440°

The Next-Gen War Has Already Started

360 Magazine: The war is already being waged. Let's take a look at the combatants...

Read Full Story >>
360magazine.co.uk
Biglet4694d ago

Xbox has more graphics. It probably has the most graphics ever. It has more graphics than graphics.

potedude4694d ago

lol. I see some people are taking you seriously already...

Dailynch4693d ago

I know, annoying isn't it?

jacksheen00004693d ago

Getting Better my friend... at least I can understand you.

NanoSoldier4693d ago Show
Inside_out4694d ago ShowReplies(1)
MOTY4693d ago

I can't wait to play a new Halo game and Gears game on MS's next gen console.

Grip4693d ago

we don't want ur Sh!t that comes out every year.. all i want my Persona :( this gen

MrDead4693d ago

Next-Gen War?........ grow up

Dailynch4693d ago

You grow up. There's a war going out there man. you weren't there, man, you weren't there... (stares off for a thousand yards)

MrDead4693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

My war ended with the Atari ST and Amiga wars of the early 90's, a lot of floppys lost their lives. You can never go back to being the same person after seeing all that carnage, you can drown out the screams with tizer and lucozade but they never leave you.

What I read on here is a load of kids flicking each others balls because mummy got them a different system.

This is no war.

Solidus187-SCMilk4693d ago

AHAHha dailynch LOL @ "FLICKING EACH OTHERS BALLS" that was funny.

edhe4693d ago

MS has already won the next gen, by having DX11 as standard.

Grip4693d ago

by the time DX12 will come out

frostypants4693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

So Microsoft won the next gen by supporting their own proprietary APIs? Really dude? Obviously Microsoft will support their own platforms. What does this have to do with who "wins"? It would be like saying "Sony will win because only they will have Cell technology". It's not a logical comment. There's nothing magical about DX11...it's just an API suite that Microsoft happened to create for themselves.

edhe4693d ago

Really? you're that shortsighted?

What, exactly, are sony going to do when all the major developers have years of coding to dx11 on the PC then have to port to whatever they use on the ps4 which is different?

All the dx11 games that are being made for PC will run on the nextbox [assuming it's a dx11 box] and will be peachy, with *very little to change*.

If you have, for instance OGL4, then there will be many features requiring changes for that. Change will be hard to push when the development of these massive titles are so highly budgeted. Optimal conditions will be the ones that the games were developed to, dx11.

Anything else will be a ported afterthough, and we've seen how "well" the cell's done with that this generation haven't we?

This means that any exclusive studios left will be wondering why, again, they're selling their product to a chunk of the potential audience and not the whole of the audience when it's so expensive to make the games.

The *only* people who'd be cutting edge on the ps4's custom solution will be the only people not getting their money's worth from their productions.

Economic dead end; change direction; go multiplat; dx11 as standard, ms box preferred.

playstation brand will suffer further erosion.

feel free to PM to discuss. :)

NB cell was one of the worst business decisions ever made. Fortunately it was balanced by one of their best - bluray included.

stevenhiggster4693d ago

@edhe

I almost agree with you, but the fact is Sony's exclusives mostly do sell well.
No not Halo or COD numbers, but well enough to be making a profit. And not everyone in the gaming industry is all about the massive numbers.
Sony's first party devs don't have to worry about the money side of things, they let Sony worry about that.

BlackKnight4693d ago

@Frostypants

I think he is referring to how the Wii U only put in a DX10.1 card, which means it is limited to around OpenGL 3.0.

And what many people can't grasp is that the higher API's a video card can support (DX11 or OpenGL 4.0) this means they have more features and capabilities which meet the standards that DX11/OGL 4.0 requires...

vyke34693d ago

so? sony has opengl 4 as the standard.

edhe4693d ago

That comeback was as well thought out and strong as a mouldy banana.

Bonobo123454693d ago (Edited 4693d ago )

@edhe

With that one short sentence he provides just as valid an argument as your whole previous essay/post.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4693d ago
Show all comments (68)
70°

Fortnite maker's appeal in Epic vs Apple case smacked down by Supreme Court ruling

The Supreme Court seems to have given it's final verdict on Epic and Apple's legal battle in the US.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
220°

Epic win: Jury decides Google has illegal monopoly in app store fight

Three years after Fortnite-maker Epic Games sued Apple and Google for allegedly running illegal app store monopolies, Epic has a win. The jury in Epic v. Google has just delivered its verdict — and it found that Google turned its Google Play app store and Google Play Billing service into an illegal monopoly.

Read Full Story >>
theverge.com
gold_drake167d ago (Edited 167d ago )

oooo shiiiit
well, there ya go

but i think the biggest issue are the judges in these cases.
most of them have no clue about all them things.

ii wonder what the judge will decide Epic actually "won" or what the out come is.

Petebloodyonion166d ago

Why are you saying the judge have no cases?
I think the judges shows lots of clairity that in a duality market (APPLE and Android) there's no competition when both are already agreeing on the price.
Do you think there would be deals if Wallmart was the only store where you could buy food?
How would the argument of "but there's competition between Cookies and cereal brands" would hold up when Wallmart could decide that each provider must pay a 30% comission just to display product in store?

There's already tons od laws to make sure that there's not only 1 physical store brand and that store owners can't be in cahoot with competition in order to fix price so why would this be different for Virtual storefront?

gold_drake166d ago

i didnt say that.
read properly next time.

and the digital market is more complex than supernarkets.

Einhander1972166d ago (Edited 166d ago )

"Do you think there would be deals if Wallmart was the only store where you could buy food?"

This isn't even the same types of argument, you have a variety of different devices you can get content on, like Apple pr Google or PC or consoles, all these things plus more compete with each other.

