770°

Naughty Dog: 'Modern Warfare 3 Multiplayer Numbers Will Kill Us'

NowGamer: Uncharted 3 won't get anything like the amount of online players as Modern Warfare 3 admits Naughty Dog's Robert Cogburn.

Read Full Story >>
ps3.nowgamer.com
Wizziokid4675d ago

sad but true, even though U3 mp is probably better

ksense4675d ago

"You can play multiple play styles, and we have these massive set pieces that you can’t get anywhere else. No other multiplayer title lets you jump from truck to truck while attacking a flying airplane."

The stuff they are doing in this game is really cool and prolly keep me playing longer than like say call of duty which I love for the first 3 or 4 months and then I just get bored and stop playing. I am personally more interested in coop but loving this beta in all game types.

humbleopinion4675d ago

"No other multiplayer title lets you jump from truck to truck while attacking a flying airplane."

Maybe not, but Halo 3 lets me jump from Elephant to Elephant while attacking a flying Banshee ;)

RedDevils4675d ago

Unfortunately NanoSoldier you're a fanboy 9 years old COD Fanboy!

StarWolf4674d ago (Edited 4674d ago )

Yea its fun and all but after the 20th time, you just want to get the actual map and not deal with the moving trucks. I think the MP is fun but unless they got like 14 maps, i hate dynamic type MP maps after a while. They get tedious.

I still will never buy MW3 though LOL. BF3...maybe for PC? I think ill pass this one, I overplayed BC2 .

thematrix12984674d ago

I played the U3 beta but it's really bad you have to empty the whole clip to kill one guy even when he is few feet away.

WhittO4674d ago (Edited 4674d ago )

I'm actually slightly disappointed in U3 multiplayer!
The menu interface is a bit "blah" and boring and not very intuitive to use.
Then there is the thing of too many options for things, like needing medals or something for special power up in game, then there is another special power up you buy each game one time only?
Then there is customisation that you have to get money to pay for the add-ons and customisation, then there is general XP you get to level up.

It just feels a little OTT and un-organised, it's 1 of the problems I have with COD, you can't just jump in and have some quick fun because all your weapons etc are sh*t because you need to spend time upgrading and customising your load outs etc.

They also seem to have ruined all of the weapons from the U2 lol, the AK-47 is useless, all the guns feel the same - with some very under-powered with some very over-powered!

Gameplay is good though and maps load REALLY fast! I like the new 3 team DM too, prob what I like best about the new MP! It has been stable for me too.

It IS only a beta though so I'm not judging yet and I'm still buying it day 1 for the SP campaign anyway.
I bought U2 for the SP campaign and the multiplayer was a bonus, which turned out to be really addicting and great!

I just preferred the simplicity of U2, but I suppose I can still go and play U2 online too, it's not like they have taken the servers down or something lol, so I actually think it's good they didn't pull a COD and just give U2 online a 1.5 patch lol.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4674d ago
NanoSoldier4675d ago ShowReplies(8)
subtenko4675d ago (Edited 4675d ago )

Obviously, Naughty Dog are real developers and they will not lie and be biased. Does this mean MW3 is a the better game tho? NOPE! two different games. They have guns in common..

on another note, Uncharted3 Beta had 1+million players the 1st or second day (I think the sony blog said 2nd day). and the numbers have been increasing, so Uncharted3 will still be a MEGA success in popularity and will get attention from people. (unless some people live under a rock, ie. those guys in that geico commercial)

Washington-Capitals4675d ago (Edited 4675d ago )

Yeah it was 1 million unique users logged in to play. Pretty good for a beta.

The game should see a lot of people playing compared to other games that are not named battlefield or call of duty. Just as a comparisons sake, blackops hit over 14 million unique users last months (includes people who make new accounts)

http://blog.us.playstation....

BeOneWithTheGun4675d ago

That guy under the rock (who speaks) is Chum Lee from Pawn Stars. Funny, he calls out to Rick, too.

NeoBasch4675d ago (Edited 4675d ago )

Don't care which is better. I'm buying Uncharted for the singleplayer (and possibly co-op). I probably won't play either's multiplayer as I will probably move on to Assassin's Creed: Revelations or something. Too many games to play to care about MP.

