250°

Tomb Raider: We'll be a Very Different Experience to Uncharted

Crystal Dynamics, developers of Tomb Raider, have stated that they are creating a very different game to Uncharted.

Read Full Story >>
ps3center.net
gaffyh4689d ago (Edited 4689d ago )

This was one of the best demos at the E3 conferences, MS should have opened with it, not MW3, because that was kinda boring. Hopefully the game is good, been waiting for a good Tomb Raider for a few years now.

Inside_out4689d ago (Edited 4689d ago )

.
MW3 kicked off the M$ press event in complete style with a rock concert like atmosphere...just WoW.

Tomb Raider looked INCREDIBLE...dark, gritty with a edge of your seat intensity. It did remind me a little bit of Deadspace 1 with so much atmosphere and enemies grabbing at you and pulling you but WOW...such a surprise. They say the original demo was 15 minutes long ( like fable journey ) but M$ didn't have the space.

If M$ would of followed that up with the Ubisoft " the definition of insanity " Far cry 3 demo, people would of fainted.

Gears Of war, Fable, Halo 4 and Elmo...0_o...what else could you ask for...lol

btw...listening to certain fanboys complain about a woman moaning and grunting was...um...disconcerting, like Drakes grunts are any better. :/

btw...Price of Persia, the sands of time never gets any credit these days...it IS the catalyst for all these type of games.

jdfoster004689d ago

Prince Of Persia went down hill when they released the Forgoton Sands of time! Horrid game compared to all the others!

MaxXAttaxX4689d ago

that they were drawing influence from Uncharted's atmosphere, as well as other games when it comes to some of the other elements of the new TR game.

BUT I have to agree with them. In the end, both are always very different experiences with a lot less in common than some people may want to believe.

4689d ago Replies(1)
lalalala4689d ago

I guess Xbox 360-only owners who were expecting an Uncharted-like experience will be disappointed. PS360 FTW!

Nate-Dog4689d ago (Edited 4689d ago )

You do know how big a franchise Tomb Raider was (and for how long) way before Uncharted ever came along right? People here seem to think Uncharted invented the type of action-adventure that the game features but it didn't, Tomb Raider was one of the first, if not the first, to do so.

firemassacre4689d ago

tomb raider is a great franchise, but uncharted is uncharted

JellyJelly4689d ago

Uncharted wouldn't be what it is if it wasn't for Tomb Raider. Nuff said.

Fanbot4689d ago

so? TR still sucks after 10 years.

Why o why4689d ago

'Uncharted wouldn't be what it is if it wasn't for Tomb Raider. Nuff said.'

thank ND Uncharted DIDNT copy any of the last tomb raiders and maybe more credit should be given to indiana jones. People cant deny that uncharted is currently better than tomb raider no matter where its influences came from or you might as well dismiss 80% of the games you love this gen. The e3 demo looked good and the reboot has definitely put TR back on my radar. Luckily for me ill be grabbing both. Ive been doing that all gen IF the alternatives are any good

news4geeks4689d ago (Edited 4689d ago )

Tomb Raider is puzzle solving adventure. Uncharted is Hollywood action adventure movie. Two very different games(similar premise but vastly different gameplay) up until now, with this Tomb Raider reboot appearing to be going the Uncharted route.

So give Uncharted credit where due and recognise that its success is changing the Tomb Raider series into copying it instead of the typical, "derp tomb raider came first" nonsense.

@why o why - exactly. Indiana Jones is the obvious comparison. But even then, the Indiana films are inspired and influenced by old B movie action scenes. How far back do we want to take this? Check out AVGN doing the action scenes in the Indiana Jones films that were completely taken from the older films.

@fanbot - tomb raider doesn't suck. If you're not into puzzle games fair enough, but that doesn't mean every game must be an action game because you like it that way.

gaffyh4689d ago

Tomb Raider isn't a completely bad game, but it's just not as good as it originally was when the first game released. This one looks different though.

TheBatman_Fanatic4689d ago

Uncharted is WAY better than Tomb Raider, get over it lol

joydestroy4689d ago

you're right, Tomb Raider takes it back. but the amount of time they had to fix it and make it more accessible is ridiculous. they have yet to improve it, imo.

Uncharted came in and stole the show when it comes to those types of games. i always tried to get into Tomb Raider but never could. i hope they've improved their formula but i doubt it. i'll give it a rent when it comes out but i have low expectations.

ainsz4689d ago

But we're all forgetting one game!

