Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction- High Scores Across The Board

Looks like Ratchet & Clank Future: Tools of Destruction is a must buy for any PlayStation 3 owner. Reviewers are agreeing that this is an AAA title with most giving at least 9/10 or over 90%. Here is a review round-up.

100-GamePro
100-GameTap
100-Play Magazine
95-PSM Magazine
95-GamerNode
94-IGN
93-PSM3 Magazine UK
93-GameZone
93-Game Informer
91-Gaming Age
90-Pro-G
90-GameTrailers
90-Games Radar
90-GameDaily
90-Game Almighty
90-PSX Extreme
85-1UP
80-GameSpy
75-GameSpot

[xhi4]

Play magazine = 100....not sure why they didn't add that :S

Does anybody know why?

[gtgcoolkid]

Gaming Trend Gave 91%.

This is an AAA.

[skagrerrrr]

and gamespot will be crucified

[jiggyjay]

PS3 fanboys can at least say that their system has a triple A title! Now is it a system seller like GOW was for the 360! Hmm we'll see! I highly doubt it is though!

[mesh1]

haha the best game on the PS3 IS A KIDS NO BRAiner platform game LOL.

[peksi]

"haha the best game on the PS3 IS A KIDS NO BRAiner platform game LOL."

Spoken like a true adult.

[Lucreto]

Are you jealous that "KIDS NO BRAiner platform game" as you call it is getting a high scores NEARLY on par with Bioshock and Halo 3

[BlaCkMaRK714]

This game deserves it.

[ruibing]

This will hopefully be the first of many AAA titles to come. Let's hope Naughty Dog's Uncharted does just as well.

[Bubble Buddy]

I knew you'd do good ever since i first saw that groovitron =P

[fopums]

insomniac is a great dev team, kudos to them, cranking out solid titles roughly each year!

that shows what some creative and talented people they really are :D

[Barreldragon00]

And now we demand Resistance 2 in no more then a year!!!!!!!
J/K

[timmyp53]

=)

[remix]

you CANNOT AVERAGE PEOPLE'S OPIONION.

ITS LIKE TAKING RED AND BLUE AND AND ASKING 100 PEOPLE WHICH IS BETTER. IF 50 SAY BLUE AND THE OTHER HALF SAYS RED, THAT MEANS, THAT BOTH COLORS ARE ugly because they average 50. MAKES NO SENSE. reviews were made to pick a reviwer YOU trust and see what they say. OR AT LEAST LOOK AT WHAT THE AVERAGE RANGE OF NUMBERS WERE. (WHICH IN THIS CASE WAS 90'S) BUT IF THIS GAME GOT A 4/10 OR SOMETHING, THAT WOULD BRING THE TOTAL AVERAGE BELOW 90. YOU PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN.

so yea this game is tripple aaa according TO MOST reviews. but since people like to average, THOSE PEOPLE are still gonna wait for somthing below 90 so they can say it AVERAGES BELOW 90 AND START BASHING IT.
theres like another 30 reviews to go now

@boostilon. yea i agree with you somewhat but again. reviews ARE BASICALLY AN OPIONION OF WHAT IS GOOD ABOUT THE GAME. LIKE I SAID, IF A REVIEWER GIVES RACHET A 20 OR SOMETHING, IT WOULD BRING THE AVERAGE WAAAAY DOWN. YOUR SUPPOSED TO LOOK AT THE (MODE)IF YOU WILL AND THEN SEE WHAT IT IS. THATS BETTER THEN AVERAGING REVIEW NUMBERS. YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT I MEAN? BUT I ALSO AGREE WITH CUTNELL THOUGH

[bootsielon]

Metacritic, gameranking and gamestats take arithmetic (or sometimes ponderated) averages of subjective SCORES, not of subjective opinions. Opinions cannot be averaged, but scores can. Of course, they are subjective an each game the game a score for different reasons. These averages are meant to give you an idea of what people think, of how enjoyable the end product of a game is, and of how much is this title worth. Sure, it's not perfect, but nobody said it is, and it's not meant to be; who said it has to be a perfect system anyway? Nothing is.

Edit:

You're wrong pal. It doesn't have to be a Normal Distribution (and scores just MIGHT be normally distributed) for averages to matter. It just has to be symmetric, and have properties that the Normal complies with BUT it doesn't have to be normal. Examples are the Binomial distribution with parameter p=1/2, the uniform distribution, and so on.

