920°

Top 5 Developers who Milk Game franchises to dryness

With the advent of any great Game franchise comes the concept of Money making by extensively milking the franchise to dryness as Developers and Publishers find different ways to exploit the winning formula.

These are Quite possibly the Top 5 Franchises that have been milked to dryness by Publishers.

Read Full Story >>
geniusanime.com
ilovepsvita4628d ago

Activision deserves to be placed at number 1 position on the countdown.
COD is definitely the most Milked franchise in gaming history with a sequel coming out every year.

Misterhbk4628d ago

Why the hell is Nintendo not on the list. Should have been right up there with Activision.

People can say what they want, but Mario is spun off into so many series one might lose track of him.

Mario Golf
Mario Kart
Mario Party
Mario World/Galaxy/Land/Whatever
Paper Mario
Mario and Luigi World/Land/Whatever
Mario Baseball
Mario Sports (just threw all the different sports into one)

I'm sure I'm excluding quite a few but you get the point. I"m not saying the games aren't different or good or fun or any of that, but lets be honest, Mario is a milkfest. they could easily create new characters and IPs for so many of these games, but nope...Just Throw Mario and Co. out there.

geniusgamerdoc4628d ago

I disagree with you my friend.

MARIO might have spun off into hundreds of games but all of them dont fall under a single gaming Genre.
We have seen all kinds of games ranging from Tennis, Golf, Cart racing, Adventure, Rpg, to Baseball and Smash brawlers.
Just because of the inclusion of Mario it doesnt become a Milked franchise.

With every new Mario named title Nintendo has brought something new. Super Mario Galaxy is one of the most Eye Candy-ish games ive ever played.

But whereas COD games look almost the same when you compare each other.

Brownghost4628d ago

they milk the character but the games are all amazing

Pozzle4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

I think a lot of people are willing to look past the shitty titles because Nintendo still manage to make some pretty good Mario titles. I could do without the crappy spinoff sport titles, but I personally hope they don't stop making games like Mario Galaxy or Mario Kart.

SilentNegotiator4628d ago

I agree.

Mario Kart peaked at Double Dash, Mario Party didn't really make the best use of the wiimote, and the sports titles haven't made huge improvements.

badz1494628d ago

it's not about the games are great or not, it's just a list for milking and Nintendo MUST BE in the list somewhere! instant FAIL!

ZBlacktt4628d ago

All those games are the franchises characters. Not the same game play type. Where COD is the same thing over and over and over.

milohighclub4628d ago

Tomb raider hasn't been milked. 9 releases over 3 gens?!

rjdofu4628d ago

This should belong to the top 5 milking topics of all times.

Wyvern4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

There are more then 220 Games with Mario in it. :D
Need to mention Street Fighter too.

-Alpha4627d ago (Edited 4627d ago )

Throwing Mario and Co. out onto these games is a lot better for Nintendo and Nintendo fans than throwing on a new face nobody knows about.

Mario is a universal character. His popularity is unrivaled and the genres he is in help keep that unique, colourful style fans love about Nintendo games. What is the point of replacing Mario with a new character? Highly counter-productive.

And there is a strong difference between milking the game and milking the name. A ton of the Mario titles are high quality games and adored by legions of fans.

In fact, same goes for a lot of other Milked games. Milked isn't always bad, it's when you do very little to improve and when you ride on the name value alone that it becomes bad.

Getowned4627d ago

NFS: Underground 2 was and still is my favourit raceing game i really wish they would make a new one just like #2 expect bigger with more cars and customizations.I would buy a HD remake of that game imo best racing game ever made **IMO**.

lol i knew cod was going to be on here.

and don't be hating mario! mario owns.

Gurt_McSquirt4627d ago

Half of these are publishers, half are developers... It should read "Top 5 Game Series' That Are Milked To Dryness"

TXIDarkAvenger4627d ago

There's not 1 Mario franchise, there's many in different genres. So no the games aren't milked but I guess you could say Mario is. But at least a majority of Mario games are quality games that are awesome and have lots of replay value.

capcock4627d ago (Edited 4627d ago )

super mario and mario golf/kart/party etc are all different franchises STARRING mario, they are not milked.

