720°

IGN: Why I Think PlayStation Won E3

Clearly, when taken as a whole, Sony won this year's E3 in terms of providing games to gamers. Sure, there's anticipation and excitement for what Microsoft is doing with Xbox 360, and rightfully so.

The games were with Sony this year, and games are what I get most excited about.

MintBerryCrunch4724d ago

no clear winner this year...in terms of content, ill give it to sony tho

majority of games shown for the Wii U were ps3/360 trailers...so we dont know the full potential of the console yet

MS keeps pushing kinect into the living room...them not showing a new core IP for the 360 was a letdown, but having stable franchises will keep the system and its games selling into the year

Nitrowolf24724d ago (Edited 4724d ago )

Yeah i don't think there was any clear winner. None really got me hugely excited like previous years, but one thing they both Sony and Nintendo did was hit the spot with their fanbase. Sony by giving the right price for Vita and Nintendo for showing that they can cater hardcore gamers now. Microsoft did good to but to much casual stuff again. Ghost recon might be good with Kinect, we will see.

Overall i thought this E3 for the big 3 was a lacking.

Thought this was funny though
http://i.imgur.com/BhYHo.gi...

MintBerryCrunch4724d ago

lol...love the gif

same guy...bit offtopic but still hilarious

http://thefrogman.me/post/6...

4724d ago
Rikan4724d ago

@Booch

Halo CE:Anniversary
Halo 4
Gears 3
Fable 3
Forza 4

Thats just to match your list. Helps to loose the bias and actually watch E3 for the games. Get over yourself.

Rainstorm814724d ago

hey rikan, what's that your E3 2010 or 2011 list?

I cant tell as those games are at every E3 for microsoft.

Nitrowolf24724d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

@Booch

the thing was i was hoping to see some more game reveals or clip from game such as Agent, FF versus, Journey, Sorcery and a bunch more from Sony.

MS did good with Halo, Fable, and Forza but they def aren't the winner if there was one out of the three, cause these are literally the same thing we see from them to cater those hardcore gamers every year. I want to see a new IP from them. They have been riding the same game for years.

I agree with Nintendo. They could have impressed but they kind of destroyed it by showing off a bunch of multiplat and not showing any real games from them and such.

good point though

I guess a lot of us feel for the hype and thought it would keep getting better year after year. We are in the middle of the life os PS3/Xbox360 so i guess things have to settle down eventually.

But i guess i'll agree Sony Won it, but it wasn't by miles or anything like that.

Catatafish4723d ago

At the lot of ya.

If the PC gaming where a unified Dev or platform PC gaming won E3 hands muthaeffing down without a fight.

ABizzel14723d ago

Definitely between Sony and Nintendo. Sony did exactly what they needed to do, and Nintendo did good, but they didn't show anything hardcore for the Wii beside a picture of Zelda and trailers for 3rd party games.

The thing that upset me most, was that both Sony and Nintendo had a bunch of other games at the show, they just didn't put them into their conferences. Twisted Metal, Journey, Payday for Sony, and Wii U had the Zelda demo, and actual gameplay of all the 3DS games.

4723d ago
MrBeatdown4723d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

I noticed you threw Fable 3 in there. That came out last year. Or did you mean that awful-looking on-rails first-person Fable?

It's kind of funny watching you defend MS. They showed off four controller-based games, one of which was nothing more than a trailer for a game that is at least a year off. Sony easily topped that number entirely with games that were either demoed with in-game footage or that could be played by the media afterwards, they didn't even need to mention Twisted Metal or Last Guardian, and absolutely slaughtered MS when you factor in the fact that Sony's games were divided between PS3 and Vita, while MS only had to worry about 360.

That's a pretty weak showing for a company that two years ago at E3 was going on and on about exclusives and how they don't have to show games that aren't years off. Although, the irony of it is that MS actually announced Reach that year, which was well over a year away.

http://n4g.com/news/343976/...

Vicodin4723d ago

"Sony easily topped that number entirely with games that could be played by the media"

A direct result of Sony's massive 20-21 first party studios. Sony has more first party studios than Nintendo and Microsoft combined. Nintendo has about 10 and Microsoft is down to about 3.

SilentNegotiator4723d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

Microsoft:
The exact same thing as last year.
Kinect dominates as it takes on voice control, over-complicating simple controls, and destroys franchises like Fable while helping LucasArts make their worst SW game in years.

Nintendo:
A system with a lineup of games releasing this year.....in 2012, and an exclusive Lego version of GTA.
Some 3DS games; ports, games like Luigi's mansion that would be a better fit times a million on the Wii, and the typical Nintendo bunch, including Mario with his amazing 5 second hang-glider rides and wheel choices.
Wii had one game showcased. Yeah....one.

Sony:
Shooters for Ps3.
Some Move support and a crappy looking Move game.
But Vita was priced right, even if they didn't show off much new.

I'd say Sony won, with Vita being the only real highlight.

ChrisW4723d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

The Atari 2600 easily won E3 this year!!!

Shadowstar4723d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

@ ChrisW : Hells to the yeah! The museum was definitely the best part of E3 this year. (Even if I didn't get to play Asteroids, thanks to the line.)