Anon19744675d ago

You and me both. It's one of the finest, single player campaigns going. Although it's nice that multiplayer is there - personally I'm just not interested. I didn't play it on Uncharted 2 (just replayed the campaign 3 times), I'm not playing the beta now and I probably won't take U3 online when it hits later this year.

mantisimo4675d ago

@ darkride.
Yes the SP is superb but sink enough time into the MP and you'll never look back, its like crack, once you get it, it gets VERY addictive.

Redempteur4674d ago

For me the true fun was co-op in uncharted ..it was somewhat lacking in the first attempt ( only 3 maps ) hopefully , ND will correct this mistake and bring longuer and more diverse maps

zeddy4674d ago

not interested in uncharted multiplayer at all but if i had to choose between uncharted 3 single player and mw3 i'd go for uncharted everytime. i'd even prefer they ditch multiplayer totally and add another 5 hours or so of single player.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4674d ago
TrevorPhillips4675d ago

I love Uncharted 3 Multiplayer, something different :)

chidori6664675d ago

"something different

errr... rip-off Gears cover *cough* ...

ASTAROTH4675d ago

Ohh yeah because Gears invented cover... 0_0

TekoIie4675d ago

gears only made the 3rd person genre a "bigger deal" this generation, they never invented the whole "cover system" mechanic...

shayol33t4675d ago

Is there anyone else who wants a new down-bubble option added "100% wrong information" or "spreading lies"?

Ryo-Hazuki4675d ago

Killswitch invented that kind of cover system and let me know when you can jump and climb in gears mp

MOTY4675d ago

@ infamousXX87XX

"let me know when you can jump and climb in gears mp"

This a is pretty stupid comment. I can come back and say, let me know when you can use execution moves and chainsaws in Uncharted's mp.

See how pretty stupid of an argument that is. Both games offer what is best suited for that type of game.

And since when is "jump" and "climb" big features to brag about? Seriously "jump" and "climb"? LOL give me a break. That comment make you look like you are desperate and backed into a corner and didn't know what to say.

evrfighter4675d ago

"Killswitch invented that kind of cover system "

winback says hi

Why o why4675d ago

Ok moty so cover is great and being able to climb is meh, got it.

Being able to climb brings a more varied appoach to the gameplay. Gears is on a 2d plane and it works well for it. Uncharted is on a 3d plane and that works well for it too. In terms of a cover system gears wasnt the first but it was the first this gen that i can remember so some will wrongly label it as the inventor. Gamers who are old enough or just less ignorant know this.

Both games have their individual feels and thats what counts. They can live in unison

Legion4675d ago

@ infamousXX87XX

Winback had it before Killzone and Splinter Cell did it prior and better then Killzone too.

People talk of Winback and Killzone... and I never cared for eithers cover system in the game. Killzone had it's primary game focus as being the cover system and both Epic and Naughty dog give inspiration kudos for the game design mechanic. Fanboys on both sides will keep spouting off who was ripping off who.

I still find the cover system in Rainbow 6 to be the better cover systems for me. Going from a 1st person to a 3rd person view to see your character as they take cover was a step above all this 3rd person shooting crap we see these days. Give me FPS games and the 3rd person games can stand in line waiting for me to get to them after I play a more enjoyable game experience for me.

MOTY4675d ago (Edited 4675d ago )

@ Why o why

I don't get your point. Both Gears and Uncharted have cover. So why are you bringing in cover? I never said Gears was the first to bring in cover. I stated that comparing 1 games features that the other game doesn't have is a pointless argument because the other game may have features that the the other doesn't have.
like the example I gave, sure Uncharted you can jump and climb, but Gears allows you to use execution moves and chainsaws.

Now you tell me, which of the 2 games sounds more exciting to do while playing. Chainsawing a guy in half or ripping off his arm and beating him to death with it....or climbing a wall and jumping....I think the answer is pretty obvious.

At the end of your comment, you also basically just agreed with my comment. I really have no idea what point you were trying to make.

Please try and keep up. I know that sometimes these conversations can go to quickly for some of you.

Klaykid1234675d ago

GUYS! This guy speaks the truth! (/s)

FORGET the cutscenes, medal kickbacks, power plays, events going on realtime and level changes as you play, not to mention cool customization and emblems shown throughout the level...

they STOLE the cover system! It isn't different at all!!!

/s

topekomsi4675d ago

@ moty

Why even say something stupid?

