980°
8.5

IGN - Rage Review

That Rage is a visual marvel should be no surprise. id Software has consistently set new industry standards since the days of Wolfenstein 3D. Rage, built using id Tech 5 engine, is one of the best looking games ever made, boasting an incredible blend of artistry, animation and smooth performance.

vlodia4591d ago

While I don't trust IGN's credibility to review a particular game anymore, I must say the score they put with RAGE is fairly impressive.

LOGICWINS4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"While I don't trust IGN's credibility to review a particular game anymore, I must say the score they put with RAGE is fairly impressive."

Sooo..why are u commenting in an IGN review thread? I don't understand why people who say they don't trust IGN's reviews click on them. This has been going on for a while now.

Damn near half of N4G claims that IGN is biased, yet everytime they review a high profile game, their review ends up being the top news story on N4G for that day. Why does this happen? Why the large investment in the opinions of journalists working for a supposedly untrustworthy website?

gamingdroid4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

it applies to most articles around here... I don't care about ABC, but just wanted to let everyone else know my opinion anyhow!

evrfighter4591d ago

logic speaks the truth console gamers don't care about graphics whenever the pc is mentioned yet lens of truth articles always dominate the news the day a AAA multiplat comes out

Peaceful_Jelly4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

because there aren't any other reviews up yet and he is interested in the game... Isn't that logical enough for you?

CloseSecond4591d ago

@gamingdroid. Welcome to the internet and freedom of speech. Rather that than only allowing a select few to share an opinion.

Dante1124591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Thought Rage would get 9 and 10s going off of the hype and fights between console owners on which version was the best lol. 8.5 is still a great score though.

Edit: @ Fatman comment below

Nice find. I thought something was weird about certain user's comments here (Most joined today to start stuff up). Why would only PS3 owners be angry when the game is multiplatform and was said to destroy UC3 in GOTY awards this year?

Edit: @ LOGIC below

True, that's how it should be. Dang shame on how some people on the IGN forums are talking about not get the game since it didn't a 9 though. Their loss lol.

LOGICWINS4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

@Dante112- Thats a good thing IMO. It means that the reviewer isn't backing into a corner by reviewing a game based on the hype it gets. Btw, I don't see how a person can determine the difference in quality between an 8.5 game and a 9.0 game. Personally, I don't see how that can be done to be honest.

For all we know, it would have been a 9.5 if another journalist from IGN reviewed the game.

JokesOnYou4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

LOGICWINS, its just fanboy talk, if any site scores any ps3 exclusive lower than what they expect its black listed by ps3 fanboys and made out to be bias, until of course they rate the competition's game low or give another exclusive a high mark and you'll get comments like "Even IGN can't deny how great this game is."(how convenient) or vice versa= Suddenly their creditable or only biased on certain days of the week or whatever new excuse fanboys can think of. I dont hate on any site or reviewer, on rare occasions if I think theres legit reason to question a review I simply say why I disagree with the CONS/merits of the review, mostly AFTER I played it or with logical reasoning why.

On topic, the game is visually stunning, but I'm not sold on the multiplayer, otherwise it'd be a day 1 purchase for me.

LOGICWINS4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"LOGICWINS, its just fanboy talk, any site that scores any ps3 exclusive the way they think it should is black listed and made out to be bias, until of course they rate the competition's game low or give another exclusive a high mark and you'll get comments like "Even IGN can't deny how great this game is."= Suddenly there creditable or only biased on certain days of the week or whatever new excuse fanboys can think of."

EXACTLY! IGN is only biased when they give a PS3 exclusive a score that loyalists don't like. But when Resistance 3, Dark Souls, LBP2, and Infamous 2 gets 9+ scores..the argument magically changes.

Forgive my rant but the idea that IGN has a devious agenda towards the PS3 is one of the most idiotic theories I've heard on N4G. How the hell does a site that gives FOUR PS3 exclusives editors choice awards in the SAME year "hate" the PS3?

Outside_ofthe_Box4591d ago

Logic be quiet already.

N4G this N4G that.

If you dislike the way people do things on N4G then why are you on this website? Why do you waste a large investment of your time on commenting on people's replies about how N4G does this and how N4G does that?

Cat got your tongue?

