120°

Zelda: Skyward Sword - SDCC 11: Ghirahim Boss Battle Gameplay (Cam)

Lord Ghirahim introduces himself and his combat prowess in this clip from San Diego's Comic-Con 2011

Read Full Story >>
gametrailers.com
ZoidsRaven4686d ago

Ghirahim went upside Link's head @ 03:25. XD

Pikajew4686d ago

not watching any trailer

dont want any spoilers

Pozzle4686d ago

I'm definitely getting Ocarina of Time/Majora's Mask vibes from these videos. Which is a good thing. Twilight Princess seemed to be lacking that LoZ 'vibe'...even though it was a good game in its own right.

Cpt_kitten4686d ago (Edited 4686d ago )

eh disappointing, zelda games will never be the same....and no im not talking about like OOT im talking before that

edit please elaborate disagrees...butthurt the classic ones are still the best?

krazykombatant4686d ago

Ummm you talking about titles such as Adventures of Link? that far back?

Seriously, OOT was great in its own right, but play it again and i'm sure you'll complain about how the camera sucks and how somethings in the game were atrocious (having to be lined up to the other ledge to jump). Obviously we over look those parts for the greater picture, such as ME having great storyline and gameplay(imo), but of course some people had to bitch..

Anyways, I thought that windwaker was great, except for the long boat rides. And Twilight princess is by far an amazing game, it went back to being a dark game. Sure this one looks a lot happier and child like. To be honest I think they've turned link into a girl. His face idk look to feminine. I digress yet again, I'll be picking this up and I'm sure you will too. Until then let's not bash one of the best franchises out there.

In which i'm sure that if Ninty were to go under (which will never happen but there are people out there that think so). Zelda could easily become something horrible like sonic did. Anyways thats my two cents.

Cpt_kitten4686d ago

yeah OOt was great but not amazingly great that it needs to be re-released on every generation of systems, and yeah a lot of 95 was spent playing that game till my parents had to take the controller away but nothing will ever beat the old games

but its time to step it up a knotch and go darker than then the others its time to stop rehashing the same thing over and over again, i would like for them to leave a cliff hanger where link is in a pinch or someone dies but its made for childeren which is where it cuts pulled back but to have link doing the same thing and fighting bosses with that are basically the same from the previous games and navigating nearly the same dungeons over and over since OOT is just ridiculous i liked the wind waker but i really got sick of the same old song and dance half way through TP

krazykombatant4686d ago

I'll agree with you on your second post, but as far as I've heard Nintendo tend to change how the game works this time around, won't necessarily fight a boss or get an item in a dungeon. Which is pretty good I think, they definitely need to get out of the comfort zone. Obviously, the old games are what set the standard for us and what made us immerse within our own little world.

I see Nintendo, as the weed of gaming. (Personally I don't partake on drugs, but anyways). Nintendo for me opened gaming, I do understand how they need keep their child like audience going, but it would be really nice to see games like zelda become really dark or something where Link or someone is really in peril of death or idk something new and fresh. Almost like metroid prime trilogy. Which was very dark. Anyways we'll just have to wait and see how SS turns out.

Show all comments (18)
110°

Why The Game Industry Needs In-Person Shows Despite The End Of E3

Skewed and Reviewed kick off 2024 with a look at the need for in-person game conventions with the End of E3 and compares the cost-cutting methods of Hollywood who still value in-person events.

gold_drake144d ago

so, this article didnt tell me why we NEED to have in-person shows like e3, other than the authors nostalgia and remembrance of covering one of these shows.

but it also doesnt mention everyone outside of america who have never had the chance to see it in person either haha
we had to watch the darn livestream, if they had it available, at 3am in the morning haha with lags amd crashes (not all the time)

while i think these shows are great and all, i dont really "need" to have them. people are busy, im busy. id rather watch a livestream than to book a flight, a hotel etc.

but theres still pax and all of that.

Garethvk144d ago (Edited 144d ago )

I did mention that you cannot have hands-on and meetings with key people and the excitement. Europe has Gamescom and had Paris Games Week and N.A
Needs an industry event again.

A Livestream does not even come close to what was lost. I much prefer seeing and playing the games in person and asking questions to developers and marketing people versus watching talking heads doing shtick on a scripted showcase with a carefully edited video.

gold_drake144d ago

"need" is a strong word for it, imo.

"good to have it" would be a better way to describe it.

and sure, gamescom is in se germanland, paris week in .. paris.

most people dont rly care for it anymore. they either tune in to a livestream or vod or read about it online.

but opinions are opinions. if u think we Need them, then there ya go.

Garethvk143d ago

I think the industry needs them. The rank and file public not as much but our coverage is greatly limited via livestreams compared to what it was to say nothing of streams. Hands on previews Re very limited as well as we used to play big games months before release.