I think the only way to accurately assess the "quality" of a game is by its score distribution. But then again, people don't like statistics. So yeah, I agree that, besides the average, the median (with an explanation, such as "half of the scores are above this mark, half are below") should be included, and also the mode (in this case, the mode is 9.0 too). Hell, why not add the Geometric, cuadratic, and other functionally convex means, ones that comply with Jensen's inequality, just for the heck of it? ;)

lol

[Cutnell]

For anyone who has actually taken a statistics class and understands it, averages are ONLY useful in a normal distribution. To clear it up now, reviews are not in a normal distribution. Furthermore, averages are not resitant to outliers which makes them less useful in a subjective sample such as this. The correct statistic to look at if you want to get a better idea of how a game is doing across the board is to look at the MEDIAN score. Which for the scores listed in the posting is a 91. The main reason behind using a median score over an average score is because the median is less affected by outliers. If you guys need further explanation read about some basic stats or take a class in stats....hope this helps!

Also, if we use the 1.5X IQR rule for outliers, both 80 and 75 are considered outliers for this set of data. Take that to mean what you wish. Normally, a statician would assume something was wrong with these two data points.

Edit: @ 6.1
And my point still stands. The average is not useful in this case. You mention uniform distribution and binomial distributions, which are not useful in analyzing this data. So good point, but irrelevant none the less.

Also, I would assume that if you know what a median score is, you would understand that half are below and half are above.

BTW, symmetric data would possess a median that is equal to the mean

Also, these scores are NOT normally distributed and this could easily be seen if you make a stem and leaf plot of the data. I have not done this, but the 1.5X IQR rule for outliers suggests that 75 and 80 are in fact outliers and these would skew the data to the left. Thus, not normally distributed or symmetric.

I do agree that perhaps the mode is another useful statistic for analyzing this data.

[DrPirate]

Good work Insomniac.

[Ares84]

Visit this: http://boardsus.playstation...

[remix]

i think something is wrong here and needs to be addressed with these so called PROFESSIONALS. (dont forget there HUMAN)

W/E THOUGH RACHET AND CLANK GETS 90' PRETTY MUCH ALL ACROSS. I DONT AGREE WITH AVERAGING REVIEWS. (READ MY ABOVE POST) BUT RACHET IS TRIPPLE AAA TO ME AND THE REVIEWERS. I LOVE FLYING AROUND WITH THE SIXAXIS. IT RESPONDS REALLY GOOD

[TheSadTruth]

Actually, that is an interesting thread, ps3 owners with intelligence do exist, posting here made me think otherwise.

Most of them in that thread don't think the review even matters and others say that the game is deserving of a 7.5 score, too bad ps3 owners on this website can't voice intelligent opinions.

"LAIR IS TRIPLE A TIDUEL GALO 3 SUX M$ PAYS REVIEWEERRR!!" At least this place is good for laughs.

[Ace_Shooter]

Xbox fanboys aren't any better though sad. One thing you forgot to mention is while to SOME gamers. reviews don't matter (like me). BUT....these professionals (reviewers) are heard through thousands of people. Therefore they have to take their job serious, especially Gamespot since they're considered a 'reliable' gaming website. You can't let 'personal preference' get in the way of you reviewing the game in which thousands of people are going to read. By reading the review it's obivous he wants to attack it (for whatever reasons i don't know but it does seem a little suspicious). This is what i say...let Platform fans (the reviewers) review platform games, FPS fans review FPS games, etc etc.... keep the bias out of it!

[TheSadTruth]

"I don't care who you are, the World Series is one of the biggest events in sports. You can hate baseball, but you can't deny the epicness of the world series."

Baseball sux!

[hurricane22]

check out the link. looks like someone forgot the first ammendment.

[n4gTurnsU_WickedGay]

my guess is when you "voiced" your opinion you were rude and insulting, maybe even using some profanity.....in other words, you were being a douche bag. if thats the case you got what you deserved.

my opinion: get the sand out of your vagina, you whiny little girl.

[Bigmac573]

Sony is VERY lucky to have them. If they didn't well, we won't get into that.

[bruiser81]

Bungie was very brilliant, MS was lucky to have them. Without them there would have been no 360, see how everything can be flipped. Its those type of comments that start fires

[boodybandit]

it wouldn't do any good either way.

[Synex]

Amazon better hurry up with my copy!

