Duke Nukem Forever is arguably a contender for most disappointing title of the decade. After receiving a flurry of less than average reviews, long-time fans of the series have once again been left with a sour taste in their mouths. But despite its poor reception, Gearbox boss Randy Pitchford has already revealed plans to make a Duke sequel. No doubt this was the intention all along. Gearbox now has the opportunity to sculpt its own Duke project from the ground up. If it's going to succeed though, here are a few things CVG thinks the studio can't afford to leave out.
It took about five seconds for artists (and fans) to notice.
What would otherwise have been a fairly minor announcement, the news that some old Duke Nukem games were coming to an Evercade handheld, has blown up after the rapid discovery that the bundle’s promotion included a bunch of terrible machine-generated imagery.
Literally who cares. It's a picture of Duke Nukem shooting a gun on a black background to announce a tiny port to a practically unheard of handheld. Why would anybody care that it's AI generated?
AI generated art often borrows or outright steals from copyrighted images. The the work of freelance artist is also used by AI without the consent of the artist, who are furthermore not given credit.
This is a bit confusing, so if an artist painting is inspired by other artists, should their art be removed? All in all, almost all art is inspired/borrowed by previous artists in one way or another, if you use some form of impressionism, should Monet descendants be able to take down your art?. In this case, the character property is from the publisher, and the rest of the art is as generic as it can be, how is this a copyright issue, is dark scenery with red smoke some kind of copyright infringement?
@Rise: If you use a music analogy, it's fine to create something in a particular style inspired by something else as long as it's not an exact copy. You most certainly cannot use someone else's recording, add your own recordings on top of it and then call it your own though.
The AI is trained on copyrighted images but does not steal them. This has already been ruled in court.
Is it taking away artists jobs? Already has, clearly. There's other artist work out there for now.
Is it taking my job? Yes
It is what it is. It ain't going anywhere and there's a 100% chance that it's gonna be used more and more for game art (and I'm sure literally every career you can think of in the next couple years).
If it gives the Duke Nukem devs (or any other dev for that matter) that much more money to spend on the game instead of ads then I'm all for it.
ps: I've been obsessed with AI for 5 years now and I truly believe this is the beginning of AI replacing the vast majority of jobs and think it's the best thing that could possibly happen to humanity. It's gonna happen quicker than you think. Nobody WANTS to work - even an artist would rather be making their own art to sell rather than being commissioned to do a duke nukem promo shot. We'll figure it out
@amplitude
no one wants to work, and yet that is all that will happen thanks to AI. AI will take all of the interesting creative jobs away from people that are actually good at them, and those people will have to find tedious jobs to keep the machine running and feed their families. yayyyy......
Amplitude: "I for one welcome our AI overlords."
If you think millions of people losing their jobs is going to be the "best thing that could possibly happen to humanity," you need your head checked. Think about it for one second.
Why do they need to apologize? You can’t use AI generated imagery in advertising now?
I'm sure there's an actual human artist that could have used the work.
Essentially, if you're not going to demonstrate to me that your game has soul, then I won't play it.
But this isn’t the game, it’s like an advertising/promo. And I’m not sure about copyright because isn’t this an original work? Games sometimes use pieces of other people’s photos for textures, for example bricks or sand.
I’d assume this would fall under something similar for use. I mean, is the image it produced original or did the AI program literally just find someone’s Duke Nukem fan art and post it?
Two collections featuring six great games will be available in November 2023. Including Duke Nukem 3D and Introducing: DUKE NUKEM 1+2 REMASTERED - developed by Blaze Entertainment!
Duke Nukem Forever originally began its life as a sidescroller instead of a shooter back in 1996, and that canceled version has just been leaked.
Very cool, but i don't know how real this is... I'll check it out later to find out.
i just want to see a good game. thats it, and in less than 14 years. thaaaanks
Yeah, DNF was just a generic unreal engine shooter with shoddy mechanics and a generally bad "feel".
It is a fact that Duke Nukem Forever really wasn't Gearbox creation from the ground up, they just patch it up and add this and that. The next Duke should be a revolutionary shooter with great grahpics, gameplay, and a funny over the top storyline as usual. They will deliver next time. They should of cancel this Duke Nukem forever and made the upcoming one instead!!! Why they didn't do that to begin with? Gamers are going to ask that question when it actually comes out.
Want to see the official letter by the CEO of whoever that developed the game, stating that Duke Nukem has officially been binned, and that the world will never have to see him again in any form for the greater good of the gaming industry.
Seriously. Old series is old, just go away.
I loved forever, any real duke fan knows that it wasn't about the graphics but the way the game was, and forever was funny with plenty of gnarly stuff, but the kids of this generation always complain.