... Unearthed.

gaffyh4689d ago

@2.1.9 - AKA Uncharted-killer

/s

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 4689d ago
ainsz4689d ago

I hope they totally re-invent the series. I'll probably get disagreed with for this, but I hated the originals. Ugh, just so tedious!

kudakadere4689d ago

who care's whether Uncharted took on the idea of Tomb Raider , people must know that the original Tomb Raiders where a Sony made inversion so really instead of complaining and arguing people should congratulate sony .

lastdual4689d ago (Edited 4689d ago )

Actually, the original Tomb Raider was released first on Saturn and PC, then on PS1. It was originally planned as a Saturn exclusive and later went multiplatform.

Vega754689d ago

i was going to say the samething but you beat me to it. so why would anyone have to thank sony for it's not like they owned Crystal Dynamics or the IP

nightmarex1214689d ago

Yeah it was a multiplatform game but i think everyone assume it was on sony exclusive well b/c it sold the most on playstaion but back then psx games were the cheapest they were around 10-30 bucks compare to the competition.

kramun4689d ago

Yeah, Tomb Raider has nothing to do with Sony.

Sharingan_no_Kakashi4689d ago

She grunts too much. Other than that I'm looking forward to the experience. The E3 demo was good.

Show all comments (41)
30°

Tomb Raider’s Risky 2013 Reboot Revived a '90s Gaming Icon

Crystal Dynamics' daring reboot of Tomb Raider brought Lara Croft back into the spotlight.

Godmars290415d ago

An attempt at a reboot with no momentum for continuance. Just a torture-porn trilogy about a poor rich girl with daddy issues reluctantly being pulling into a world of violence, versus say the adventures of a quipping Brit treasure hunter who solves ancient puzzles while gunning down rare and extinct animals that it originally was?

Honestly, don't have all that killing. If the devs had been truly clever, not focused on mangling a message about the senselessness of killing which was seemingly and quickly forgotten, they could have worked, if not bloodlessly then not directly by Laura's hand, dealing with enemies as part of the puzzle solving - they didn't have in the game in the first place...

badz149414d ago

"Revived a '90s Gaming Icon"

LOL

the only thing similar between the 2 is the name of the protagonist. if they would have given the game a different name, NONE would even think that it was somehow a resurrected Tomb Raider IP. the last game with the real Tomb Raider DNA was TR Underworld.

250°

The Tomb Raider Survivor Trilogy's Take on Lara Croft Deserved More Recognition

The Survivor Trilogy was a drastic reimagining of Lara Croft and Tomb Raider, and it provokes changes for the character that are truly fantastic.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
isarai478d ago (Edited 478d ago )

Deserves less IMO, i think the 1st in the new trilogy was a perfect 1st step for the new direction. The next 2 games were half steps at best. Not only that, every character in the series including Lara is just annoying and doesn't make sense in terms of motive, like yes they have a motive, but none of it seems proportional to the lengths they are willing to go through for it. The most annoying thing is every one of the games say "become the Tomb Raider" yet 3 games later and we're still not there? No thanks. Then there's the mess of the 3rd game, massive skill tree that serves almost no purpose as there's literally only like 3-4 short encounters in the whole game, and they took till the 3rd game to finally manage some decent puzzles even remotely close to previous games in the series. Nah, the trilogy infuriated me to no end as a long time fan of the series, i hope we get better going forward cause that crap sucked.

Army_of_Darkness477d ago

The first in the trilogy was my favorite. I thought they were going into the right direction with that one until the second one came out and seemed like a graphical downgrade but the gameplay was okay. As for the Third, Graphics were really nice but it was kinda boring me to death with its non-stop platforming and exploring with not enough action! Well, for me anyway...

DeathTouch477d ago

Graphics on the 3rd one were abysmal. It’s more colorful and has more variety, but everything else was a noticeable downgrade.

The more open world with NPC quests was also handled very poorly, to the point I missed Angel of Darkness.

thesoftware730477d ago

I know it is your opinion, but she did progress as a character in each game, she even got more muscular and seasoned.

That is the thing, people first complained that there was not enough platforming and actual tomb raiding in the first and second games. Shadow remedied that and kept the combat elements.

3-4 encounters? huh? did we play the same game? there was plenty of combat and, the skill tree did matter, like being able to hang enemies from trees, set explosives traps on bodies, being able to counter, and that are just a few of the combat skills. The skill tree also had things like being able to hold your breath underwater longer, crafting upgrades, zipline upgrade, and climbing upgrades that all changed how you can approach situations.