[AllroundGamer]

omg i have to wait another 2 weeks to get this masterpiece here in EU :(

[jack who]

100-GamePro = use less
100-GameTap = use less
100-Play Magazine = use less
95-PSM Magazine = use less
95-GamerNode = use less
94-IGN = i give you that one
93-PSM3 Magazine UK = use less
93-GameZone = use less
93-Game Informer =i give u that one
91-Gaming Age = use less
90-Pro-G = use less
90-GameTrailers =i give u that one
90-Games Radar = use less
90-GameDaily = use less
90-Game Almighty = use less
90-PSX Extreme = use less
85-1UP = lolz
80-GameSpy = lolz
75-GameSpot = pwntaged

[bootsielon]

What does "pwntaged" and "lolz" is supposed to mean, you illiterate moron?

Seriously, GamePro and Games Radar are well respected media outlets. They're some of the few with a reputation left almost untouched, unlike IGN which has actually copied articles from Games Radar (hell, it has that annoying guy Matt Cassamassina, how can you possibly trust them?), GameSpot which has proven to be an Xbot site (Gears > Zelda, and by a wide margin? Yeah right); not only that, but they've given the lowest scores to PS3 games. 1up and EGM have also proven to be sellouts by giving Halo 3 and Gears scores of 10 or so when their reviews read like somewhere between an 8 and a 9.

[grimygunz]

your time arguing with idiots. To think that only a few sites reviews matter makes no sense as even the big sites at times have bad reviewers. just cause it came from one site dosn't make it any more important than another. Its not like there is one Perfect reviewer on the the bigger sites and mags and not the mid ranged and start up sites.

[Skerj]

You lose credibility for using "u" in place of the full word, and for "lolz". Oh yeah useless is one word I kept reading it as "use less" which didn't make sense.

[jack who]

useless cuzz they are useless aka gamepro and it top 10 that top 5 this top 3 when and crap post on the site that goes on for ages...

useless cuzz you have over 5 diff Play Official(lover) Station aka Play Magazine PSM Magazine PSM3 Magazine UK PSX Extreme psu

need i keep goin?

[YoMeViet]

16 out of 19 reviewers gave it a 90 or higher so you call then "use less". Of the last 3 you gave the lowest a "pwntaged"...i don't get it.
maybe you should "use less" crack and "use more" brains.

oh i almost forgot jack, Pwned!

[Skerj]

Hahahaha wow your post made me laugh so hard, I wish I had thought of that.

[Bolts]

Useless= Jack's brain. He prolly doesn't even have a PS3 so there is no way for him to verify if the reviews are right or wrong.

[Mr_Kuwabara]

All I got to say is that these developers are very talented. Job well done. I want to buy a 60gb this month (I got connections to get it in a very low price =P) so I might pick this one up a long with Heavenly Sword, and Lair.

[kingjkv]

Yeah well the guy above me had too much to drink. Anyways, it looks like Gamespot once again proved that they are Pro Nintendo and Xbox, "YEAH i love my checks when they come in the mail from Redmond, i love mi checks" says a Gamespot employee.

[AllroundGamer]

MS probably gave the poor Gamespot reviewer 5$ to lower down the score, what could he do...

[atke car]

greet game.

[Kenshin_BATT0USAI]

Hi game.

[joydestroy]

damn gamespot...you're the only one that low.
that says something's fishy...

[grimygunz]

convenently Let the Sports game reviewer Review a game thats a Platformer and not a Sports game.

[Skerj]

Hah seriously, that's like me reviewing Madden. I have no idea wtf you do in that game I don't even watch American football.

[Real gamer 4 life]

i dont know but gamespot is looking kinda suspect right now.

[aaquib5]

Stupid fanboys. I find it funny that they are the ONLY site to give it in the 7 range. ONLY site. Sure it may be one person's opinion, but why is it that amazing, stellar PS3 games like Folklore or Resistance get great everywhere, but then goes to Gamespot to get a 7 or 8 instead of the 9.0+ it deserves. And then, Gamespot is once again looking for Bill's groin so they can give his games all high 8's or 9's when they clearly aren't perfect(*cough* halo, gears of war). I was planning to just rent Ratchet, but Im going to make sure to support an incredibly talented developer like Ratchet and help make this game a million seller.

[Bathyj]

I guess Gamespot are just flat out wrong.

[boodybandit]

that review Gamespot cranked out.
I played R&C for a couple hours today and I had to drag myself away. The game is so gourgeous and addicting I felt like a kid on Christmas Eve. I'm no kid. So I guess this whole kiddy game crap is about as nonsense as the Gamespot review.

