360°

Is Project K a Kinect-Integrated Controller?

GR: A tipster dropped this off in our mailbox this morning without much speculation. Apparently what we have here is a controller designed for use with Kinect, one that gives the player access to all the buttons you'd normally find on an Xbox 360 controller.

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
doctorstrange4699d ago

You (and this) are the controller

fr0sty4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

I have always said since day one that if they finally gave that stupid motto up and released a controller, they'd have the best motion control system out there (assuming the controller was as capable as move is for lag free input). If this is real, I (not the biggest MS fan) will admit that they have the best motion control system available. the only issue then becomes the cost of the kit.

omi25p4699d ago

surely if you are using the controller you are in control which makes you the controller

Boody-Bandit4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

They can call it "Kinect(ed)"

Instead of "You are the controller" it can be "You are Kinected". Either way MS will market it in such a way people will forget about their original campaign any way. They could sell ice to Eskimos

fr0sty4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

I agree with you on that last point. They sold online multiplayer for crying out loud, something we've had for free since the dawn of multiplayer gaming. They convinced folks to pay for it. They're great salesmen.

However, unlike the former, I think Kinect with a controller would actually be a device that is worth paying for. It would actually enhance shooters and such (again, assuming they tackle the lag issue with internal sensors in the controller like move does), and the full body tracking would give it an advantage over move that sony couldn't match without releasing a new piece of hardware and further fragmenting the move user base. Then again, that's kinda what MS would be doing here as well...

None the less, for motion gaming a 2 controller kinect enabled experience seems like it would be about as good as it gets with current technology. lagless tracking of both hands, buttons, and then kinect's full body tracking. if it weren't for xbox charging you to play online, I'd buy that.

captain-obvious4699d ago

this nullifies the WHOLE no controller part
if this is true then MS failed to deliver their promises

MaxXAttaxX4698d ago (Edited 4698d ago )

as the only input method for Kinect is not the future and is stupid. And that you need a controller with BUTTONS to have much better control.
http://5.media.dorkly.cvcdn...

Awaiting spin....

EVILDEAD3604698d ago

LOL @ the usual suspects in troll mode..the designer of controller wrote a reply in the comments section of the article:

'Hi All! I am the original designer of Project K. Visit the blog here:

I was tipped by a friend that my design has been posted on Gamerevolution.com. I am extremely flattered to see my work elsewhere on the web!

If you have any questions about ProjectK, please ask! The image above is the 1st iteration of the controller. Since I originally posted that image in January , several updates to the controller have been made. It is packed with features the core gamer will love!

Project K is a product I fully intend to bring to market, pending patent decision, in the coming months. Follow me on twitter @project__kfor quicker updates'

I love how it's clear people are scared that Micrsoft is going to use controller with Kinect..and you should be because.Micrsoft already stated that there will be hybrid titles down the line..It still won't change the fully body capabilities of the device. Bu-bu-but then that means 'you are not the controller'..nope it means you are also the controller when the games makes sense to have hybrid controls.

Best of both worlds..but THIS controller isn't one of 'em.

Evil

MaxXAttaxX4697d ago

Not relying on body movements alone- wouldn't that make more of an EyeToy/PS Eye? LOL

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4697d ago
kingdoms4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

That's not really funny Microsoft announced kinect would have accessories the day they announces project natal that would be coming a couple of years down the road at the time. Only a fanboy thinks in either or's.

Kinect will do 3 things

-Hybrid games with standard controllers
-Standalone controllerlless motion
-Hybrid with kinect specific accessories

^^I think this is actually your real motivation for trolling.
The things I mentioned above were announces as being brainstormed the same E3 kinect wad announced.

wollie4698d ago

@Kingdoms

so its like an eyetoy then?

subtenko4698d ago

lol its obvious the xbox fans want a controller like the ps move with the pseye on ps3, or at least they can have a controller like the wii.

whats funny is before they didnt want a controller, now xbox fans have a two sided mentality (no surprise there), half of them want this, the other half want it the other way..shesh make up your mind guys.

M$ dont say you are the controller when you will play with a controller..(play with yourself, if you will.lol) that means "you are A PART of the controller, not THE CONTROLLER itself". Two different things folks.. so M$ will you eat your words?

they did revise the xbox with stuff that shoulda been in it, so Im guessing they will eat their words. This is good news tho, hopefully some games that I like will come out on the thing, not impressed so far

cochise3134699d ago

A controller should have been included at first release. This will reduce shovelware hopefully.

dbjj120884699d ago

Haha, "you're only part of the controller"

Kon4699d ago

So much for controller-free gaming

stormeagle64699d ago

M$'s pipe dream that everyone would embrace the Kinect was folly to begin with. Having a one-handed controller was a no-brainer from the beginning. But I think it's already too late for them at this point.