TheFirstClassic4591d ago

As I mentioned earlier in a reply to someone who's account got deleted, each reviewer has a different opinion, that's why some reviews seem inconsistant. Saying that everyone at ign are a bunch of xbox fanboys is ignorant in itself. Greg Miller, Colin, and Ryan are three people there who perfer ps3 to xbox, just to name a few. Some people who work there might be xbox fanboys, but you have to remember that ign isn't just one person, its made up of a bunch of different people, some who perfer xbox, some who perfer playstation, and some who perfer nintendo. Also, you should know that there are more people there that perfer ps3 than there used to be.

LOGICWINS4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"If you dislike the way people do things on N4G then why are you on this website?"

Who said anything about "disliking" the way people do things on N4G? All I'm doing is asking questions in order to figure out WHY certain individuals do certain things. Just because I may disagree with what certain people say or do on N4G doesn't automatically mean that I dislike them or their comments.

"Why do you waste a large investment of your time on commenting on people's replies about how N4G does this and how N4G does that?"

Because I ADMITTEDLY care about this site and what people do on it. Very different from the people who say they "don't care" about IGN's reviews...but decide to click anyways.

In short: I'm not a hypocrite.

Dante1124591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

@ JokesOnYou and LOGIC

So you're saying that only PS3 fans do this because I could've sworn that when Destructoid gave GeOW 3 an 8, that the reviewers got alot of heat not only from the fans but Cliff himself.

".....Oh, that was different" XD

Edit: Another thing, how did the whole "PS3 fanboys" come into this article? Are you two assuming vlod's one because he's skeptical about IGN's reviews lol?

Outside_ofthe_Box4591d ago

Who said people didn't care about IGN's reviews?

Hell, the person you commented on didn't say he didn't care.

People DO CARE about IGN's reviews because believe it or not there are a good amount of people that will solely base their purchase on a game based on whether IGN gave it a good score or not. People click on IGN's reviews to see if IGN did the game injustice. That is all.

LOGICWINS4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"People click on IGN's reviews to see if IGN did the game injustice. That is all."

????

That makes no sense. How would you know whether or not IGN did the game an injustice if you haven't played the game yet???

@Dante112- Correct. Its not only PS3 loyalists..HOWEVER, the majority of members on this website are not only pro-console, but also pro Sony. If you check the forum posts, the PS3 section has more than 2 times more posts than most of the other sections combined.

281,576 posts for the PS3 forum, 71535 posts for the 360 forum etc. Its obvious who the majority is.

The hate comes from both sides, but because N4G is predominantly pro-Sony as far as members are concerned, it APPEARS as if they are the worst of the bunch.

Outside_ofthe_Box4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Come on... use logic...

Read the review. Does the complaints and/or praise of the review match the score?

If there are hardly any complaints or if the complaints aren't that big of a deal and the game ends up getting a 7.5, you can safely claim that the review is a load of BS...

LOGICWINS4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"Are you two assuming vlod's one because he's skeptical about IGN's reviews lol?"

No we're speaking in general about how the complaints for IGN generally come from the PS3 crowd...especially on N4G. It's like they feel that they've been victimized and/or have something to prove.

I see a lot of them to this day downplaying doom articles from 2006-2007 and constantly making these lists of exclusives games as some odd type of validation that they've made it through some "struggle". I always wonder why I have the ability to enjoy my PS3...yet I don't feel the need to vigorously defend it as if it were my first born, unlike others.

"If there are hardly any complaints or if the complaints aren't that big of a deal and the game ends up getting a 7.5, you can safely claim that the review is a load of BS..."

Oh noes! A 7.5! Anything but that!

s/

Certain complaints mean more to certain reviewers than others and different people will find different complaints than others. Even if Rage has a decent story(just not a great one) the reviewer may have a HUGE issue with this because storytelling may be very important to him or her.

You can't determine whether a reviewer did a review justice because its all a matter of opinion.

