340°

Microsoft Confirms 360 Arcade Console

Microsoft Corp. today released a new Xbox 360 console that delivers games and content to everyone in the family for an incredible value of $279.99 (U.S. estimated retail price)*. Available in stores beginning today, Xbox 360 Arcade console is the first Xbox 360 console to include five family-friendly games, a wireless controller, a high-definition multimedia interface (HDMI) connection to enable high-definition output if desired and 256 MB of memory useful for storing games and entertainment content. At $279.99, the Xbox 360 Arcade console will include five best-selling games: "PAC-MAN Championship Edition" (NAMCO BANDAI Games America Inc.), "Uno" (Carbonated Games), "Luxor 2" (MumboJumbo), "Boom Boom Rocket" (Electronic Arts Inc.) and "Feeding Frenzy" (Sprout Games).

Read Full Story >>
gamingtalkhq.com
razer6073d ago

But still no dedicated HDD! If MS was going to revamp the core I wish they would of taken a bit of a "hit" and put an HDD on it. It's lame to fragment your user base and discourage developers from making the HDD standard. I know MS has given in a bit and are making some games require a hard drive.. But things would be so much easier if they would of just made every system have one like they did with the Xbox1.

I also think these DVD9 size issues would be less of a problem, it would be more like PC gaming where things can be loaded and streamed from the HDD.

The tradeoff to appeal to the cheaper/casual gamer is lame and a lot of 360 titles will suffer because of it.

Bonsai12146073d ago

well obviously if there was a HDD standard, companies would install data on it. but then, what would happen to the xbox trolls who say, "omg, you have to install the game onto the HDD for ps3. therefore it sucks"

having a HDD standard would not only benefit the consumer, but the developers and ps3 owners as well, because then there would be at least some minimalistic standard to go off of.

Close_Second6073d ago

...the 20GB HDD. Hell, you only end up with 13.2GB of the HDD available anyway which to me is ideal to make it a good family value console. The premium should come with a 60 or 80GB HDD with the Elite coming with its current capacity HDD.

I can't believe the cost of the el-cheapo 20GB HDD is not such that it could not have been included as part of this $279.99 deal.

AllanWakker6073d ago

280 dollars for the base console.
100 dollars for the tiny 20 gig harddrive you can only buy through Microsoft
50 dollars every year just to be given the privilege to play online games by Microsoft

430 bucks just for the first year but the online fees keep adding up

200-250 dollars in online fees over 4 to 5 years brings the price up to 580-630 buck

And Microsoft still can't get brand new 360s to stop failing with the RRoD.

Close_Second6073d ago (Edited 6073d ago )

Tell me, if the buyer of this console does not want the HDD and only wants Silver Xbox Live membership (which is free), how much do they pay in the first year?

An even better saving would be to not buy a console at all. Not only would they save on the purchase price and on-going costs of buying new games but they would not have to put up with fanboys like you either.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 6073d ago
WafflesID6073d ago

Aren't those games just demos?

And seriously...JUST THROW INTHE FREAKIN HARD DRIVE.

What are they thinking?! Oh yeah..$99 for a 20 gig...

$$$$$$$$$$

One of the worst decisions made in recent console history (first being nintendo giving sony the shaft when sony was creating the cd-rom drive for the SNES, which they later turned into the PS1...and we all know what happened after that).

Sucks that devs can't program a game that depends on the hard drive.

Eclipticus6073d ago

yeah they should of thrown in the 20 gig hd
but those 5 games are the full editions

wageslave6072d ago

What the fcuk are you talking about? The Arcade is the best price price for a next-gen gaming system.

Period.

aslucher6073d ago

almost bought one last week... haha, a little late on the anouncement! they have been at Fry's Electronics and others.... but seriously no HDD is such a turn off for me..... haha

Clinton5146073d ago

Vgchartz are you covering this?

haha.

Show all comments (54)
50°

Movie Tie-In Games And How They Were All The Rage Back In The Day

Movie tie-in games were all the rage during the '90s and at their peak in the 2000s. Today, there are barely any around.

210°

Metal Gear Solid 5, Nearly After A Decade, Is Still A Timeless Classic

The Metal Gear series, led by Kojima, pioneered the stealth genre, creating a masterclass in storytelling and gameplay.

SimpleSlave2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

No. But MGS5: Ground Zeroes might actually be one of the greatest Game Demo ever, if not the best.

xHeavYx2d ago

I know a lot of people didn't, but I actually liked that story twist at the end. The game was fun and all, but I wouldn't call it a timeless classic.

Cacabunga2d ago

Metal Gear legend stopped with number 4.
MGS5 needed a year or 2 more of development to be maybe among the classics.. it was clearly rushed, especially at the end. The story teaches us absolutely nothing new.

just_looken2d ago

A demo is free that was a $40 cry for help as later we would know konami did not want to fun hideo and his team anymore that is why we got the unfinished phantom pain.

-Foxtrot2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Meh

Great stealth gameplay but the game was just average.

Bland open world that felt lifeless, the story felt shoehorned in, unfinished story etc. The whole thing was just average to me compared to the other main titled games.

I would have rather preferred it if they kept Ground Zeroes for the main game as the opening and the rest of the game turns into a Metal Gear 1 & 2 remake to bring things full circle.

just_looken2d ago

If you dig around they had old behind trhe scenes of phantom pain vids and books wrote around the time.