Oh and the game isn't any easier or harder than the last couple R&C games. Did some of these reviewers ever play an R&C game before?

This game is simply amazing. I haven't had this much fun since Kameo as far as this type of game goes. The graphics and colors in R&C are amazing! The best part about this game is it's a 1st gen R&C on the PS3 but I can't imagine how the next one can be improved upon.

Absolutely must have AAA title!

[ROCCOZILLA]

going to pick it up friday,cant wait!

[PS360PCROCKS]

Hey gamespy and gamespot open your eyes and REALLY PLAY THE GAME because your scores make you look like a joke and a disgrace, hey come to think of it, you look alot like my Colorado Rockies right now! Woo for sh!tty pitching and hitting! Yay! UGH!!!!

[Nightwing12]

i agree

[Kenshin_BATT0USAI]

When theres a difference of 25% in a review you know that one of them is biased, but when there are over 10 reviews over 90% and one below 80% then you know that theres a biased bastard out there.

[HarryEtTubMan]

Gamespot is on crazk anyone can see this game is easily a 9.0... obviousl everyone else thinks so.... seems they do have a little stinky something going on. I already knew it before I saw this... Seriously either Microsft is paying people or people are tired of seeing Sony on top so they intend on bashing them or.... they don't want Sony to choose the format of choice again so try to lead people away. I dunno but they suck horribly. Seriously a 7.5 is stupid for a game with great gameplay what almost EVERYONE(even MTV!) says has a "PIXAR" look to the graphics. 7.5 for 60FPS at 720p but a 9.6 or 7 for 620p at 24FPS just cause it says HALO on the front. Gay. gay GAY. And the PS3 will still succeed!

[jack who]

http://n4g.com/ClickOutTips...

[H-V-H]

Haha !!

[Skerj]

Man you make mesh1 look like the founder of MENSA. Abusing N4G tip posting to perpetuate more bs fanboyism, you're SO cool!!

[supermandead666]

The dude who review is only human, may the GOD have mercy on his soul.

[Peekay]

everyone needs to calm down - there is another thread somewhere with 490 + and counting to go and vent your anger out on. R&C is confirmed AAA. GameSpot is now confirmed as a joke in the gaming community. Next up - Uncharted - bring it!

[Bnet343]

the guy who reviewed R&C also reviewed HEAVENLY SWORD and gave it an 8, which is a full point higher then what IGN gave it.

[jack who]

its a conspiracy

i neeedzz mowr bubulessss

[shmee]

100-GamePro
100-GameTap
100-Play Magazine
95-PSM Magazine
95-GamerNode
94-IGN
93-PSM3 Magazine UK
93-GameZone
93-Game Informer
91-Gaming Age
90-Pro-G
90-GameTrailers
90-Games Radar
90-GamingTrend
90-GameDaily
90-Game Almighty
90-PSX Extreme
85-1UP
80-GameSpy
75-GameSpot

XBOTS control your jealousy

[Skerj]

Thank you shmee, you get bubbles for logic and for the name from Squee (even if you didn't get it from there).

[Says you]

titles that they give to the console that breaks alot and always have bias reviews that are good lets face it the console that breaks down all the time always gets bias reviews example Halo 3 same as the 2nd one nothing different and oh of course theres the hd problem no matter how bad that crappy game is or if that games frame dropped to 20 that game will still get the same scores and oh Gears of War that game is crap to aswell considering their really wasnt a war going on that much as the game say's! on its title I've seen more war on Resistance fall of man.

[Takumi86]

The People Download GT-5P

Skyline unmasked and subaru are now playable check it out

[Maestro]

By the way, the last score is an 8/10 from EDGE.

WhAT a FreaKIng AmAZZZiNg "AAA" GaME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LMAO

Get over it, this is not an AAA game. But at least is better than LAIR!

[chrisin3]

Bioshock got an 8 out of 10 from EDGE too. What was your point again?

[ScentlessApprentice7]

Maestro won't get anything you try to tell him/her/it. It's like trying to teach a monkey with down syndrome how to play poker.

[chrisin3]

lol...agreed.