JokesOnYou4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

I've been on this site for a long time now, with the same name to boot, and 1 thing I can tell you for sure NO ONE COMPLAINS LIKE THOSE WHO PREDOMINATELY SUPPORT THE PS3, its almost like religion....whats worst is they are so fickle about it, IGN, Gamespot, Gamesradar, Gametrailers, Eurogamer and of course EDGE, seriously the opinion about these site seems to change as easily as the wind blows(generally based on their latest review) lol, whats worst is many of the same who were saying for over a year that reviews are pointless, suddenly started using review scores for UC2 in their fictional fanboy wars. lmfao

Now the best part is this site has history, GO BACK AND LOOK AT PS3 vs 360 REVIEWS of course there are a few 360 fanboys who swear site X is biased when they give a 360 exclusive a low score, there are ALWAYS going to be idiots on both sides however most who tend to be found in 360 news, who like 360= 360 fans don't go attacking reviewers and swearing that site X is biased, hell do you think I didn't like a few of the low scores for Alan Wake, Halo3, and few of my other favorite games YES and even some ps3 games too got lower scores than I thought they deserved, but OK thats life, not everybody will see what YOU see....on the other hand when a ps3 game is given a "presumed" low score, all hell tends to break loose. lol, It started as far back as Lair, when 1st initial reveiews hit ps3 fanboys swarmed and bashed the reviews for bias/micro conspiracies, on to later admit and find that yes the game had some huge flaws, yeah, yeah I hear it was patched, blah, blah but at the time of the review it had real issues. Listen, if it were the occasional ps3 fanboy like nasim in the past, you'd have a case that I'm nitpicking 1 side but its totally slanted towards ps3 on this topic, not even close. I don't want to take you down memory lane but I garuantee if you for every 360 fan complaining or attacking a review theres 10-20, depending on the particular game outright calling reviews liars etc. lol, and although its not as bad today it still heavily persists within the ps3 community, call me what you will but its the truth that even most ps3 supporters know is true.

slayorofgods4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

IGN is the top reviewer, like it or not people look towards their review. Why? because more times then not the reviews are accurate.

When it comes to multiple consoles things can get heated, and people get pissed when an edge is given to the competition. I'm sure ign has miss-fired on a review during their long history of reviewing and I'm sure that might have stuck in someones mind.

But let's face it, we all know ign is about as legit as it can get as far as reviewing games goes.

@JokesOnYou

I own a PS3 and PC, and I agree that this site is more pro PS3 then anything else. Even talking about pc gaming and not getting backlash can be hard.

gumchewinasskikr4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Logic, gamingdroid, and Jokes

For crying out loud can you guys give it a rest already. We get it you don't like PS3 fanboys, but I don't even see a reason here for you gusy to even bring up PS3 fans. Fact is this game atm is a joke on PC, where I and many others thought it would perform the best.

@logic

"281,576 posts for the PS3 forum, 71535 posts for the 360 forum etc. Its obvious who the majority is."

Seriously you need to get out more... What the heck is your problem with Sony. There are idiots on both sides, just like there are idiots in life everywhere. Why does it bother you so much?

gamingdroid4591d ago

@CloseSecond
***Welcome to the internet and freedom of speech. Rather that than only allowing a select few to share an opinion.***

Freedom of speech doesn't apply to all countries even on the internet, but I digress.

That said, what sort of response do you expect in return for stupid comments?

@gumchewinasskikr

***We get it you don't like PS3 fanboys, but I don't even see a reason here for you gusy to even bring up PS3 fans.***

When did I bring up a PS3 fan? I only said, that nobody cares if you care or not. If you do NOT care, we don't care to know!

If you want to share something, share something intelligent please....

vickers5004591d ago

@slayerofgods

"But let's face it, we all know ign is about as legit as it can get as far as reviewing games goes."

I don't know, they're pretty bad sometimes. Just look at GTA4, Resistance 2/Gears 2 (given the same score, both had problems, but were most likely scored the same so as not to piss off the fanboys, as neither of those two games, as much as I love them, deserved a 9.5), Modern Warfare 2.

"Even talking about pc gaming and not getting backlash can be hard."

You're f*cking joking right? Go to almost any BF3 article and you see some elitist pc tw@t smugly inserting some commonly known fact about the pc version being technically superior for the sake of simply being a smug douche. And then look at the amount of agrees he has compared to disagrees, then you'll see how full of sh*t your "backlash against pc gaming" statement truly is.

humbleopinion4591d ago

It's funny how the people who claim that IGN is biased against the PS3 are exactly the same people who claim that Edge is biased against the PS3 - and then bring some disputable evidence that at the same time shows how IGN tends to score PS3 exclusives higher.