Biggest4699d ago

Doubtful. They'll brand it as a new evolution/revolution/HOLYMOTHE ROFGODTHEMOSTORIGINALEVER and certain media outlets and fans will eat it right up. Aggressive marketing means never having to say "We messed up".

stormeagle64699d ago

@Biggest:
No doubt that will be the marketing approach. However, unlike the Kinect's original release, this here's meant to target the hardcore gamer more than anything else, and we all know that the hardcore gamer is very prideful and very disdainful of anything to do with motion controls. I don't think the target demographic will give in to the hype machine this time.

sinclaircrown4699d ago

Too late? Seriously man, Kinect hasn't been around very long.

One handed controller like this could be what it needs for hardcore games.

Fanboy comments like "Oh I thought YOU were the controller" aside, MS is working to improve Kinect each day. The Kinect hardware will also be used with Windows soon (Already is actually), and I'm be surprised if its not used with the next MS Console.

Nintendo's console will have something similar to kinect at launch or soon after, as will Sony's next console. At which point alll consoles will have the same controls available, plus anything new from each.

Then fanboys will argue over who copied who, just like they've done with controllers, rumble, 3d graphics... the boring list goes on.

Redgehammer4699d ago

And what is your argument substantiating your position that its too late for them?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4699d ago
MOTY4699d ago

Not necessarily. Any game that MS releases that wouldn't utilize an additional peripheral would still be controller-free.

MS is not going to just add this component to every game, just some games while leaving some other games still open to be controller-free.

Keltik824698d ago

@sinclaircrown

Fanboy comments like "Oh I thought YOU were the controller"

That isn't actually being a fanboy, that's pointing out exactly what Microsoft stated.

T3mpr1x4699d ago (Edited 4699d ago )

Yay buttons (.com)!

Show all comments (60)
20°

Joy Ride Turbo - The Beginning of the End for Xbox Kinect

Joy Ride Turbo launched 10 years ago today. The first title was Xbox Kinect exclusive, yet this sequel failed to support the device at all.

300°

10 of the Biggest Video Game Hardware Failures Ever

Cultured Vultures: "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal, and no matter how much developers might try, some gaming hardware just fails to hit the mark. We’ve compiled a list of 10 gaming hardware fails, and boy did some fail hard."

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Knightofelemia834d ago

I would label the Power Glove, Kinect, and that Tony Hawk skateboard more as hardware addons hardware failure would be like the Virtual Boy and one day Stadia.

Magog833d ago

Kinect was bundled with every Xbox One and inflated the price on an already underpowered and low RAM machine so for the One it wasn't an accessory as much as a white elephant.

CaptainHenry916833d ago (Edited 833d ago )

Definitely the RROD but that power glove had a lot of issues as well. The Kinect just didn't work

833d ago
CrimsonWing69833d ago

Hardware add-ons are more like RAM or a video card, basically components that enhance capabilities or performance of the computer.

If you really want to get technical the Kinect is more of a peripheral device, kind of like a keyboard or mouse to a computer.

ThatsGaming833d ago

The person in this article obviously is not up on their gaming history....

Sega Saturn, Sega Dreamcast, Coleco Gemini, Commodore 128, Commodore Amiga, Atari 5200, Atari 7800 were all massive failures and in most cases cost their companies participating in future gaming generations.

Gamer79833d ago

Sega saturn (successful in Japan) and dreamcast were not failures.
Seems like you're not up on you're gaming history

septemberindecember833d ago

@Gamer79

How in the world are the Sega Saturn and Dreamcast not seen as failures? They both sold around 8M each, which is much lower than the ~30M that the Genesis had sold before it, and even the Master System before that. They were both the worst selling consoles in their respective generation (PS1, N64 outsold Saturn, PS2, GC, and Xbox outsold Dreamcast). Both of the consoles were incredibly short lived. The Saturn was discontinued in every territory but Japan after just three years. In Japan the console was discontinued after six years. Meanwhile the Dreamcast was discontinued worldwide in 2001 after launching in most territories in 1999 and in Japan in 1998. The failure of the Saturn and Dreamcast lead to Sega pulling out of the hardware market. Which, by the way, all of this occurred when Sega was massively dropping the price of their consoles quickly to compete. Sega was hemorrhaging money at this point.

None of this indicates a successful console. Saying the Saturn was a success because it did better in Japan is like saying the Vita is a success (they both sold around the same amount of units in Japan). Even the Wii U outsold these consoles worldwide.

Magog833d ago

The picture should be the 360 RROD. When I think of gaming hardware failures that's what springs to mind. Kinect and it's bundled price tag definitely hobbled the already underpowered Xbox One though for sure so I would give it a close second place.

porkChop833d ago (Edited 833d ago )

That's not what the author means by failures. It's about hardware that failed in terms of sales (Wii U) or just failed to deliver on its promise (Kinect).

