570°

MW3Blog: First Details of MW3

CarlosX360 Writes: "In the last 12 hours, we've seen a lot of information floating around, and so, MW3Blog breaks down each information and compresses them into an article that everyone can understand without being confused. All that's left; Is the new Call of Duty either Project Colossus, or Modern Warfare 3? Officially?"

crematory4737d ago

i just cant understand how an old fucking 10 years engine can
do destructible environments!

retrofly4737d ago

easy there tiger, the engine is only 4 years old. And its built for stability, side by side its looks better than BF:BC's engine, but BF:BC's scale is much bigger and has destruction, but its still clearer and crisper.

COD's engine is designed to run at 60FPS on console hardware, I doubt there is much they can do until a new console is released.

Will be good to see BF3's engine on the console to see what they can squeeze out, but I bet you it wont run at 60FPS.

Adding damage modling to COD's engine wouldnt be difficult, espeically if they've had 2 years to work on it, it all depends on if they can keep up the 60FPS perforamce.

Nitrowolf24736d ago (Edited 4736d ago )

It uses an upgraded Quake engine, so yeah pretty much its old. It's just been upgraded with better graphics and physics overtime.

4 years?

wellllllllllllll....

Black ops is based off a modified world at war engine, which is also based off cod COD4. And if you didn't know, COD4 engine is COD2 and this engine is based on Quake engine, which released in 1996.

it's literally 15 years old engine thats been heavily modified over time.

ITS AN OLD ENGINE JUST LOOK AT THIS CHART COD IS AT THE MIDDLE RIGHT
http://upload.wikimedia.org...

seriously it's gonna take a lot of work to get COD on the same level of damage as BF games.

retrofly4736d ago

Still one of the best looking games on the xbox, maybe the xbox can't cope with better graphics and still run at 60FPS.

There are brand new games with new engines that look shitter.

The unreal engine was created in 2009, are you saying GOW3 which uses an upgraded engine is shit becuase its 12 years old?

Do me a favour.

Trunkz4737d ago (Edited 4737d ago )

BF3 > MW3

Show us a new engine, and I'll show you new respect.

Solid_Snake-4737d ago (Edited 4737d ago )

its about 15/16 years old as far as i know activision still use the QUAKE engine.

theEx1Le4736d ago (Edited 4736d ago )

I don't know why you got disagrees, its a heavily modified I.d tech 3 engine. Just to put that into perspective, I.D have released several engines after this and one of the games they last used it was in quake 3.

SynysteR4737d ago

I bet they had a right old giggle in the DICE studios.

retrofly4737d ago

Really? Developers arn't fanboys, they more than likely respect eachothers work, instead of rag on it all the time like the kids on N4G.

SynysteR4737d ago

And EA & DICE haven't been ragging on it at all then? My mistake then, I guess they haven't been talking trash over the past 2 years with their mission to dethrone COD and regain it themselves, Just saying.

retrofly4737d ago (Edited 4737d ago )

Really, I havn't really noticed any of that. And them talking of de-throing COD, must mean they see COD in a good position and want to be better than them, thats them wanting to be the best, essentialy saying at the moment COD are the most successful but they want to be better.

Sounds like a compliment to me.

Gazondaily4737d ago

"Really? Developers arn't fanboys, they more than likely respect eachothers work, instead of rag on it all the time like the kids on N4G."

Really? So what do you call what EPIC games were doing with the Bulletstorm adverts where they ridiculued COD and even went to the extent of making a mini game doing the same? What about the developers behind inFamous and their various jibes at other games?

Hopefully you've learnt a lesson about making sweeping generalisations.

retrofly4737d ago

Its more tounge in cheek, the fact they acknowlege another game shows that it must see it in some higher stature, otherwise they wouldn't mention it.

If anything it's just pandering to the kids on N4G.

If anything the dev's dont come up with this stuff anyway, more likely the PR and marketing guys.

Im pretty sure if you sat down with the actual developers they would tell you they actually repect COD, maybe enjoy playing it.

Anyone in the industry can see how successful the COD series has ben and how much money it's made, and they will respect that. They arn't fanboys dicking about on a forum like most of the kids here.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4737d ago
GrumpyVeteran4737d ago

I knew the next COD would be infested with micro-transactions.

BIGBOSS084737d ago

we dont need first details. most of us have already played modern warfare 3. just play any of the past 2-3 cod's. its the same thing.

Gazondaily4737d ago

As much as I despise the idea of these additional micro-transactions, this could be a VERY clever move on the part of Activision. If you observe the number of people who bought additional content for the Battlefield Heroes game( the old cartoony one)and consider how popular the COD franchise is, these so-called 'micro-transactions' will be be making MEGA-bucks for Activision.

Whether they deserve it or not however, is an altogether different matter.