Kos-Mos4591d ago

Those who are silent agrees. Learn common human nature before posting.

lumley6664591d ago

logicwins...... i dont care much for ign reviews but i still check them out because sometimes they get it right..... its with perticula games they get it so wrong, i mean halo 3 10/10 oh plz, halo reach 10/10.. see a patern? as much as i loved halo 1 and 2, halo 3 and the rest after were no way a 10/10. they were pretty much the same game. they contradict themselves too often, many times they have gave a lower score to a sequel because it treads the same pattern and havnt brought enough new to the table, but games like halo and mario galaxy 2 for example get perfect scores even tho they are basically the same as the previous one. now i loved galaxy 2 but from there logic it shudnt be reviewed perfect score for basically the same game. and yes ign are biased, just fact im affraid

Gazondaily4591d ago

Logic speaks the truth. You know its true!

trouble_bubble4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Holy god Logicwins, you have COMPLETELY DERAILED this thread...yet you still have 6 bubbles?

THAT is what's wrong with N4G more than anything you've posted. 6 bubbles to complain about complainers, go completely off topic about fanboys and bias lol. Talk about the game maybe? Nope, you just wasted all your bubbles talking about how much N4G sucks and which forum has the most posts. Try derailing like that on IGN, Gamespot, Gametrailers, NeoGaf, Gamefaqs, XBoxachievements, PS3trophies, Destructoid, 1UP, LOT etc forums and see how long before the mods step in.

Anyone wanna talk about the game yet?

solidjun54591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"Holy god Logicwins, you have COMPLETELY DERAILED this thread...yet you still have 6 bubbles?"

I'm still trying to figure out how deadreckoning666 (call him Logicwins all you want) still has 6 bubbles. I've been bubbling him down for immaturity for all this post. Vlodia just said one thing and LOGIC gets his panties in a bunch. Yet he still has 6 bubbles.

Anyway on topic: I'm drying up on funds here...but damn this game looks good.

Ser4591d ago

Am I not allowed to read the review just because I don't like the particular site, Logic?

Is there some unspoken internet law that prevents me from doing this?

I hate IGN's reviews, but I like to read them nonetheless.

starchild4590d ago

Logicwins is absolutely right. The double standards from the PS3 camp are simply appalling on this site.

And there is nothing wrong with expressing displeasure with that fact. N4G is a great site that is supposed to be for gamers of all stripes. But a lot of its potential is limited by immature PS3 fanboys that overrun the site.

Anyway, Rage looks like a very nice game. I have planned to pick it up for some time now and the positive reviews have only cemented that plan.

JokesOnYou4590d ago (Edited 4590d ago )

@gumchewinasskikr, There are plenty of normal ps3 fans, but unfortuntely this site tends to attract more fanboys than normal, it gets old hearing the same old baseless BS like the first comment on this thread, so be mad all you want but if they can keep spamming threads with garbage comments, then Im allowed to keep pointing out the obvious hypocrisy. Yes it happens on both sides but by and large ps3 fanbase tends to have armies of soldiers waving the same old tired flag.

@solidjun5, does anybody really care about bubbles? In many cases they are not a indicator of the quality of a members comments, if you really want to keep alot of bubbles you can just make multi accounts and bubble yourself up.

@DrakBlack, I dont think "reading" a review of a site you dont trust as the 1st comment suggests is beneficial, but reading AND COMMENTING suggesting that they arent trustworthy while at the same time saying its impressive is downright counterproductiveor at least a contradiction in logic.

solidjun54590d ago (Edited 4590d ago )

"solidjun5, does anybody really care about bubbles? In many cases they are not a indicator of the quality of a members comments, if you really want to keep alot of bubbles you can just make multi accounts and bubble yourself up."

Yea, LOGIC is a great indicator of that.
Why would I do that? In a way, you just implied Logic create accounts to keeps himself afloat.

Besides, this whole thread went to nothing when someone took a comment (LOGIC) and blew it up out of proportions. He's whining about whining and you're essentially adding on to it.

Bon Scott4590d ago (Edited 4590d ago )

It's obvious that this site is funded/controlled by a group of moronic Microsoft haters without lives,,
or is actually owned by Sony(best guess)to
use in smear campaigns to make gamers believe the PS3 is the better choice this gen.
Psychological marketing.

The moderators are probably Sony employees(along with a dozen or more so called members with a dozen accounts each all on Sonys payroll) who sit here all day being paid to bash,bully anybody pro 360 in a feeble attempt to sway their opinions,beliefs, and purchases.