The only winner in this decision are Epic, Microsoft and other people who are already rich. All these greedy companies are using the law to steal profits from each other and it's going to be the consumers who pay more.

All these devices we use are heavily subsidized by the profits these platform holders make from selling peoples products. If you think Epic is going to start charging less for their MTX now or whatever your crazy, consumers are not going to get anything back from the winners here. All consumers get is the privilege to pay more for devices.

Edit:

"Wallmart could decide that each provider must pay a 30% comission just to display product in store?"

Walmart does take a cut of every sale in their stores....thats how they make money. They also sell shelf space, the products that are are in the center instead of the top or the bottom pay to be there and to have higher visibility and easier access. They also sell access because obviously they don't have enough space for every brands products.

Using your Walmart analogy, how long do you think Walmart would stay in business if they just let anyone walk into their store and sell things without helping to pay for the upkeep of the stores and other costs? They wouldn't that's why things don't work like that.

That is what Epic wants, they want to use these devices with out paying to help maintain them.

Petebloodyonion166d ago (Edited 166d ago )

@Gold _Drake
Sorry bad writting from my part I meant to say Why do you think Judges have no clues?

@Einhander1972
Last I checked tons of small developpers and consummer association complained about the 30% tax cut that Sony Steam, Google, Apple are charging so why do you say only Epic benefit from that decisision is beyond me. Heck I recall this article making the headline recently
https://www.gamesindustry.b...

As for Walmart Upkeep, I would like to remind you that it's Wallmart and other store who need to cut in THEIR profit margin if they want to match price seen in other stores and not the other way around like in the digital market where Game publisher must sign price parity clause to please Google, Apple, Valve and Sony
https://www.linklaters.com/...
https://www.ign.com/article...

166d ago
Extermin8or3_165d ago (Edited 165d ago )

Thst isn the issue here. Thr issue ws the secret deals Google was doing to lower its cut for certain big apps publishers and only them and the fact that a requiremenf for said deals was nof helping epic games sefup its own mobile store.

Einhander1972165d ago (Edited 165d ago )

"Last I checked tons of small developpers and consummer association complained about the 30% tax cut that Sony Steam, Google, Apple are charging so why do you say only Epic benefit from that decisision is beyond me. Heck I recall this article making the headline recent"

Yes, yeah developers and other people who are selling things to you may benefit but the main benefit is these large companies who want to bypass fees.

But at the end of the day they are not going to start charging you less, they are going to charge the same but get more profits.

And the link you posted about the case against Sony is filed by Alex Neil a certified con artist who doesn't care about consumers they just want a huge personal payout.

And as for parity clauses again the money is going to come from the consumers one way or another, these people are fighting to take each others profits, if the parity clauses are blocked we'll pay more for hardware.

The idea that any of these changes are going to make things cheaper for the consumer are a joke, the only thing that changes is who gets the profits.

And as for Walmart, you missed what I was saying Walmart may lower the price on an item but they just charge the manufacturer of that item more to stock it on the shelves.

In some ways the digital stores are better because they don't charge an upfront fee to put an item on the store they instead charge a fee per sale. Which if they have to reduce the fee that charge for sales they would likely recoup that money by charging a fee to sell something on the ap store. Which also would benefit the rich companies over small developers who would be able to pay upfront fees that smaller developers may not.

Which is the reason Walmart only stocks the major brands and not a bunch of start up small brands, because the major brands can pay for shelf space.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 165d ago
1Victor166d ago

Don’t hold your breath yet there’s a long road ahead with the appeals process then the Supreme Court will have the last words and I don’t see this court going against the big corporations earnings.

I’m been known to be wrong some times and truly hope I am on this one

anast166d ago

The pot has been stirred.

Einhander1972166d ago

This is terrible news for consumers, while Epic and others get richer we'll now have to pay more for our devices.

ChasterMies166d ago

How? Android phones like Samsung Galaxy are not subsidized by purchases from Google Play Store. And Google can’t quit on Android because of how much money Google makes from Google search on Android.

Einhander1972166d ago (Edited 166d ago )

Google pays Samsung billions to have their store on Samsung phones.

Samsung also offers it's own store.

neutralgamer1992165d ago

Einhander1972

samsung has it's own store but how many know about that store? its like comparing MS store to other well known stores

GamerRN166d ago

So does this mean Apple also has a monopoly?

Plague-Doctor27166d ago

No. The cases argued were different.

Epic sued Apple for a monopoly over iOS. Apple said iOS competes with Android, MS, Nintendo, Sony, etc for Fortnite. Therefore there is market competition and no monopoly. The judges agreed.

Epic sued Google over a monopoly on android devices. Because Google was found to have shady deals preventing phone manufacturers from putting competing stores on phones as a default app, among other shady dealings, they found google has a monopoly on android marketplaces specifically.

Basically, Apple being a walled garden actually kind of protected them

ChasterMies166d ago

Android isn’t a walled garden tied to hardware like iOS. Android is like Windows or Linux for PCs. Any phone manufacturer can use Android and any seller can have their own store on Android. But Google used its muscle to tie up 90% marketshare for apps on Android. That’s monopolistic behavior.

Hofstaderman166d ago (Edited 166d ago )

Phil and slimey company sitting up and plotting.... expect to hear how Sony is anti-gamer for refusing to have GamePass on their ecosystems they may very well do this to avoid 2027 . I can imagine his email to Satya...."we got them" lol.

Show all comments (33)
40°

Crytek Interview - Hunt Showdown's Success and How It Has Evolved | MP1st

MP1st talks to Crytek about Hunt: Showdown's success, future title updates, inspiration behind weapons and more.