280°

Wii Sales Slowing Down; Was Sony & Microsoft Right?

Games Outlook asks was Sony & Microsoft Right?

"The sales of the Nintendo Wii have been slowing down in recent months at stated below in the Osaka report:

OSAKA: Japan's Nintendo Co Ltd posted its second straight fall in annual profit on Monday, as sales of its ageing Wii games console slowed and the March 11 earthquake weighed on Japanese consumer spending. Operating profit fell 52 percent to 171.1 billion yen ($2.09 billion) in the year ended in March from 356.8 billion yen the previous year."

Read Full Story >>
gamersoutlook.com
FlameBaitGod4761d ago

Y wouldn't they go down, I mean seriously..... how much more do they need to sell ? almost everyone has a freaking wii, I'm amazed it took this long for its sales to go down.

Will-UK4761d ago (Edited 4761d ago )

Very true nearly everyone I know with a PS3 or 360 has or had a Wii. I think Nintendo know its dying out slowly so are releasing a new console to catch up with the HD consoles. Also to keep up interest in Nintendo and increase the slumping profits.

perfectCarbonara4760d ago

LOL, this was the console that at some point was supposed to overtake the PS2 in ww sales.

LOL

PS2 remains the most successful console ever.

Valk4760d ago

LOL Great job kid. Celibrate a company selling a faulty console to the point they had to be sued to fix it. Thats really something to brag about...

BTw DS is the most succesful. Did it without selling faulty hardware and forcing people to buy 2-3.

I am sure you will disagree like a good sheep but software sales speak for themselves. Both Wii and DS have done something PS2 never achieved. Games that sold over 20 million copies.The lawsuit over PS2 is common knowledge also

heroicjanitor4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

That's because Nintendo consoles concentrate all software sales on a handful of Nintendo titles, PS2 has the highest software sales of all time and the highest attach rate. With the wii people buy the Nintendo games and nothing else, so of course they have individual games destroying others in terms of sales, it isn't an even fight for third parties. They also bundle a lot.

PS2 is still the highest selling console, though the DS will overtake it this year(which is because it has been much cheaper for the majority of its life. Cheap things generally outsell higher priced things).

The DS does force people to buy more than one. Myself and all of my brothers have one each because we can't play separate pokemon files otherwise. My Ds is pretty much broken now since the screen won't calibrate, one of my brothers bought a ds lite because of faulty hardware.

Silver3604760d ago

They need to release a new console because they found out to their chagrin that hardcore gamers by games for the lifetime of a console. Those casuals they sold all those consoles to only buy one or two games then they are done. They don't make any money from third party games, that severely limits the life span of the system. What good is a console if you can't sell new games that aren't first party on it?

frostypants4760d ago

The Wii 2 won't sell nearly as well. Those impulse-purchasing grandmas and other hyper-casuals won't see the point. They have their Wii Sports and that's all they want.

jacksonmichael4760d ago

If they thought Wii Fit was worth the money, they definitely will.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4760d ago
Primetimebt4761d ago

It was only bound to happen.. I honestly don't see a Wii 2, or 3DS been much of a success see most causals will not fork over money to buy an upgrade.

EYEamNUMBER14761d ago

what does the 3DS have anything to do with the so called casuals?

the nintendo handheld market has been the same since gameboy

Ju4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

Its about price. Nintendo traditionally sold at a low price range. 3DS is an expensive handheld (for its market). And it shows in sales (after the initial rush). Wii2 will be the same. Unless Nintendo can sell a Wii2 below PS3/360 prices with better features it will be a tough sell to its traditional customers - unless it is a high price range console which directly targets PS3/360 customers with "hardcore" titles. But then, this at the cost of the traditional Wii/Nintendo audience. Big risk for Nintendo.

schlanz4760d ago

ever heard of a thing called a price drop

Trunkz4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

If I remember correctly the DS didn't sky rocket even tho it was $149.99 at it's original launch. For being $100 more and having much more hardware in it (and an even worse launch lineup) it's doing pretty good so far considering it wasn't even a Christmas launch, which by then many great games will be out for players to choose from.

If Nintendo plays its cards right for this Christmas when the NGP comes, they can sell it for $229.99 and really sell them like hot cakes.

Ju4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

I doubt it. NGP can cost more a) it is a different perception (say what you will, but everybody "expects" a Sony product to be expensive) and b) it has just so much more under the hood - which will become very apparent when it actually hits the market. Dropping $249 to $229 will not be enough for the 3DS. Also, it is still more of the same content - where traditional DS players have to shell out $100 bucks more to play. 3DS is lacking after the initial rush. It dropped of very fast - within a week of launch. I am sure this is not the success Ninti had envisioned.