CrimsonAng3l4627d ago

I agree with you Misterhbk about everything you said. Sonic is another franchise that's been milked for so fricken long that it should be on the list.

JaredH4627d ago

I think Nintendo characters are milked more than anything else, even Call of Duty. Nintendo hasn't even made an original ip since Pikmin(not counting the mini-games). All they do is take the characters they thought of years ago and put them in new situations. I do think it's great that they somehow make the games fresh but honestly they can't do that forever.

BattleAxe4627d ago

1. Call of Duty
2. Mario
3. Halo
4. Madden
5. Tiger Woods

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4627d ago
ATi_Elite4628d ago

Here's two good ones........

well EA has been pumping out John Madden Football games since 1988 and yearly since 1990.

But seriously I thought Street Fighter 2 got milked down to the butter milk before Capcom released Street Fighter 3.

Biggest4627d ago

Sports titles shouldn't be thought of in the same sense as Call of Duty or Mario. There is a new season every year for sports, and though games like Madden try to change as little as possible, they aren't exactly the same. Mario and Madden might add as little in each new release (a few add-ons or changes to the general gameplay), but Mario does it for the sake of doing it. Madden does it because there is a new season. I guess I'm saying they have a more legit reason for a new game. That being said. . . I haven't purchased a Madden game since 2003. The 2K series was much more rewarding to me. Madden buying rights to the NFL license turned me off immediately. Furthermore, I still love Mario. I play every classic-type Mario game and will be playing Paper Mario. Yes, Mario is milked. Sometimes I love milk.

Tachyon_Nova4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

You know that since Rathcet and Clank began in 2002 there was a game in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2 games in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2011. That is 10 games in 10 years.

Since Battlefield began in 2002 there was a game in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2 games in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2 games in 2011. That is 10 games in 10 years.

Since FIFA branded games began in 1993 there has been a game in 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2 games in 2000, 2 games 2001, 2 games in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2 games in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. That is 23 games in 19 years, and this not counting FIFA Manager or FIFA Street games, which would take that total to 34 games in 19 years.

Since Call of Duty began in 2003, there was a game in 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. That is 8 games in 9 years.

Need for Speed began in 1994, and there has been a game in 1994, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2 games in 2009, 2 games in 2010 and 2 games in 2011. That is 18 games in 18 years.

Don't even get me started on Mario or Final Fantasy, I would be here all year listing mario games alone.

So is CoD really the most milked gaming franchise ever? Not by a long shot.

StoneyYoshi4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

rachet and clank has brought something new to the table each year they had released a game. same goes to battlefield.

call of duty stopped bringing new things to the table once cod 4 came out.

and it definitely has been more than 8 games in 9 years for call of duty

Call of duty: finest hour

Call of duty 2: Big red one

Call of duty: roads to victory

Call of duty: World at war: final fronts (ps2)

Call of duty: modern warfare: mobilized (nintendo DS)

Call of duty : world at war: zombies 1 and 2 (iPhone)

so that actually makes it 14 games in 9 years. not milked?

Hicken4628d ago

Sports games don't count. As the roster of each team changes each year, new games were necessary- before this generation, it wasn't possible to update your rosters via online connection.

As for everything else you mentioned, only one of those games- as far as I know- has DLC you're required to pay for, multiple packs per year, and that people buy up by the millions. Only one of those game(s)eries) will still be full price a month before the next entry's release.

I'll let you guess which series that is.

Tachyon_Nova4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

@ Hicken - I tend to agree that sports games don't count myself. However, it has become a popular stance to take that each 'new' CoD should be released as DLC, since all it adds is new weapons, maps and a 5 hour campaign. If all that can only be considered worthy of a DLC release, then how can a new player roster and a few gameplay tweaks warrant a completely new game?

