As IGN was checking out the new Virtua Tennis 3 for the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 at Leipzig, they made note of the "slight" differences between the two versions saying that the PS3 edged out the 360 when it came to graphical dominance.
Sega's prominent tennis sim just couldn't be beat. And then vanished without a trace. Why?
Answer: Sega.
You could change the name of the game in the title that was awesome in its day, could still be around today because of its fun factor with a remake, remaster or sequel, that's in their huge back catalog, that's no longer being produced as a franchise. And the answer would still be the same: Sega.
As much as I love their games and their spunky attitude. That Sega no longer exists that I grew up with. The current company is a mere shadow of its former self with only a few moments of grandeur. Which is why owning their previous consoles like Dreamcast, is a necessary thing if you want to continue playing games like Virtua Tennis. The reason why I have two of them just in case one stops working. And of course emulation on the go. Wink. Dreams do come in red.
Both Virtua Tennis and Top Spin have gone. It’s annoying for tennis game players.
I used to play tennis IRL and in videogames. My 2-cents is that a boring game that was simulating an extremely boring sport, was thrown under the rug, now that the devs can produce more complex and interesting games.
It's like the tetris-like games and games like space-invaders, that stopped being produced ... it is because they were good and simple to make in the early days of commercial videogame development but they are just not as interesting as, let's say, an open-world coop arpg ...
This VS is pure emotional, physical and mental volleying.
OPM: Thousands of Brits will be inspired to pick up a racket this week on the back of Andy Murray’s success at Wimbledon – but in this heat, and given our hand-eye co-co-ordination, we’ll be sticking to the virtual type. Looking to fill your week with some ace-smashing antics? Then join us in revisiting PlayStation’s finest tennis efforts…
everyone knows that the 360 and ps3 pretty much have equally graphics. on some games 360 looks on other ps3 looks better. who really cares all it comes down to is your playing style. turn based rpg's and alot of other japanese titles go for the ps3 straight action and the best fps's on the planet go to 360. i love my 360 and if i had the cash to afford a ps3 i would buy one to have both even though they look almost exactlly the same. one always edges out the other in certain games. boo hoo fan boys they are freaking graphics.
Is it just me or is that guy's neck really long?
I think if the a game is done by two differant developers it should not be called the same name.
Is it just me or is that guy's neck really long?
I think if the a game is done by two differant developers it should not be called the same name.
Incase you guys didn't read the article it says the game was made by 2 different companies. So once again we're gonna have to wait to see which console has the marginal edge in graphics.
Both are very near equal.
suprise to see there`s no flaming,that`s nice.