ApocalypseShadow143d ago (Edited 143d ago )

I get what you're saying. In person is always preferable with a hands on. Because there are those like myself that like to try before buying. That likes physical mostly over digital.

But having said that, I think it's more *your personal need* than a need for the industry itself. You need to be the middleman giving your point of view, possibly your own personal bias or subjectivity or objectivity to the equation. *We* as gamers don't actually NEED it. We can come to the same conclusions, positive or negative about a game as you can.

Companies like Sony or Nintendo used to sit back and watch others give their take on things that were negative to the message or had an agenda. Especially during the PS3 era of website bias, swag bags, advertising hand shakes, biased video, free laptops, etc.

Companies like Sony took the reigns and decided to let their base see for themselves what the games look like, than through the eyes of some journalists, bloggers and vloggers looking to cash in on click bait and advertising.

Delivering their message directly to the consumer killed a lot of that nonsense. You see the developers, you see the game, and in many cases, you can speak to these developers on discord than worrying about some article's take on something.

It's not that I want you to become obsolete. But for some, I'm glad it killed their business practices. Also, we live in an era where these games could be streamed directly to the consumers after the presentation from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft that gives that hands on of a game. They just have to implement that technology and make it high quality without latency. And *WE* as gamers can speak to each other on a preferred media platform and give our opinions on the gameplay we just experienced. Many journalists have not been fully honest on games before release because they fear losing their backstage pass and free gifts. We would know just by playing if a game is something we want. Remote play is possible now without lines, without expensive trips, etc.

To close, Sony has sold mostly 50 million PS5 consoles, over 110 million PS4 consoles and Nintendo has sold over 120 million consoles without a journalist take. They delivered their message and it's still reaching the consumers they are targeting without spending the millions of dollars on in person setup at a venue

I get what you're saying. I lived through the whole era when E3 was created and watched. But I don't need it and never been to one. And really don't need a journalist to tell me what to like or dislike.

EvertonFC143d ago

The ques for 1 game were 4 hours long for the most part, that's NOT fun.

S2Killinit143d ago

The problem with live shows was that it became all smoke and mirrors and a show of things not related to gaming. Therefore I would argue that it added a new layer of cost to the game developers and console holders that necessarily will need to made up for. Either we the consumer have to pay for that cost or the developer/manufacturer will have to bear the cost thereby taking away from profits leading to smaller studios dying out.

Remember xbox buying celebrities to make appearances? Thats a good example of unnecessary cost.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 143d ago
JackBNimble143d ago

You don't need to go to the movies either, you can sit on your ass and watch any number of streams but that doesn't make it any better then actually going out.

This generation has become so spoiled and lazy.

gold_drake143d ago

booking a flight and a hotel aint the same as going to the movies, but pop off i guess ha.

Garethvk143d ago

Streaming cannot replace the communal experience of event films.

EvertonFC143d ago (Edited 143d ago )

Actually it does, for one it's cheaper eating my own snacks at home than over priced pi** take cinema prices. 2 it's About £150 to take the family to the cinema or £15 for a new cinema release and watch at home on my awesome 4k TV.
3 We can pause the film when needed, sit in the warmth of our home and have no di*kheads talking through the movie.
That's called using your brain, not being lazy or spoiled dude.

TheColbertinator143d ago

I'd rather publishers send out closed betas to garner gamer concern and interest like how we had demos back in the day.

I don't miss E3 as much as I loved it at one point but that era is long gone.

Garethvk143d ago

There is a need but refinement was and is needed.

Zenzuu143d ago

Sad to see it go. It was a great event for gamers and developers all around the world getting together and celebrate gaming as a community.

The announcements of new games/hardware, hype, surprises and seeing live audience reactions, it's something only events like E3 are able to bring. It will be missed...

hombreacabado143d ago

if its going to be anything like the game awards where celebrities that dont even play games are there and its just full of fluff and commercial crap than no we dont need in person shows. we just end up watching the trailer montages the next day anyway.

Shiro173143d ago

To be honest E3 was one of my favorite times of the years when I was younger. I couldn't wait for all the big conferences and new announcements. It was hype even if nothing good was announced we had cringe moments to laugh at.

Show all comments (18)
60°

Talking Mortal Kombat 1 With Ed Boon And Thiago Gomes

During SDCC I spoke with Ed Boon and Thiago Gomes about Mortal Kombat 1 as part of a Roundtable.

60°

DC Heroes United and Borderlands Comes To SDCC

This sounds awesome. This afternoon, Genvid Entertainment announced two, all-new interactive streaming series at San Diego-Comic Con: DC Heroes United and Borderlands EchoVision Live.