures look almost identical "

and from this article :
""Pop -ins are bad on both consoles, though it appears to take longer to load textures on the Xbox360." "

i know you feel sad
you want xbox win
so feel free to think what ever you like
this game have nothing in the gfx to brag about anyway

gamingdroid4592d ago (Edited 4592d ago )

Screenshots doesn't show popins....

As I said, was the "slower" loading of textures from disc? If so, it is obvious. Just install the game, problem solved.

Kiroe4592d ago

Sure, the game looks the same in stills, but watch the megatextures streaming comparison video. PS3 lags behind:

http://www.gameblurb.net/fe...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4592d ago
skyward4593d ago

PC is going to be the only way to play a game from the makers of Doom and Quake. Does look nice on the 360 though...

wnek94592d ago

pc version doesnt have any video options lol its a console port, texture popping every few seconds.

trancefreak4592d ago

Serious? You cant tweak your PC. How wonderful too take away what pc gamers fundamentally do. They tweak it to the best graphical setting and try to dial it in too that close marker being fps to appearance.

LOL screw that I want to push my system to the max, I don't need some predefined graphical test to tell me what settings it thinks are best for me.

I'm sure someone will make an advanced graphics option like the one for crysis 2 but I will hold my breathe

TimmyShire4592d ago

lol - I was only jesting anyway. I actually think it doesn't matter about graphics, you'll play on whichever console you personally prefer. Well, that's what I do anyway.

JellyJelly4592d ago

Got the 360 version pre-ordered and I can't wait to play it!

Show all comments (79)
110°

Xbox Deals With Gold and Spotlight Sale Discounts – 4th-10th Aug 2020

Neil writes: "Just been paid? Fancy getting a new game added to that backlog of shame? The Xbox Deals With Gold and Spotlight Sale is back with even more discounts on a variety of great Xbox titles. If you've got time in your life for a new gaming experience, the following bargain basement titles are available for your cut-price purchasing between 4th-10th August 2020."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
90°

Rage's Open World Was Intimate & Memorable, Not Another Huge, Empty Sandbox

Rage from id Software and Bethesda Softworks was largely overlooked, yet its handcrafted FPS open world and memorable characters transcend genre convention.

Read Full Story >>
escapistmagazine.com
Fist4achin1622d ago

I enjoyed the first game. I plan to play the sequel soon!

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster1774d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada071774d ago (Edited 1774d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X141774d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase1773d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted1774d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster1774d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack1774d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH1769d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.