160°

Ultimate Marvel vs Capcom 3 - See Ghost Rider in action

Capcom announced Ultimate Marvel vs. Capcom 3 over the weekend at the 2011 San Diego Comic-Con. Attendees of the convention were treated to exclusive videos of four of the game's new characters.

Now, Capcom and Game Guys are letting you in on the action. Check out the video above to see the motorcycle-riding Ghost Rider in action.

NewMonday4697d ago

i swear, before watching the clip i predicted one of his moves would be running the enemy over with the bike, and another will involve the penance stare.

right on the money.

FACTUAL evidence4697d ago

Ok, Im done with Capcom. How more ultimate can a game like MVC could be?!? It's already a speedy ass game. If this is CC excuse for dlc then I'm pissed....I shouldn't have bought MVC3 if I knew this was going to happen....I don't have money to blow like this.

Ares844697d ago

I might get this used on the cheap when Ultimate Hyper-Super Marvel vs Capcom 3 Alpha Arcade vs Remixed edition comes out.

lizard812884697d ago

I thought Ghost Rider could only ride a motorcycle....

Crapcom...

showtimefolks4697d ago

FPS makers charge too much for a dlc, what we never hear is how fighting games can charge 4-5 dollars per character and people are fine with that

Capcom has become the king for this releasing so many different editions of SF and now same thing with MVC along with many characters DLC

and lets not forget how little content was on disk at launch with MVC compare to SF4 and MK

Urrakia344697d ago

I think it's because a DLC character in a fighting game has alot of depth to them because you need to take your time to figure out their strengths, weaknesses, move list, combos, etc. I think that adds alot to the game overall and so I believe it warrants a $5 price tag.

lodossrage4697d ago

I have to agree with showtimefolks on this.

First off, the idea of DLC is a rip off in itself in the first place. But $5 for a single character of a game is ridiculous. You're not even guaranteed to LIKE using the character you buy in the first place.

Baka-akaB4697d ago

how are you not guaranteed to like it ?
Whenever a dlc char for a game got out , there movelists was already listed , some of their combo analyzed , and they feats extensively videotaped , before you could even get an hand on them .

UltimateIdiot9114697d ago

I dislike the whole $4-$5 per character as much as $15 for 2-4 maps.

I didn't buy Yoda for SC4 and I got SC4 for $10 dirt cheap a few months after release.

I also didn't buy MvC3 for the lack of characters and possibility of a better edition. I however did choose to preorder Ultimate MvC3 as I have a promotional credit I need to use before it expires. Also, I figure I can sell the alternative costume pack to cover my cost even more. If they choose to release another edition, I will sell the game and buy the upgrade edition.

showtimefolks4697d ago

adding 5 new maps in my opinion adds a lot more than a $5 character that you will be done with within half an hour

the whole idea of DLC in general needs an overhaul

look at fallout games when they release we know we will get 4-5 dlc packs

the only right dlc i have seen are KZ3 for like $10 you can get like 6-8 maps if i am not wrong

and the way RS did LC for gta 4 than RDR had awesome dlc

it can be done right but most companies just want the quick buck

Baka-akaB4697d ago (Edited 4697d ago )

except there is no way you'll be done with the character like you claims , that is if you're really into the game .

A character is easily hundreds of hours of gameplay to figure out , or learn to fight against , and double if you do both .

I dont like the idea of dlc character , for many other reason mind you . I just cant agree with the idea of maps being better

M-A-R-S-H-A-L-L4697d ago

Ghost Rider looks awesome but I can't help but feel he reminds me of Simon Belmont with that belt.

Show all comments (17)
110°

Why The Game Industry Needs In-Person Shows Despite The End Of E3

Skewed and Reviewed kick off 2024 with a look at the need for in-person game conventions with the End of E3 and compares the cost-cutting methods of Hollywood who still value in-person events.

gold_drake154d ago

so, this article didnt tell me why we NEED to have in-person shows like e3, other than the authors nostalgia and remembrance of covering one of these shows.

but it also doesnt mention everyone outside of america who have never had the chance to see it in person either haha
we had to watch the darn livestream, if they had it available, at 3am in the morning haha with lags amd crashes (not all the time)

while i think these shows are great and all, i dont really "need" to have them. people are busy, im busy. id rather watch a livestream than to book a flight, a hotel etc.

but theres still pax and all of that.

Garethvk154d ago (Edited 154d ago )

I did mention that you cannot have hands-on and meetings with key people and the excitement. Europe has Gamescom and had Paris Games Week and N.A
Needs an industry event again.

A Livestream does not even come close to what was lost. I much prefer seeing and playing the games in person and asking questions to developers and marketing people versus watching talking heads doing shtick on a scripted showcase with a carefully edited video.

gold_drake154d ago

"need" is a strong word for it, imo.

"good to have it" would be a better way to describe it.

and sure, gamescom is in se germanland, paris week in .. paris.

most people dont rly care for it anymore. they either tune in to a livestream or vod or read about it online.

but opinions are opinions. if u think we Need them, then there ya go.