I honestly don't see how CoD's DLC is milking though. Each CoD game provides a heap of maps and game modes, easily more than most other FPS's straight out of the box. If you still want more, then you have the option to buy more.

If they were starving players for content by only having 4-7 maps (as with Medal of Honor and BFBC2) as opposed to 12-15 maps as with CoD, then I would say you had a point.

@dontbhatin - I am only counting main games, not platform specific variants like CoD 4 mobilised or World at War: Zombies for iPhone. I didn't count Battlefield 2: Modern Combat, Bad Company 2 for iPhone or any of the Battlefield expansion packs, so I don't see that it is fair for you to for CoD.

StoneyYoshi4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

id rather have 4-7 well created maps, instead of 12-15 maps that they didn't put much work into. still no reason to charge 15 dollars for 4-5 maps when you see the competition tossing everyone new maps like free candy. the only maps that either bad company game charged for is vietnam for bad company 2.

@tachyon

then rachet and clank should only be 7 games then because 3 of those are variants for the main games.

and for battlefield it should only be 8 games then. if you only want to count main games.

J_Cob4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

I'm going to have to agree with Hicken and Tachyon_Nova regarding the sports games. I just don't get the why people always jump on the CoD hatewagon. If you break down Battlefield to its fundamentals its big maps and vehicles. They just recently added destruction with the BC series and now it looks prettier. To say a game isn't milked because it has a new paint job is just ignorant. By that logic all IW has to do is get a new engine and add destruction and it's a whole new game. It's still the same thing at its core. People would still complain because of the DLC.

Hicken4628d ago

Doing that WOULD make it a new game. If all they added was moderately destructible environments, it'd cause the way people played to change drastically: no more camping, no more setting up turrets in choke points. For vehicles, they'd need bigger maps, which would again force people to change how they played the game.

As for the DLC, I honestly think Activision is at a point financially where they could give away the DLC for an entire entry. They've made more than enough money off the franchise to do at least that as a thank-you to fans.

But they never will. As long as people are willing to buy it, they'll be willing to charge for it.

J_Cob4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

@Hicken I'll agree that destruction would change the game but fundamentally it would be the same. Just based off the design of CoD's play style. Choke points could vanish to a certain degree, but with the map design people would know where people are going after awhile and what they are going to blow up. With CoD's fast arcade movement people with slow reflexes are going to camp regardless. It's the nature of the beast. CoD picks up tons of new people with each iteration every year. Most never having played an FPS before. These people camp even when the grenade symbol is shown on their screen. They will not move for anyone or anything. You also mentioned they would need bigger maps. Then it wouldn't be CoD anymore. That's trying to turn CoD into BF with destruction. You need to think along the lines of CoD with destruction.

morkendo234628d ago

@ Tach nova

out of those 18 NFS only first 7 was EXCELLENT i have ALL 7. "the RUN" will be # 18 until nov. other 10 was horrible (in my opinion)

WANNAGETHIGH4628d ago

@Tachyon_Nova..Save ur comment.N4G is anti COD with bias BF fan boys. Ur list is spot on. But I disagree with spot gamrs,Its normal when a season finishes nd a new one starts a new sport game has to come out. But the rest is spot on.

aman84r4628d ago

You know what the funny thing is people count expansion packs as games only in case of COD.

Biggest4627d ago

Call of Duty would be a brand new game if it added new elements. Call of Duty 4 was new. Before it there were similar games with minor updates. After it there have been similar games with minor updates. If Call of Duty added new elements to gameplay (destruction, vehicles, maps) it would become a new game and change their trend of milking. I hate Call of Duty because it is $60 for nothing new. In comparison you can purchase other games for $60 that re-work/change multiple aspects of the game. Uncharted 2 is a good example of that. They added multiplayer, increased graphic fidelity, and changed the basic presentation into an industry standard. . . For $60.

jdfoster4627d ago

You missed out Fifa World cup which released in 2010 to coincide with world cup

Getowned4627d ago (Edited 4627d ago )

no i think it's actually about 22 call of duty games if you count all systems.