Executions and chainsaws are NOT capable of enhancing environments, or making a game play more vertical.

The fact is gears games are kinda linear, actually if it got anymore linear, it would be on rails.

When executions and chainsaws can enhance the environment, then your argument would be relevant, but as it stands, not so much....

4675d ago
Why o why4675d ago

Keep up yeah.....oh a bit of unhumorous humour. You speak like what you say is facts. Would i rather do one of 3 pre canned 'chainsaw' finishers or aim a well timed jump to land behind somebody then do one of the 3 pre canned neck snapping finishers then climb to a ledge and pull the dude who was letting shots off over the edge...ITS OBVIOUS INIT. Anybody can project opinion as facts. so thats a fail. My whole point was that you were downplaying playing on a 3d plane which obviously gives you more options and gameplay mechanics. Not downplaying anything but finishers are just finshers and are more for affect and style over a game changing mechanic. Still good.

limewax4675d ago (Edited 4675d ago )

Just for anyone looking, Perfect Dark Zero was the game where Gears stole their cover system......Works two ways huh?

DeadlyFire4674d ago

Do I even play Gears? No. Do I care about this debate over where this concepted cover system was based on in development? No. It works. Its pretty good, but not perfect. I have noticed death in beta even while in cover. Magic bullets or something.

+ Show (12) more repliesLast reply 4674d ago
THC CELL4675d ago

Well nd dont worrie you wont be killed by me I love the beta and u3 will be my number one game this year online, call od duty is dead deep down and plus u should not worry really. Call of duty is loved mostly by people who are just idiots who cant get kills on other games and likes to camp big time.

antz11044675d ago

First of all ppl can camp in any game, whether its UC3, BF3, of MW3.

Thats about the only thing that UC3 and MW3 have in common. These games are nothing alike and that extends to their multiplayer components. To say "only idiots that cant get kills play CoD" is just a really generic, unintelligent thing to say.

mastiffchild4675d ago

Yeah, he went too far and looks a little OTT as a result. Thing is, COD does appeal to eople because they CAN pick the game up and after a few hours, even having never played FPS before be holding their own or even doing well in a few matches[-it's pick up and play, as Halo started really, taken to a higher level and as suc it's, again like Halo, easy tobe OK at but vdery hard to excel purely because anyone with a modicum of skill can have a game where they can mess things up even for pros.

It's a falsel;y made and contrived playing field that does ske things to give new players and the less skilled the chance to feel they're not that bad, that they can mix with the big boys-really, as i'm shit at shooters it SHOULD be my dream game but after bit I feel patronised by it's hand holding and the fact it feels the exact same as it did last year-so I wonder why I've been cajoled into buying it again-it's fun but it's reached a point where I feel it thinks a lot of us are stupid and is catering to that rather than the gamer in al of us.

Conversely, my favourite FPS is TF2 and my favourite console MP title would be Warhawk and neither game can be saisd to be pick up and p[lay imn any way and as a self confessed FPS/shooter liability I had to REALLY work at these games just to be Ok from time to time bt the way UI enjoy that streep and unforgiving learning curve over a longer time than I can keepplaying COD sows that the pick up and play model doesn't work long term(I have NEVER stayed interested in ANY COD game to buy ONE map pack for example while I've bought lots of Halo packs, all the Warhawk expansions and updated everything i could going back to Counter Strike days on PC.

This COD being the game of the idiot ignores the way sme GREAT players like to tewst themselves in a different way and COD offers that by being a bit of a leveller for them-in games based more centrally on gaming skill and no assisted aim they know luck is taken out of it a lot more and maybe they get bored of the constant equality of that experience and like the risk of being upset by a relative noob kin COD-as a crap player IDK and can only guess!

Pint is any shooter can be for any gamer but Warhawk or, in this case, Uncharted won't attract the big, pick up and play crowd's simply because they're a bit harder to play right off the bat and don't hold newcomers hands as much either.

mrbattle4204674d ago (Edited 4674d ago )

well liked the beta ,not bad at all but ps3 gamers will play more call of duty for sure and not support uncharted mp again

skyward4675d ago

I haven't enjoyed the beta as much as I thought I would, but I'm looking forward to having a go on the finished thing...

Roymunson4675d ago

Read it,they say because UC3 is only on 1 platform....runs n hides from the 360fanboy mods who mark posts as trolling if you dont support 360.

