The world has flooded and the only refuge is a floating city called the ark. Two factions have started a war, the original ark dwellers known as the Security and the refugees known as the Resistance. Which side will you fight on, will you maintain order with an iron fist or descend the city into chaos and fight for the masses. In the end it really doesn’t matter because the only difference is your outfit...
AAA games get all the attention. But some games get lost in the shuffle. Especially shooters! Make time for these five.
I didnt care for brink. I thought it was going to be like overwatch back in the day.
It’s time to Switch to Brink before taking 12 Orbits around Letters from Whitechapel? That sort of works.
Six years later, and the game is available to anyone who wants it on PC.
Reviews for this game have been all over the place. I've seen several really low scores, a few middle-range scores (like this one), and a few high scores. Not quite sure what to think at this point.
I just played the 1st two missions by myself and I have to say having friends play with you will def. help. I just don't see why all the game scores are all over the place. I think if you're expecting a MOH/COD type feel you're going to be caught off guard. The game reminds me of teamfortress for some reason. It's no OMG game but it's not a piece of crap either. It's a solid tittle especially of a new IP.
the game is very fun, sucks when you play with people who just run around shooting. The game is all about completing objectives kills mean shit in Brink. I think thats the main reason people arent liking it.
Fail review for an awesome game. This is what happens when a lone wolf reviews a game designed from the ground up for team based objectives. They don't like it. Big shocker?
mediocre Unreal Tournament Clone with superfluous Mirror's Edge freerun mechanics and cliche story, pretending to be revolutionary and better than Killzone 3.