CrimsonEngage4627d ago

Hate to burst your bubble but there have been only 3 Battlefield games - 1942, 2 and BF3. The rest are spin-offs. Hurrrrrrrrr

hadriker4627d ago

@Tachyon_Nova

You have to take into account the game quality as well

Since Modern Warfare 1, Activision has released a CoD game yearly with little changes in game play. Mostly just glorified expansion packs. They did the same thing with Tony Hawk, and guitar hero. They milked the IPs for all they were worth, and when the consumer market finally said "we need something new in our favorite IP" They failed hard and the franchise went the the way of the Dodo.

IPs like Battlefield may have a comparable number of releases as the CoD franchise, but every release has been a logical step forward in terms of gameplay, technlogy and innovation. They aren't just releasing the same game with some new skins and maps, which is basically what Activision is doing with the CoD series, and has done with others.

Thats the difference they are trying to point out.

Tachyon_Nova4627d ago

Alright this is my last comment so I'm going to reply to everyone who has mentioned my post here.

@dontbhatin - No, there have been 10 seperate Rathcet and Clank games. The original, Going Commando, Up You Arsenal, Deadlocked, Size Matters, Tools of Destruction, Quest for Booty, A Crack in Time, All 4 One and Secret Agent Clank. That is 10 games. As for Battlefield, I feel that there is enough content in Heroes and Play4Free that they can be considered seperate 'main' games. although they are obviously spinoffs.

@Hicken - I'm sure they could give the DLC away if they wanted to, but they are a business that exists solely to make money, why would they give a product which costs them a lot to produce for free? If they did it for one game, people would expect it for the next and would be significantly less likely to pay for it. As for camping, I don't see how bigger maps would help reduce this. Have you ever played Bad Company? The bigger maps just give people an incentive to snipe because they don't have to run so far in order to get into a position where they can kill people.

@J_Cob - Exactly, people will camp no matter what sort of measures you put in place to stop them, its how they want to play.

@Morkendo23 - I haven't played thta many of the NFS games, but I can say that the original Hot Pursuit and Hot Pursuit 2 back in the 90's were easily my favourite games from the series.

@WANNAGETHIGH - Like I said above in my second comment, I tend to agree that sports games shouldn't be counted, but I included it only because a lot of people like to say that each new COD should be released as DLC only, when clearly there is more fresh content in each new COD than in each new FIFA.

@aman- It's not surprising, people seem to apply different rules to COD games (i.e. in general graphics don't matter apparently, but in COD's case using the samer engine each game is grounds not to by the game)

@Getowned, why would I count each game for each system seperately, it is still the same game?

@CrimsonEngage - You're joking right?

@hadriker - Fair point, although EA are more guilty of this than anyone in at least one case (Battlefield Play4Free is literaly BF2 except with mild destruction and some new assets).

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4627d ago
WitWolfy4628d ago

I agree Activision at the top, they literary milked GH to DEATH!

Altosax314627d ago

Didn't they milk Tony Hawk as well?

Ser4627d ago

Yup. Literally.

Guitar Hero literally DIED because of the excess milking. The same goes for Tony Hawk. What was the last Tony Hawk game? Ride? With that stupid skateboard peripheral? What a joke.

hadriker4627d ago

Activation is easily the worst

CoD
Tony Hawk
Guitar Hero

Legion4628d ago

The issue is milking it to dryness though. I truly don't think the campaign has been milked to dryness yet, as it is still interesting each time I play the game.

The multiplayer though... I haven't seen enough quality change in it to see it as anything but dry. BUT saying that... people must really like evaporated milk, because they are playing the hell out of that game.

narutogameking4627d ago

Yeah and Mario games are a rarity these days......