Garethvk154d ago

I think the industry needs them. The rank and file public not as much but our coverage is greatly limited via livestreams compared to what it was to say nothing of streams. Hands on previews Re very limited as well as we used to play big games months before release.

ApocalypseShadow154d ago (Edited 154d ago )

I get what you're saying. In person is always preferable with a hands on. Because there are those like myself that like to try before buying. That likes physical mostly over digital.

But having said that, I think it's more *your personal need* than a need for the industry itself. You need to be the middleman giving your point of view, possibly your own personal bias or subjectivity or objectivity to the equation. *We* as gamers don't actually NEED it. We can come to the same conclusions, positive or negative about a game as you can.

Companies like Sony or Nintendo used to sit back and watch others give their take on things that were negative to the message or had an agenda. Especially during the PS3 era of website bias, swag bags, advertising hand shakes, biased video, free laptops, etc.

Companies like Sony took the reigns and decided to let their base see for themselves what the games look like, than through the eyes of some journalists, bloggers and vloggers looking to cash in on click bait and advertising.

Delivering their message directly to the consumer killed a lot of that nonsense. You see the developers, you see the game, and in many cases, you can speak to these developers on discord than worrying about some article's take on something.

It's not that I want you to become obsolete. But for some, I'm glad it killed their business practices. Also, we live in an era where these games could be streamed directly to the consumers after the presentation from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft that gives that hands on of a game. They just have to implement that technology and make it high quality without latency. And *WE* as gamers can speak to each other on a preferred media platform and give our opinions on the gameplay we just experienced. Many journalists have not been fully honest on games before release because they fear losing their backstage pass and free gifts. We would know just by playing if a game is something we want. Remote play is possible now without lines, without expensive trips, etc.

To close, Sony has sold mostly 50 million PS5 consoles, over 110 million PS4 consoles and Nintendo has sold over 120 million consoles without a journalist take. They delivered their message and it's still reaching the consumers they are targeting without spending the millions of dollars on in person setup at a venue

I get what you're saying. I lived through the whole era when E3 was created and watched. But I don't need it and never been to one. And really don't need a journalist to tell me what to like or dislike.

EvertonFC153d ago

The ques for 1 game were 4 hours long for the most part, that's NOT fun.

S2Killinit153d ago

The problem with live shows was that it became all smoke and mirrors and a show of things not related to gaming. Therefore I would argue that it added a new layer of cost to the game developers and console holders that necessarily will need to made up for. Either we the consumer have to pay for that cost or the developer/manufacturer will have to bear the cost thereby taking away from profits leading to smaller studios dying out.

Remember xbox buying celebrities to make appearances? Thats a good example of unnecessary cost.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 153d ago
JackBNimble154d ago

You don't need to go to the movies either, you can sit on your ass and watch any number of streams but that doesn't make it any better then actually going out.

This generation has become so spoiled and lazy.

gold_drake154d ago

booking a flight and a hotel aint the same as going to the movies, but pop off i guess ha.

Garethvk154d ago

Streaming cannot replace the communal experience of event films.

EvertonFC153d ago (Edited 153d ago )

Actually it does, for one it's cheaper eating my own snacks at home than over priced pi** take cinema prices. 2 it's About £150 to take the family to the cinema or £15 for a new cinema release and watch at home on my awesome 4k TV.
3 We can pause the film when needed, sit in the warmth of our home and have no di*kheads talking through the movie.
That's called using your brain, not being lazy or spoiled dude.

TheColbertinator154d ago

I'd rather publishers send out closed betas to garner gamer concern and interest like how we had demos back in the day.

I don't miss E3 as much as I loved it at one point but that era is long gone.

Garethvk154d ago

There is a need but refinement was and is needed.

Zenzuu154d ago

Sad to see it go. It was a great event for gamers and developers all around the world getting together and celebrate gaming as a community.

The announcements of new games/hardware, hype, surprises and seeing live audience reactions, it's something only events like E3 are able to bring. It will be missed...

hombreacabado153d ago

if its going to be anything like the game awards where celebrities that dont even play games are there and its just full of fluff and commercial crap than no we dont need in person shows. we just end up watching the trailer montages the next day anyway.

Shiro173153d ago

To be honest E3 was one of my favorite times of the years when I was younger. I couldn't wait for all the big conferences and new announcements. It was hype even if nothing good was announced we had cringe moments to laugh at.

Show all comments (18)
60°

Talking Mortal Kombat 1 With Ed Boon And Thiago Gomes

During SDCC I spoke with Ed Boon and Thiago Gomes about Mortal Kombat 1 as part of a Roundtable.

60°

DC Heroes United and Borderlands Comes To SDCC

This sounds awesome. This afternoon, Genvid Entertainment announced two, all-new interactive streaming series at San Diego-Comic Con: DC Heroes United and Borderlands EchoVision Live.