340°

Homefront kills Crysis 2 in sales totals

With EA's Crysis 2 mostly regarded as the better game by gamers and the gaming press alike, that positivity hasn't translated into actual sales if sales data is to be believed.

Read Full Story >>
msxbox-world.com
ThatEnglishDude4748d ago

Both games are a huge letdown. Sadly, I own both of them. Although I think I've had a more memorable experience with Homefront to be honest.

Winter47th4748d ago

Homefront has one of the most fun perfected MP since Call of Duty 4. The SP is a joke though. Vice versa for Crysis 2.

Pixel_Pusher4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

Damn nice numbers.

ASSASSYN 36o4747d ago

Well said winter. I agree.

zootang4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

Killzone 3 was the best game out of the 3 for me personally.

Hellsvacancy4748d ago

Meh, HomeFront never looked all that great and i didnt like the beta for Crysis 2 at all, my buddy bought it and said it was pretty crap although he thought it was better than K3 (another game ive yet to play)

Deus Ex 3, Rage and BF3 are all i needz in the fps department, anythinelse will be a rental

lelo2play4748d ago (Edited 4748d ago )

If Crytek made Crysis 2 exclusive to PC with it's full potential... it would probably be a better game and sold more. Crysis 1 for PC sold pretty well.

Crysis 2 is a good game... but could of been so much more.

caboose324748d ago

Yea, it's a shame so many features had to be compromised because of consoles.

Model4748d ago

i hope crytek will get the message, lot of pc gamers are angry at them

stevenhiggster4748d ago

It would have looked better, no doubt about that. But the game is still rubbish. I am a massive fan of the original and I really just wish the second one hadn't happened at all. I mean seriously, the story was just terrible compared to the first game, completely ruined the franchise in my opinion.

rob60214747d ago

Crytek has invested a lot of money to be able to develop on all three consoles, I doubt they're about to pull out and go PC only any time soon. Besides they can only pull a rabbit out of a hat for so long.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4747d ago
ReservoirDog3164748d ago

I only got homefront. SP felt like it was missing polish and a 2nd act. Felt like there was a beginning and an end. Me personally, I could never join a match only with more than 4 people through matchmaking.

It has potential for a good sequel. If it doesn't look good than I won't buy it. I gave them a shot.

Crisis 2 turned me off cause I never played 1 and that first gameplay unveil at E3 looked really boring. Meh.

chidori6664748d ago (Edited 4748d ago )

well deserved.

Homefront kills Crysis 2 MP all day...

Hellsvacancy: Crisis better than KZ3? are you crazy?

4747d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 4747d ago
worm20104748d ago

i got both, but i've only played multiplayer on crysis a few times thought it was crap

shades724748d ago

Crysis 2 is simply the better game, maybe a number of gamers were taken in by Homefront, purchased, and then returned. Especially as that 5 hour campaign is criminal. Crysis 2 offers better value for money, although admittedly I had a lot of fun with Homefront's big team battles multiplayer.

Robearboy4748d ago

Home front was total shite, i beat the game on the hardest setting in 3 hours, the only decent level was the last one on the bridge

Soldierone4748d ago

Probably because thats where games normally pick up and carry onwards for a good 3 to 4 hours...someone at THQ forgot to add that part of the game. lol

led10904748d ago

i bet crytek must be scratching their heads right now. When crysis sold a million copies on the pc, they said that games of such quality sell at least 4 times more. And now they have the same numbers on 2 platforms. But i feel the missing pc numbers make a huge difference for this game

therapist4747d ago (Edited 4747d ago )

@led1090
crysis 1 sold over 3 million

warhead sold over 1.5 million

pc only and it would have sold better, console games are starting to sell like crap!

@masterchef below......

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A CONSOLE TO PC PORT!!!!

What is wrong with people, games are not made on consoles, games are made on pc, ALL GAMES ARE MADE ON PC, every game you play was made on pc, then maybe PORTED to console, here is a video to help those that have trouble reading, go to 3:20 min. in and see killzone 2 being developed on pc, maybe that will help the slower ones understand.....

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

see all the guys working on pc to make killzone 2 ??????????

There are never games made on ps3 or 360 then ported to pc!!!

Every game you play was made on pc using things like C++, java, bink, physx, havok, unreal, scaleform, realtree, frostbite, demonware, these are all pc tools used to create console games.

man people are slow

Show all comments (58)
90°

Looking back to 2011 and the arrival of Homefront

Jack writes: "Back in March 2011, the first-person action shooter Homefront arrived on the Xbox 360 from THQ, along with a storm of publicity which included a really cool live-action trailer"

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
matt1391140d ago

Fantastic game, shame about the terrible sequel.

LucasRuinedChildhood1140d ago

The multiplayer in Homefront was actually really fun.

100°

The Crysis Trilogy Joins EA Access Vault

Featuring the complete nanosuit experience, The Crysis Trilogy has now joined the EA Access vault as a title that's free for those that subscribe to the EA service on Xbox One consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
Games1st1388d ago (Edited 1388d ago )

Just in time for those that got the month trial.

DrDeath1388d ago

Wait? There is more than one? lol

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster1772d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada071772d ago (Edited 1772d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X141772d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase1771d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted1772d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster1772d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack1772d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH1767d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.