Kotaku: Ubisoft’s CEO Yves Guillemot claimed that a new Assassin’s Creed will be coming this year, stating that it will be “something interesting around the Assassin’s brand.”
Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot commented on Grand Theft Auto 6, the future of Xbox, and Skull and Bones' pricing during the company's financial conference call.
No it won't, it will just further highlight the huge disparity in top tier open world games and Ubi's poor attempts at them.
Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot was asked about the company's plans for the convergence between AI and creativity in game development.
Cool so I'm just going to have to climb towers in a more reactive world thanks ubi that wasn't your problem.
In my view ubi needs to clean house rehire all the writers because their stories are paper thin this focus on needing to be woke play as anyone has done nothing but harm the quality of their games which have gotten so bad lately it somehow makes their average games from 10 years ago look like masterpieces
Why don’t you just focus on making good games again? Hurts me to see what a soulless shell of a company Ubisoft has become. Captain Laserhawk on Netflix is the most creative thing they’ve had anything to do with in a decade. Which is just sad.
Ubisoft CEO Yves Guillemot and CFO Frederick Duguet talked about Skull & Bones, Microsoft's acquisition of Activision Blizzard, and continued to tease the unannounced "big game" which is now slated for Q4.
That whole statement about the ABK deal I heard as "Hey, we're available for sale for $68B as well! Come buy us! We have good mobile IPs as well!"
Quite possible. Especially considering that he didn't answer the part of the question about his opinion on independence.
With how hard it was for MS to get the ABK deal through I have hard time believing they could take another, their third publisher.
I'm not saying it couldn't but after what they've just went through, imagine getting another one passed.
Microsoft will buy every other 3rd party publisher in due time. Prepare yourself/
Going by how shytty the protection are around mergers/aquiring whatever is. They'll be fine and will be able to aquire easily. The only one giving them trouble is CMA. The FTC basically prolonged it I would say it was easy for MS just annoying i bet.
Yeah I can't see any other big ones being purchased by MS, not for a good while. However Sony can buy a couple of really big ones now without any opposition.
If I was Sony I'd just buy rockstar and take GTA, RDR away from MS and go see we can fu*k you up too.
Edit: don't think that would ever happen btw and if it did it would be more beneficial staying 3rd party profits wise.
ABK was hard because they are the biggest publisher in the industry, if not the biggest company overall. Ubisoft is a lot smaller, so probably not as tough.
***Microsoft is certainly not the only buyer in the market. ***
*Embracer and Tencent have entered the chat*
I mean at this point they might just try and gobble up everybody, one by one and have the Netflix oh gaming even though ps has a nice amount of games to keep you busy,
I think it will be easier for Microsoft to buy the next one. Given the way the FTC was humiliated by congress and that Khan will be fired because of her resistance the next head of the FTC won't be too anxious to interfere. The next one will be easy. Especially since Sony's exclusivity deals weren't made a big deal of yet. To prevent further acquisitions by Microsoft Sony needs to try to get a deal with Microsoft that stops exclusivity deals in return for no more acquisitions. Sony can't afford a acquisition battle. So they should assure Microsoft they will no longer be locked out of franchises. Otherwise we are going to see some big offers or hostile takeovers.
What happened to them is they play it safe and follow industry trends and most of their newer games aren’t fun and are loaded with filler content. Hopefully with the new Prince of Persia and the Star Wars game, they can turn things around and bring excitement back to their releases.
If they are desperate to sell then that means they are struggling or know things will go south eventually. No company would try to find buyers if they were growing.
I'm not saying it couldn't but after what they've just went through, imagine getting another one passed.
Yeah that's why I think they did it in the order they did. First they buy a few studios ( Ninja theory, compulsion games, double fine, playground games) okay no big deal. Then they get something a little bigger (zenimax/bethesda/ID software etc). That caused a stir but again, okay I guess. Then finally the hammer (activision). That caused a huge commotion and a lot of attention. Had they done this in the reverse order, I doubt Bethesda would've passed. They will likely lay low with acquisitions for a looong time now.
Awesome another must buy for me this year, "If It Comes Out", i just want to have a decent ending this time.
They are seemingly moving towards the annual CoD-direction. And this CoD-direction will in the end be disastrous for the quality of these games. Money money money
As much as i love Assassins Creed series, i will say that releasing a Sequel each year is SH#T, literally SH#t.
From all 3 i love the first one the best, it was repetitive as hell, but it had a unique and different feel to it.
They already said that there would be one last year before brotherhood was out
Lots of milk from ubi