Same with Wii2. I would think Sony/MS will work towards a massive price drop as soon as the Wii2 hits. Nintendo never sold with a loss. But if they want to push the new console, I could imagine they will do just that to be competitive.

In regards to the Wii. It still sells pretty good, surprisingly. I am curious if Nintendo pulls a "PS2" with the Wii - but that would be a bit counterproductive to sell a HD console. $100 Wii and it will be around for a while.

Trunkz4760d ago

You would be surprised at how good 229 can look good to a parent compared to 249 (especially when compared to an NGP @ 299 or 349)

Ju4760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

$79 looks good to a parent, $129 looks good, too, $149 looks acceptable...$229 doesn't matter any more. I'd rather make my kids save up. $149 I might consider sponsoring...especially if you have more than one. Above that, I'd expect something really breathtaking to justify the price (makes me wonder why people shell out $500 for a phone). But a 3DS ain't it.

N4g_null4760d ago

Ju it's more about the games than the price. You have many people out there with two dsi that can change the price of a 3ds if that truely is a problem. I mean even the nes and snes sold with games. Even the wii sold with a game every one wanted to try.

People just want to be able to do more with the thing than just say ooooohhhhhh 3d. I'm betting once every thing is out they will be fine. I mean no pokemon on the thing yet sort of defeats the purpose of getting it. I believe they did sell more dsi because of just that game.

Lol the NGP is going to cost as much if not more than the wii2 lol. Then they are going to try and cram ps3 games on it you have already beat.

Also expecting something to be higher in cost is not a good thing. Just look at Sony laptops every one expects to pay more for the same hardware but we all say why? Then you won't be buying that.

Nintendo just forgot we want more games and if 3rd parties are slow then they better step in. 2d Mario would be great in maybe the Mario 2 style? 3D metroid? Well at least pokemon.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4760d ago
ArchangelMike4761d ago

Can you say 'market saturation?'

slavish34761d ago

i can't believe it. wii is dead thats why nintendo is moving on. ps360 still sells and will out sell wii before there successors are released

matey4760d ago

they would have to sell 30 million this year and next

slavish34760d ago (Edited 4760d ago )

you can't read i said ps360 will out sell wii before there successors are released which is in 2014! they can sell just over 10 million a year plus they will have full support from m$ and sony plus third parties. wii is done. ps360 will continue and if they do drop the price 199 or lower. ps360 sell will continue too and past 2014 while they wii will be forgotten.

TacoTaru4760d ago

I don't think it's so much "you can't read" as it is - you can't write.
I can't really argue with you though since you don't convey ideas clearly enough to be disputed.

Theyellowflash304760d ago

Yeah they were right 87 million units and 6 years later....... Michael Pachter was also right about the Wii HD...... eventually its bound to happen.

Show all comments (45)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18812d ago (Edited 2d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo1d 22h ago (Edited 1d 22h ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus231d 15h ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville1d 8h ago (Edited 1d 8h ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

KwietStorm_BLM1d 7h ago

So you do understand it or..?

rokos1d 6h ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb331d 5h ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC19h ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 19h ago
SonyStyled1d 21h ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

1d 19h ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies1d 9h ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear211d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 19h ago
jwillj2k42d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot1d 23h ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC19h ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615861d 4h ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k41d ago (Edited 23h ago)

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin1d ago (Edited 1d ago )

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k41d ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody2d ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead1d 13h ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya1d 11h ago (Edited 1d 11h ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage1d 7h ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast1d 23h ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19791d 23h ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel1d 14h ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage1d 7h ago (Edited 1d 7h ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19791d 4h ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage1d 7h ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)
90°

Microsoft Opening Xbox Mobile Game Store in July

The Xbox brand is expanding, as an Xbox mobile game store is opening this coming July where Microsoft will brings its "first-party portfolio."

Jin_Sakai3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

“Bond adds that they will start on the web”

This will go nowhere.

Nice knowing you Xbox. This is what happens when the house never gets cleaned.

MrDead3d ago

The only this MS is expanding is the amount of feculence it sprays on everyone who just want to enjoy gaming and make games.

The best thing MS can do for the gaming industry is leave and never return.

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Good luck with this even it might not succeed.

Show all comments (7)
210°

Microsoft once tried to nab LittleBigPlanet from Sony after a few drinks

It turns out that many moons ago, Microsoft once had its eye on the Sony published LittleBigPlanet series.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
XiNatsuDragnel4d ago

Microsoft had a good idea but fumbled it again.