....Waits for anti-ps3 comments to get mass agree`s n 360 fanboys being in another ps3 article n not getting removed.

I also find it funny how this will get approved(along with all the other psn got hacked articles n sony is 3rd place/sales are bad articles) yet any article against the 360 gets FAILED.

maniacmayhem4675d ago

What in the hell are you talking about?

Solidus187-SCMilk4675d ago (Edited 4675d ago )

you will be marked as trolling by anyone who reads your comment not the mods.

Clearly you are a troll as you are the only one here who cant shut up about 360.

I will be getting this game specifically for the multiplayer, I love it.

Im even going to go eat at crappy subway in october so I can get early access to the multiplayer.

Edit- The fact is that the COD multiplayer numbers on PS3 alone will still decimate the Uncharted numbers. But who cares, I know that I will be enjoying the uncharted 3 multiplaer for hours and will not be buying COD. The only time Ill play COD is at my friends house since I know they will be buying the new COD every year.

Roymunson4675d ago

BS and you know it clearly being a 2bubble troll. How does someone with more agrees than disagrees get marked for trolling but the real trolls with 20-30 disagrees, not get marked for trolling n infact gain bubbles and dont even get me started on anti-ps3 articles , they will have 13 reports n 1 or 2 approvels yet magically it gets approved.

Just remember this for when im perma banned n the likes of LONER n WARPRINCESS are still around.

Morbius4204675d ago

bring your friend some jersey mike's subs and throw out that subway crap.

Peaceful_Jelly4675d ago

entire quote: "In terms of numbers of players, I have no doubt that Modern Warfare 3 is going to kill us. It is a ridiculously powerful franchise, you know, their sales are through the roof, they’re multiplatform, and to be honest, the industry needs games like that," he added.

antz11044675d ago

"Tommy, did you eat a lot of paint chips as a kid?"

"So?"

Wow buddy. I had to read that twice to fully understand it, lol. There are clearly alot of fanboys here for both sides but I definately think this site is PS3 oriented.

NoobJobz4675d ago

Think you got it backwards.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4675d ago
Show all comments (142)
80°

Call of Duty Players Disappointed by $80 B.E.A.S.T. Glove Bundle Deal

Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Kaii18d ago

Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash

melons17d ago

Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.

Gridknac17d ago

They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.

X-2316d ago

I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.

170°

Cheech And Chong Are Coming To Call Of Duty Because Everything Must Be Consumed

The famous comedy duo is the latest example of pop culture becoming one big grey blob

Christopher32d ago

Certain to have some sort of reference to their online store for CBD/THC chews, which is advertising heavily online the last month or two.

Sciurus_vulgaris32d ago

The randomness of the multiplayer characters is one of reason I quit playing COD after briefly returning in 2022. We got Space Marines, rappers, tree monsters etc. all in a series called “ Modern Warfare”.

OtterX31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

I think if there was ever a time for a competitor to rise up and take away some of Call of Duty's thunder, the time would be now. A military shooter that takes itself seriously, not sold out to Fortnitism. Easier said than done, I know... but the time is ripe.

I can't stand this stuff either.

Palitera31d ago

There are tons of MP shooters that make no profit, if you're looking for one of those

fsfsxii31d ago

You guys have been saying this shit since 2009. Fortunately, nobody’s bringing down cod anytime soon, if ever.

crazyCoconuts31d ago

I agree. I really didn't like how the silliness takes away the gritty origins. That and all the crazy effects... dunno. I'm still playing it but I'd love for someone to steal their cheese and cater to grittier players

OtterX31d ago

@fsfsxii It's not so much wanting COD itself to die as it is wanting this silliness to die. Like CrazyCoconuts said, it takes from the grittiness. Many OG COD players want a straightup Military shooter experience, not silly costume time at Carnival.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 31d ago
Profchaos31d ago

is this what the kids want these days a pair of iconic stoners who were big in the 70s and have kind of held on I enjoyed their movies decades ago but I never recall the movie where cheech infiltrates a enemy base while chong snipes for support guess I must of missed that one

Man I'm getting to old for this

Knightofelemia31d ago (Edited 31d ago )

Cheech just looks so wrong in the picture.

Profchaos31d ago

Why just why. cod up in smoke

anast31d ago

They charge too much for a game that is kitsch.