Magog833d ago (Edited 833d ago )

Given that the 360 had a year head start, much easier hardware to develop for, was cheaper, and still ended up in third place I think it qualifies especially when you factor in the frustration and huge losses incurred by RROD.

porkChop833d ago

Selling over 80 million consoles isn't a sales flop. We get it, you don't like Xbox, but that doesn't mean the 360 is suddenly a failure.

Rhythmattic833d ago

Porky....
You know how many people I know bought a 2nd or third 360 due to RROD? Even when MS had to confront the issue with replacement systems, my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in, and waiting for a replacement.,,..,..
If that's how you consider it a win... OK.. but so is having 5 , of which 3 don't function.... Its a win win....mwhahahahaha

porkChop833d ago

"my mates couldn't wait for even the turnaround of sending it in"

You're acting like it would take months. When I sent my 360 in I got a new one literally 5 days later. As soon as MS had tracking confirmation that you sent yours, they'd send a new one to you the same day. No one is going to spend hundreds to buy a new console instead of waiting a week. I swear you guys pull some of the dumbest shit out of nowhere and think people will actually believe it.

Regardless, none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about.

Rhythmattic832d ago (Edited 832d ago )

Porky
"You're acting like it would take months"
Sometimes it could.. FFS.. 'Strya here...
Best turnaround I reckon was 2-3 weeks.....
Either way, My mates experiences still exist.. So Sorry, no point trying to earn Xbox Achievements when it doesn't feature in what was a situation you never dealt with,,,,
3 of my friends would disagree (overall, 10 extra Xboxes purchased)
Regardless.. MS sold a lot of 360's that was due to this reason.. That is sales. Fact

"none of this changes the fact that this isn't what the article is even about."
Headline says HELLO !
Oh and "Sadly, not all hardware is created equal," that's enough to pass this on without taking your article bias into consideration.....
As for the rest.... Ok.. But you've actually gone out of your way to give MS a Pass... Fap on.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 832d ago
Aloymetal833d ago (Edited 833d ago )

Yup, and because of that big fiasco MS had to fork out 1 billion but knowing them I think they're very proud of the 360, it's the only time a MS console reached 80mil+ sales, RROD played a big part of that and a record they will never break again.

Rhythmattic833d ago (Edited 833d ago )

So true.. Even when MS accepted they where caught out in the biggest lie of any generation, The wait for a replacement was outweighed by just buying another, and having one be returned as a backup, which, btw, generally failed on first swap.
I own honestly can't believe MS tards are just supporting , or arguing why and what MS did by just dismissing it....

lonewolf10833d ago

Lol I had the Atari Jaguar, surprised its "competition" the 3DO isn't on the list too, both as "popular" as each other.

SullysCigar833d ago

Lol same. Played the crap out of Aliens Vs Predator and Tempest 2000 .... aaand that's about it really!!

lonewolf10833d ago

Sad but true that was pretty much it.

Kurt Russell833d ago

Agreed, I never actually saw a 3DO make it to retailers in the UK. At least the Atari Jaguar was sold for around 6 months.

lonewolf10833d ago

It made it to some my brother got one, fared just as well as the Jaguar so most probably hard to find in general.

darthv72833d ago

3do had way better games. Jaguar not so much. Neo Geo sold less than both and yet isnt considered a failure. Go figure.

LWOGaming833d ago

Stadia is a weird one. It hasn’t sold at all well but in terms of how it works it’s still miles ahead of Xcloud in terms of stability and performance. Xcloud is still a way behind and that needs sorting but it will be in time. Stadia for me is one of those things that will go down as a what could have been moments. With better marketing it could have been a roaring success. I still play it and it remains the best place in my opinion to play CyberPunk 2077. Only platform I have played it on without having any issues at all. The tech is great. The concept is fine. Marketing terrible. Shame really.

Magog833d ago

The sales model was awful. They should have teamed with an existing player to allow for local and cloud access to games or a gaming subscription service.

LWOGaming833d ago

It was a strange mess from such a huge company, as I said, as a system it works really well but without gamers it’s nothing. Such a waste,

LWOGaming833d ago

The Xbox One was Microsoft’s Nintendo Wii U. Undercooked, undersold and just an unholy mess. The thing is with any of these failures is to learn from them and thankfully both Nintendo and Xbox did just that to the benefit of gamers everywhere.

Show all comments (39)
120°

Pivotal Decisions in Gaming History - Xbox Goes All-In on Kinect

Xbox 360's Kinect had flopped yet Microsoft insisted on mandatory Kinect for Xbox One, driving the price up and alienating their potential customers.

Read Full Story >>
techstomper.com
darthv721010d ago

the tech was pretty damn good but their focus on making it the centerpiece was not. Had they opted to keep it as a secondary or even tertiary device, it may have found new use for AR/VR.

