320°

Crysis 2: Stunning Heavy-Weight Textures Package in Development (Comparison)

Some stunning comparison screenshots from the upcoming textures package for Crysis 2.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
MinusTheBear4746d ago

Its unacceptable that this wasn't available at launch.

Pandamobile4746d ago

What. These aren't made by Crytek.

MinusTheBear4746d ago

Wow that sucks even more then.

theonlylolking4746d ago

Crytek should of had these high res textures from the beginning though.

CrimsonEngage4746d ago

It's pretty sad that people who don't even work for Crytek do a better job at creating textures and professionals...

nilamo4746d ago (Edited 4746d ago )

Yes because these same people are also capable of creating a multiplatform engine across three platforms GTFO. Game development is more than just creating high res textures.

TheIneffableBob4746d ago

Yes, that is true, but if one guy was able to do this in his spare time, Crytek could have easily hired a texture artist to specialize in high-res textures and released it as an optional download like how BioWare did with Dragon Age 2. Crytek has the resources.

caboose324746d ago

@nilamo
It's sad when a sequel has worse graphics than the original game. It's not like its even that hard to improve on something you had already accomplished. It's called being lazy.

Tachyon_Nova4746d ago (Edited 4746d ago )

Lol,

The artists have to design an level than design and build all of the objects, then concept and create textures plus work on light positions/levels and even then that level may end up getting cut.

Creating a texture is an easy and relatively small part of the whole process, and as you can see this guy hasn't even redone most of the textures, ands in most cases is just taking the original texture design and redoing it in a higher resolution.

@ Caboose32 - Crytek are not lazy. After finishing their PC engine (CE2) in 2007 they then rebuilt the engine more or less from the ground up for multiple platforms for the first time (for them) while at the same time developing several games using the technology and licensing it to other companies. Does that sound lazy to you?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4746d ago
captain-obvious4746d ago

yah the textures in crysis 2 is a setback

like the first crysis 1 was photo realistic
crysis 2 got great graphics but not photo realistic
its just eye candy

Shackdaddy8364746d ago

You never played the first Crysis 1 did you... Some textures were really good but most were horrible close up. Believe it or not C2 was a step up with textures.

TheIneffableBob4746d ago

Crysis 2 was more consistent in its texture res, but it isn't higher res than the first Crysis. Things like grass had their resolutions halved.

the_1080p_guy4745d ago

@Shackdaddy836,
'You never played the first Crysis 1 did you...'

Actually,I wanted to ask you the same question.Care to explain the 'horrible close up' texture in Crysis 1? Even 5 years later,games cant match textures of the first Crysis.

Its Crysis 2 that has horrible texture up-close,looks good at a distance though.While u can use the binoculars in Crysis 1 if you are too desperate to find some bad textures.

Shackdaddy8364745d ago (Edited 4745d ago )

@1080 There were bad textures in Crysis. Crysis was never known for its textures (although it did have some amazing textures). The thing is that Crysis does an amazing job of hiding it.

Look at any cliff side or any tree trunk or the ground behind foliage and you will see.

Ineffable was right though. Crysis 2 didn't have higher res but it was a lot more consistent.

SRTold4746d ago (Edited 4746d ago )

You guys are so hung up on graphics that you can't enjoy the game.. pathetic.

I just recently played through Crysis 2 on the Xbox, and even though I heard the graphics were toned down, this game fucking blew me out of the water. I would say that it is at least in the top 3 best looking Xbox 360 games, right up there with Enslaved.

I am currently playing an old MUD called Moosehead. MUDS are what MMORPGS came from. WoW came about because of these MUD games. They are essentially WoW's grandfather.
I have played this Moosehead game nonstop for the past 7 days. This game HAS NO GRAPHICS whatsoever. It is all text, and the gameplay is so addictive that I can't stop playing. I would even go as far as to say this is the best Multiplayer game of all time, and the best RPG of all time, yet NO GRAPHICS AT ALL.