Lawliet4723d ago

No clear winner, but we all know there's a loser, none other than Microsoft, truly a joke conference.

Why o why4723d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

'Thats just to match your list. Helps to loose the bias and actually watch E3 for the games. Get over yourself.'

yo try tooooo hard my friend. Just fess up. It was the worst of the three EVEN if the other two weren't that great

@ MrBeatdown

what a great and overlooked point. Sony had showings for two formats but you could argue MS had two formats to; 360 and kinect

AKS4723d ago

Regarding Microsoft's showing, I found myself one again thinking "Hmm, most of this doesn't really grab me, but I'm looking forward to Gears 3." This is a very familiar sentiment for me, as the overwhelming majority of my 360 gaming is with Gears and long gaps inbetween those games. I will buy Mass Effect 3 for PC. Dark Souls will be great for 360-only owners who missed Demon's Souls. Both 360 and PS3 owners are in for a treat with Dark Souls. It looks so much like Demon's Souls in style and presentation, which is a very, very good thing.

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4723d ago
Rainstorm814724d ago

Id have to say sony as well, the surprise of E3 to me had to have been the price of the PSV...

Nintendo showed alot of thier hits for the 3DS and the Wii U doesnt look bad at all so they would be a close second

MS had Gears other than that it was very Kinect-y

E3 overall wasnt the "BEST E3 EVER!" but fairly solid and the big 3 would be in that order.

g0green4723d ago Show
Masta_Killa4724d ago

Make your peace with God people. The end is near. A positive PS3 article from IGN...

StbI9904724d ago

Dude, the vita won...vita WON, read with me yall, VIVAL LA VITA WON LOL.

It had me applauding at that prize, my family was like, wtf, and I like clap clap clap.

ReservoirDog3164723d ago (Edited 4723d ago )

The Sly Cooper 4 announcement Sony win E3 for me. Uncharted 3's a given even if there's spiders in it (*sigh*) and an Insomniac game's an instant buy when it's bundled with a sick Move bundle.

But Sly 4 was made for me.

edit: And of course the Vita seems coo.

coryok4723d ago

the majority of wii U games were ps3/360 trailers means that its probably going to b about the same potential as ps3/360 for the majority of the games lol

sony definitely won, they showed me games that i wanted to play. microsoft shoveled shit onto the stage and nintendo didnt show me much of anything, by not showing things and not showing the potential that can be had, theyre loosing. they should have had 15-20 games showing off wii us potential, instead they just show us what we've already seen and what i already bought, hint hint nintendo, im not going to be buying ports of games thaty i already have because you make a new console

tplarkin74723d ago

It's pretty sad when a company launches a console and can't win E3.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4723d ago
-Alpha4724d ago (Edited 4724d ago )

I have to say that the PSVita has really grown on me over the last couple days.

Originally I wasn't that interested with the PSV and the E3 demoes didn't help (aside from LBP)

But, when taken as a whole, I was struck by Sound Shapes, Gravity, and SSD Delta. These games are original, make awesome use of the touchscreen, but more importantly they look like actual games designed for portable gaming.

Still think Nintendo had just as good as an E3 though. Wii U has really impressed me, and they revealed so many AAA titles for the 3DS' 2011 lineup.

jc485734724d ago

Nintendo just felt a little unorganized or should I say incomplete? 360 was just trying a little too hard to attract casual gamers. Sony on the other hand, well, I blame it on the lack of third party support.

morganfell4723d ago

I have to agree on that. I have long been familiar with Eve as Sci-Fi is my favorite genre, but never got into it. Dust 514 actually got me to pick up the Commander's Edition of Eve. The character maker in Incursion absolutely buries any character maker ...ever.

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

http://www.youtube.com/resu...

It will be interesting to see how everything matches up in Dust. Sony had originally planned for a new Planetside and I guess this is their alternate....and much more appealing venture.

shadowknight2034723d ago

Certainly. What has me intrigued is that everything from Eve to Dust will be on 1 server. And essentially in order for both kinds of players on two different games to survive, we will have to rely on each other.

undercovrr4724d ago

All 3 conferences this year sucked IMO. E3 is not what is was in 07, 08 and 09.

Sony was the best of the worst for the reasons Colin stated - the games. Nintendo had no games (with the exception of Zelda) just a new empty console, and MS had wayyy to much Kinect that I got bored halfway through. Still, Sony should have spent more time showing footage of games we haven't seen much of (Twisted Metal, Last Guardian), and perhaps a surprise reveal.

Show all comments (65)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers20d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken19d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g20d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing20d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H920d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola20d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn66920d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle20d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg20d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos20d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion20d ago (Edited 20d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola20d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies41d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken41d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga41d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken41d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6440d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long40d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197240d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic40d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
DivineHand12541d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91341d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer41d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91340d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit40d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 40d ago
Christopher41d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6940d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit40d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal41d ago (Edited 41d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher41d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken41d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197240d ago (Edited 40d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic40d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2341d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218340d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit40d ago (Edited 40d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder41d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts41d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)