Not knocking your opinion, but we definitely had different experiences. I had 98% completion on the shadow.

SoulWarrior477d ago (Edited 477d ago )

Sorry but i'm with him about the low number of encounters, the game throws loads of weapons and skills you're way with a comparatively low amount of places to actually use them, so they felt under utilised.

-Foxtrot478d ago

Yeah...no

It was awful, for THREE GAMES it was "become the Tomb Raider" where she went back to square one after each game. Not to mention after a huge reaction of killing someone for the first time she then becomes Rambo straight after and goes on a slaughter spree without a single other reaction. Her development was all over the place.

She was whiney, weak and in later game a little arrogant and selfish

Oh and the voice actress compared to the previous ones was not as good

Lara Croft deserved better and while they are decent games as they are, we deserved actual Tomb Raider games, we could have had better survival games if they just stuck with the original Lara Crofts origin about her plane going down. Surviving 2 weeks in the Himalayas...I'd have liked to seen that, who knows what mystical threat she could have faced in the mountains or underground some secret concealed cave.

Tacoboto477d ago

I thought Shadow of the Tomb Raider had better gameplay than Rise, but it annoyed me the most of the trilogy when I stopped to think about the story.

It's like they deliberately decided to make her unlikeable and did nothing to make the character you're playing as likeable or have even one sign of humility.

SoulWarrior478d ago

2013 I thought was a fine entry, but Rise and especially Shadow were painfully mediocre follow ups imo, I really didn't like how selfish and angry her character was in those two.

Terry_B477d ago

No. Please forget the crap completely.

northpaws477d ago

First one was decent, played through it twice.
Second one was okay, played through it once.
Third one was really bad, tried twice a year apart, still can't get through the first two hours, it is just really bad.

thesoftware730477d ago

Honest question, what did you find bad about it? the opening 2 hrs of Shadow were fantastic imo.

The opening was very similar to the first 2, what did you find really bad?

Not looking for an argument, just an honest question.

Starman69477d ago

3rd one just didn't feel like a tomb raider game. Possibly because the development was passed to another development team. Big mistake! Microsoft killed tomb raider making the first game a timed exclusive. Never recovered after that.

Show all comments (45)
160°

Analyzing 'Uncharted: Drake’s Deception' – Wait, What is The Game About?

Uncharted 3: Drake’s Deception has a lot to live up to as Uncharted 2: Among Thieves is an incredible and near-perfect game.

Read Full Story >>
goombastomp.com
Profchaos915d ago

It's about retirement...oh wait

UNCHARTED2FANATIC915d ago (Edited 915d ago )

I cant even say what the point was its easily the worst story in the series. The online was a whole lot of fun though but overall doesn't come even close to 2

porkChop915d ago (Edited 915d ago )

It was a step back for sure. Personally, I thought even the MP was way better in U2. Solid game, glad I played it. I just think they didn't push as hard as they did with U2.

UNCHARTED2FANATIC910d ago

Yes both the online and story was better in 2 no doubt

Flewid638915d ago

The "young Drake" portion was pretty top notch, story-wise. But yeah, everything outside of that I felt was inferior.

DanielEndurance915d ago

Villains were all over the place in this… one second they wanted Drake dead, the next they needed him, then they want him dead again, then they coulda killed him, but poisoned his friend instead, then coulda shot him again, but had brunch with him, then needed him alive, then coulda mowed him down, but decided to kill him by fire and let him escape… Uncharted 2 was way better. 😅😅

slowgamer915d ago

=D Sounds crazy. I don't remember any of that. Played it on ps3 and I remember thinking that why was this game so bashed compared to second one. I liked it.

Chocoburger914d ago (Edited 914d ago )

Another thing that annoyed me about UC3 events was the agent Talbot teleporting around Turkey. It just felt off to me, and made no sense.

Also, for about one third of the game, you go on a wild goose chase to rescue Sully, who wasn't even there to be rescued, and you end up back where you started again. There was simply no pay off for all the events you go through, so it fell flat in that regard as if they couldn't figure out how to make the game longer, so they decided to side-track you to do something with no pay off, hoping you wouldn't notice due to all the incredible action set pieces they made.

Overall though, even with its flaws, I still enjoy the game.

TheEnigma313915d ago

This was actually my least favorite in the series. Didn't have that same impact that part 2 set.

Flewid638915d ago

Uncharted 2 is the pinnacle of the series (to me).

Granted, 4 had the best story in my opinion, but 2 was the overall best game.

Show all comments (12)