280°

The Definition of Loyalty, as Written by Capcom

This is an article on the loyalty, or lack thereof, that has been shown by Capcom to the PlayStation 3 fan base and the PlayStation fan base in general.

"So here we have Capcom, arguably one of the best game developers of all time. The company has produced classics such as Resident Evil, Devil May Cry, Street Fighter, Okami, and Monster Hunter only to name a few. There is no question that the company has talent, but was it ever enough to propel the company to its success today? Hardly. Every game listed above hit full steam on a Sony console, whether it be the original Resident Evil series or Street Fighter Alpha on PS1, or Devil May Cry or Okami on PS2, Capcom owes a lot to Sony. However, the only thing Sony has received from Capcom is a lack of loyalty."

Read Full Story >>
sonyprotectiongroup.com
Kokoro6048d ago (Edited 6048d ago )

it's so silly to think that they would care about one little letter, when there is so much money involve.

TripleTags6048d ago (Edited 6048d ago )

It is your decision in the end, but I felt that it was a good article. I pretty much agree with what was said in the article. Capcom truly needs to realize where all of the fame came from and what format it started on (the fame that is, not saying Capcom started on PlayStation...). It's as if Capcom is cutting off the hand that fed them, which is not a smart move at all....

ruibing6048d ago

Well it's not surprising these days to see memories fade faster than checks, it would be nice to see more integrity (maybe not the best word for it) from developers when so many of them are bleeding old franchises dry for money. Though I can't blame Capcom for their business decision, as a long time PS fan and having owned almost every one of their releases on the PS2, I am disappointed as a consumer. It is not so much in the lack of exclusive as the old notion that developers just don't spend as much time perfecting a game on a specific platform when it is not an exclusive, so I would be more likely to purchase from other Japanese developers such Konami, Level 5, and Square Enix.

gogators6048d ago

and their original start came in the arcades. One would even have to ask based on this premise about Capcom loyalty to Nintendo.

unlimited6048d ago

Konami(metal Gear solid 4 and sqaure(final fantasy VIII and versus) is making their games exclusive to the PS3..it is about money your right but at least give at least one game exclusive it can be DMC4 or Resident Evil but they dont want too..not even time exclusive!!!

i dont like capcom ill still buy dmc and resident evil but i wont have respect for them.

sticky doja6048d ago (Edited 6048d ago )

"Capcom truly needs to realize where all of the fame came from and what format it started on (the fame that is, not saying Capcom started on PlayStation...)"

Are you serious? How old are you, 12? I'll list a few games for you that you may or may not have heard of before Playstation ever existed, and then see if you still feel that way. 1942, Commando, Ghosts N Goblins, Mega Man's, Breath of Fire's, Eye of the Beholder, Final Fight's, Knights of the Round, Street Fighter 2. Those are SOME great games on systems before the Playstation and doesn't even include Arcade only games.

Leathersoup6048d ago (Edited 6048d ago )

If you're so dead set about the loyalty bit. Why aren't you pissed off at Square Enix for not making Final Fantasy for the Nintendo only? As a matter of fact I believe Capcom was making games for the NES and SNES long before the first Playstation even existed including *drum roll* Metal Gear!

Why aren't you pissed off and only buying Nintendo products for your Capcom fix?

Sad. Just sad.

emaddox846047d ago (Edited 6047d ago )

I don't know if you know this or not, but the reason Square switched over to the Playstation for Final Fantasy VII is because of the CD-ROM drive. Nintendo's cartridges couldn't hold enough information for what is now considered one of the greatest games of all time (Kinda makes you think of Blu-Ray doesn't it?). Another fact that you may not know is that Nintendo only had themselves to blame for this. Back in the early 90's, Nintendo commissioned Sony to make a CD-ROM drive for the SNES dubbed the SNES-CD, but then backed out of it and left Sony high and dry. Well, Sony instead redirected their efforts on the SNES-CD and make the Playstation. I'm sure Nintendo regretted this decision greatly during the N64/Gamecube life cycles. Anyhow, now you can see how your allegations about the lack of loyalty from Square to Nintendo aren't so warranted anymore, since their switch came from not only technical aspects, but bad decisions from Nintendo. And I guess the same could be said about the original Metal Gear Solid, the space requirements of that game would not have been doable on cartridges that held from 4MB to 64MB(which was only on RE2 towards the end of the N64 lifecycle).

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6047d ago
RadientFlux6048d ago (Edited 6048d ago )

Interesting opinion... with it's limited outlook on the history of console gaming.

Fanboys make a big deal about loyalty but only when it comes to their console. If Capcom was big on loyalty they would still be developing everything on a Nintendo system.

VendettaWFT6048d ago

Capcom should be showing NES the love. But besides the nostalgic feeling of "give props to the originator"...I think more people in this site get upset with Capcom because they feel the company owes Sony something and XBOX nothing, and when they see a capcom exclusive for the 360 they get confused and upset. Seriously, it's not like Capcom gave Sony the "f*ck you" and decided not to develope anything for them anymore

greed6048d ago (Edited 6048d ago )

who cares i just have to look for another company to throw my money at when they realize people are not buying there games for a certain console i wonder if they will start to care then!! (I WAS A DMC FAN)......."WAS".

to 2.1 i would have thought the same thing until i saw that part of there big anouncment was a rehash supposidly bigger and better version of a game that is like a year and a half or something old that came out on 360 and a game that isn't really that great to begin with but wait you also get a new street fighter......YAHHHHH!! i mean it's not a new ip and it's not a exclusive but hey you can fight while on the street in this game regardless of how great that is they should have never hyped it up to be bigger then it really was!

gamesR4fun6048d ago

Sure Capcon gave us the shatft without even so much has a decent reach around... But who care? Mh3 was the only game they had I was looking forward 2 now their going over 2 wii. They can keep their crap planet and I expect Sf4 will suck if they try and do 3d... If they do a 2d version it better be a cheep dl off psn ha ppl want a lot more than a crummy 2d game for their 60 bucks.

PS360WII6048d ago

Yea I'm not sure if this is news, but all I can say is give it a rest. They did it to the GC and I'm sure they did it before and to other systems as well. Devil May Cry is a good game but by the 4th one I'm not to sure it's a big console seller so it's okay that it goes multi, Resident Evil usually starts off on one console then goes everywhere else, Monster Hunter.. well who knows maybe Nintendo threw a bunch of money at them.

I can only bring up GC because I remember that really easily. Resident Evil 4, Viewtiful Joe, PN03, and Killer 7 was a deal that Capcom signed up for making those titles GameCube exclusive and hmmm 3/4 of those titles are found on PS2. Did I hate them? No for I knew they can offer the game to more people and get more money to make more games. Lost Planet for the 360 was a cool game but for it being on 360 only took away a branch of gamers who could never play it. So now they offer it up on PS3. Much like Okami where it was found on the PS2 but seeing that the PS2 was so saturated with games it was overshadowed. Now with the Wii it might get the recognition they could of had. What most are forgetting is that all the systems are still getting games made by Capcom. They aren't just tuning you out they are spreading the wealth. Good time for gamers bad time for loyalists.

And thank you RadientFlux for if they were loyal along with every other older developers out there we would only be seeing Nintendo games.

VirusE6048d ago

Capcom owes more to nintendo than sony. The 8 bit nes and 16 bit super nes made capcom, konami, sqaure and so many other companies. Only a newb gamer who got in during the 32 bit era would say such nonsense.

Show all comments (90)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader821d 20h ago

No 7 days to die is criminal

210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow4d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1823d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere2d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX3d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 19h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno3d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno3d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)