950°

Call of Duty 4 GameZone Review: Xbox360 - 9. 5 (0.1 lower than PS3)

Give Xbox 360 Version 9.5. Compared to PS3 version which ended up getting 9.6 there are couple of things different. The game was reviewed with different personal so that might account for the difference. Anyways, the graphics get a lower score while the multiplayer gets a higher score. The break down is as follows. The parentheses are the ps3 scores.

Gameplay: 9.5 (9.6)
Graphics: 9.5 (9.7)
Sound: 9.5 (9.5)
Concept: 9.5 (9.5)
Multiplayer: 9.5 (9.3)

Overall: 9.5 (9.6)

Read Full Story >>
xbox360.gamezone.com
wil4hire6018d ago (Edited 6018d ago )

But.. its not detrimental to the game. It looks good on the 360.

It just looks better on the ps3.

I think the xbots are going to have to sit the rest of this year.. well.. the rest of 08 as well out.

I need bubbles to take on mart & bladestar... thx

Ps3Fanboy7776018d ago

What good is a review if you have no solid foundation to base it off...

I just read another review where they said the framerate stuttered? Not to mention the tard notion of .1 of a deduction that winds up being due to a two different reviewers?

Ill say it again. Reviewers are not needed.

kooplar6018d ago (Edited 6018d ago )

better graphics on ps3, better multiplayer on 360. seeing as this games main focus and appeal is the multiplayer part, I think il takke the xbox version. Besides, the graphics dif. is minimal, compared to how better live is over psn. But at the end of the day, cod4 is cod4 on any system and that rocks!

edit: actualy, i dont own a ps3, but there is one at my house about 4 days a week ( my cousin brings it over) and any moron will take a better online expreince over a minimal ( and i mean minimal) graphic
enhancement on the ps3.

@onewindangel: look at my profile
psn:blackvenumb ( add me if you like and il prove that its me)
live:blackvenumb
and yes gears did lag alooot ... when i used to have that crappy connection. Once you get a good connection host advantage isnt that much, really.

wil4hire6018d ago

I doubt you have a ps3 in the first place, when would it ever have been a question which system you are buying the game for :|

the ps3 supports kb&mouse.

DONE and DONE.

onewinedangel6018d ago

as far as i can see u have never play in psn .while in psn u have no lag due to the dedicated servers in live u lag like $hit i remember all that host adv in gears and now the lag in halo is unbelievable and it looks crappier than COD4 so what can u expect from a 18 multiplayer game only more lag so dont be stupid and just accept the truth ps3 is supior and that it instead of trying to give stupid excuses and comparisons

Snukadaman6018d ago

Only the big hitters have dedicated servers...otherwise its P2P like xbl..and wil4hire...this game doesnt support Kb and M so more fUI there...finally a game that shows ps3's good graphics...but like someone said allready..I will take great multiplayer over graphics anyday...the comparison videos are a day away...

NewZealander6018d ago

keep telling yourself that

ps3 has better graphics?...from what ive played on ps3 games usually have poor framerate bad textures and colour not to mention countless reviews saying lighting and AI arnt as good as what you would find on 360

blame the ps3's cr@ppy ram

Kaneda6018d ago (Edited 6018d ago )

Gave Xbox 360 COD 4 - 8.7

and PS3 - 9.2

:) J/K

rubarb236018d ago

that also states the graphics are better on the ps3 than on the 360? the fact that 2 different people reviewed the same game might something to do with it. oh well, at least ps3 owerns finally get something to 'cheer'about? although i ask again, is there another site that agress the ps3's graphics are better than on the 360?
you can also look at it this way, 360 owners paid approx. $200.00 less to play the same game which looks the same and has superior online on the 360.
as far as any remarks in regards to the $200.00 goes, i'm referring to people who purchased the ps3 prior to all their desperate price drops.

mark096018d ago

do you think they were oblivious to one anothers reviews?

Seeing as they rated sound and concept the same and gameplay slightly better on ps3 because of sixaxis, im pretty sure the graphics were rated higher for a reason as well (as well as the multiplayer slightly lower on the ps3).
They most likely agreed upon the scores and compared the two versions.
I mean if one version turned out to be a 8.7 and the other a 9.5 would that make any sence at all, coming from the same reviewer source? With 2 almost identical games...

2Negativecool6018d ago

I'm so god damn tired of posted stories posted explicitly for the purposes of hits. Fanboy wars = hits.

Call of Duty 4 will be the same for both consoles.
It is a pretty good front runner for game of the year, and it is on both PS3 and 360.
WTF is wrong with that?
Anyone below me b1tching about reviewers, PS3, or 360 is a f***ing sheep. You should all just be excited to play this game.

Besides, everyone knows the PC version of everything is better:P

Danja6018d ago

Well we all knew that the 360 version was inferior and they gave the edge in MP to the 360 cuz they didn't want to make it that obvious that the game is inferior in all categories...

PS3 for the win...

I like my online games LAG FREE thank you...ohh and it's free..!!