Show all comments (17)
430°

Naughty Dog’s Next Game Is “Really Ambitious” And Will Be “Really Hard” To Create

Speaking on what’s coming next for Naughty Dog, which could be either their new IP or The Last Of Us Part III, Druckmann gave what he seems to feel are realities of the project he’s talking about. That it’ll both be “really ambitious” but also “really hard.”

H954d ago

"I’ve really surrendered to knowing it’s going to be really hard, knowing it’s going to stress members of the team out"
As if crunch wasn't stressing them enough

helicoptergirl54d ago

Members of the team don't have to crunch anymore

helicoptergirl54d ago

According to people who work there

H954d ago

So the people who remained in a studio that had tons of workers quiting and others laid off said that they don't have to crunch, and you are just believing that

frostypants54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

They absolutely will wind up having to crunch. Happens at the end of almost every software project development cycle, especially with release date pressures. It's part of the job. Obviously they aren't in a crunch when they aren't in that late phase. But it's wishful thinking if they think they won't see that stress again. Druckmann himself seems to be aware of that.

helicoptergirl54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Yes I believe them. The people who want to crunch can do it. The people who mentally and physically can't, don't actually have to. Some have young babies at home. Things have changed since the Schreier report.

rlow154d ago (Edited 54d ago )

@helicoptergirl
It wishful thinking to think some workers can choose to crunch or not to do so. That’s akin to people you work with saying they don’t have to do work they don’t like and you’re the one that has to take up the slack. That’s not how things work. Especially if your the person assigned to a specific task that has to be completed for the development to move forward. It’s a team sport when it comes to making a game. As with most things in life. Now that they are a smaller group, it’s even more important for everyone to pull their weight. Peace

helicoptergirl53d ago

@rlow that was exactly the mentality before the exposure and it was talked about and reported on. It's different now. You know, sometimes things and attitudes just change for the better. They knew they needed to change and they have and they're not stopping trying to make the creative environment as good as it can be.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 53d ago
Tristan198254d ago

When someone pays another person to do a specific job in exchange for a certain rate of pay, it's called work.

H954d ago

They didn't sign to crunch and neither were they paid for it, people were hospitalized in Naughty Dog

MatrixxGT54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Exactly most of these people wouldn’t last a season in the trades.

-Foxtrot54d ago

I f******* love how many people are doing a complete 180 on their views of crunch culture despite the awful stories reported on over the many years just because we’re talking about NaughtyDog

You can’t just cherry pick what to be mad about

“They signed a contract…it’s called work…that’s life…it’s a job”

I mean really guys, if this was EA you’d be having a field day

I bet you any money if any of these guys regardless of studio went in and said to their superior “Listen, don’t feel like the over time tonight, I’ll just stick to my normal contracted hours if that’s alright” I highly doubt they’d be given a warm response

Crows9054d ago

@h9

Actually yes they did. If overtime is mentioned...that's crunch.

Christopher54d ago

@Tristan1982: The problem is crunch is because of the inefficient management and sudden changes in projects. ND made major story changes based on some feedback, that results in months of rework, redesign, etc. And none of those changes were built into the project from the get-go, so they still have to meet a deadline.

@H9: One person. And they did sign up for crunch, ND is notorious for hiring people who don't mind it. That's the problem, they tell you who they are, people just aren't listening. And, they did get paid, just their QA level of people are paid shit, which is an industry issue for something so freaking important. And people wonder why we have such broken games at launch. Because companies don't want to pay to deliver as long as people will buy enough to get them past first few months of patches and then re-release a major patch with an expansion to get people to come back.

@-Foxtrot " You can’t just cherry pick what to be mad about " -- N4G home of 'hold my beer' on that alone.

CantThinkOfAUsername54d ago

The kindda guy to guilt trip others into overwork or tell them to be better slaves ('employees'). Exactly what corps like. How does it taste?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 54d ago
anast54d ago

They get paid and they signed the contract. It's not a slave factory.

Shane Kim54d ago

Shh... your in the era of feeling sorry for people.

jwillj2k454d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Assuming you have a job, how would you feel working 80 hours a week for the same pay? You’ve not experienced crunch otherwise you wouldn’t be speaking like this.

senorfartcushion54d ago

As somebody who has crunched before. No, it wasn't my choice, no, you couldn't handle it, and no, you don't work in a better industry than I do.