Dee_914627d ago (Edited 4627d ago )

what how isnt EA number one

they literally release the same gameS every year for the past decade and a half

iWishTifaWasReal4627d ago

@ilovepsvita

not to mention

fcking DLC (Map packs)

cost $15. if you multiply it by four (4 map packs a game)

15 x 4 = $60 + plus COD (the actual game) 60

= $120

4627d ago Replies(1)
+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4627d ago
Godmars2904628d ago

With a possible 5-6 games set in the FFXIII world, Sqaure needs to be at #1.

Jihaad_cpt4627d ago

the stories are all different though and look at how often the games come out, not every year

Godmars2904627d ago

And its another thing that they presented these games early and have taken forever to get them out besides. Will be changing much of the theme and gameplay while still on the same world.

The really bad thing that's going on is that they offered a weak story with a poor resolution with FFXIII, and now they're stretching it out. How is that not an example of poor story telling?

Marceles4627d ago

A poor resolution? I hope you mean story-wise. Personally I didn't find it any different than FF5, weak story but fun as hell to fight. Especially in the post-story missions.

kaveti66164628d ago

It's ironic because you're milking this topic to death.

Brownghost4628d ago

didnt they say they will have yearly releases of halo

Legion4627d ago

Actually original plan was to have Halo and Gears of War release in off years. Might not have came about exactly as planned but that was the idea at the beginning.

Brownghost4627d ago

well i hope not and my comment was not bashing halo i was asking a question

Legion4627d ago

I din't say you were bashing Halo. But you made a statement not a question. You can fix that problem by adding some punctuation when posting.

I was simply giving you the facts that I have read based on your statement in counter to those facts.

No issues...

Brownghost4627d ago

oh no i wasn't talking to you just the general reading this also i cant edit my post and wish they would let you edit your comments

IHateYouFanboys4628d ago (Edited 4628d ago )

wheres ratchet and clank? whatve they had, 10-11 games in 9 years?

Also, it should be PUBLISHERS that milk franchises, not developers. every other NFS game is developed by someone different, same with half the other games on the list.

BiggCMan4628d ago

10 years, 6 main games excluding spin offs. 7 if you count the new co-op one coming out. They are also all substantially different in many ways.

MaxOpower4628d ago

Totally agree, none of these are developers!

narutogameking4627d ago

Every other Call of Duty is also developed by a different studio. Treyarch and Infinity Ward take turns.

Show all comments (223)
40°

Call Of Duty 2026 is a Ghosts reboot claim leakers

The details for multiple future Call Of Duty games appear to have leaked, including a follow-up to Advanced Warfare.

350°

Square Enix Preparing for Layoffs in U.S. and Europe Amid Heavy Restructuring

In a town hall that took place on Monday, Square Enix president Takashi Kiryu reportedly confirmed imminent layoffs in the U.S. and Europe.

1d 13h ago
lelo2play1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

Square should ask Sony for more money...

Outside_ofthe_Box1d 7h ago

Square should ask Microsoft to buy them out...

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 4h ago

@Outside_ofthe_Box,
So that Microsoft can close down the studio after doing nothing with them? Right...

Outside_ofthe_Box15h ago

@FinalFantasyFanatic

That's exactly my point...

gleepot1d 11h ago

Sad but true. It's the consequence of a shift in player habits, massive overhead, and out of control budgets across the industry.

blackblades1d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

What did NA and EU did anyways? Just translate or something? I would say it might help them get back to there roots but DK.

Hofstaderman1d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

Actually, you are correct they play a hand in localization especially in Europe with the many languages. That and marketing.

nommers13h ago

Marketing for SE has been poor lately so these layoffs make sense if true.

Profchaos1d 3h ago

Yup videogame crash 2024 edition

_Decadent_Descent16h ago

Hope so. Industry needs a good crash to shake it up again.