Cacabunga3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Project Spark idea was decent but they quickly gave up ..
LBP was wonderful

ApocalypseShadow3d ago

Microsoft in a nutshell. Always tried to poach Sony employees, games, 3rd party games and devices like the depth camera that was turned into Kinect but was running on PS2 before Xbox 360. Wouldn't be surprised they wanted LBP. Just like they worked behind the scenes pushing the MLB to bring Sony's baseball game to Xbox instead of making their own.
https://www.playstationlife...

They didn't spend years trying to develop their own baseball game. They wanted Sony's game.

They're scum.

Zachmo1823d ago

Microsoft didn't force MLB on Xbox. MLB gave Sony 2 options either go multiplat or risk losing the license.

Rynxie2d ago

And why do you think MLB said that? I believe Ms approached MLB.

ApocalypseShadow2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

Totally ridiculous comment.

The only exclusivity Sony had was to their own creation of The Show. Microsoft could have paid the MLB for the license just like Sony did and made their own baseball game.

Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox. They're worth 3 TRILLION dollars. You think that's not enough money to make their own baseball game? Don't be delusional.

Microsoft spun it like they always do and told the media that they had to trust Sony with their hardware. After they put Sony in that position of not having a choice. Either go multiplatform or stop making one of their successful games. That's a no win scenario.

And what did Microsoft do? They didn't try to sell the game to the Xbox community. They put it on game pass to hurt Sony. Pushing the idea of why buy games that are $70 when you can play them in their cheap service for $10. It was a dirty tactic.

You fell for the Kool aid drink Microsoft served you instead of spitting it out. Hope it tasted good because you were fooled by Phil and the gang.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

Bond revealed that MLB The Show “always came up” in conversations between Microsoft and the Major League Baseball organization. “We always said, ‘We love this game. It would be a huge opportunity to bring it to Xbox.'” she recalled. However, when Microsoft’s efforts materialized, it put the company in an awkward situation where it had to send in pre-release consoles to a rival company.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 2d ago
Notellin2d ago

"Microsoft instead, groomed MLB for years in trying to poach Sony's game and bring it to Xbox."

Take a nap, conspiracies are rotting your brain.

2d ago
Hereandthere2d ago

Xbox executive Sara Bond has told Axios that Microsoft spent a number of years trying to get MLB The Show onto Xbox consoles. And when it finally succeeded in breaking off PlayStation’s long-held exclusivity, the company had to “trust” Sony with pre-release Xbox Series X/S consoles.

ApocalypseShadow1d 16h ago

Lying to yourself is unbecoming.

Article link tells you all you need to know in Sarah Bond's own words.

Hereandthere2d ago

They were too cheap/inept/lazy to develop their own mlb game, so they port begged for years and bribed the mlb to make the show multiplatform. Like i said many times, xbox brought nothing to the table their 24 years, ZERO.

ApocalypseShadow1d 16h ago

At least you and others get it. Note drank the Kool aid and asked for seconds thinking it was refreshing.

Most don't even know how it all played out but it's there in black and white for all to see. Microsoft brought it up for years until the MLB forced Sony's hand. It was a win win for Microsoft. Kill one reason to buy a PlayStation or kill the game by dropping it in a cheap service to kill Sony's sales numbers on PlayStation.

OtterX3d ago

"However, Healey said Media Molecule wouldn't have felt right doing that, adding it would have been "morally corrupt"."

Major kudos to Media Molecule for being an upright studio with principles.

Cockney1d 11h ago

They chose well, Sony gave them the backing to pursue their dreams with no restrictions even tho their games especially dreams have very niche appeal. Media molecule and Sony deserve respect for this in an age of risk averse publishing.

RNTody3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Great, more stories like this please. Show the last of the zombies holding the line what we've been saying for years: Microsoft is anti competition, anti industry and has no interest in making games at all.

But hey, at least there's an Xbox Games Showcase to look forward to, right?

Inverno3d ago

Well considering SONY just killed the series, LBP would've been dead by now either way. Though MM probably wouldn't exist by now either, so I'm glad they stayed with SONY, hopefully they don't get shut down any time soon or ever honestly.

Inverno3d ago

They shut down the servers, that's millions of user created levels gone. That and dead are pretty much the same, it's also been years since 3 and they cancelled HUB soooo.

2d ago
fsfsxii2d ago

They shutdown the servers because no one was playing, no one in the community cared about the user created levels so why keep them up? Wtf you guys would never succeed in running a business.

Inverno2d ago

Yea dood no one was playing so they shut off the servers. Cause people with enough common sense can't just Google why they were actually shut of, right?

Show all comments (29)