Markusb3353d ago

exactly, get the game out before PS6 and if it takes crunch, or over time which you get paid for, get on with it

anast53d ago

"Assuming you have a job"

Assuming I haven't worked more for less, I suppose. And yes, I do.

"Shh... your in the era of feeling sorry for people."

I feel awful for the people that fought for the workers and got stuck holding the bag and lost everything.

"no, you couldn't handle it, "

You mean "I"

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 53d ago
Christopher54d ago

I really hope this isn't management BS stress. I get wanting to put the best out, finding the best new ways and concepts, and ensuring your design is just top notch and not wasteful and fulfilling, but when I hear some manager talking about this my first thought is "Are these jerks changing paradigms on a regular basis that's making people play catch up and redo work to meet their new goals?"

54d ago
Kiryu199254d ago

They lost so many great experienced talented people over the past 5 years

anast53d ago

Burnout is real. I even had to change my job because of it.

Markusb3353d ago

as if you dont get paid for crunch, get on with it,

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 53d ago
Stuart575654d ago

That it’ll both be “really ambitious” but also “really hard.”

Not 'is' but 'will be', kinda suggests that they haven't started yet, hope not.

Come on ND, a game PLEAAAAASSSSEEEE. Desperate this gen.

S2Killinit54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

From the article:

“Working on this new game, it’s really ambitious, parts of it are really hard,…”

That is the actual quote. They are already working on it.

LucasRuinedChildhood54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Yeah, a lot of people push fake narratives about NaughtyDog and misquote things. That quote is very straightforward.

https://twitter.com/MitchyD...
Above is the complete debunking of a false story that still gets spread around all the time. And the bad faith actors doing it also only pin it on Druckmann for some reason and ignore Straley. They want to portray Druckmann as an evil schemer, even when the false story they're spreading doesn't align with their narrative. They don't care about reality ...

SuckerPunch doesn't get even 1% of this criticism and they haven't provided any update whatsoever on their next game, and it's a sequel not a new IP, so turnaround would be quicker. That's not logical.

Markusb3353d ago

probably 7 years out at this point after wasting all that time on factions

Stuart575654d ago

Also, just off-topic slightly but..

Does anyone think that layoffs now may well be making space for AI integration of game development, and 'crunch-time', 'unsustainable', 'big budget' are all terms been used to butter us up to receiving the news that AI integration will help and maintain the level of AAA games that were accustomed to? Perhaps the layoffs were the devs that didn't join a union quick enough and if only they had the smarts of SAG members and strike while the time is right, before its too late?! Imagine DEV's on strike at a time like this, there's already a game drought.

isarai54d ago

Nah, quite literally every industry around is having layoffs.

shinoff218354d ago

I work in manufacturing. Layoffs here to. Especially people with no skill. I feel bad for them more then anything.

isarai53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

I work in advertisement, Im being laid off in may despite being the 3rd best on my team of 15 just under the team lead and assistant team lead, and the assistant team lead is out next week. Yet the last two years we've all been congratulated for record numbers. Times are weird.

shinoff218354d ago

Game drought. Lol what. I can't keep up. There's so many dope games releasing. I gotta ask what do you play

Stuart575653d ago

Not Naughty Dog games, not this gen. You know, Naughty Dog? Who the article is about?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 53d ago
Brazz54d ago

I hope they remember to make it realy fun to play.

FunAndGun53d ago

I hope it's extra woke and really fun to play.

Kneetos54d ago

And then Sony will lay off 900 more staff to save costs

Christopher54d ago

Is this supposed to be a big gotcha after Microsoft laid off 1,900 and we're ignoring that? Let alone the over 16,000 other layoffs from Microsoft in 2023?

Kneetos54d ago

This is an article talking about Sony, no one said anything about Microsoft

And we should always be reminded of it like people are doing with Microsoft, Sony shouldn't get a free pass either

Christopher54d ago (Edited 54d ago )

Yes, and this article is 100% about Sony firing people.

ND says new game is ambitious - until Sony lays off 900 more staff to save costs!
Sony publishes new gameplay video - until Sony lays off 900 more staff to save costs!
Sony announces weekend sale deals - until Sony lays off 900 more staff to save costs!

Show all comments (87)