It must say something that I am playing a text-only game, when I have a 60 Inch LED LCD 1080p Sony Bravia, with an Xbox 360 and PS3 hooked up, as well as an Alienware M17x super laptop with an onboard card and 2 extra graphics cards running in SLI.. Yet I can not pull myself away from this NO GRAPHICS text only game.

captain-obvious4746d ago (Edited 4746d ago )

no one said anything about being a graphics whore hell i update my PC in like every 15 years lol

but its a clear setback fron the first crysis
they should go forward not backward

yet the game (crysis 2) is still fun game play wise (not MP tho)
but in here we are talking about graphics so yah

i mean i still like and play games like RE3 and C&C on PC and boy those got some stupid graphics but i still like them

Baka-akaB4746d ago (Edited 4746d ago )

Wow touchy much ? No one usually accepts a sequel of a game to be worse looking .. be it from a low budget or blockbuster game .

The game isnt just setting the bar lower in graphics , it's smaller and got a far worse IA , according to everyone who actually touched the first game .

Why shouldnt fans from the first hour complain then , and why should they care that you are happy with the inferior version being one of the best on an outdated and inferior machine , that didt even get the first game ?

nilamo4746d ago

Isn't it the duty of fans to spread the love and let everyone enjoy that which they call themselves fans of?? What's wrong with him liking the game? God this is the reason why I ****** hate PC gaming. Not once have I ever met a hardcore pc gamer that said he loves to play a game because it was fun, the only thing I ever hear is GFX GFX GFX. I

Baka-akaB4746d ago (Edited 4746d ago )

Did you just rest whatever you wanted ? The complaints are on all aspect of the games being inferior to the first game so far .

Nothing wrong with liking the game ... but where does people come off calling older fans graphic whores after quite a few valid complaints ?

"this is the reason why I ****** hate PC gaming. Not once have I ever met a hardcore pc gamer that said he loves to play a game because it was fun"

Ah yeah that BS again . I'm tired of PC fanboys with their "console is ruining us " mantra .. but that kind of stuff isnt even better .

FYI at every turns the most popular pc games were almost never high end graphic benchmarks .

Ever heard of starcraft , wow , diablo , sims , civilization , among many other things ?
Are you going to tell me you couldnt meet a pc fan who enjoyed those games that used low specs overall , and whoop any crysis' ass saleswise ?

Tony P4746d ago

I could understand the "it's just graphics" thing for the majority of games.

But not for the game that friggin' set the bar for high-end graphics.

Ravenor4746d ago

Good for you? Crysis was a great game, gameplay wise and visually. It also had some pretty decent MP maps, it wasn't a bad package and it sold well.

With Crysis 2, I don't think it's unacceptable for people to have high expectations for the visuals and also for them to be discussed and critiqued that's the nature of games like Crysis. You think the console versions look fine? Fine, I wont argue with that. For me going from the first to the second, it was a atrocious step backwards.

A step backwards with software like this should never be accepted.

Gohadouken4746d ago

Pretend otherwise if you want ...

There are a few games and categories of games that are at least half about looking good and hyper realistic , than their gameplay .

Stuff like racing games, sports simulations , and games like Crysis .

The game is all about realistic graphics and being an open fps experience . The second isnt looking nor playing as well , of course their should be complaints .

Again try to pretend otherwise , especially after professing the game blew you away by being one of the 3 best looking 360 games .

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4746d ago
You Noob4746d ago

this remind my crysis 1 :)

Show all comments (31)
100°

The Crysis Trilogy Joins EA Access Vault

Featuring the complete nanosuit experience, The Crysis Trilogy has now joined the EA Access vault as a title that's free for those that subscribe to the EA service on Xbox One consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
Games1st1422d ago (Edited 1422d ago )

Just in time for those that got the month trial.

DrDeath1422d ago

Wait? There is more than one? lol

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster1806d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada071806d ago (Edited 1806d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X141806d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase1805d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted1806d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster1806d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack1805d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH1801d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.

80°

13 Awesome Games Set In Real Places

Jum Jum from Unleashthegamer writes: We gathered the best real setting games we could think of if you’re looking for something in a familiar location to soothe your thirst for real-world games.

Read Full Story >>
unleashthegamer.com