[Coke-a-Cola]

Congratulations Ratchet and Clank
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

[parasite]

My 360 went rrod over the weekend, which sucks hard. I had planned on picking this up anyway, but holy Sh1t is this a great game! I have both systems and yes I agree most of the stuff I have played on my ps3 has only kept me interested for a few days at most. However this game is gonna tide me over just fine until I get my 360 back, and I have a feeling after that Drakes gonna take a chunk out of my time as well. Put all this fanboy poo aside and play the game before you comment. How did you know pizza taste good? You tasted it, duh. This game is the one reason now to own both systems if you are a true gamer. You wont get to play this on the 360, and you really do need to experience this game. You can tell the developers learned alot from RFOM, and even tho gears looked alot better then RFOM, it can't hold a candle to ratchet and clank. Now why do I compare these two? Because this is a one year later release just like gow, and frankly imo it is hands down better. Rock solid 60fps, no screen tearing, great controls, awesome level design that encourages you to explore and then rewards you for doing so. So much can be said about the quality of this title and it should. Give credit were credit is due. BTW if this is what happens when a developer learns how to code for the ps3, then we are in for good times ahead.

[icechai]

No need for so much hate on Gamespot. Its one guys opinion, doesn't mean it will be yours or the majority of people who play it. Granted I never read their reviews (b/c I think they're crap) but no need for the super flaming hate above, c'mon just look at movie reviews, sometimes they're all over the place, sometimes they all agree, and sometimes, everyone agrees except for one cynical bastard, but no one blames him because he's a critic.

[DFresh]

You folks can say whatever the hell you want all I know is that this is the best game available as of now in all categories.
I mean Halo 3 doesn't even deserve a 10 let alone an 8 the reason it doesn't play in HD 640P all for shading in a game my ass therefore don't call it next gen or a AAA title because it's neither.
Can people agree this gen is about the HD graphics?

[Primetimebt]

I think we get that game is getting reviews but unless it doesnt start selling it's not tripple A so instead of talking about let's go out and buy a copy.

[gtgcoolkid]

I played it for 3 or so hours and finally stopped as trying to save the fun and office tomorrow. Its a great game. So far I give this game about 9 to 9.25 out of 10.

I personally think that Aaron guy at Gamespot was on crack while reviewing the game. Either that or he is stupid. I will even give him the choice of which he wants to be.

[bootsielon]

Neither Sales nor reviews make a game "AAA"

It's the budget. Of course, nobody buys a game based on the budget it's made off. So whether it's AAA or not, it doesn't matter. What matters is that it's a great game, and that it should sell.

Okami was a AAA underrated game, because Capcom didn't learn that advertising surely helps a game sell until Lost Planet came out. Lost Planet was AAA, but it met with so so critical reception... not to mention Lair or Heavenly Sword.

Don't argue with me... this is theFart's fault for fumbling around the AAA term like an idiot. That's why everyone at N4G thinks that AAA is synonymous with "9 and above".

[nix]

AAA refers to the big budget spent on one franchise. it's like hollywood movies: big star casts, big budgets, big special effects make it a "blockbuster" movie irrespective of how it fares in box office.

[Skerj]

Thank you man, thank you SO much. SOMEONE had to say it, AAA is one of those buzzwords I hope gets left in this year because people are using it left and right like they really know what in the hell they're talking about. Truth be told I'll take Okami over any of the so called "AAA" games that has been coming out lately too.

[Relientk77]

Im actually not suprised this game got reviewed soo well

one reason:

its made by INSOMNIAC GAMES ....heres a small list of their games u might know:

Spyro the Dragon
Spyro 2: Ripto's Rage
Spyro: Year of The Dragon

Ratchet and Clank
Ratchet and Clank: Going Commando
Ratchet and Clank: Up Your Arsenal
Ratchet: Deadlocked

Resistance: Fall of Man

^i have every single game on that list and i love them all.. they are all AMAZING.... Thank You INSOMNIAC GAMES u r one of the best game companies in the world

[solidt12]

This is the funnist game I have ever played in my whole life.

[akira]

to all sony fanboys like me lets all unite and ban this ass kissing(microsoft),money hungry sites namely GAMESPOT, GAMESPY and 1UP. they are dumasses which does not have the right to be called review sites. they are all microsofts puppets! especially that guy AARON THOMAS he is full of crap because he is trying to destroy something that a lot of people put their heart and soul on perfecting a game like ratchet and clank
i must tell you guys right now it is the most awesome game i have ever played. it will make you say OH MY GOD!!!!! that is how good it is. the graphics is unbelievable they have put so much attention to detail that as a lot of people said almost like PIXAR quality and that is quite an achievement. all right people be smart and if you call yourselves gamers then test drive this baby and see what you've been missin, which to my mind is going to be the game of the year!! well i'll probably reserve that until i see uncharted drakes fortune. as for me i'm lovin every moment of this. thats all for now dudes.. peace out! AAAAAHUUUUUUUU!!!