Show all comments (64)
460°

Square Is Shifting Strategy To Aggressively Pursue Multiplat Releases,Focus On Quality Over Quantity

Square Enix is shifting its strategy to aggressively pursue multiplatform releases and focus on quality over quantity.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
CantThinkOfAUsername1d 22h ago

Yup, it's official. FFXVI and FFVII Rebirth didn't sell as much as they expected.

gold_drake1d 21h ago

read the report, where exactly does it say what u just said ? lol

TheEroica1d 7h ago

Denial isn't just a river in Egypt for some gamers.... 🤣

Barlos1d 19h ago

It's your interpretation. That doesn't make it 'official'.

CantThinkOfAUsername1d 12h ago

- 1% increase in net sales compared to a year with Forspoken and Octopath Traveller II, which didn't sell more than 3 millions combined (and I'm being generous).

- A 38.3% decrease in operating income despite the release of 'High-Definition' titles namely FFXVI, FF Pixels Remaster, Dragon Quest Monsters, and FFVII Rebirth.

- Aggressive multiplatform strategy one year after saying that exclusivity with PlayStation was mutually desired.

Sure, it's all in my head.

Sonic18811d 16h ago (Edited 1d 16h ago )

Probably for PC and the upcoming Nintendo Switch 2. Square Enix games doesn't sell to well on Xbox

Extermin8or3_1d 15h ago

Nothing sells well on Xbox that's precisely Microsoft's problem

The3faces1d 15h ago

Apparently they don't sell well on PlayStation either.

Lightning771d 14h ago

Square named Drops Xbox as part of their multiplatform approach in their quarterly reports.

Like it matters MS will probably find away to close them down to.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 5h ago

I can see them going for PS5/Switch/PC for the most part, it'll mostly likely be the Switch 2 by the time their next game enters development, which is probably a good thing since the Switch is struggling with 3rd party games. If they're hurting for money/sales, I don't see them bothering with Xbox, that's just wasted time/money for them.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 5h ago
DarXyde1d 16h ago

I mean, maybe? They'll want as much as possible and I figure they could have been hoping for greater impact on PlayStation, but that's good reason to reflect and realize the resources and development cycle of these games aren't very sustainable. The solution is to make more affordable games with shorter dev cycles, then once in a while bring out the big guns.

I think Final Fantasy VII Re make and Rebirth would do really well if it was multiplatform. Specifically, if Nintendo gets their hardware up to snuff, and the rumors are promising. I don't really have much faith in its performance on Xbox, but Nintendo gamers really commit to buying their games. At one point, Breath of the Wild for Switch outsold the Switch itself.

Granted, Zelda always solos everything except GTA, but Nintendo folk are avid Final Fantasy fans. I think it would do exceptionally. Nintendo just needs to make porting easy and inexpensive and they'll get more games.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 5h ago

I don't think the exclusivity hurts them as badly as they think, I think it's a range of factors, like the quality of the games, high sales expectations, ESG/DEI, censorship, development costs/time... I also suspect that Square-Enix is extremely inefficient with their resources, they struggled/avoided towns in the FF13 trilogy, and FF14 was mostly wilderness with little to do apart from derp about in the wild (they also avoid towns and making a lot of characters there too). But FF14 also went through development hell, I think Square-Enix just needs to overall how they do everything, because the way they manage that studio just isn't working.

Christopher1d 14h ago

The two most profitable games for them didn't sell as much as expected. Yes. Make it make sense.

MrCrimson1d 11h ago

I interpret it as - they want to be multiplatform, as they will sell more copies.

EternalTitan1d 10h ago

16 isnt even a JRPG let alone a final fantasy game.
So glad that it bombed.

itsmebryan1d 7h ago

Square finally realized what Sony figured out recently, their installed base is not enough. We are going to see a lot less exclusives from everyone moving forward.

MajorLazer1d 1h ago

PS5 is nearly at 60 million only half-way through its life-cycle, but sure, the install base is not enough.