They can remove or give bubbles in an instant,and control the agree/disagree count with the stroke of a keyboard.
So much for votes right?

I think that's the case in this dump!

Guarantee MS has their websites too.
If you come here to communicate,know what your getting into.....................or go somewhere else.

+ Show (29) more repliesLast reply 4590d ago
NukaCola4591d ago

This is something I could believe. But where games have poor stories and get a free pass becuase of solid gameplay, IGN seems to have gigged Rage for it. Most recently I am thinking of Gears 3 which is solid thorughout, but the story is weak. I haven't played Rage to make any opinion on it. But I still am getting it, because it looks flat out fun.

gamingdroid4591d ago

Gears story is actually pretty good if you read the books. Unfortunately, if you didn't read the books, a lot of the references wouldn't make sense.

dragunrising4591d ago

Oh look...lots of agrees that Gears 3 has a "poor" story. I wonder how many of those agrees actually played it...

As long as the combat is fun in Rage I'm not sure why anyone is overly concerned about the story. Borderlands has no story yet it's a lot of fun. When was it decided that a story or lack of actually mattered?

JokesOnYou4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"But where games have poor stories and get a free pass"........"Most recently I am thinking of Gears 3 which is solid thorughout, but the story is weak."

-Well theres the problem, you suggest your opinion as if it is fact. Gears3 story for me and most of the *reviewers is the best of the bunch,(I personally like Halo3 more) but don't get me wrong Gears3 is no Mass Effect which is my favorite storyline this gen for any game but its definitely much better than most shooters this gen in that it actually delivers a bit more emotion and interest in the charachters.= Therefore your assumption is baseless, the only thing we have learned from it is that YOU didn't like the story as much as MOST others did.

IcarusOne4590d ago

Personally thought Gears 3 had a pretty weak story, the weakest of the series. Was never engaged by it. Still enjoyed it, though, and the gameplay was fun. Hordez!

Looking forward to Rage. But not sure at $60.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4590d ago
Ravens204591d ago

After hearing that review I don't even feel like getting it. They make it seem like all you're doing in the game is shooting enemies. Hopefully Gamespot review comes out soon. I usually agree with their reviews

Ravens204591d ago

Just went to gamestop. It didn't have the cool embossed slip cover. Last time i'm ever going to that garbage store. I like to have my games complete when I buy them, Best Buy FTW.

Freshnikes4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Gamespot gave it a lower score...graphics are amazing, but If the camera move to fast u get (texture pop up)...big world with not a lot to do but drive around(fillers)... Pointless missions, majority (example, got get me this n come back,,,,thanks can u get me something else, and so on....the reviews are not good.....anything good that I'm hearing about this game is(graphics) ...not for me at $60

4591d ago Replies(5)
gogospeedracer4591d ago

Game looks amazing. Getting it for the PC. Woot

Prophet-Gamer4591d ago

Surprised IGN didn't give it a 9.. they seem to be giving those out like candy.

Number_134591d ago

Right?? Like Resistance 3, I mean psssh!

caboose324591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Charles Onyett Is actually one of the few editors from IGN that I would take his word seriously.

wicko4591d ago

I've been skeptical about IGN's reviews for some time now, and that Gears 3 review reinforced that opinion even more so. But after reading the Rage review, I felt it was pretty honest and accurate - and 8.5 is a great score. I can't wait!

Number_134591d ago

Sarcasm?? If not then alot of games are flops this year, Killzone 3, Resistance 3, infamous 2, Bulletstorm, Mortal Kombat. . .

Motorola4591d ago

Chill out ^ He's probably just being sarcastic

BlindGuardian4591d ago

so it's not open world, it's not RPG, it's not very long (10 to 12 hours in a review actually means around 8 for me), no MP except races, doesn't sound that good

what's certain is that you can forget about GOTY consideration for this one from major sites, candidates now are: Dark Souls, Skyrim, Uncharted 3 and Arkham City, and if it has to be five nominees then maybe LBP2 or Deus Ex HR

Ducky4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

Couldn't care less if a site doesn't nominate it for GOTY.

If Portal2 becomes GOTY, then it neither increases nor decreases the amount of enjoyment I got from that game. (And it very much is in the running despite not being open world nor an RPG nor having any real multiplayer)
Same applies to RAGE.

gumchewinasskikr4591d ago

You have to admit that to hours for the main story is kind of weak ass for an rpg. I was expecting more.