Show all comments (32)
200°

Players claim Fortnite ruined Call of Duty by letting in more corporate greed

Do you remember what gaming was like before Fortnite entered the gaming space? One of the biggest arguments was about loot boxes. Now we have conversations about crossovers, battle passes, and community outreach.

Read Full Story >>
gamesandwich.com
GoodGuy0911d ago (Edited 11d ago )

Idk. Loot boxes did disappear and battle passes and in game purchases are all cosmetic. We get free weapons and maps post launch, any gameplay affecting content. I could care less about all the cosmetics.
I absolutely hated the days where weapons were locked behind a less than 1% chance lootbox pull where it'd take 5+ hours to have enough tokens to do a single pull and lazy remastered/remake maps cost you $15 each wave or $50 for the season pass that you didn't know what you'd get and these maps were only available to those that bought it so you get a smaller pool of players match with.

Tacoboto10d ago

The "good ole days" are actually what drove me away from COD and Halo 3/Reach. Halo 4 becoming a COD-like drove me away from that only a week or so after it launched and I beat its campaign.

It sucked way back then, going a month or two without playing online-shooter-of-the-moment, and then needing to buy a $15 map pack to play with the majority of the population or your favorite playlist. The "community" rejecting Spartan Points in MCC killed that game's support, too. No revenue = no support, plain and simple.

Cacabunga10d ago

That headline could easily be something Spencer could have said 😅 I had to check if it was really an opinion piece

KyRo10d ago

As times gone on, the COD battle pass has got ALOT worse so they can push people to buy the more premium battle pass which itself is a huge rip off and nearly half the price of the base game.

The cosmetics can be fine but they've taken it to far to the point of no return. Why make a military themed game then have rabbits, dinosaurs, cats, rats & z list rappers as skins? You wouldn't add a Lamborghini to a fantasy RPG to replace a horse and you would never see Mario have limb dismemberment because they know what they are. COD is having identity crisis but kids and streamer but then all

franwex10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Call of duty can simply not copy the bad aspects of Fortnite? Or is that too out of this world? Like COD, a realistic shooter-just HAD to have Nicki Minaj running around? Or super heroes?

Inverno10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Exactly! Trends don't all need to be followed. Plus where Fortnite got somewhat better with it's monetization, Acti got worse. Or at least Fortnite has lended itself more to the wacky stuff, and has put more effort and quality into that stuff.

jjb198110d ago

I prefer the battle passes with free maps than the $50 season pass that divided the community. I definitely feel that Fortnite had some influence on CoD having loot boxes with Blackout being introduced in 2018 with Black Ops 4.

PRIMORDUS10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Actually Fortnite bullshit ruined Unreal Tournament. Epic are sellouts and I will never have that shitty store on my PC, fuck them and that shit bag Tim Sweeney. At least the community keeps the games alive, I still play UT2004.

StoneTitan10d ago

I mean cant really blame them for supporting the game that made them the most money and the most people player...ever?

Psychonaut8510d ago

Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance.

Ra30309d ago

100% correct! The makers of Call of Duty ran out of ideas long, long ago so they take ideas from other games like Ghost Recon, Fortnite and any other FPS game hat had success hell CoD remasters maps that they've remastered several times already then charge you again for it. Call of Duty is simply a cut, copy and paste and then put the $70 price on it every year. Activision and now Microsoft has been essentially remastering Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare every year since it was released in 2007 its to the point it's worse than the sports game like the Madden, NBA and others yearly sports franchises.
@Psychonaut85 is spot on "Call of Duty ruined Call of Duty. They needed no outside assistance"!

Show all comments (24)
100°

Massive new COD Black Ops Gulf War leak lifts the lid on loadouts

The Black Ops Gulf War leaks continue with a list of weapon descriptions giving more info on what you can expect from new and returning weapons.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
80°

Call of Duty Players Disappointed by $80 B.E.A.S.T. Glove Bundle Deal

Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.

Read Full Story >>
xpgained.co.uk
Kaii18d ago

Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash

melons18d ago

Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.

Gridknac17d ago

They call that a crack head! Thats what this is really about, its an addiction. People who dont smoke cigarettes look and laugh at the addicts that spend $8-$10 a pack, but they cant help themselves, they are addicted. That same analogy applies perfectly to the whole MT industry. Only an addict that was not thinking clearly would spend this kind of money on something so frivolous. A round of multiplayer provides the same high a person gets from scratching a lotto ticket, or putting money on a sports bet. MT in general need to really be regulated because you have a generation of kids becoming adults who grew up only knowing the MT era of gaming. Its normal to them and they will in turn teach their kids the same by just being a gaming parent and getting their kids involved with them in gaming. Thats why no matter how ridiculous the headlines keep getting out of the MT industry, it never seems to fade or go away.

X-2316d ago

I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.