EternalTitan2h ago(Edited 2h ago)

Good exclusives always sell despite install base. Look at Nintendo's recent Zelda.
Its just 16 was awful.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 2h ago
CrashMania1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

Hopefully the next Nintendo system isn't a potato and it can contribute to FF sales in future as well, in addition to PC releases. If this ensures the long term health for SE and franchises than like FF and KH then I'm all for it.

NotoriousWhiz1d 21h ago

Adding Nintendo and PC customers is the best way to increase sales and long term success. Not going to get that from Xbox.

shinoff21831d 16h ago

Hopefully square brings all the lose switch exclusives over to.

Hofstaderman1d 21h ago

Will there be a XBOX for Square to release games on? Or a MS Games service?

thesoftware7301d 19h ago

Hof,

You must not have heard they are launching new hardware and have already committed to a Next-Gen Xbox.

But, for some reason, I think you already knew that and wanted to spin a silly narrative; besides, why wouldn't they release games on the SX/SS? You do know these consoles will still be here, right?

Hofstaderman1d 18h ago (Edited 1d 18h ago )

Optics. They have a STATED plan to do so. Thats not commitment. The shareholders and board are calling the shots now. Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already. Investment in hardware, R and D and marketing is how much again? That cost with the history of their hardware performance....at most maybe a handheld. What I am certain of XBOX is finished, the writing has been on the wall before the studio closures. Its MS Games and they are not hardware. They are software because MS is a software company. Expect them to be folded in the Surface team.

DarXyde1d 16h ago

*hardware

I believe they committed to hardware.

I hate to nitpick, but that's kind of the company they are. You have to.

1d 15h ago
Michiel19891d 10h ago

@hofstaderman the board and shareholders have always called the shots or had a huge impact on decisions.

Xbox finished lmao, the writing has been on the wall? mate they just spend 70 BILLION dollars, and you see the writing is on the wall that they're done. 0 idea what you're talking about. They grafiti'd on the wall and you still can't see it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1d 10h ago
Aloymetal1d 17h ago

No to both, not worth the effort, money and time on an already dying brand.

1d 15h ago
thesoftware7301d 17h ago

"They have a STATED plan to do so. That's not commitment."

Huh? What are you talking about? They announced they would be unveiling new Hardware this holiday season; how else are they supposed to commit to it?

" Lets see if they have the appetite for hardware because they are owed 80 Billion Dollars already"

What a silly statement, you think this deal was approved so they could make 80 billion in less than a year? This is a long-term commitment, a future-proofing of profit.

"What I am certain of XBOX is finished,"

No, you are not certain of this lol; as you stated, if they make even a Handheld in the form of a Steam-Deck that can dock to a TV/monitor, wouldn't that be just changing the form factor but still XBOX?

Closing these studios has really got you guys delusional; that is what happens in companies, in a changing market: you acquire, and you trim; like it or not, that is the way things are done. Lets look.

Where is the new Psygnosis with a new wipeout?
What happened to Japan Studio? Pixl Opus? London Studio?
Where is Zipper Interactive?

I can list more, but you see, closing devs doesn't mean your company is finished, especially when you have like 30+ dev teams.

Extermin8or3_1d 15h ago

They won't be unveiling the hardware this holiday season it will be like the series x and s they got a tease at the game awards 2018. But no details until year of their release in 2020 lol

Relientk771d 20h ago

Please tell me the Dragon Quest III HD-2D Remake is still coming. I feel like I've been waiting forever for that game.

gold_drake1d 16h ago

i think the juggernauts kingdom hearts (disney provides the money for that one) final fantasy and dragon quest are fine, the rest not as much

Michiel19891d 10h ago

I'm kinda worried about the future of DQ though, Toriyama and the composer both passed away. Huge blow to the franchise.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 5h ago

@Michiel1989,
Akira Toriyama had an understudy though, he emulates his style, so maybe he'll do the art for Dragon Quest games, I would love to see Nobue Uematsu do music for the series though, that could be fun if they could convince him.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 5h ago

I'll be so p*ssed if that doesn't go ahead, also, where's DQ12 at? They've been silent on that for so long, and it was announced years ago.