50Terabytespersec4590d ago

I Agree with the Score but I do SEE something of a pattern I call the "nerdboy loser storyline" requirement.
If it isn't about the multi-loser , I meant multi player gameplay it is about the story,how it isn't , scary or deep enough.
I see a pattern , where lonely panzy nerd boy reviewers , huddle in their cubicle, playing a game expecting :
1. A scarry story line.
2. Desolate story.
3. Some female co-character in the game (to help with social self esteem...(sadly most gamers repel real women)
4 Cowboy big truckin ignorant cliches characters.

This all leads to a score of 9 always!!.
But if you create a game that is a Gamers Game meaning in your face like Arcade games and games that are for people who have lives and do things for society beside , suck air and push buttons and repel women.

Id rather be Biking,...
IGN discredited!

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4590d ago
Gamer30004591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

8.5/10 is great and all from IGN
but i'm shocked
i thought this game will get atleast a 9 out of 10

but this will not stop me from playing this game

@LOGICWINS
lol true
but i don't call any review a biased
i see them as only others people opinion
they are not facts just opinion

@fatoldman
i only see them as other gamers view of the game
i mean many game scored under 9 and 8
i loved them and they was my fav this gen
like Lord of shadows
for me it was 9/10 game but i think in give 7.5/10

Ducky4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

"but i don't call any review a biased"

I call every review biased.
It's kind of inherent.

I guess I better start pre-loading the game now.

wicko4591d ago

Hope you have a fast connection - 21GB

At least if you plan on playing when it's unlocked.

Ducky4591d ago (Edited 4591d ago )

^ 10mb per second.
I think I'm good.
=)

Zephol4591d ago

It will not be GOTY. Rage's story has failed. I was disappointed this analysis. I'll wait to see more pages.

Soplox4591d ago

I can see your disappointment in your avatar

kevnb4591d ago

story is really not very important in shooters, I dont know why anyone says any different.

undercovrr4591d ago

Story is not important in shooters? Maybe for you because popular game devs these days ignore the story while trying to add multiplayer. Look at Half Life games, STALKER, Metro 2033, and tell me story isn't important. You should be ashamed to call yourself a gamer with that sentence.

wicko4591d ago

Horseshit. Shooters can be great and have terrible stories. It's a game, not a book, not a movie, a game.

This doesn't mean I don't enjoy a great story - but I don't think its required for a game to be good.

sikbeta4591d ago

Hmmm.... you don't see the problem in that? better stories could make shooters better games...

Graey4591d ago

Going to have to disagree with you there. Just think that there should be more of a reason to kill someone in game.

Other than here is a gun you woke up from cryo stasis and uh well there you go.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4591d ago
skyrim4591d ago

i still can not wait leaving in 1 hr to go to gamestop MIDNIGHT LUNCH BABY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! btw nice review pretty much what i expected

VvKILLAGOOSEvV4591d ago

mmmmmm, midnight lunch, that sounds delicious! Taco Bell 4th meal anyone while waiting in line?? haha jk

Graey4591d ago

@ Rob

Hey if you get a chance. Let us know objectively your initial impressions an perhaps a couple hours after.

Curious to see what you think of it. If you could give some detail without spoilers that would be nice.

I don't particularly want to pick it up but I am curious about the game.

Show all comments (141)
110°

Xbox Deals With Gold and Spotlight Sale Discounts – 4th-10th Aug 2020

Neil writes: "Just been paid? Fancy getting a new game added to that backlog of shame? The Xbox Deals With Gold and Spotlight Sale is back with even more discounts on a variety of great Xbox titles. If you've got time in your life for a new gaming experience, the following bargain basement titles are available for your cut-price purchasing between 4th-10th August 2020."

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
90°

Rage's Open World Was Intimate & Memorable, Not Another Huge, Empty Sandbox

Rage from id Software and Bethesda Softworks was largely overlooked, yet its handcrafted FPS open world and memorable characters transcend genre convention.

Read Full Story >>
escapistmagazine.com
Fist4achin1620d ago

I enjoyed the first game. I plan to play the sequel soon!

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster1773d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada071773d ago (Edited 1773d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X141772d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase1772d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted1772d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster1772d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack1772d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH1767d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.