[caffman]

it didn't get high scores across the board. good though anyway

[squallsoft]

...i applaud Insomniac on a job well done. they have elevated themselves to be one of the best, possibly THE best, developer of this generation. Mario and master chief have met their match. i always personally considered ratchet and clank to be the mascot of the PlayStation brand, and being about 3 hours into their latest adventure, now there is no doubt! thanks a bunch, insomniac!

[u got owned]

AAA or not i dont think this game will move to many consoles. I think it would reach maybe 700,000 copies sold.

[GameHero]

and it is exactly what they say it is "an Awesome game", while playing I found myself losing control of my gameplay because I was mezzmorized by the beautiful graphics. Does anyone know? if this game is running at 60fps in 1080p because it feels like it is!

[HondaSIRowner]

This is a must buy title!

[Adamalicious]

Reviews schmeviews - this game is awesome no matter how you slice it. Now I just have to get to the end of the work day so I can keep playing and find out what happens next!

[Cat]

lombax fever!!

[DiGiTaL Ki11eR]

this would be a perfect 10 if it wasn't for that huge black eye of a glitch after the six level. who want to add or subtract 500mb from their hard-drive just fix this?

[PLAYSTATION4EVER]

i give it a 9.7/10.0 score. i just play it for 6 hours none stop.

[solidt12]

Everything in the video and what he said gives me the impression that he is giving this game a very high score. Sounds like he was complaining about it having too much content and variety. Since when is that a bad thing. This game has more variety than any game I have every played. I give it Game Of The Year. I like it better than Bioshock and Halo 3. Resistance 2 Will rule next year. Insomniac is the leader in games on the PS3 now. Lets see how Killzone 2 stacks up.

[Daytona]

Being someone's criticism that it's easy even for a child to play does make it just a childs game so in theory yes, it's not a 10.0, however if it's beautiful to play and has ample game play then based on video I saw I'd say it's a solid 8.7 based on my criteria anyways.

I think a lot of sites are rating it higher b/c of all the bad sony titles they don't want to look like their anti sony so they've softeneed abit on the scores. Is it a solid 9 out of 10 or 10 out of 10, lol, hell no, but it's a good game for kids.
8.7 solid:)

[chrisin3]

So are all platformers kids' games? Is mario a kids' game? I have yet to figure out why this is a kid's game. I definitely see how it can appeal to a younger audience, but I don't see why that means it should be labeled a kids' game. After all, many older people play it.

It seems like people are just getting into way too much blood and gore, and forget that games don't need to show lifelike violence to be considered 'for an adult'. Ratchet is one of those "every person" games--not just for kids.

[Padre]

LOL all the PStards.

Get OVER it, Ratchet & Clank Future IS NOT an AAA game. Go and see the metascore of the game, is below 90!!!! Don't commit suicide after you see this, PStards:

http://www.metacritic.com/g...

R&C IS NOT AAA GAME - R&C IS NOT AAA GAME - R&C IS NOT AAA GAME - R&C IS NOT AAA GAME -

Face it fanboys. AAA my Ass, n00bs.

[chrisin3]

Oh, we face it, and could care less. You are the one who cares, and you are not even a sony fan. Imagine that...sort of weird, don't ya think?

Padre, this is from Electronic gaming monthly:
"Not only is Future a great game, it's the best yet on PS3, arguably the best-looking game ever, and an absolute pinnacle of fun. [Dec 2007, p.112] "

Sure sounds like a heap of sh*t to me.

[Padre]

If you are accepting what EGM said, then you are also accepting that this is an 8.5 at the very best, because that's the review of 1UP, and 1up is EGM. Get over it fanboys, it's not an AAA game.

[chrisin3]

90 Electronic Gaming Monthly

If you scroll down metacritic, you will see that they gave it a 90. I figured you would know that, being that you are so informeed and all.

[Padre]

Wow dude, you are blind. 1up: 8.5/10, 1up = Electronic Gaming Monthly most important review.

[chrisin3]

Isn't EGM a magazine/publication with different reviewers regardless of ownership? Anyway, I don't know, but if you look on metacritic it says 90 for EGM and 85 for 1up so stop arguing with me. I can't help what it says, so stop disputing something so blatantly obvious. Take it up with metacritic. There are obviously two different reviews for 1up and EGM. This isn't rocket science.