PrimeVinister1010d ago

Maybe. But they were two early for VR and too late for motion control

1010d ago Replies(2)
Godmars2901010d ago

Their focus was marketing metrics. Information gathering for targeted advertising. Also "event curating" or head counting for special TV events. If MS had had their way with always online and mandatory Kinect pre COVID, as and during it they'd likely be turning into dominant presence in many Western homes. Be getting subsidized by Disney and other streamers as well as the NFL.

Thing was, Kinect as an actual game system, its games, just weren't ready. MS moved on it too soon. Thankfully.

Atticus_finch1010d ago

Sorry but it was incredibly bad for gaming. The thing barely worked as intended and the games were broken shovelware. And let's not forget all the lies from Xbox to try and sell it. What happened to Milo?
It's like Xbox it's a perpetual lying machine.

PrimeVinister1010d ago

I had almost forgotten about Milo. It looks so unbelievable in retrospect. How did anyone believe it?!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1010d ago
TheEnigma3131010d ago

Kinect requirement, TV focused, DRM, and $100 buried Xbone before it even stared.

PrimeVinister1010d ago (Edited 1010d ago )

I think Kinect was the worst of the bunch. They reversed DRM overnight and try to play down the TV stuff when they realised it made them look disinterested in gaming.

Kinect stuck around for six months, preventing sales and making more and more people upset when they dropped the Kinect and the price.

Atticus_finch1010d ago

Don't forget the inferior hardware which affects their game development to this day.
And the constant boasting and lying that hasn't change very much to this day.

kayoss1010d ago

I was kind of excited for the kinect. It had potential. That was until i tried it at one of their Microsoft store. The thing was so laggy and worker who was there, had no clue what he was doing. It kind of made rethink about buying an Xbox One with Kinect.

PrimeVinister1010d ago

I had already been turned off of the idea by Kinect for 360. Even when it worked, the games were bad and showed no potential.

Wii made you understand what they were going to do with it within about 10 seconds of Wii Sports. It went on to become a bit of a joke but at least it worked and had a purpose.

Thundercat771010d ago

The damage to the Xbox brand was so hard that til this day they are just the last place brand in the market.

PrimeVinister1010d ago

Totally. They haven't been really all that relevant since.

Godmars2901010d ago

That has to do with repeatedly failing, having to reaffirm only to again fail at creating a competent flow of decent games.

@PrimeVinister:
Until Game Pass and BC are mentioned. Only for the point to be missed.

kayoss1010d ago

thats because they dont know what they want to be. A gaming console, Television, or a gaming service?

Godmars2901010d ago

@kayoss:
They wanted, expected, to be Steam. To have everyone coming to them and paying for the privilege. That's the exact mentality on display when they tried to push always online.

brewin1009d ago

Its sad because the Xbox one version of Kinect was actually pretty solid. Not for motion games, I couldnt care less about those, but for the other features that are now commonplace in the gaming ecosystem. Things like voice control and optional motion features in games. Stuff that Sony did with the PS camera was pretty sweet and they could have done some of that stuff with Kinect.

The tech was pretty sweet when implemented right though. Who remembers the implementation in Dead Rising 3?! You could lure zombies away by saying stuff into the kinect, it was a bit hokey at first, but it actually enhanced the game significantly once you learned all the different voice commands. There was and still is nothing else like that!

The focus on TV seemed to be an issue for people, but the TV pass through had some real potential. They could have had cable companies giving the XBone out instead of cable boxes! I understood what they were trying to do, but they needed to show the games too, and thats where they lost the core gamers. Being able to jump right to a sports event or TV show with out leaving the console was actually a pretty cool thing. I spent many nights switching between NHL games or TV shows and jumping right back into my games seamlessly, just by telling Kinect to do so. It was better than people care to admit, but I loved it!

People say XBone had no games, but on launch I got Dead Rising 3, AC Black Flag, Watch Dogs, Killer Instinct, Battlefield 4, Forza 5, and Ryse. That was actually a pretty solid lineup in hindsight! Then later on it got gems like Quantum Break, Dead Rising 4, Sunset Overdrive, Gears 4 and 5, the Ori games, Rare Replay, Forza Horizon 3/4, State of Decay 2, ReCore (SUPER UNDERRATED GEM), Halo 5, Halo Wars 2, and all the great 3rd party stuff as well! I dare anyone who sat on the Xbox One to go back and give it a shot now.

It was actually a pretty great console all things considered. Yes the PS4 had better 1st party stuff, stuff that MS just couldnt top or even compete with, but there are some really great games that a lot of people missed out on that they would probably really enjoy if they actually played them. Thats why I recommend a Series S and Gamepass to a lot of people, as its a great way to get an awesome lineup pf games for super cheap!

Show all comments (22)