Before funding was puled the main idea was to keep peace walker coop it was in the games early builds and that end game were your building your base that was suppose to be metal gear one.

You as the fake big boss was going to make your own metal gear one map aka your base (outer heaven) then me as sold snake use the mode that is in the game invade/defeat the base even fight your current version of metal gear that was in the game but not finished.

So your idea was on the table bit got canned.

CrimsonWing692d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Like hell it is. That was the first time I became aware of being sold an unfinished game and was blown away about blind fanboys saying it was some perfect game.

Yea, the first few chapters were great until they do that thing halfway and make you replay all the missions again. Then little things like capturing animals but only seeing a JPEG unlike 3 where everything was modeled out. Areas were massive, desolate, and boring to look at.

Game was a massive let down for me and the potential was so high for it. Honestly, this was one of the most disappointing games I ever played. What’s worse is it starts off brilliant. You literally play through until you get to the point where you could tell they just stopped developing and then quickly used glue and construction paper to “finish” it and then sold it. Quite frankly, that’s insulting to consumers and fans.

Inverno2d ago

People have selective memory. This game had huge drama attached to it, what Konami did to Kojima and this game was horrible. Now they praise Konami cause they revived Silent Hill, even though SH looks half arsed too.

CrimsonWing692d ago

I dunno if they’re getting much praise after the Silent Hill 2 debacle. Makes me scared sh*tless for the MGS 3 Remake…

Michiel19891d 20h ago

I don't wanna defend konami, but Kojima had 7 years to make the game, it's not that weird for a publisher to expect a game to be finished in that amount of time.

Also no one is praising konami from what I've seen, they're just excited that a Silent Hill game is releasing

CrimsonWing691d 4h ago (Edited 1d 4h ago )

@Michiel1989

You’re absolutely correct. Look, the dude is a visionary and has brought us some incredible games, but he constantly would go over budget and could never stick to a deadline. I don’t know if people remember the MGS 4 trailers but it became a joke when you’d see a release date and then they crossed it out in the next trailer to give another.

What a lot of people don’t know is there’s a certain amount of money given for development and marketing. When you go over the budget and add additional marketing over the deadline it isn’t cheap. MGS GZ and V were laughable to me for the amount of time he had to develop them and he spent even more time on the engine that wasn’t anything revolutionary to me. I mean, GZ was nothing more than a demo and they released that art like $40 I think, probably to further help fund V. He then spent money for Kiefer Sutherland who did nothing for the character, which I think Kojima just wanted because he’s a fan.

Konami just had enough and said this is the deadline and you’re done after this. It’s business, but fans took it personal. I mean look at this Overdose game he’s been doing.,, like when is that ever coming out?

Michiel198923h ago

I kind of forgot about overdose but yeah exactly my thoughts. He has made some of the best games out there and definitely deserves time to create his new masterpiece, but it's not a bottomless well.

This is pure speculation but I imagine he got around 4 years to make the game excluding pre-production. If after those 4 years the game is nowhere near being done, the relationship will be strained between them one way or another.

about the konami being praised thing, if let's say blizzard announces world of warcraft 2 today I'll be excited as hell for the game, but that doesn't mean my opinion of blizzard changes only a tiny bit cause they're still trash.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 23h ago
Yui_Suzumiya1d 8h ago

Yeah, it was the only MGS I didn't play and this is coming from someone who got back into gaming after skipping a generation due to MGS4 back in 2008. It just seems to be the complete opposite of the MGS I always knew and loved (1-4).

JEECE2d ago

Yes and no. In many ways in was a great game; there's a very strong argument that it has the best gameplay of any MGS game, and that it is one of the more interesting open world "playgrounds" we have gotten, in terms of how the world operates. But as an MGS narrative, it is pretty far down the list, for many reasons.

Storm232d ago

I don't think there is any argument. The gameplay was incredible. But yeah...disappointed in the rest. Could have been incredible but...well...we all know what happened...

JEECE20h ago

I don't think there is much of one either but apparently some people found the world very boring compared to the more linear structures of other entries so I didn't make a definitive statement in order to acknowledge the outliers.

DarXyde1d 23h ago

The thing about Metal Gear Solid is that the narrative is what determines which is your favorite because the gameplay had ALWAYS improved with every mainline entry. It's amazing.

If it was gameplay, we'd all say The Phantom Pain, but the story is what truly sets them apart.

For me, that's Snake Eater, which is also my favorite game of all time.

JEECE20h ago

That's my favorite too, particularly if we are talking about the subsistence version with camera control.

Fishy Fingers2d ago

For me, best gameplay, worst, everything else.

Storm232d ago

Yeah...gameplay was so damn good.

Show all comments (36)
80°

How Valve has treated Team Fortress 2 is a disgrace, and its community deserves better

17 years on from release and 5 years into a botting epidemic, Team Fortress 2 is on its knees, and it's high time Valve stepped in to fix it.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
badz1493d ago

Valve can do no wrong, remember?

fsfsxii3d ago

Ah yes, pc gaming aka the bastion of fairness and equity and everlasting online playerbase, all i can say is lmao
Not to mention that these tf2 idiots were the progenitor of mrx in gaming