Agent VX6018d ago

What a bunch of tards.........2 different reviewers posted 2 different scores.

LOL, we all know the 360 version not only runs better, but looks better with better online. Childish sony fanboys are soooo silly!

AngryTypingGuy6018d ago

Yes, if two different people reviewed them, then take it with a grain of salt. It's ONLY ONE review. One version doesn't become automatically better from one review. I'm anxious to see what GameSpot and other websites say, and what their percentages will be at gamerankings and metacritic. Probably pretty close either way.

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 6018d ago
TheExecutive6018d ago

hair splitting is all this is. Both versions are going to look and play fantastic. But flame on if it makes you feel better.

celticlonewolf6018d ago

A 0.2 diff wonder why they botherd with that? Kind of funny though if you read what they wrote by the scores you's think the 360 had the edge(NOT SAYING IT DOES) just the way they write it lol.

Jack Bauer6018d ago

Different People reviewed them...

TheSadTruth6018d ago (Edited 6018d ago )

don't worry, I'm sure when a real comparison is made and the xbox 360 version is deemed better (it isn't in this case as they were reviewed by two different people like you said).. the PS3 fans will suddenly be gone and have nothing to say.. just like EVERY multiplatform game

pooh11256018d ago (Edited 6018d ago )

>I'm sure when a real comparison is made and the xbox 360 version is deemed better

yeah,i'm pretty sure too.just as the other games......
remember ps fanboys said in n4g "these games are better on ps3,those games too....." with bullshit screenshot comparisions or something
and 99.9% of the games were better on 360 after all.

no offence but i wonder if the IQ average of ps fanboys is lower than that of xbox fanboys.

the gamerzone review ......the reviewers are not the same people.
nothing more.
not only the garaphic scores but gameplay ,or difficulty scores are differnt.
this is not worth arguing.

pooh11256017d ago

the same people gave the same review and the same scores while only ps3 version 'S review was written by a different people,right.

if the game looked better on ps3 version from GZ reviews,the ps3 version would also look better than PC version.
but that's impossible,mates.

Show all comments (193)
50°

Why MW 2019 is still the best looking Call of Duty to date

MW 2019 is five years old at this point and on previous gen hardware, but it is still the best looking Call of Duty game to date.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
EazyC9d ago

MW was an excellent videogame. They messed up Spec Ops big time, but aside from this it was a huge step in the right direction initially. Most notably, at launch it seemed to come from a very cohesive creative vision that was felt across gameplay, to story to art style/visual direction. It was also very notably written by prominent ex-Naughty Dog guys that quit almost immediately before release.

That COMPLETELY dissolved through post-launch content and the full pivot to a "cross-mode" narrative that completely obliterated the cohesion in overall story direction. Warzone then "became" the new face of Call of Duty and the franchise completely removed itself from anything remotely creatively "good". It is a pure money machine, so I kinda get why they're doing it....but I personally completely lost interest.

I would love to see Infinity Ward move off CoD and get to make their own product with full control. They clearly have some massive talent in their ranks but it's perverted by Activision's corporate interests.

70°
3.0

Call of Duty Modern Warfare III (2023) Review - Jump Dash Roll

Call Of Duty is back with its yearly instalment, but is Modern Warfare 3 breaking new ground, or just a lazy cash grab? The answer may not surprise you in today's review from JDR.

Read Full Story >>
jumpdashroll.com
220°

Call of Duty 4 and Modern Warfare 2 servers are back online

The original Modern Warfare and Modern Warfare 2 games have been drawing players back in

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
neutralgamer1992286d ago

I really hope we get other activision games on GP soon. My dream would be Scarface but I know the license probably expired

P_Bomb286d ago

Love me some Scarface! I even bought the comics. Yeah, licensing would probably be an impasse.

4Sh0w286d ago

hmmm, coincidence? Either way this is a good sign for gamers after the ABK deal.

porkChop286d ago

I played through Scarface again last year and it still holds up. Such a fun game. I would love for Xbox to get the rights back to remaster Scarface and make a sequel. It sold well and they had plans for Scarface 2, 3, and 4. With how long it takes Rockstar to make games the market is wide open.

TheColbertinator286d ago

That game was so much fun. Expected a cheap GTA clone but it was a good drug empire building game.

shinoff2183286d ago

They didn't just have plans but there's actual gameplay out there for scarface 2

neutralgamer1992286d ago

Seriously man we need games like

True crime
Sleeping dogs
Watch dogs( more like original not legion)
And proper saints row

GTA can’t be the only option we need other games

P_Bomb286d ago

@neutral
Gun was Activision as well. Nice open world Wild West there imo.

neutralgamer1992284d ago

Gun is such a underrated game

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 284d ago
SlothLordPootus286d ago

None of those games had dedicated servers on console in the first place? Were always player hosted. Did something change?

Rutaprkl285d ago

Older cods like Mw, Mw2 and WaW were way better than Call of Dutys nowadays

GoodGuy09285d ago

Make activision remaster mw2 (2009) multiplayer please xbox.