@gold_Drake,
I'm pretty sure they can siphon some profit from A Realm Reborn to keep FF and Dragon Quest going too. I think the company would have gone bankrupt if it wasn't for that cash cow.

gold_drake1d ago

14 is definitely brings in the a consistant cashflow

Charal1d 20h ago (Edited 1d 20h ago )

Another sign that dedicated consoles market is in trouble, while PC seems more and more attractive to big publishers.

Having a good gaming PC and a PS5 myself, given current trend form both Sony and MS I am less and less playing on PS5, waiting for exclusives to release on PC, so I understand the logic behind the new strategy.

anast1d 20h ago

Post those numbers. Then your comment might make sense.

thesoftware7301d 19h ago (Edited 1d 19h ago )

Ants,

I get that we don't know exactly without numbers, but come on, man, we can clearly see what's happening.

The console market has not grown much, the highest-selling console in history is still the PS2. You can play the " prove it" game all you want, but Sony's more aggressive PC push, SE completely rebooting their company/business, after being mainly exclusive to one console and showing a sizeable profit loss is telling.

PC is a high seller, and your doubtful PS5 dominant stance does not change the clear writing on the wall, straight from Sony's mouth, that they need to be, and will be more aggressive in the very lucrative PC market.

So, in other words, PC market is indeed looking more and more attractive to Pubs.

anast1d 18h ago

@730

Numbers?

I'm willing to bet the farm that ¨PC gamers are not the dominate number compared to console, but I don't know because I don't have numbers. However, the price point of entry can allow us to infer what I had just stated.

anast1d 13h ago

I don't click on links on forums. Tell me why that .com source is legit.

Tacoboto1d 11h ago

What an ironic thing to say on a link-agreggate site like N4G. Explains your comment history perfectly.

Michiel19891d 10h ago

asks for numbers. receives numbers and then continues to say I don't wanna click a website (because it might shatter my illusion)

anast1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

@All the people with that good 'ol folk wisdom

It's ironic how I clearly asked for the site and people still can't even answer this simple question.

Tell me how many people click on random links on forums?

Tell me the site and I will look. I don't mind being wrong and I'm barely intelligent enough to change my mind with something substantial.

All the numbers I have seen is that PC doesn't even come close console gaming in revenue, and nothing touches mobile gaming. More people touching something doesn't mean anything. It just means more people own PC for work and touch Steam every now and again, those numbers mean even less.

Charal1d 1h ago

Anast I wasn’t expecting more from you and I haven’t be disappointed.

Don’t believe any number if you want, but things cannot be more evident that most of games companies are pushing to get the most they can from PC market.

Hell, we have both MS and Sony that are releasing their biggest franchise on PC with no or less and less delay vs console release, that is never seen before in the industry.

What is surprising me is that PC is not cheap in term of hardware cost, a rig close to PS5/XBX perfs may be close to double the price I guess, and close to 4x for a good gaming PC.
Plus, PC gaming does not have physical release anymore.

So a lot of supposed advantages from console market are not there but PC market is successful anyway, it would be very interesting to understand it.
Maybe one big argument is that we are more likely to need a PC at home, were we can work with, browse, and game, than a dedicated gaming machine. That why handled console market have been crushed by smartphones, we could see a repeating pattern here.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 1d 1h ago
Babadook71d 7h ago

From what I can ascertain PC is a smaller market than PS. There are occasionally times when PC looks to be stronger but overall it's still behind.

FinalFantasyFanatic1d 5h ago

PC also has a lot more competition, especially when people can easily buy and play older games from 20 or so years ago on it.

anast20h ago

You probably need to worry about yourself and your own expectations.

You still haven't even complete the simplest task in telling me the name of the website. Let that sink in. I asked for the name of the website so I can look at it and you couldn't even complete that task.

Show all comments (109)